Author Topic: Giaxo - Leicester Square  (Read 18987 times)


51 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5661814) (45 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline golden bull

Bit cheeky isn’t he??
Sounds like a right creep :thumbsdown:

Offline mrbang123

Getting “YOU” vibes from Karim with this behaviour.

The longer he stays quiet the worse it is for him.

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
Getting “YOU” vibes from Karim with this behaviour.

The longer he stays quiet the worse it is for him.

But how to come back after this when he sought to mislead the forum and is clearly a stalker? As the said WG is a member of this forum I think he is probably nervous she will spill even more damaging evidence if he makes any attempt to post a fabricated a defence. She has already named his alias AW accounts on SAAFE!
« Last Edit: November 07, 2020, 10:48:50 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline mrbang123

But how to come back after this when he sought to mislead the forum and is clearly a stalker? As the said WG is a member of this forum I think he is probably nervous she will spill even more damaging evidence if he makes any attempt to post a fabricated a defence. She has already named his alias AW accounts on SAAFE!

I mean he can always hold his hands up and admit! However I don’t see that happening!


Offline MLawro93

I mean he can always hold his hands up and admit! However I don’t see that happening!

What would that do though? He won't be welcome back here again, guy is a creep.

Offline PLeisure

What would that do though? He won't be welcome back here again, guy is a creep.
The other best thing about this forum - all the losers and lowlifes eventually get called out.

He's probably been accessing the site as a guest since the WG posted her reality check.
He's about as relevant as Trump  :sarcastic:

Offline Bloody foreigner

He's probably been accessing the site as a guest since the WG posted her reality check.

100%

I think, that should be changed and access to reviews would be only for logged in users. The same like is with the off topic section. At least we could see if he was logged in after being called out.

Offline MLawro93

Admin can see his IP address for his account access. Can easily put two and two together and find out if he is still lurking about.  :D

Offline Qwerty69

If he's accessing the site via guest, he could be using a vpn.. And therefore his ip could keep changing

Offline Animalbeast

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 211
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 8
I mean he can always hold his hands up and admit! However I don’t see that happening!

He didn’t accidentally fart in an elevator
Banned reason: Doesn’t listen to warnings
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline MLawro93

If he's accessing the site via guest, he could be using a vpn.. And therefore his ip could keep changing

Admin blocks certain VPNs I think. Might not be that easy, but I'm sure he'll find a way. Lucky you can't register as a new user at the moment.

Offline laidbackasiandude

OP, since yesterday you have posted six new reviews but overlooked for nearly two months the rebuttal (reply no 7) on this thread by EmmaLoiuse89 on behalf of Giaxo?  In addition you are on the SAAFE Warnings List posted by Giaxo on the 30/10/2020 where she clearly states that this review according to her is false and in essence malicious, in addition to allegations of stalking her on-line and incessant calls/texts over an extended period of time (as well as pretending to be another client who previously met Giaxo to secure a booking on false pretense).

Perhaps finally you can respond to the rebuttal posted by EmmaLouise89 and provide evidence that this review isn't fake & malicious?









Offline cotton

Oh wow. This whole review was fabricated?

Hidden Image/Members Only
I realise the site errs on giving punters the benefit of the doubt but where theres significant groundswell of opinion that a review is fake and malicious isnt it in the best interest of upholding the sites integrity that a member is required to answer scrutiny.  Otherwise if nobody is ever held to account and anyone can post any made up nonsense to suit their own agenda what then  :unknown:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
I realise the site errs on giving punters the benefit of the doubt but where theres significant groundswell of opinion that a review is fake and malicious isnt it in the best interest of upholding the sites integrity that a member is required to answer scrutiny.  Otherwise if nobody is ever held to account and anyone can post any made up nonsense to suit their own agenda what then  :unknown:

+1

I think where there clear evidence of malicious postings (Admin being the sole judge of course) a fake review should be removed. Some punters won’t bother scrolling through the full novel on this thread but automatically assume it is a valid Negative review.
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bonapati

+1

I think where there clear evidence of malicious postings (Admin being the sole judge of course) a fake review should be removed. Some punters won’t bother scrolling through the full novel on this thread but automatically assume it is a valid Negative review.

Agree. But by removing his review how do you know his positive reviews are even truly positive?
Admin could easily tag it as fake or suspicious like AW does. I have read all his reviews and find no value or anything new in them... he genuinely comes across as a “can’t find the word I’m looking for”.

