Author Topic: Girl_Next_Door aka J’adore Dior - West Kensington - Robbery/Extortion Scam  (Read 10546 times)


6 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5441466) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]
8 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5475124) (2 positive, 0 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by lewishamguy]

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Shocking review and interesting subsequent thread.

First of all sorry to hear OP you were scammed by a bitch. At least no violence followed thank god.

@Bob Mery just to clarify my understanding of your passionate defence. Are you saying OP made this thing up ? Or if he was robbed the WG had nothing to do with it and he was robbed by a random?


I am saying that he made this thing up without a doubt  :thumbsup:

The girl has the screenshots between the text and calls and after you’ve been robbed you the hell go back again ?
I dont think so

After him calling her and saying was someone at your door trying to rob me ... then the girl invite him back and after 5 minutes he texts “I’m outside”
Really ? So after an attempt you go back for the second ? BIG LOL

So is 100000%% made up story
  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 12:00:02 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Yes I am taking to her right now

1. She told me that she never messaged him
“After a while” about the cigarettes she asked at the beginning

2.Nd she said that never kept calling/texted him instantly only twice and she sent me the screenshots of the messages and whole conversation so there are only few messages exchanged about her asking to “let her know when outside”

3.rd she said the guy called her to say on the phone “A guy was outside asking me for money” and she said maybe was a neighbour outside smoking “( also she said that he didn’t sounded on the phone like being on the street as was very silence on his end)  then after he texted her in less then 1 minute “I’m outside and she went out but no one there ... and then again after 5 minutes he texted her “Nice try”   ...when he claim here on the original post that all this “experience” should have Happened in more then 15 minutes (this Is what I conclude from the who story). But between the texting time and calling time was 2-3 minutes difference and then 5 minutes after the last text “nice try”

hmm....

OP needs to get involved at this point

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
You know i never actually looked at her review history

.....i just did..you are the only positive she has ever had

Just looked at OP’s review history. 3 negatives out of 3. Plot thickens!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
hmm....

OP needs to get involved at this point

I’m wondering if he would
As her screenshots proves everything
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
I’m wondering if he would
As her screenshots proves everything

I am making a second request if he has been a cunt he needs to be called out so please post the screenshots. Most fake reviewers go into hiding leaving us guessing. At least if we see the screenshots that you claim to have we know once and for all.

If you choose not to post them and OP takes a similar stance then as far as I am concerned we are as we were and the review stands as valid in my book.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 12:07:22 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline last_days_of_logan

I am making a second request if he has been a cunt he needs to be called out so please post the screenshots. Most fake reviewers go into hiding leaving us guessing. At least if we see the screenshots that you claim to have we know once and for all.

If you choose not to post them and OP takes a similar stance then as far as I am concerned we are as we were and the review stands as. Slid in my book.

3rd

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Just editing the number etc ...
I assume I am not allowed to post his number

Give me just 1 min
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Just editing the number etc ...
I assume I am not allowed to post his number

Give me just 1 min

yep clear out personal info

BTW: its an unnerving amount of insight into this you have

i assume its okay to leave date and time

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
He post this review 1 day before meeting  (12.12.2020)

 Or Am I blind ?

Phone calls 13.12.2020
Ask the OP if he can see us talking on here to specify on the Original Review what time he “met” her

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 12:24:32 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

He post this review 1 day before meeting  (12.12.2020)

 Or Am I blind ?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Bob, mate...we arent 12 years old on this site

you know i actually kind of like you, you're quite funny  :lol:

do you have anything else aside from that?  :D :D :D

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Bob, mate...we arent 12 years old on this site

you know i actually kind of like you, you're quite funny  :lol:

do you have anything else aside from that?  :D :D :D

That’s it mate but hopefully clarify most of all  :hi:
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

That’s it mate but hopefully clarify most of all  :hi:

what does that clarify exactly?  :D

Bruv i respect the hustle, i really do...make ends meet and all that

But this girls best bet is to lock off that account and head to Vivastreet cause no one is seeing her on AW again..certainly not on that profile if they have any sense

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Bob, mate...we arent 12 years old on this site

you know i actually kind of like you, you're quite funny  :lol:

do you have anything else aside from that?  :D :D :D

Something is real fishy between @Bob Mery and OP. Maybe rival pimps.

Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Bob, mate...we arent 12 years old on this site

you know i actually kind of like you, you're quite funny  :lol:

do you have anything else aside from that?  :D :D :D

 .
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
He post this review 1 day before meeting  (12.12.2020)

 Or Am I blind ?

Phone calls 13.12.2020
Ask the OP if he can see us talking on here to specify on the Original Review what time he “met” her

Hidden Image/Members Only

 :dash: :dash: :dash:
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
what does that clarify exactly?  :D

Bruv i respect the hustle, i really do...make ends meet and all that

But this girls best bet is to lock off that account and head to Vivastreet cause no one is seeing her on AW again..certainly not on that profile if they have any sense

Well that’s not my problem that’s her problem
I haven’t ever commented on any other negatives of her cause as I said before some of my experiences was not amazing either

I don’t judge from the first meeting but the “scamming thing and all this made up story” was exaggerated.

 :hi:
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Something is real fishy between @Bob Mery and OP. Maybe rival pimps.

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

For bloody hell seriously mate please stop with this one
I AM NOT HER PIMP

Pm me if you wanna meet up for a beer and we can chat and why not have 3 Somme after tired 4
You pick the girl  :drinks:

Maybe by new year time I will get rid of this “nickname”  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 12:44:02 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
:lol: :lol: :lol:

For bloody hell seriously mate please stop with this one
I AM NOT HER PIMP

Pm me if you wanna meet up for a beer and we can chat and why not have 3 Somme after tired 4
You pick the girl  :drinks:

Maybe by new year time I will get rid of this “nickname”  :sarcastic:

Otherwise will end up to changing my username on here into “ThePimp”  :dash:
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 12:44:14 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Well that’s not my problem that’s her problem
I haven’t ever commented on any other negatives of her cause as I said before some of my experiences was not amazing either

I don’t judge from the first meeting but the “scamming thing and all this made up story” was exaggerated.

 :hi:

it kind of is your problem now cause you are advocating on her behalf, and i dont mean that metaphorically..i mean it literally...you are in contact with her...she with you, she gives you numbers..dates and times about topic , you post them here and its her side of the story you are putting forward etc etc

you have seen her multiple time, you are the sugar daddy and you never mentioned to us all the negatives you have experienced with her....but you are the only positive and you jump in defending not just now...but have done so before am i right?

but its all conjecture...something is up with this lady....and its not good

Not that my opinion counts for anything but EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY AND SAVE MONEY> SHE IS A BAD PROVIDER. HER LOCATION ISNT SAFE AND SHE IS MOST LIKELY IN LEAGUE WITH BLACKMAILERS AND THIEVES.

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
it kind of is your problem now cause you are advocating on her behalf, and i dont mean that metaphorically..i mean it literally...you are in contact with her...she with you, she gives you numbers..dates and times about topic , you post them here and its her side of the story you are putting forward etc etc

you have seen her multiple time, you are the sugar daddy and you never mentioned to us all the negatives you have experienced with her....but you are the only positive and you jump in defending not just now...but have done so before am i right?

but its all conjecture...something is up with this lady....and its not good

Not that my opinion counts for anything but EVERYONE SHOULD STAY AWAY AND SAVE MONEY> SHE IS A BAD PROVIDER. HER LOCATION ISNT SAFE AND SHE IS MOST LIKELY IN LEAGUE WITH BLACKMAILERS AND THIEVES.


