Author Topic: CMarika90 Nottingham  (Read 2678 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5682027) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline alftupper

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

£70 for half an hour.

I'm still not sure why I decided to visit this wg, but i'm glad I did.

First contact was via aw, then a couple of texts on the day. All promptly and clearly answered. Venue was a scruffy council house in Highbury Vale, seemed safe enough to me on a sunny day in August, others might disagree on a rainy night in November.

Is it the girl in the pictures? No.

Reading her answers on the interview tab, I was already pretty sure the pictures weren't her, or were out of date. She's mixed race, not stunning but not bad looking either, you wouldn't give her a second look on the street. Dyed blonde hair showing a few inches of dark roots. Average build, just over 5 foot and could do with losing a few pounds around the belly.

it's obvious it's her house and she has kids, but no sign of them or anyone else present. Looking at her availability tab she only works when the kids are elsewhere.

Went to the bedroom and handed over the cash, she then dropped her dressing gown to reveal some lingerie, and a belly covered in tats, not to eveyones taste but ok with me.  Started with some very enthusiastic dfk, stripped off quickly and was soon grappling with her on the bed. I prefer a big soft handful of natural tit, hers are small and enhanced, soft to the touch but a good squeeze and you can feel the firmness. Very good owo, all tongue and mouth, no stopping to toss me off between sucks. Responded well to oral on her, condom on and she rode me till I came.

I was in and out in just under the half hour, but never felt rushed.

This was a definite positive for me. She isn't a young hotty, and could do with losing a few pounds around her belly. But she makes up for that with her enthusiasm, she certainly wants to please, and I would rather have that than a gorgeous wg that is uninterested.

Online Charliehutton

Alf, I've read with interest this review and that of English Rose, and your positive ratings sound very generous to me.

Both photo profiles give bugger all away and sound completely bogus. How, in this day and age, can a girl only find two or three photos to do her justice?

I'm glad you had a good time, because based on that evidence I'd have given both of them a wide berth. :hi:




Offline alftupper

Alf, I've read with interest this review and that of English Rose, and your positive ratings sound very generous to me.

Both photo profiles give bugger all away and sound completely bogus. How, in this day and age, can a girl only find two or three photos to do her justice?

I'm glad you had a good time, because based on that evidence I'd have given both of them a wide berth. :hi:

That's a fair comment.

With English Rose, she has been reviewed on here so I was aware the photos were dodgy. And to be honest she was only just a positive, I did consider a neutral rating.

From the start I thought Marikas pictures were possibly fake, but the rest of the profile suggested she was genuine. On the day I was ready to walk . But I have to admit that was part of the thrill, a step into the unknown.

i agree that a couple of genuine selfies should not be beyond the average wg. But I don't know how a wg's brain works, you'll have to ask one of the amny on aw who can't or won't upload decent or accurate pictures.

Offline ir34

Interesting review OP and I'm tempted to visit her. One point of clarification. You mentioned that the photos are not of her. My research shows that it is in fact of her. (Google CMarika90 to see her Twitter account). It could be out of date for sure.

One Q. She states that she's a submissive, in her Interview. Was she really? How did you feel?




Offline alftupper

Interesting review OP and I'm tempted to visit her. One point of clarification. You mentioned that the photos are not of her. My research shows that it is in fact of her. (Google CMarika90 to see her Twitter account). It could be out of date for sure.

One Q. She states that she's a submissive, in her Interview. Was she really? How did you feel?

Well I'm getting lazy, I normally try a google search but didn't this time, she's also on Instagram.

Honestly I dismissed the gallery pictures as being too vague to be helpful. The main profile picture looked more like her, albeit out of date. I couldn't decide to go with "not her" or "out of date", I went with the option I thought was most likely, looks like I was wrong.

As for being submissive, my feeling is that if you make it clear that's what your looking for she will oblige.