Indian Cinnamon £150.00 for 60 mins Cambridge. (DIDNT HAPPEN - V LATE CALL OFF)

[Cambridgy]

I think it’s time to send in IQ129 to do a review 

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Well well, this has turned into a real saga;!

Pity for NFS bloody long way to come - to not cum! not handled too well by the lady in question.

Rocky making a bit of a chump of himslelf, are you really seeing this lady Two times a week thats a helluava lot of loot! Seems to me you've got an EAS addiction there mate! Mind you can see how it could be done:) As to publicising her photos as i might have said elsewhere one lady who would do well to get some decent professional  photos done as her own ones arent repersentaive of her looks.

She is however an excellent SP when you do get to see her, which i have a few times she is by her own admission a tad "fiesty" and this is where she rub's some up the wrong way as withness the self promotion posts the other year, but be that as it may dosn't efect what we get when we get there!

However and I don't think most anyone will disagree with me in the fact that Cambridge has now lost one of its very few good girls and theres bugger all else around and that's the really sad thing!

Very greatfull to Ja2Zy and his constant tracking of decent Chinese Asian ladys and I must admit i have a very soft spot for these girls and if i was to take on a full time partner again i'd like one of they!

To that end there used to be a girl around here called "Orient Softlips" seems to have disappeard of the radar anyone know if shes moved elsewhere or changed name of  or just gone? Meant te review her but never got aroundtuit!

[JayEZ2K]

To that end there used to be a girl around here called "Orient Softlips" seems to have disappeard of the radar anyone know if shes moved elsewhere or changed name of  or just gone? Meant te review her but never got aroundtuit!

I've never seen her myself, but seems she's gone as well, I'm guessing around the start of Covid. He profile is fully deleted. If it wasn't more than 6 months ago you could also review just in case she returns, which is quite possible.
External Link/Members Only

[norwichfunseeker]

Isha profile is still down, wonder if she has packed up?
Maybe RB can enlighten us?

[winkywanky]

Don't bring him into it!   

[norwichfunseeker]

Don't bring him into it!   

Apologies WW!

[winkywanky]

Periods do vary in length and severity, who knows?

I don't imagine she's been put off AW for life after that little débacle. Perhaps it's simply that she and Rocky have taken the opportunity to spend a lovey-dovey-duvet Bank Holiday together? 

[norwichfunseeker]

Funny how his white Knighting of her appears to have cost her bookings!

Maybe that was his intention, so he gets her more to himself! Who knows.

[winkywanky]

It does tend to. If she realises this, she might kick him out of bed.

[Watts.E.Dunn]

I'd expect that by now shes got enough regs to get by on.

We tend to forget that not every punter in Cambridge and shire is a UKP member;!....

[winkywanky]

Good luck to her. If Rocky and yourself and some others can keep her in clover that's all good.

This is not UKP members ganging up on her. It's a punter who got let down badly by her for whatever reason (hardly unusual, hardly the end of the world) and he simply and quite rightly reported on that.

I don't think there's any animosity towards her at all, it's all the bullshit perpetrated by White Knights that gets people's goat. And that does her more damage than the original review IMO.

[norwichfunseeker]

Good luck to her. If Rocky and yourself and some others can keep her in clover that's all good.

This is not UKP members ganging up on her. It's a punter who got let down badly by her for whatever reason (hardly unusual, hardly the end of the world) and he simply and quite rightly reported on that.

I don't think there's any animosity towards her at all, it's all the bullshit perpetrated by White Knights that gets people's goat. And that does her more damage than the original review IMO.

Couldn't agree more ww, and it was actually through this site I discovered her.
I NEVER see a girl without checking on here first. And even if they have some - ve ones, I don't instantly dismiss I read them and take a balanced view.

Interestingly Isha and I have spoke since this incident and all is good between us, certainly no animosity here, She has said she Is keen for an opportunity to attain a positive review from me. I have replied that I will not change the status of this review, but if we do meet I will review that punt in total isolation and according to how I felt it went. If it's positive I will of course duly report that, but if I feel it's a negative, or another no show, I will update this one, as I dont think two reviews with the same rating are permitted.

It's just the 140 mile round trip that's stopping me. Oh and that her profile is still offline.

[Watts.E.Dunn]

Couldn't agree more ww, and it was actually through this site I discovered her.
I NEVER see a girl without checking on here first. And even if they have some - ve ones, I don't instantly dismiss I read them and take a balanced view.