Part of it you’re right but otherwise how could I have prove it (on her behalf) as you asked me to post the screenshots

And if necessary I can post a review of my ex meetings with her

There’s been 5 meeting in 1 year and I’ll tag them
2 good
2 neutral
1 negative

Well a sugar daddy is not a pimp and the fact cause I like her and defended her (about the scamming)  I don’t think is a bad thing

Cause I was certain about it
So I don’t see anything wrong in being her sugar daddy or defending her


And apart that it’s fine I agree with you
People can stay away from her and don’t waste their money and sometimes yes she does give bad/effortless services ....

But she’s not a scammer and she doesn’t have any pimp ... so based on my arrangement with her if people are not getting bored I can post a review every time I see her and make an entire story on here about my evolution with her  :D
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 12:51:45 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Well that’s not my problem that’s her problem
I haven’t ever commented on any other negatives of her cause as I said before some of my experiences was not amazing either

I don’t judge from the first meeting but the “scamming thing and all this made up story” was exaggerated.

 :hi:

Sorry mate we have no evidence of this. We asked politely for you to post the evidence of the screenshots you claim exist you have failed to do so. Only you know why. Instead you post a phone record that allegedly belongs to OP. We are not stupid.

So yes you are behaving like an individual with vested interest. Pimp/Loverboy/get freebies/EAS/WK who knows. You are her only positive review to date out of 6. OP has 3 negs out of 3.

So yeah your defence and OP’s account differ but as things stand unless 1 see evidence that flatly contradicts his account taken together with her track record she is a low life and punters should book with extreme caution if at all.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline last_days_of_logan

Sorry mate we have no evidence of this. We asked politely for you to post the evidence of the screenshots you claim exist you have failed to do so. Only you know why. Instead you post a phone record that allegedly belongs to OP. We are not stupid.

So yes you are behaving like an individual with vested interest. Pimp/Loverboy/get freebies/EAS/WK who knows. You are her only positive review to date out of 6. OP has 3 negs out of 3.

So yeah your defence and OP’s account differ but as things stand unless 1 see evidence that flatly contradicts his account taken together with her track record she is a low life and punters should book with extreme caution if at all.

+1

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Sorry mate we have no evidence of this. We asked politely for you to post the evidence of the screenshots you claim exist you have failed to do so. Only you know why. Instead you post a phone record that allegedly belongs to OP. We are not stupid.

So yes you are behaving like an individual with vested interest. Pimp/Loverboy/get freebies/EAS/WK who knows. You are her only positive review to date out of 6. OP has 3 negs out of 3.

So yeah your defence and OP’s account differ but as things stand unless 1 see evidence that flatly contradicts his account taken together with her track record she is a low life and punters should book with extreme caution if at all.
:thumbsup:
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 01:09:41 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
+1

But ok I’ve done enough and I don’t want to be accused again of being part of it I understand somehow I am but if the proofs weren’t enough whosever want can ask her and she’ll clarify


So for a last time All I wanted to state on here is cause the OP review was a made up story that’s all
Cheers  :hi:
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
This is another conversation with any of you on here I assume who deposited her and haven’t been scammed



Hidden Image/Members Only

Bro I think you should stop. You’re digging yourself into a deeper hole ... work out what I mean.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 01:20:15 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Bro I think you should stop. You’re digging yourself into a deeper hole ... work out what I mean.

The fact cause people still believe her and not this OP made up story is not digging anything
Is just a screenshot also taken on here from another punter who thought has been robbed because of the fake claimings of this OP review

Is just another evidence of the truth

I think as girls has to be checked up (if they’re genuine) someone would also have to check up the members on here and make sure the reviews are genuine
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 01:36:17 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Will end up being as Fake as Adult work ones ( such reviews)  :hi:
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 01:38:26 pm by Bob Mery »
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline socksfellan2

Sorry to hear this happened OP, but the following conversations have piqued my interest

Bob you have a very strong interest in absolving this woman from these accusations
In my opinion, you've made your point in your first post. For anything beyond, you can be seen at best as a white-knighting cretin or at worse as somebody directly benefiting from her continued business (make of that what you will)

  • As you seem to be in direct communication with her, and have made her aware of this thread, she should defend herself as the big woman she is or not and accept the consequences of remaining silent
  • As for the OP, he has made strong accusations but we have nothing substantial from his end though I can see he hasn't logged in since his post. So he's got the benefit of my doubt until he does.

