SA - Notme23, Earls Court

[CroPunter]

External Link/Members Only

Sorry guys I did not wrote so many reviews in the past, but I hope this one will provide enough information.

1. Price ?
   £300 - pay per meet

2. Length of stay?
  Around 4.5 hours

3. Venue ?
  Nice and clean 1 bedroom flat

4. Nearest tube station
   Earls court

5. Services provided ?
   DFK , OWO, 69, CIM, Sex with condom

6. Date of visit?
  Early December 2020

7. Pictures accurate?
  It is her on pictures, however she is using 1-2 bigger dress size now.

8. Overall experience?
     This was my first SA booking, comparing to an escorts this was a bit smoother, without rush. She was properly wet after DFK, and sex was really good.

9. Will I visit again?
  Uh this is a tough one, probably not. It was to good, and I don't wish to risk again to have EAS.

[cotton]

Is this the only pic there is of her ? if so it would help if you described her to fill in the gaps.
Also what services did she provide and how did she perform ?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Nz]

Is this the only pic there is of her ? if so it would help if you described her to fill in the gaps.
Also what services did she provide and how did she perform ?

5. Services provided ?
   DFK , OWO, 69, CIM, Sex with condom

[CroPunter]

Is this the only pic there is of her ? if so it would help if you described her to fill in the gaps.
Also what services did she provide and how did she perform ?

Hidden Image/Members Only

I took her private images  and blur her face. Have in mind that she is more curvy now, however still very sexy.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Mr_Shins]

That photo does it for me! The shoes is the main thing I look for.

Not sure if she'd want to give me a full-over kinky body massage with them.

I'm also not sure if site rules allow SA reviews as such, given that you cannot simply book such a person. (Also PPMs are against their rules)

[90125]

Oldadmin changed the rules to allow discussions in the open forum so reviews would be allowed.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=235085.msg2399402#msg2399402

[CroPunter]

That photo does it for me! The shoes is the main thing I look for.

Not sure if she'd want to give me a full-over kinky body massage with them.

I'm also not sure if site rules allow SA reviews as such, given that you cannot simply book such a person. (Also PPMs are against their rules)

I asked for a permission few days ago.

Yes but if you out yourself the post will not be deleted.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=235085.msg2399402#msg2399402

[martini2429]

Personally speaking I think you are setting a dangerous precedent here by posting this review (OP) and allowing it to be posted (Site), yes Old Admin changed the rules, but in all that time not one person has submitted a review, why, I think because they knew in doing so you could be opening a large can of worms and leaving yourself (Site & Reviewer) open to all sorts of legal actions not only from the lady concerned but also from the Owner of Seeking.com.

I also think that publishing her pictures from her private gallery is totally out of order, I appreciate you have blocked out her face but they only give permission to people they want to see them not the whole world in this case, I think the pictures should be taken down.

As a site I think you should think again about allowing reviews of ladies from Seeking, we can keep on posting warnings about scammers and frauds and pictures sellers etc etc, but reviews, no

However at the end of the day it is your site and you can allow what you want, but I hope you are ready for the consequences should they arise

 

[tynetunnel]

8. Overall experience?
     This was my first SA booking, comparing to an escorts this was a bit smoother, without rush. She was properly wet after DFK, and sex was really good.

Booking? You just don’t get it 

[The Night King]

Personally speaking I think you are setting a dangerous precedent here by posting this review (OP) and allowing it to be posted (Site), yes Old Admin changed the rules, but in all that time not one person has submitted a review, why, I think because they knew in doing so you could be opening a large can of worms and leaving yourself (Site & Reviewer) open to all sorts of legal actions not only from the lady concerned but also from the Owner of Seeking.com.

I also think that publishing her pictures from her private gallery is totally out of order, I appreciate you have blocked out her face but they only give permission to people they want to see them not the whole world in this case, I think the pictures should be taken down.

As a site I think you should think again about allowing reviews of ladies from Seeking, we can keep on posting warnings about scammers and frauds and pictures sellers etc etc, but reviews, no

However at the end of the day it is your site and you can allow what you want, but I hope you are ready for the consequences should they arise

 

Ok you may have a point when you say "yes Old Admin changed the rules, but in all that time not one person has submitted a review" 

However, in 4 years of membership you haven't written a single review yourself I'm not sure you're in a position to lecture an OP who takes the time write a review whatever the rights and wrongs of it may be. 

[martini2429]

Ok you may have a point when you say "yes Old Admin changed the rules, but in all that time not one person has submitted a review" 

However, in 4 years of membership you haven't written a single review yourself I'm not sure you're in a position to lecture an OP who takes the time write a review whatever the rights and wrongs of it may be. 

There are probably a lot of people who have been on here longer than I have who haven't written a review, but reviews won't matter when a pissed off SB gets this site shut down because someone posted her private pictures without her permission, you think it won't happen?