Interestingly Isha and I have spoke since this incident and all is good between us, certainly no animosity here, She has said she Is keen for an opportunity to attain a positive review from me. I have replied that I will not change the status of this review, but if we do meet I will review that punt in total isolation and according to how I felt it went. If it's positive I will of course duly report that, but if I feel it's a negative, or another no show, I will update this one, as I dont think two reviews with the same rating are permitted.

It's just the 140 mile round trip that's stopping me. Oh and that her profile is still offline.

Sounds fair, lets hope its up to her usual performance standards this time:-)

[Chorley]

What  a  massive pisstaker!  A stone cold negative without a doubt. 

[norwichfunseeker]

Profile still offline. 😔

Maybe one of her regs could confirm if she's back working again?

[sunnyj]

Couldn't agree more ww, and it was actually through this site I discovered her.
I NEVER see a girl without checking on here first. And even if they have some - ve ones, I don't instantly dismiss I read them and take a balanced view.

Interestingly Isha and I have spoke since this incident and all is good between us, certainly no animosity here, She has said she Is keen for an opportunity to attain a positive review from me. I have replied that I will not change the status of this review, but if we do meet I will review that punt in total isolation and according to how I felt it went. If it's positive I will of course duly report that, but if I feel it's a negative, or another no show, I will update this one, as I dont think two reviews with the same rating are permitted.

It's just the 140 mile round trip that's stopping me. Oh and that her profile is still offline.

I went again and seen WGs who initially wasted my time and got good service. I suggest you use a different burner SIM and not use the one that you used for this booking. 

My negative and positive reviews for the same WGs
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=233091.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=236075.0

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=252190.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=254956.0

[winkywanky]

Why would he use a different number when the WG in question has offered him a discount, is aware of this thread and will be keen to make amends should he wish to book again?

[norwichfunseeker]

My thoughts exactly WW, shes not ghosting me.

I'm not in the habit of texting WG's when they haven't declared their availability in 'open forum'.
Its the same as I expect them to respect my privacy, works both ways.

[sunnyj]

Why would he use a different number when the WG in question has offered him a discount, is aware of this thread and will be keen to make amends should he wish to book again?

It's just a suggestion and it's up to OP to take it or leave it. It's a decision between taking the discount and letting the WG know your personal appearance who can then link it with OP's number and UKP account or leave the discount and don't let her know his appearance. 

Also for UKP, how useful is a review when the WG already know in advance that a particular client of her will post a positive review if she didn't mess him and provides good service. 

[winkywanky]

It's just a suggestion and it's up to OP to take it or leave it. It's a decision between taking the discount and letting the WG know your personal appearance who can then link it with OP's number and UKP account or leave the discount and don't let her know his appearance. 

Also for UKP, how useful is a review when the WG already know in advance that a particular client of her will post a positive review if she didn't mess him and provides good service. 

Fair point.

From the OP's POV he wasted 3hrs of his life and £30's-worth of fuel and it might be nice for him to receive some kind of recompense for that.

Of course should the punt go ahead and she knew who he was, and if her performance was very good, then everyone will know the background to the review coming out of that. In that sense it would be almost meaningless but at least the OP got his punt and hopefully a nice time.

I should imagine the OP is already using a punting phone/number, so to go out and obtain yet another punting number purely for this punt would be yet another inconvenience.

But you're right, it's all up to the OP.

[norwichfunseeker]

Isha can already connect my ukp account to my punting phone, so to use another number would remove the ability to claim my discount. However it would mean the review could potentially be more accurate.

However the history is well documented on here and any review will be based solely on that visit, good or bad, and readers will be able to make their own minds up knowing the full history.

From my perspective, anything I can do minimize the potential of a negative punt is good for me. Surely that's what this site is about?

[winkywanky]

I'd agree with that. You want the best punt possible, and why not? You deserve it.

It's already established the girl knows your UKP identity with your current number, and bearing in mind what's happened so far, everyone knows your experience might not be that of a 'random punter'.

I guess bearing that in mind you could either not review (unless it's a Negative!) because the result might be skewed, or you review and include a big caveat, so people can make up their own minds.

We're getting into the realms of statistical random samples here, isn't life fascinating on UKP sometimes? 

[Mrbenn2016]

NorwichFunSeeker.

To be fair it would appear that you made an error someone else made recently regarding long distance and advance booking a week or three days in advance. Especially with the AW  booking system down.

You didn't check in the morning or an hour before travel. Any person with common sense or experience would know this.

