British Indian Aisha, Ilford - Worst SP in London (possibly the UK)! 0/10!

[jonloops]

I have responded to Davie Mac via private message.

[daviemac]

Appears the OP doesn't have the balls to admit he's reviewed the wrong SP. This review should be rescinded.

I will say this again, this review is entirely false and misleading for the girl that was mentioned.

The OP has answered the questions I asked and the one he saw fits the description of the one in his review.

[v I r G I n]

The OP has answered the questions I asked and the one he saw fits the description of the one in his review.

Thanks for clearing it up. I am still going to stick by the facts and the facts do not add up. This is a BULLSHIT review in my opinion.

[daviemac]

Thanks for clearing it up. I am still going to stick by the facts and the facts do not add up. This is a BULLSHIT review in my opinion.

You are entitled to your opinion but that's just what it is, an opinion you have no facts.

As with any review members will use the information contained in the review and that posted on the thread as they see fit.

You think it's bullshit so just ignore it. 

[v I r G I n]

  I am going to ignore it and I urge other members to ignore it  The OP has not had the decency to counter the challenges made against him on this thread. He has decided to stay silent throughout and has only responded to a mod question via PM. That's pretty damning if you ask me.

[daviemac]

I am going to ignore it and I urge other members to ignore it  The OP has not had the decency to counter the challenges made against him on this thread. He has decided to stay silent throughout and has only responded to a mod question via PM. That's pretty damning if you ask me.

The OP doesn't want people like you constantly having a go at him because he posted a negative review, he felt by replying to me there would be no need for him to comment further on here. If you had convinced me this review is wrong I would do something about it, you haven't.

What is more damning to me is the way you are white knighting the escort in question, you have gone out of your way to try and discredit this review.

[Animalbeast]

I am going to ignore it and I urge other members to ignore it  The OP has not had the decency to counter the challenges made against him on this thread. He has decided to stay silent throughout and has only responded to a mod question via PM. That's pretty damning if you ask me.

Are you the girl’s stalker or pimp? How can you possibly know where she’s been every single day since her profile popped up? Through pm the op has satisfied admin that he linked the correct profile, why are you so intent on trying to redeem this girl’s negative? Just hypothetical but how do you know the op didn’t post his booking text and it matches the girl’s AW profile ?

Something more off about you then the op... op might be shy and got intimidated by your angry tone and demands for posting the date of his booking

[v I r G I n]

The OP doesn't want people like you constantly having a go at him because he posted a negative review, he felt by replying to me there would be no need for him to comment further on here. If you had convinced me this review is wrong I would do something about it, you haven't.

What is more damning to me is the way you are white knighting the escort in question, you have gone out of your way to try and discredit this review.

How do you work that one out? And how am I white knighting her when I've not even met her? I saw her friend so if anyone is being white knighted here it's her friend! This review deserves to be discredited because it's not a review. It's a lie.

[Animalbeast]

How do you work that one out? And how am I white knighting her when I've not even met her? I saw her friend so if anyone is being white knighted here it's her friend! This review deserves to be discredited because it's not a review. It's a lie.

But you talking as if you got a gps strapped to her

[v I r G I n]

Are you the girl’s stalker or pimp? How can you possibly know where she’s been every single day since her profile popped up? Through pm the op has satisfied admin that he linked the correct profile, why are you so intent on trying to redeem this girl’s negative? Just hypothetical but how do you know the op didn’t post his booking text and it matches the girl’s AW profile ?

Something more off about you then the op... op might be shy and got intimidated by your angry tone and demands for posting the date of his booking

Neither. She's on my hot list and I do check most days all the profiles that are on and are showing as available. Every time I've seen her as available I check the location to see if it's changed but it's been the same since the profile started, which is why I believe there is doubt in this review.

[Stealthmode]

Neither. She's on my hot list and I do check most days all the profiles that are on and are showing as available. Every time I've seen her as available I check the location to see if it's changed but it's been the same since the profile started, which is why I believe there is doubt in this review.

You cant rely in AW for location. The profile is almost word for for the same as her stable mates, clearly being managed.

What you should do, seeing as you are so adamant, is see the girl yourself and then leave a review.

[Animalbeast]

Neither. She's on my hot list and I do check most days all the profiles that are on and are showing as available. Every time I've seen her as available I check the location to see if it's changed but it's been the same since the profile started, which is why I believe there is doubt in this review.

Most days or every single day?

Girls don’t have to be available today to still answer their phone and accept bookings.

So unless if you know her more then you’re letting on there’s no way you can be so certain.

[daviemac]

How do you work that one out? And how am I white knighting her when I've not even met her? I saw her friend so if anyone is being white knighted here it's her friend! This review deserves to be discredited because it's not a review. It's a lie.

You have never stopped going on about how this review is of the wrong girl, that is how you are white knighting her. You are only guessing that it is fake you have nothing to prove it is, the OP has, to my satisfaction, answered the questions I put to him about it

At least the OP has taken the time to actually post one, unlike you.

Saw this WG recently and would echo the review, she was quite poor and most of what happened in this review also happened to me. I was going to write a negative review too.

[v I r G I n]

You have never stopped going on about how this review is of the wrong girl, that is how you are white knighting her. You are only guessing that it is fake you have nothing to prove it is, the OP has, to my satisfaction, answered the questions I put to him about it

At least the OP has taken the time to actually post one, unlike you.

Perhaps I am guessing. But I'd rather write nothing than put in a BS fake review.

[Jerk Chicken]

I have to say I always find it strange when punters go out of their way to defend a WG that they do not know. I had similar ding-dong with a poster who was adamant a WG would never use the N word BUT he had only met her once

In this case @vIrGIn whilst I get he may feel aggrieved because OP did not respond publicly he should accept as final (as I did) that OP responded to @daviemac and that’s the end of it.

Forum members can then draw their own conclusions if they want to book this girl.... she still looks like a Rom to me changing premium dosh

[sunnyj]

Capturing her profile which is now updated with a reference to this review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Jerk Chicken]

Capturing her profile which is now updated with a reference to this review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Oh WOW!

The plot thickens

Did @vIrGIn alert her to this review ...So White Knight in chief ? Or is Sergei a secret lurker so protecting his/her income by way of profile update? 

[puntingpumping1920]

TBF, I've never seen this girl charge £80 or advertise in Ilford
 
I always see her profile based near west kensington station

[Gambitman92]

Oh WOW!

The plot thickens

Did @vIrGIn alert her to this review ...So White Knight in chief ? Or is Sergei a secret lurker so protecting his/her income by way of profile update?

To be fair to virgin, I've seen her profile a number of times, imo it doesn't make sense to go from £130/30mins for weeks then £80/30mins for a day then back up to £130.

Sending a mod a private msg instead of posting here makes no sense and still leaves a lot of questions, a review is supposed to help us not leave everyone confused.

But I'll leave it, his review, his choice.

[Animalbeast]

Oh WOW!

The plot thickens

Did @vIrGIn alert her to this review ...So White Knight in chief ? Or is Sergei a secret lurker so protecting his/her income by way of profile update?

Either that or he’s the one writing the profiles

[sunnyj]

There is no doubt v I r G I n is white knighting this SP. We also should remember new registration is still closed which means this SP can't come here to give her account.

[Jerk Chicken]

Agree with all the subsequent comments.

To me where @vIrGIn went wrong was the continued defence of the SP/tantamount to WK when he can’t know for sure if OP saw her or not.

We do not know what OP said to mods. If he chooses to keep it a secret up to him. But on my part the conclusion I am drawing from this review (albeit questionable) is until such time another punter fucks and reviews her then this is just another review and would not put me off from booking her.

[LLPunting]

Agree with all the subsequent comments.

To me where @vIrGIn went wrong was the continued defence of the SP/tantamount to WK when he can’t know for sure if OP saw her or not.

We do not know what OP said to mods. If he chooses to keep it a secret up to him. But on my part the conclusion I am drawing from this review (albeit questionable) is until such time another punter fucks and reviews her then this is just another review and would not put me off from booking her.