Sooner or later word will go around in the SP world and he won’t get a look in for awhile.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2020, 11:53:13 am by bonapati »

Offline bedhedred

Word is out already. The post on saafe from 30 October set lot of SPs on notice.  :angry:


Offline tantric talents

I have got the popcorn out but would quite like to see a bit more balance here.

I don’t know much about the OP but he did recently and promptly reply to a question I posed regarding extras on a different SP.

As to the SP in question, I actually did send her recently a very complimentary AW email coupled with seasons greetings.
The message was read but as yet no response. Not very polite nor professional.

I just re-read some of the OP’s posts and reviews and find that I have also seen ( often many times ) a number of girls he describes and would say he accurately represented them and their services.

He has so far chosen (for his own reasons) not to get further embroiled in this debate. As a result he appears to have been generally lambasted by a number of members.

As to the Saafe references this is a punters forum and I really couldn’t care less what is posted there!

I also know some punters are freaked out by sex while a women is menstruating. Personally it has never bothered me but I understand how some might be upset and affronted especially with no prior warning.

Let’s see how this all pans out. I am not making any judgements merely factual observations.

Some of the veteran members have all been here before of course.  :hi:




Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
I have got the popcorn out but would quite like to see a bit more balance here.

I don’t know much about the OP but he did recently and promptly reply to a question I posed regarding extras on a different SP.

As to the SP in question, I actually did send her recently a very complimentary AW email coupled with seasons greetings.
The message was read but as yet no response. Not very polite nor professional.

I just re-read some of the OP’s posts and reviews and find that I have also seen ( often many times ) a number of girls he describes and would say he accurately represented them and their services.

He has so far chosen (for his own reasons) not to get further embroiled in this debate. As a result he appears to have been generally lambasted by a number of members.

As to the Saafe references this is a punters forum and I really couldn’t care less what is posted there!

I also know some punters are freaked out by sex while a women is menstruating. Personally it has never bothered me but I understand how some might be upset and affronted especially with no prior warning.

Let’s see how this all pans out. I am not making any judgements merely factual observations.

Some of the veteran members have all been here before of course.  :hi:

I think you are being extremely generous in your assessment of OP. There is so much evidence that points to him being a proper cunt but yet he chooses to stay silent.

The pattern when punters get called out and are challenged by the forum and/or WG herself to produce evidence to back up their version of events they never can. She has publicly listed his other AW accounts, his other telephone numbers but yet he stays silent but has time to post six yes six reviews in one day on other WGs he has allegedly seen.

Insofar as her non contact with you and not replying to your e-mail that has no relevance to OP being a deluded stalker who became obsessed with trying to fuck her again. Rejection is tough more so in the p4p environment.

Until such time he mans up and tell the forum his version of events with proof then there is only one valid conclusion we can come to.
« Last Edit: December 26, 2020, 10:09:07 pm by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline bedhedred

I have got the popcorn out but would quite like to see a bit more balance here.

I don’t know much about the OP but he did recently and promptly reply to a question I posed regarding extras on a different SP.

As to the SP in question, I actually did send her recently a very complimentary AW email coupled with seasons greetings.
The message was read but as yet no response. Not very polite nor professional.

I just re-read some of the OP’s posts and reviews and find that I have also seen ( often many times ) a number of girls he describes and would say he accurately represented them and their services.

He has so far chosen (for his own reasons) not to get further embroiled in this debate. As a result he appears to have been generally lambasted by a number of members.

As to the Saafe references this is a punters forum and I really couldn’t care less what is posted there!

I also know some punters are freaked out by sex while a women is menstruating. Personally it has never bothered me but I understand how some might be upset and affronted especially with no prior warning.

Let’s see how this all pans out. I am not making any judgements merely factual observations.

Some of the veteran members have all been here before of course.  :hi:

He did KSG.

He did Giaxo

He has attempted things recently with an SP I met, though that is early stages.

It's possible that he might still be an innocent lamb, wronged and misunderstood by one and all.

I say this in the interest of balance.

😏

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
He did KSG.

He did Giaxo

He has attempted things recently with an SP I met, though that is early stages.

It's possible that he might still be an innocent lamb, wronged and misunderstood by one and all.

I say this in the interest of balance.

😏

The Sweeney or the professionals???

Vote?????
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
The Sweeney or the professionals???

Vote?????