Merry Christmas

 

[The Night King]

There are probably a lot of people who have been on here longer than I have who haven't written a review, but reviews won't matter when a pissed off SB gets this site shut down because someone posted her private pictures without her permission, you think it won't happen?

Merry Christmas

 

Merry Christmas to you too but how the f**k is some random SB going to get this forum shut down? 

The Online Harms White Paper is not yet law and even if SB wanted to take this up do you really think the DCMS are going to pick this up for a SB when there's so much else going on in terms of online abuse.

I'd suggest Priti Patel and Oliver Dowden have bigger fish to fry m'lud.

PS a review would be appreciated. As you purport to appreciate the finer aspects of the law you might want to at least abide by the spirit of this site if you wish to use it as your mouthpiece.

[daviemac]

I took her private images  and blur her face. Have in mind that she is more curvy now, however still very sexy.

Stop reporting this post and read the information you were given.

Guys a quick question  Is it ok to put a review of a girl from SA, if they offer PPM? I mean they are not "pro" but still they are providing services for money.

To which the reply was -

Yes but if you out yourself the post will not be deleted.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=235085.msg2399402#msg2399402

In that link is this. -

"Be warned you post publicly about SA profiles at your own risk, if the "sugar baby" reads your public post (and she can do easily for posts outside the dedicated SA thread) then I will not be deleting the post should she pressure you to get it deleted. The advice is to share sensitive info via PM and if a public post is required then best not go into too much specific detail that you could be identified."

if you are daft enough to still post what should be private information then there's not much to say really.   

[king tarzan]

External Link/Members Only

Sorry guys I did not wrote so many reviews in the past, but I hope this one will provide enough information.

1. Price ?
   £300 - pay per meet

2. Length of stay?
  Around 4.5 hours

3. Venue ?
  Nice and clean 1 bedroom flat

4. Nearest tube station
   Earls court

5. Services provided ?
   DFK , OWO, 69, CIM, Sex with condom

6. Date of visit?
  Early December 2020

7. Pictures accurate?
  It is her on pictures, however she is using 1-2 bigger dress size now.

8. Overall experience?
     This was my first SA booking, comparing to an escorts this was a bit smoother, without rush. She was properly wet after DFK, and sex was really good.

9. Will I visit again?
  Uh this is a tough one, probably not. It was to good, and I don't wish to risk again to have EAS.

Laughable how this distances itself from standard regular prostitution..
It's straight up prostitution under an arrangement over length of time and exchanges..

Be realistic for fucks sake

[jakesurrey7]

Laughable how this distances itself from standard regular prostitution..
It's straight up prostitution under an arrangement over length of time and exchanges..

Be realistic for fucks sake

+1 it is exactly the same, stripped down to basics it is  services for money.

[massagepuntingfan]

My two cents worth - I don't think you should be posting reviews of of SBs on an open thread.

[puntingpumping1920]

I took her private images  and blur her face. Have in mind that she is more curvy now, however still very sexy.

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

 
Wow!
 
If you can get that for £300/ 4.5 hours.......what is the point visiting escorts
 
Next year, I may need to try SA rather than escorts

[king tarzan]

 
Wow!
 
If you can get that for £300/ 4.5 hours.......what is the point visiting escorts
 
Next year, I may need to try SA rather than escorts

Average £80 hour

Then after a few times you will get sick of her physical appearance.. the flaws of her physical attributes will start to show..


Variety... Cannot eat a Macdonald's 3 times a day same meal 24/7 all year round!!

[justanotherinch]

Booking? You just don’t get it 

Some people say it’s just like a meet so what’s the matter with calling it a booking if that’s what it effectively is? I haven’t a clue about this so please clarify.

[Mr_Shins]

Some people say it’s just like a meet so what’s the matter with calling it a booking if that’s what it effectively is? I haven’t a clue about this so please clarify.

She doesn't advertise services that she offers to whoever pays. So even if you agree a PPM with her, all she has to do is turn up and stay the hours as part of the agreement. She doesn't have to have sex with you, or anything else.

If an escort did that, it would be pretty much breaking the agreement and you could call her a scammer, but if someone you meet on Seeking doesn't want sex with you but still keeps the money, you can give a negative review of course, but you can't say she scammed you.

She's also likely to be far more selective about who she meets.

[justanotherinch]

Right, fuck that

[Flipflop]

I’m new here sorry what’s an SA and SB ?

[Mr_Shins]

I’m new here sorry what’s an SA and SB ?

seeking.com which used to be called Seeking Arrangement, it's like a dating site but you pay them, and they're generally after older rich men. The site has rules and you're not supposed to arrange "Pay Per Meet" but because nobody will trust a woman to give them a lump sum of money and expect her to meet up with him 4 times for that, you tend to only pay them when they actually turn up.

It's quite an expensive site to use for men, but what you can get, which you don't normally get from escorts, is long meets, e.g. 3-4 hour meets for £250-£300.