By default, for me at least, I believe the reviews on UKP until shown otherwise and your 'proof' isn't proof of anything

Overall, I suggest:
  • The sex worker request an account from admin and stand up to the scrutiny
  • OP returns to clarify and explain his position
  • That you stop sharing screenshots of this thread with her as guests have been blocked by admins from seeing content

In any of these scenarios, you aren't in a position to make the case for anybody besides sharing your experience so you should cease activity in this thread :timeout:

PS - what on earth does religion have to do with this? many religious people are hypocrites, if anything her being a sex worker is in fact massive sin and kills any credibility that her religiousness offers. also nobody asked about her parents you oversharing weirdo
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 02:57:24 pm by socksfellan2 »

Offline last_days_of_logan

But ok I’ve done enough and I don’t want to be accused again of being part of it I understand somehow I am but if the proofs weren’t enough whosever want can ask her and she’ll clarify


So for a last time All I wanted to state on here is cause the OP review was a made up story that’s all
Cheers  :hi:

you have absolutely no idea this is the case unless you were there. only question is do you think its possible

you dont... a few of us do

Offline Arigold

Op did that cunt contact you again? If she was constantly texting you etc and after what happened to you then she is involved. Glad your ok , put this down as a learning experience and approach with caution.

Cheers, no she sent one text that was deleted, then another saying she needs to come out to open and after the missed call, nothing

Offline Arigold

Sorry to hear this happened OP, but the following conversations have piqued my interest

Bob you have a very strong interest in absolving this woman from these accusations
In my opinion, you've made your point in your first post. For anything beyond, you can be seen at best as a white-knighting cretin or at worse as somebody directly benefiting from her continued business (make of that what you will)

  • As you seem to be in direct communication with her, and have made her aware of this thread, she should defend herself as the big woman she is or not and accept the consequences of remaining silent
  • As for the OP, he has made strong accusations but we have nothing substantial from his end though I can see he hasn't logged in since his post. So he's got the benefit of my doubt until he does.

By default, for me at least, I believe the reviews on UKP until shown otherwise and your 'proof' isn't proof of anything

Overall, I suggest:
  • The sex worker request an account from admin and stand up to the scrutiny
  • OP returns to clarify and explain his position
  • That you stop sharing screenshots of this thread with her as guests have been blocked by admins from seeing content

In any of these scenarios, you aren't in a position to make the case for anybody besides sharing your experience so you should cease activity in this thread :timeout:

PS - what on earth does religion have to do with this? many religious people are hypocrites, if anything her being a sex worker is in fact massive sin and kills any credibility that her religiousness offers. also nobody asked about her parents you oversharing weirdo

Hi yes, tbh, just wanted to forget about it so didn't log in.

- Incident happened on 12th Dec, got outside her place at 15:10
- I honestly can't decide if she was involved or not, parts of it seem like a set up, but I've always preffered to give someone the benefit of the doubt
- Post was more about warning people of the signs that I shouldhave seen, but wasn't thinking with my head
- Not had any contact or tried to contact her since then
- Attached screenshot with last messages with her with the number visable. from what I included in the post
- Happy to clarify anything if needed

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Hi yes, tbh, just wanted to forget about it so didn't log in.