Indeed.
Sadly the less than attractive face...
The general lack of reputation for South Asian SPs...
Perhaps she'll join the many unreviewed Brits who are being kept secret by UKPers unwilling to share their unicorns.

[Stealthmode]

Agree with all the subsequent comments.

To me where @vIrGIn went wrong was the continued defence of the SP/tantamount to WK when he can’t know for sure if OP saw her or not.

We do not know what OP said to mods. If he chooses to keep it a secret up to him. But on my part the conclusion I am drawing from this review (albeit questionable) is until such time another punter fucks and reviews her then this is just another review and would not put me off from booking her.

Precisely. Not every negative review is necessarily of putting (altho this one is pretty bad), but what I mean is one man’s negative could be a positive to someone else. For example I dont partake in RO or DFK. So if it wasnt offered I wouldn’t mark her down. Someone else who is really into this (looking at King Tarzan), that would be a negative.

[scutty brown]

I'm rather inclined to question the OP's review record.
Ten reviews, seven negative, one neutral, and the positives look borderline. Some of the negatives are very thin on detail.
I've never met any of the girls involved, so can't comment on them, but..............taken together the ten reviews look to me like either an extreme case of bad luck, or an extreme case of shitstirring.

[king tarzan]

Precisely. Not every negative review is necessarily of putting (altho this one is pretty bad), but what I mean is one man’s negative could be a positive to someone else. For example I dont partake in RO or DFK. So if it wasnt offered I wouldn’t mark her down. Someone else who is really into this (looking at King Tarzan), that would be a negative.

certainly 

[LLPunting]

I'm rather inclined to question the OP's review record.
Ten reviews, seven negative, one neutral, and the positives look borderline. Some of the negatives are very thin on detail.
I've never met any of the girls involved, so can't comment on them, but..............taken together the ten reviews look to me like either an extreme case of bad luck, or an extreme case of shitstirring.

Or he's only fussed about posting warning to save other punters' money.

[Waterhouse]

Or he's only fussed about posting warning to save other punters' money.

This.

I didn’t detect or smell anything disingenuous about the OP's review.

virgin geezer on the other hand clearly had an agenda.  Good riddance.

[LLPunting]

This.

I didn’t detect or smell anything disingenuous about the OP's review.

virgin geezer on the other hand clearly had an agenda.  Good riddance.

Certainly he got over-zealous with the lobbying and accusations.  Perhaps stir crazy after no pussy during lockdown.  Dog with a boner 'n' all that. 

[Jerk Chicken]

Certainly he got over-zealous with the lobbying and accusations.  Perhaps stir crazy after no pussy during lockdown.  Dog with a boner 'n' all that. 

 

[LLPunting]

Take your pick: External Link/Members Only

[Waterhouse]

Take your pick: External Link/Members Only

“Pikachu... PIKACHUUUUU..!!”

[scutty brown]

Certainly he got over-zealous with the lobbying and accusations.  Perhaps stir crazy after no pussy during lockdown.  Dog with a boner 'n' all that. 

I'll agree with you there. From the outside looking in, I got the impression he had a case - but rabid argument isn't the way to do it.

[arrow0404]

Capturing her profile which is now updated with a reference to this review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Wow I wonder who the ‘mole’ is?

[PatMacGroin]

Hmmm...

Looks to me like v I r G I n made a good case, which was supported by comments from other members. It does seem like he took it a bit too far. Although, in my opinion that was because he was very confident he was correct and was desperate for vindication of his suspicions. As much as any desire to defend this particular WG.

To satisfy daviemac that this is a genuine review of this WG profile, I presume the OP must have PM'd screen shots of his booking texts. Texts which verified he saw a WG at a hotel in Ilford for £80 per half hour. Texts which are linked to this WG by the +447385592645 phone number confirmed by the SunnyJ post from July.

I can understand why the OP would not want to share those texts by posting them into this thread on an open forum. Without seeing those texts myself, and only reading through the post history, I would have been more inclined to believe vIrGIns assertion that the OP simply got the AW profile mixed up. I'm not interested in seeing this WG myself, but I'll be interested to see how future reviews describe her.