The Sweeney all day long :D

Jokes aside @KT the guy is a cunt and makes it difficult for punters to get bookings with decent reliable sexy WGs. She has reported she has had to put in extra checks and I am regularly seeing punters reporting she does not reply to their booking requests. Prob shit scared it might be OP with a new AW ID :scare:

Saying a girl is fucking on her period with smelly mango when it is all fabricated plus sending begging e-mails to her because she does not want to fuck you again is as low as it gets!

But yet @karimbenzima1991 stays silent and we want balance  :dash:
« Last Edit: December 27, 2020, 09:39:35 am by Jerk Chicken »
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline RAJEC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Likes: 19
  •  
  • Reviews: 162
He’s posting reviews with this cloud hanging over him....  :thumbsdown:
« Last Edit: December 27, 2020, 09:43:16 am by RAJEC »

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
He’s posting reviews which this cloud hanging over him....  :thumbsdown:

Exactly .... silence is golden!
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline RAJEC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Likes: 19
  •  
  • Reviews: 162
Exactly .... silence is golden!

He should have a little banner under his name; instead of ‘banned’ perhaps ‘read with caution’  :unknown:

A ban would allow him back in at some point, but keeping him in plain sight would be safer

Offline massagepuntingfan

Did anyone report the OP. Surely its a case for admin to decide. Not sure mob mentality is the way to go on this, as hounding a member doesn't achieve much.

Offline lewishamguy

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 39
The Sweeney all day long :D

Jokes aside @KT the guy is a cunt and makes it difficult for punters to get bookings with decent reliable sexy WGs. She has reported she has had to put in extra checks and I am regularly seeing punters reporting she does not reply to their booking requests. Prob shit scared it might be OP with a new AW ID :scare:

Saying a girl is fucking on her period with smelly mango when it is all fabricated plus sending begging e-mails to her because she does not want to fuck you again is as low as it gets!

But yet @karimbenzima1991 stays silent and we want balance  :dash:

I suspect that sad arsehole has had EAS issue and starts stalking WGs after few meetings and posts malicious reviews as a revenge. :thumbsdown:

Offline The Night King

This situation is so fucked up. As if it wasn't enough to have to deal with Sergei, this OP is like a double agent writing false reviews which make it even harder to disseminate fact from fiction.  :thumbsdown:

To make matters worse it puts the SP on edge, no doubt making any potential booking even harder to arrange. I'd quite fancy seeing this girl but having never visited her before I can imagine the rigmarole in setting up a meet, logistics-wise could be a passion killer :unknown:

Offline Manutd007

Its fucking impossible to book her.

This guy  :dash:

Offline Jerk Chicken

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,106
  • Likes: 25
  •  
  • Reviews: 54
It’s the season of goodwill ... so going biblical

“Father forgive them, they know what they do” Luke 23:24 :yahoo:
Banned reason: Previously banned (Sean70) - Pimp, dangerous and using UKP review threats to demand extra services
Banned by: Kev40ish

Offline mrbang123

karimbenzema is actively avoiding replying to this thread because he’s guilty - smart on his part as he doesn’t want to douse the fire with more petrol.

Offline bedhedred

I'm guessing we are all sinners here. 😂

KB must be thinking...

"ye who is without sin cast the first stone" John 8:7





Offline TP84


Offline Payyourwaymate

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,070
  • Likes: 99
  •  
  • Reviews: 145
Has OP graduated from terrorising this WG to WGs all over london now? I'm seeing OP get alot of flack on his recent reviews now  :lol:.

Offline golden bull

This should be on Netflix 🤣😱😱 I know what you posted last summer?
The hunt for KarimBenzema?
The stalking dead? 🤣🤣

I’ll get my hat 🎩.
Taxi 🚖!!

Offline RAJEC

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,493
  • Likes: 19
  •  
  • Reviews: 162
This should be on Netflix 🤣😱😱 I know what you posted last summer?
The hunt for KarimBenzema?
The stalking dead? 🤣🤣

I’ll get my hat 🎩.
Taxi 🚖!!

Ostalk

Sorry  :cool:

Offline WAP

After my recent positive review of Giaxo I decided to read this negative review through from start to finish for the first time just now and am amazed to find that this is still unanswered.

 KarimbenZema has gone on silent mode, posting 6 reviews and very few comments. He logged in only yesterday. His silence on this matter for almost 10 months seems to imply his guilt at making a fake malicious review.

And yet he has done reviews and so still adds value here. What’s a punter to do? Can we trust his other reviews? Does his silence set the example that the best way to avoid punter and moderator heat is to remain silent?  :unknown:

Offline mrbang123

Yeah KB got off lightly! Planning a meet with her soon, will update with review if it happens.