- Incident happened on 12th Dec, got outside her place at 15:10
- I honestly can't decide if she was involved or not, parts of it seem like a set up, but I've always preffered to give someone the benefit of the doubt
- Post was more about warning people of the signs that I shouldhave seen, but wasn't thinking with my head
- Not had any contact or tried to contact her since then
- Attached screenshot with last messages with her with the number visable. from what I included in the post
- Happy to clarify anything if needed

Hidden Image/Members Only

So where are the numerous insistence’s of her the ones you were  talking about on the review ?
And where is the rest of the conversation.... ?
Please post the whole conversation...
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
So where are the numerous insistence’s of her the ones you were  talking about on the review ?
And where is the rest of the conversation.... ?
Please post the whole conversation.

Given that you refused to post any of the conversation at all that you claimed you had it’s a bit rich you now challenging OP’s version of events/screenshot.

You should also look back to your screenshot that tried to con us that OP had called and booked this WG on 13 December that was subsequently saved on the WG’s phone as “Bulshit”. It is clear the dialogue took place on his booking day which was 12 December.

Either you or she or both are telling porkies.

Broadly speaking OP’s screenshot matches his original review. Your version of events so far have shown to be untrue.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 08:52:56 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline last_days_of_logan

So where are the numerous insistence’s of her the ones you were  talking about on the review ?
And where is the rest of the conversation.... ?
Please post the whole conversation...

Eh?

You didnt post ANYTHING..except some made up stuff about "bulshit" making a few calls....then claiming that was OP booking A DAY AFTER (no doubt from her telling you that was the case). OP just completely debunked that to smithereens and now you are asking for a full conversation ?

Go get the full conversation from your friend first, the two of you conspired to put out some evidence and its coming across utterly hopeless and juvenile. These are grown men here from all sorts of educational and professional back grounds you are trying to convince and you guys are looking like you dont even know how to get a good story going  :D

the thing i love about this is that if there was any doubt she was involved ...the more the pair of you talk and put things forward, the more evidence that she is 10000% involved. I hope she never works again

have we got a facial? We have to put it up to warn others

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Hi yes, tbh, just wanted to forget about it so didn't log in.

- Incident happened on 12th Dec, got outside her place at 15:10
- I honestly can't decide if she was involved or not, parts of it seem like a set up, but I've always preffered to give someone the benefit of the doubt
- Post was more about warning people of the signs that I shouldhave seen, but wasn't thinking with my head
- Not had any contact or tried to contact her since then
- Attached screenshot with last messages with her with the number visable. from what I included in the post
- Happy to clarify anything if needed

Hidden Image/Members Only

She said that all of this happened in the evening time and nothing at all day time
And the messages were exchanged via IMessage and nothing at all by WhatsApp

Also she said that she remembered this messages also on WhatsApp but that was a different person who just didn’t turned up at all without any further contact (exactly as per this screenshot a let missed call without an answer)

So there are couple of possible options

Or you have photoshopped the timing of this messages
Or you came back to her later from a different number and just by normal text because she said when went out 3 times to check if the guy was outside it was dark outside

Because there were following messages from you after what happened saying that you texted her “Nice try”  and the number she’s got saved as another “2:30 pm Timewaster” is not registered on WhatsApp anymore and doesn’t match the timing showing on your screenshot (and was normal text IMessage not WhatsApp)

She’ll register on here and come back with the screenshots so will compare everything after

In the mean time please OP post the screenshots about the “insistence contact after” (calls) and the “IMessage” ones because this screenshot has no connection of what she’s saying but either with what your saying
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Given that you refused to post any of the conversation at all that you claimed you had it’s a bit rich you now challenging OP’s version of events/screenshot.

You should also look back to your screenshot that tried to con us that OP had called and booked this WG on 13 December that was subsequently saved on the WG’s phone as “Bulshit”. It is clear the dialogue took place on his booking day which was 12 December.

Either you or she or both are telling porkies.

Broadly speaking OP’s screenshot matches his original review. Your version of events so far have shown to be untrue.

Am even starting to think he is the guy that took OPs money you know  :D

Offline last_days_of_logan

He post this review 1 day before meeting  (12.12.2020)

 Or Am I blind ?

