Hardly in a position to criticise the reviews of others yourself are you, 3 reviews in 4 years. Best not to cast stones if you live in a glass house. And now another person, Crackpot11, has made the same observation.
Employment or unemployment have precisely ZERO bearing on the authenticity of a review or indeed an AW profile. Likewise, the number of reviews is irrelevant, whatever you may think - we all start somewhere, that number being 1. Quality over quantity, otherwise this whole forum would have become irrelevant a long time ago.
It's the feel of the review which was under suspicion due to lack of any solid detail. It doesn't have to be explicit, just useful to other readers. I could have summed it up with "she's young, beautiful and I'd shag her again" which is common to 98% of reviews and fairly predictable given what this site's about! Just stating the obvious. I can't speak for the other gentlemen here, and I'm not asking for her bank account details or inside leg measurement, but a *little* more detail without going into the explicit would have added more usefulness to your post. I think that alone, but in combination with the hidden recommendations added suspicion, as there are people who post just to bump up an SP's reputation, sometimes the SP themselves.
Primarily my complaint was not about your review but about the SP's hidden recommendations.
I stand by my statement that any SP who hides their profiles has probably got bad feedback beyond the acceptable or normal. More particularly when they only have two pieces of feedback. The suspicion rating climbs further still when that extends to only two pieces of feedback in nearly five years, which was my original observation.
Please separate the critique of your review, which was extremely mild, from the critique of the AW profile, which was anything but.
Topic: Naughty Elizabeth Taunton (Read 3629 times)