Cheeky Hands Bristol

[Hector]

 External Link/Members Only    or    External Link/Members Only

Thought long and hard about making this review.  Going to go NEUTRAL rather than negative as I have not met the WG for reasons explained below.

AW profile says:

 "The pictures are all of me and recent and if you want to see my face the pictures in my private gallery will show you. I have uploaded many, many new pictures both public and private today".   

Bought the PG but it appears no recent new pics added and no face pics that I can find.  So a money making PG scam methinks?

Fair enough if a WG doesn't want to show her face but I think it is poor if she advertises that face pics are available in the PG but does not display them.  False advertising IMHO.

In this case decided not to make a booking and to look elsewhere.

[rudolph hucker]

 External Link/Members Only    or    External Link/Members Only

Thought long and hard about making this review.  Going to go NEUTRAL rather than negative as I have not met the WG for reasons explained below.

AW profile says:

 "The pictures are all of me and recent and if you want to see my face the pictures in my private gallery will show you. I have uploaded many, many new pictures both public and private today".   

Bought the PG but it appears no recent new pics added and no face pics that I can find.  So a money making PG scam methinks?

Fair enough if a WG doesn't want to show her face but I think it is poor if she advertises that face pics are available in the PG but does not display them.  False advertising IMHO.

In this case decided not to make a booking and to look elsewhere.

Have you raised this with her?

[SirFrank]

How can you leave a review for a girl you haven't even booked? It's hardly fair

[Johny Stone]

Was discussed here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=27382.msg403245#msg403245

I dont think its fair, even if i dont like her much

[herelonely]

Does pg scam not count as a negative?

[Johny Stone]

from my point of view, it shouldnt, he never met her. It will create precedent and soon we will have neutral or negative reviews because some guy didnt like the pics in someones PG. WTF?

[SirFrank]

from my point of view, it shouldnt, he never met her. It will create precedent and soon we will have neutral or negative reviews because some guy didnt like the pics in someones PG. WTF?

Agree. How can you leave a review for any girl that you haven't even booked? That's not fair IMO

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

Well I have seen her twice and look forward to a third time in the near future. Your comment should be in the general discussion section about Private Galleries perhaps?

[Roth]

The Review Section is for Good and Bad Service Providers.  Providing pictures is part of a service in a way.  Saying you will provide a face pic then not doing it is a bad service, I think.  There are plenty of reviews on UKP where the punter has not met the prossie in the end.

[Roth]

from my point of view, it shouldnt, he never met her. It will create precedent and soon we will have neutral or negative reviews because some guy didnt like the pics in someones PG. WTF?

Don't get fluffy!

[Hector]

I had seen some other posts here and as I happen to be in Bristol for a bit of business this week,   I thought I'd give this one another go.  Texted to see she's available.  She texts back to say yes she is free and to call.  I call and get no answer.  I then send her a text to check what part of Bristol she's in.  I then get a text back saying to book via Adultworks as she's too busy to send texts and to call me back at her cost!  Cheeky cow!  One minute she's free the next she's too busy! I tried calling again but she hung up.

WG normally include the cost of texts and calls as part of their work.  Well at least I thought so!