Phone calls 13.12.2020
Ask the OP if he can see us talking on here to specify on the Original Review what time he “met” her

Hidden Image/Members Only

Okay so .... 1 big ass lie thwarted. Was a bit of a comical piece of evidence anyway

Bob's johnson is being led about by an illiterate and low IQ service provider

One of the things that made me doubt her initial involvment was that she would have to be utterly stupid, brain dead and intellectually inept to do someone thing like this that would effect her livelihood ...but maybe i gave her too much credit. With a piece of evidence like the above...she is completely moronic and i think she would be capable of low level short lived fast money like that indeed  :lol:

Offline last_days_of_logan

Hi yes, tbh, just wanted to forget about it so didn't log in.

- Incident happened on 12th Dec, got outside her place at 15:10
- I honestly can't decide if she was involved or not, parts of it seem like a set up, but I've always preffered to give someone the benefit of the doubt
- Post was more about warning people of the signs that I shouldhave seen, but wasn't thinking with my head
- Not had any contact or tried to contact her since then
- Attached screenshot with last messages with her with the number visable. from what I included in the post
- Happy to clarify anything if needed

Hidden Image/Members Only

Mate this is a FUCKING set up!!

Fuck this blackmailing thieving bitch man.....look at all that shit there...where are you constantly.... tagging him from "the shop"..come to 53 ...and then boom gets run up on by her partner in crime "Are you here for the girl?"

OP....what kind of building was it? single house or a block of flats?

Offline Bob Mery

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 95
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Okay so .... 1 big ass lie thwarted. Was a bit of a comical piece of evidence anyway

Bob's johnson is being led about by an illiterate and low IQ service provider

One of the things that made me doubt her initial involvment was that she would have to be utterly stupid, brain dead and intellectually inept to do someone thing like this that would effect her livelihood ...but maybe i gave her too much credit. With a piece of evidence like the above...she is completely moronic and i think she would be capable of low level short lived fast money like that indeed  :lol:

Well mare now it’s start getting suspicious for me too
So I think I’ll stay away of her for now also and will just give it a miss on further meetings

I do apologise for trying to defend her but I can see now it doesn’t worth it as one of them are lying and I can’t say who anymore

Even though she’s involved or not now with all this happening I’ll stay away too

Cheers all of you and the conclusion is just better to AVOID her and kinda that’s it
 :hi:
Banned reason: White knight / undeclared association with the girl.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

Given that you refused to post any of the conversation at all that you claimed you had it’s a bit rich you now challenging OP’s version of events/screenshot.

You should also look back to your screenshot that tried to con us that OP had called and booked this WG on 13 December that was subsequently saved on the WG’s phone as “Bulshit”. It is clear the dialogue took place on his booking day which was 12 December.

Either you or she or both are telling porkies.

Broadly speaking OP’s screenshot matches his original review. Your version of events so far have shown to be untrue.

this breh got no shame you know, proper digging the grave that is this service providers job...retirement. Let him keep it up...the more he tries to excuse everything the worse she looks ...and his IP address will get flagged anyway on at least 3 sites  :D

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
this breh got no shame you know, proper digging the grave that is this service providers job...retirement. Let him keep it up...the more he tries to excuse everything the worse she looks ...and his IP address will get flagged anyway on at least 3 sites  :D

We should all have a forum whip round and hire James Bond😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

We should all have a forum whip round and hire James Bond😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

 :lol:

Offline Arigold

Mate this is a FUCKING set up!!

Fuck this blackmailing thieving bitch man.....look at all that shit there...where are you constantly.... tagging him from "the shop"..come to 53 ...and then boom gets run up on by her partner in crime "Are you here for the girl?"

OP....what kind of building was it? single house or a block of flats?


Was a street literally next to a dual carriageway, row of houses with a baseme flat below them

Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,077
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Wow what a mess. Unlucky OP, at least you are safe. Oh, and Bob Mery...don't go digging your grave of where your credibility will rest by defending stupid WGs with no mental capacity for long term planning.