Regarding the excuse it fits. Cramps can last 2 weeks. bleeding 3-5 days. It isn't always clockwork.
Nothing particularly sinister in offering 15 mins

Most of the WG assume no contact no show.

I have been in similar situations. Two girls did it to me twice in a row either on the same day or 24 hour booking. Both left early. One was badly organised the other not so but the distance and her bookings back to back just didn't work and l was a regular but fell out with her. Lesson learned always check in the morning and then an hour or so before booking time if you are travelling especially.

Some compensation is better than nothing. The girls are unlikely to offer you anymore than half a an hour free and no way near the two hours round or more for anyones wasted travelling. Especially as she lost 3 days work.

Some WG girls decide to work through this period excuse the pun by offering BJs only. I don't see a problem with this.
If she later retracts because cramps are to severe  that is her prerogative.

I have been in convo with her but she has been booked so not seen her. I have had second thoughts as l don't think her facial photo does her justice presumably like many others. If anyone else has better ones feel free to post or pm them to me.

[winkywanky]

NorwichFunSeeker.

To be fair it would appear that you made an error someone else made recently regarding long distance and advance booking a week or three days in advance. Especially with the AW  booking system down.

You've neglected to mention he exchanged texts the night before with the girl?

With the distance involved (90min drive?) and depending what time he left, the girl may not even have been up and about or had her phone on at that time.

You're right that you'd ideally check on the day but it's not always practicably possible.

If the girl had a problem, she'd have seen his morning text and should have texted back asap to let him know. She didn't. The blame is all on her.

[Mrbenn2016]

Apologies NorwichFunseeker. I re-read your review.
You did all the risk mitigating measures.

It must have been annoying but these things can happen. Nature can be a funny beast.

I am sure you have had to call off a booking due to a lastminute tummy bug, something dodgy you ate, a flat battery or burst tyre or a family emergency?
I am sure she let you know at the earliest opportunity?

A common one given for abandonment is the Landlord turning up unexpectedly due to either complaints from the neighbours or not being paid knowing she is earning lucrative income.

I have experienced a couple of these too. But l don't punt EE girls anymore.

I would have just put this downto experience.

Apologies again for the false accusations

[Mrbenn2016]

You've neglected to mention he exchanged texts the night before with the girl?

With the distance involved (90min drive?) and depending what time he left, the girl may not even have been up and about or had her phone on at that time.

You're right that you'd ideally check on the day but it's not always practicably possible.

If the girl had a problem, she'd have seen his morning text and should have texted back asap to let him know. She didn't. The blame is all on her.

Thank you WW. I had already noticed my error. My bad but personally l would have clumped it all together. Not broken up the booking process by parking.

Minor and only a paragraph/sentence away but still a better /flowing quick read.

However to reiterate regarding the social norms across the board for travel 1h max is the largely accepted as the bar.

Anything else time wise or cost wise is prohibitive and at the OP's or SP's (Outcall risk).

So it can be argued the extra £15 and 1.5 - 2hs is his responsibility. 

Regarding the rebooking l am not quite sure either has anything really to gain. She is busy if the Op hits a traffic accident or something else he will miss the slot unless there is a an agreed 1.5h booking or 2h slot. (Unlikely) May be at th end of the working day? She may be tired so not give optimum service. She only has a two week window so apart from genuinely trying to come to some sort of mutual agreement l don't see what she has to gain.

I also think the impact of the review in isolation has not necessarily had the impact to her business as some think.
I think the Op still has more to lose personally and she does not have any exceptional ksp to mitigate a risk of being too vanilla for the Op to warrant the hassle.  I maybe ding a disservice to the Op. GFE maybe his priority. There is no aminosity now so why not just move on?

Also glaringly obvious question is why he chose/chooses  to travel an extra hour or so? Is the availability in Norfolk Suffolk or the Midlands that bad?

[norwichfunseeker]

Blimey Mr Benn,

i feel I have been cross examined! you are indeed entitled to your views and opinion, & I accept they may be different to mine.

Its punters choice who and where they wish to punt, and the time / expense is at their (my) own cost I totally agree. The problem with this one being cancelled was the trip was wasted, that was the niggling / upsetting part. This isnt the furthest I driven for a punt, and on the previous one, (as is usual with all of my trips, I leave in plenty of time) to mitigate any issues travel wise. although I accept the longer the journey the increased risk of delays. I wasn't aware of the 1 hour travel 'rule' on UKP. but the problem with Norwich is without motorways in the county you can travel for an hour, and only done 40 miles at best!

Isha and I have been trying to agree a convenient time for a visit for a number of weeks, and she has been very polite, and chatty on the messages (which increases my wish to see her) rather than the offish 'what time do you want to come' and then silence. Isha and I conversed over text the night before to confirm requirements etc. I also texted when I was on route (no reply), and then once parked, 10-15 mins before booking time. I never text before im parked in case I cannot parked. but thats just me.


There has been plenty of talk about her appearance, and she states she had a face pic in private gallery if you wanted to see. However she is certainly not the first girl on AW to now show her face.

Regarding you comment on why I wished to see Isha rather than a girl more locally, is basically down to punters choice, and there hasnt been anyone in Norwich (bar Hannnah Banks) who has ticked my boxes.

You mention, in passing, a free punt scenario (that someone else has also said in a PM to me) that would in my opinion totally change the dynamic of the meeting, and not sure how comfortable id be with that.

Apologies if this is sounding antagonistic, I dont mean it to, just we all have a different point of view, to which you, of course, are welcome to yours.

I never expected my review of events to provoke such a response. I love this place, its what its all about. Keep it up fellas and stay safe.

[Watts.E.Dunn]

I'd ask the Hon member Mt Benn 2015 is he resident in east anglywold area?..

As Cambridge is a bloody punting desert and Norwich and Norfolk hin't a lot better with the exception of Bella over at Swaffham:)

[norwichfunseeker]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only is now is swaffham too (leaving today)

[Bornslippy]

Cor blimey guv! Looks tasty. Are photos flattering or is she  ice size 8?

[Charlie Chalk]

Mr Benn - What a load of verbose nonsense! First of all you were so desperate to mount your charger and come to this damsel's rescue that you failed to read Norwichfunseeker's review properly, and once this was pointed out to you come out with this garbage:

However to reiterate regarding the social norms across the board for travel 1h max is the largely accepted as the bar.

Anything else time wise or cost wise is prohibitive and at the OP's or SP's (Outcall risk).

So it can be argued the extra £15 and 1.5 - 2hs is his responsibility. 


Also glaringly obvious question is why he chose/chooses  to travel an extra hour or so? Is the availability in Norfolk Suffolk or the Midlands that bad?

You don't decide what is a social norm or what any "bars" are. Furthermore, anything above your invented "bar" is not at the risk of the punter, especially if he has done everything he can to mitigate risk from flaky SP's. The extra time is not his responsibility, it is the SP's. Finally, he chooses to travel whatever distance he wants to see the SP he wants to see - simple.

This isn't crime of the century. Either the SP in this case is genuine and the OP was unlucky, or the SP decided she wasn't up for it and screwed up her comms. Either way, Norwichfunseeker has done the right thing by posting a review of the non-punt for us all to make up our own minds as to which of these possibilities is more likely and consequently whether we would be prepared to risk a booking.

The bottom line is that it is the SP's responsibility to honour any agreed booking, or at least to cancel in enough time to prevent any wasted time/expense from the SS. They are paid enough for their services (sorry, time) for that to be an expectation on our part. It should be rare that a punt is cancelled by the SP for genuine unavoidable reasons but yet we see reports of this happening a lot on here due to many SP's being either lazy or flaky. No wonder any such occurrence is treated with suspicion on here.

[whatno]

I've never seen her myself, but seems she's gone as well, I'm guessing around the start of Covid. He profile is fully deleted. If it wasn't more than 6 months ago you could also review just in case she returns, which is quite possible.
External Link/Members Only

Yeah her visa was expiring so she went back to China.... to her boyfriend .... shame!

[sunnyj]

I also think the impact of the review in isolation has not necessarily had the impact to her business as some think.

Reviews are written to help other punters with information and not to impact or boost WGs business.

[winkywanky]

Reviews are written to help other punters with information and not to impact or boost WGs business.

Exactly.

And overtly fluffy comments bring suspicion about the veracity of those comments.

Just as persistent mudslinging by punters over WGs they've fallen out with, often betray a hateful agenda, designed to ruin the girl's business out of spite.

Both are equally undesirable on a review site.

We need clarity and objectivity, tempered with a bit of YMMV.

[norwichfunseeker]

I like to think of myself as a fair man hence the following update on this thread.

Today I rebooked my visit to Isha, and my review is here

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=284021.0

This review as a negative still stands for when it was written, as a true reflection of the events that took (or didnt) take place at that time.
However having now had a punt, im happy to rate as a positive and would thoroughly recommend.