Author Topic: Ali-May - Allure - Heaton - TOFTT New Escort  (Read 2699 times)

Offline As272887

I have a backlog of reviews waiting, but seeing as they have been reviewed in the past, but Ali-May hasn't I decided to post here first.

30mins for £60
External Link/Members Only

Short story: girl looks older than stated age, I'd say 30-31. Very petite, average looking, but a nice personality all round, if a bit shy (probably due to me seeing her on her second ever day. Body wise as mentioned petite, not toned but not flabby. Nice arse, average face, very saggy petite breasts and lots of stretch marks on belly. May be due to having kids. Service was ok, nice kissing and fondling, good hygiene. Responsive to reverse oral. Owo skills need work but I suppose that will come with experience. Decent enough sex.
Would I return, maybe after she has a few months experience depending on what other day about her skills improving.

Long story:
Felt "that" itch last weekend. Saw a new girls was working for allure so fired off the messages and set up meet for half an hour later. Comms great as always from Allure.
Usual Heaton flat. Ali opened the door and instantly I though she's older, but I was here already and her body looked good in the silky robe she had on. Led upstairs, quick visit to the loo then up again to the bedroom.
Paperwork out the way, so I stripped down and onto bed, started with some kissing and fondling before I asked he to go down on me. Her technique need work I'll be honest, but there was no hint of any teeth so that a good starting point, few minutes later she did ask if I wanted to move along or wanted more oral. I pulled her up for some more kissing before I went down on her. Hygiene was good. She was responsive and pretty soon had her coming. Then got the rubber and moved onto missionary, pussy is reasonably tight, and she was very responsive, plenty of kissing and all the right noises. Then on to cowgirl, I couldn't get into this too much as I was distracted by the aforementioned saggy breasts, usually doesn't affect me but did this time. Then doggy, she does have a nice arse, which I took the time to admire.
Finally decided to lay down and have her finish me off with her mouth, she couldn't quite get me there so I ended up wanking off as we made out.
Followed by a quick clean up and chat before I made my way out. Here is when I found out it was only her second day in the job ( this explains the lack of skill, but I'm sure it will come with experience).

A neutral may be harsh, but I think I would have a good time with her once she's found her feet and gets a bit more confidence!

Thanks all, more reviews to follow when I get a chance!

Offline The Outsider

Good information, thank you.  A neutral seems far from harsh for what sounds like a bang average punt. 

There are no photos on her profile at the moment.  Did you go in "blind" or have they been removed since? 

Offline Happynerd

Thanks for the review. I had noticed her too as her listed stats are exactly the type of lady I go for but I wanted to wait until pictures. Likely for those plus some experience.

Offline Sar-Major

Good information, thank you.  A neutral seems far from harsh for what sounds like a bang average punt. 

There are no photos on her profile at the moment.  Did you go in "blind" or have they been removed since?

From what I can recall OS, I don't think that there has been any photos of her on that profile.

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline As272887

Her stats looked good so I went in blind. Tbh I rarely trust the agency photos as more than a slight indication of looks anymore. Been burnt a handful of times!!

Offline Sar-Major

Cheers for the review.    :drinks:     Sorry to see you rated it a Neutral.  :unknown:

But having read your review several times I have to agree with your second last comment I personally think your being a tad harsh.

I’ve never seen the lass and I’m only going off your review and her profile. I can’t recall any photos on her profile and it does say on there that she’s new to the industry.

So the only three minor things are her age, which all WG’s knock a few years off so nothing new there. Saggy tits and belly, which as you say could be because you think she’s been “Pupped”. Well that’s what happens in life and were not all 100% perfect by any means. Then the OWO you said needed working on, maybe, but one man’s meat is another man’s poison, and all that.

The end of the second last line sums it up for me, is that you’d go back and see her when she gets more confident.

To me the fact she’s new to the industry, second day on the job, NO real issues as you gave her some nice positive comments. Yes I can see the bit about the lack of experience and I would have given her the “Benefit of the Doubt” a bottom end positive as opposed to a neutral.

Bottom line is, your review, your call, only my opinion.

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Winker121

Cheers for the review.    :drinks:     Sorry to see you rated it a Neutral.  :unknown:

But having read your review several times I have to agree with your second last comment I personally think your being a tad harsh.

I’ve never seen the lass and I’m only going off your review and her profile. I can’t recall any photos on her profile and it does say on there that she’s new to the industry.

So the only three minor things are her age, which all WG’s knock a few years off so nothing new there. Saggy tits and belly, which as you say could be because you think she’s been “Pupped”. Well that’s what happens in life and were not all 100% perfect by any means. Then the OWO you said needed working on, maybe, but one man’s meat is another man’s poison, and all that.

The end of the second last line sums it up for me, is that you’d go back and see her when she gets more confident.

To me the fact she’s new to the industry, second day on the job, NO real issues as you gave her some nice positive comments. Yes I can see the bit about the lack of experience and I would have given her the “Benefit of the Doubt” a bottom end positive as opposed to a neutral.

Bottom line is, your review, your call, only my opinion.

 :hi: :hi:

Getting close to WKing there mind!

Offline As272887

Cheers for the review.    :drinks:     Sorry to see you rated it a Neutral.  :unknown:

But having read your review several times I have to agree with your second last comment I personally think your being a tad harsh.


Thanks SM, yes I do think I'm being a bit harsh, but when I'm handing over hard earned cash I tend to be. But as you later alluded to there were some positives which is why I might try again in a few months.

It was borderline but I stick with my neutral, just my personal opinion on this punt. If things change next time I will happily hold up my hands.... And take some credit as helping give her the experience she needed to become a better punt!!   :lol:

Offline Sar-Major

Getting close to WKing there mind!

Winker, I’m far from being a “White Knight” all I have done is to state the obvious from the review by AS, that he was a bit “Hesitant/Uncertain” whether to call it a Positive or Neutral. All I said was that AS said more positive things about her than actually bad things. Plus her being new to the industry and her second day working, I put my “Opinion” on this review. I haven’t been singing her praises as I’ve never met the lass, so I can’t see why I should be classed as a “White Knight”.

 :hi: :hi:

Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline waynekerr600

Winker, I’m far from being a “White Knight” all I have done is to state the obvious from the review by AS, that he was a bit “Hesitant/Uncertain” whether to call it a Positive or Neutral. All I said was that AS said more positive things about her than actually bad things. Plus her being new to the industry and her second day working, I put my “Opinion” on this review. I haven’t been singing her praises as I’ve never met the lass, so I can’t see why I should be classed as a “White Knight”.

 :hi: :hi:

I thought he meant you were getting like Wayne Kerr.

I'd taken it as a compliment.

Offline The Outsider

I thought he meant you were getting like Wayne Kerr.

I'd taken it as a compliment.

I'm not sure which he will think is the most offensive accusation!  :bomb:  :lol:

Offline Sar-Major

I thought he meant you were getting like Wayne Kerr.

I'd taken it as a compliment.

I can see you ending up in one of the many NE Institutions that I look after, for having "Thoughts" like that WK..........  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Who in there right mind would want to be a "Sweaty Foot Sucking Rotund Little Twat" like you.  :scare:    :P    :D   :D   :D

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac

Offline waynekerr600

"Twat"

I'm normally a cunt.

I think you're mellowing in your (very) old age  :)

Offline Sar-Major

I'm normally a cunt.

I think you're mellowing in your (very) old age  :)

Oh NO I'm not, it's just that a "Cunt" has a more useful purpose in life than a "Rotund Little Twat"  :P     :lol:   :lol:   :lol:

 :hi: :hi:
Banned reason: Fantasy reviews. Using UKP name to push boundaries and attempt bareback & stalker
Banned by: daviemac