Offline JayEZ2K

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,960
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 276
It is really best to avoid this lady. She has five negatives, with the only positive coming from her sugar daddy/pimp, Bob Mery. Best to avoid as statistically you are at best going to have a negative punt, at worst, you are likely to be robbed.



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: December 20, 2020, 10:39:57 pm by JayEZ2K »

Offline PLeisure

Well mare now it’s start getting suspicious for me too
So I think I’ll stay away of her for now also and will just give it a miss on further meetings

I do apologise for trying to defend her but I can see now it doesn’t worth it as one of them are lying and I can’t say who anymore

Even though she’s involved or not now with all this happening I’ll stay away too

Cheers all of you and the conclusion is just better to AVOID her and kinda that’s it
 :hi:
You're so full of shit and you know it.

The above is standard modus operandi for you when it's becoming obvious you're going to be outed as her pimp.
Consider this response to your October '19 review of the same WG:
Hi guys
Yep all of you are right
Been paying attention on everything you said and decide to call Elisa as initially I’ve seen her and wasn’t aware of the Helen story with the pimping out etc

Surprisingly when I asked about it she got very angry about that and told me to leave her alone

Again what I. Can definitely say they are 2 different girls but everything this Elisa does I think it’s just trying to get some  reputation out of Helen’s back 

She definitely does know about this website and I thinks it’s  just playing around
Best thing I’ll take your advice in consideration and I will avoid them both from now on


From reply 22 and 23, other punters start commenting that another WG, also working in the same area, has used the same pics. I took it one step further, noting that the images were being recycled between the two. Which they were. I know this because I had both in my hotlist at the time.
In your other review - supposedly of another WG, and posted just three weeks apart: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=265946.0 - you became defensive and employ your usual 'attack as best form of defence' strategy.
Exactly as you've done in this thread towards the OP.

The final comment from that review, posted six months later, proves a point that we'd been making all along. One that you realised would be better not to attack because it provides irrefutable evidence:
To avoid any confusion, let me clarify once and for all - Deluxe-French-Model (ID: 5475124) is the same girl as Exquisite Elisa (ID: 5441466) - 100% and without doubt. How do I know this? Well, I texted both numbers on the two profiles and got the EXACT same address near West Kensington. Then I met 'Elisa' and she confirmed that the two profiles belong to her. I am quite happy to do a review on here if there is appetite for it here, but it was the same experience as the review by YoungBrom over here - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=168950.0

She is working during the lockdown, but I wouldn't recommend.


Protecting your investment, I get that  :rolleyes:

You're so transparently full of shit  :sarcastic:

Offline Animalbeast

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 211
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
She said that all of this happened in the evening time and nothing at all day time
And the messages were exchanged via IMessage and nothing at all by WhatsApp

Also she said that she remembered this messages also on WhatsApp but that was a different person who just didn’t turned up at all without any further contact (exactly as per this screenshot a let missed call without an answer)

So there are couple of possible options

Or you have photoshopped the timing of this messages
Or you came back to her later from a different number and just by normal text because she said when went out 3 times to check if the guy was outside it was dark outside
I lied and sent bullshit fake evidence. Here are a couple of possible options why?
I’m her pimp
I’m her
I’m a fluffy



Fixed it for you.
« Last Edit: December 21, 2020, 01:21:45 am by Animalbeast »
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Well mare now it’s start getting suspicious for me too
So I think I’ll stay away of her for now also and will just give it a miss on further meetings

I do apologise for trying to defend her but I can see now it doesn’t worth it as one of them are lying and I can’t say who anymore

Even though she’s involved or not now with all this happening I’ll stay away too

Cheers all of you and the conclusion is just better to AVOID her and kinda that’s it
 :hi:

Thanks to Daviemac for banning this insufferable piece of scum. :thumbsup: