CherryBaby123 - one hour outcall London Hotel / False advertisement

[mike1976]

So I met with Daniele at a west London hotel, for one hour outcall, at the beginning of December. The only reason for doing that, because I was mesmerized by her photos, her big (supposedly) natural boobs and how very fresh/optimistic her profile looks (plus I like ee girls  ).

First things first.

The girl. Smily, positive and polite young ee girl. Clean, good english, good toned body

Service. I only ask for a vanilla service (oral both ways, different position, light kissing, stroking each other) and she delivered

Location. Outcall to London hotel. Discreet and no problems for either of us getting there.

Unfortunately, it wasnt what I would have described as the best experience.

She hides her face on her profile; from her photos I kind of expected a beautifull girl (as she describes herself on her profile) however that is simply not truth. By any standards, she is not beautifull, nowhere near in fact. So that was my first let down. But the biggest problem was, and I should have told that this is not okay and it is a major let down for me, her big natural boobs, arent natural at all  . They are hard as rocks with massive scars underneath.

I really dont fancy fake tits, lips, ass etc. And I booked the girl hoping to squeeze some natural juggers, but no such luck, she lied and still lies about it on her profile right now. I dont understand, this is a business like any other, girls provide service just like other people provide their service, so why lie about stuff and false advertise?

Nevertheless, this is the reason for negative. She is friendly, polite and good body. But not beautiful, and this horrible false advertisement, I simply cannot give her positive, or even neutral review.

[Goldfinch]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[mike1976]

Update

Daniele having read this review, sarcastically then messaged me saying 'Thanks for the review' which I understand stands for 'kiss my ass you stupid wanker'. Oh well 

However, since my biggest and only issue was the false advertisement on her profile, which has now been updated to contain all correct information, I really cant fault her.
I mean, I do not want to delete my review, it happened and unfortunately it wasnt fantastic for me (due to the false advertisement).
But what am I saying, even if I didnt find her attractive (which is just a personal preference) she is still a good company with a cracking body and good attitude, so book with no worries, since her profile now exactly says 100% true what you will get.

[Al]

May be helpful if you clarify what the original profile said before and what has changed now.

[mike1976]

When I was booking her, at the top of her profile, it stated in a very distinguished way 'beautifull' and I did not think she was beautiful.
Now I understand 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' so you might say this is not false advertisement. She is cute, but 'beautifull' is a very strong word so you cant just throw it around, I certainly did not find her beautiful. Mind you, this is gone now.

Second; at a time, it stated her boobs are natural. They are not, which now has also been updated to Enhanced.
And those were my two issues.

[Al]

If you take a risk on seeing someone without face pics and they turn out not to be to your taste I can't see how that justifies a negative to be fair as you took the risk.

On the boob issue - fair enough, if it was incorrect then that could justify a negative.