British Indian Aisha, Ilford - Worst SP in London (possibly the UK)! 0/10!

[jonloops]

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Initial Contact: was very slow in responding; but after initial response a booking and details were agreed; once I got to the location she guided me to her room (hotel)

Location: A popular hotel in Ilford.

Cost: 80 GBP for half hour.

The Meet: The worst meet that I have ever had. Far below the standards of even the worst 'Romanian' SP.

Having got to her room, she asks for payment even before the door has closed - it was so badly timed that the passer-by walking to his room must have heard her. I hand over the payment - she then leaves the room and I assume goes to her fellow friends room or her pimps room to bank the payment. She returns after a couple of minutes and throws a condom on the bed and asks me 'to get hard' and put it on (I prefer OW so wasn't too fussed, but her mannerisms pissed me off). This time she leaves for the restroom, again wasting a good 3-4 minutes doing fuck all. We are now probably a good 7-8 minutes in. She returns and tells me that the 'clock starts as soon as you walk into the room.' I was angry, but didn't complain. Now that she was on the bed I ask her to take her bra off so I can fondle her breasts and give them a good licking. Her response - 'I am a recent mother who has a child... I don't let anyone play with my breasts... my family has a history of breast cancer...' literally every excuse in the book. I was very close to asking her to get my money back so I can leave. She then concedes and lets me play with her breasts. After a couple of minutes she says 'you don't have long left' - even though we barely started and even on her own 'timer' there must have been at least 15-18 minutes left. She asks me to fuck her and I oblige and she tells me to finish quick... by this time I'd had enough of her and did my thing and left.

Easily the worst service provider in London and possibly the UK.
I regret not demanding my money back and I was close to asking her for a full/partial refund or I would have walked off with one of her phones... Decided to accept the loss and avoid trouble - god knows if this lunatic was carrying any weapons on her or not or if her pimp or friend(s) would have come running after me. Was not worth the risk. I'll never go for a profile with 0 reviews ever again.

The biggest waste of money in my life - No exaggeration.

[jeanphillipe]

there seems to be a pattern of new girls joining the scene, want the money but don't want to put in the work.

i am waiting for my cooldown period so havent reviewed yet, but i recently saw a girl stunning 10/10 body, definitely the hottest wg i've been with. however there was a lot of no doing this no touching that... are you sure you want to be an escort ?

[jonloops]

there seems to be a pattern of new girls joining the scene, want the money but don't want to put in the work.

i am waiting for my cooldown period so havent reviewed yet, but i recently saw a girl stunning 10/10 body, definitely the hottest wg i've been with. however there was a lot of no doing this no touching that... are you sure you want to be an escort ?

Appearance wise she was very good looking, extremely fit, flat stomache (deffo not someone who had recently had a child...).
Service wise and everything else she was a 0/10. An absolute disgrace to even call herself a 'service provider.'

[Stealthmode]

there seems to be a pattern of new girls joining the scene, want the money but don't want to put in the work.

i am waiting for my cooldown period so havent reviewed yet, but i recently saw a girl stunning 10/10 body, definitely the hottest wg i've been with. however there was a lot of no doing this no touching that... are you sure you want to be an escort ?

+1

Now upped her 30mins rate to £120. Definatley one to avoid. I personally would have request my money back or at least some of it and cut it short.

soon she’ll be asking for advance payments/deposits.

Pictures added in case this profile is shut down.

Thanks for warning everyone else.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[arrow0404]

External Link/Members Only


Her Verification pic

[Stealthmode]

stable mates/duos partners. Maybe approach with caution

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[sgc]

Definitely a good looking girl and I would have been tempted so thanks for the warning. What an absolute horrendous service. I think this might be one of the worst I have read on these forums.

[Meursault]

Great looking girl but what a rude and unprofessional rip-off merchant.

[Bornslippy]

sorry to hear. makes my previous bad punt seem amazing.
shame, she would have quite a few regulars if her service matched her looks/type

[Comicman]

Thanks for this sorry she was so crap she is well out of my price range so not for  me

[Marquis]

+1

Now upped her 30mins rate to £120. Definatley one to avoid. I personally would have request my money back or at least some of it and cut it short.

soon she’ll be asking for advance payments/deposits.

Pictures added in case this profile is shut down.

Thanks for warning everyone else.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Now £130 for 30 minutes!!!

[treadmill1]

Hi,

I agree with the above, called her to enquire but she had attitude on the phone therefore i did not go ahead.

[king tarzan]

there seems to be a pattern of new girls joining the scene, want the money but don't want to put in the work.

 but i recently saw a girl stunning 10/10 body, definitely the hottest wg i've been with. however there was a lot of no doing this no touching that... are you sure you want to be an escort ?

there are many out there who defend them.. yet when one writes in annoyance against  them then he is the one that gets chastised...
very odd world to shield the perpetrator of the annoyance yet attack the victim of the annoyance.. very odd..

[Xtro]

External Link/Members Only


Her Verification pic

Better quality - External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[arrow0404]

Better quality - External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Cheers - happy girl isn’t she

[Xtro]

Cheers - happy girl isn’t she

Life and soul of the party by the looks of it!   

Phone - +447385592645      07385592645

Another pic....

Hidden Image/Members Only

[joninbristol]

Thanks for the tipoffs, two blacklisted for the price of one. Appreciated

[v I r G I n]

Sure the OP has got the correct profile? These new on the scene girls operate from West London, not Ilford. I recently saw the Chinese bird before she vanished and they all operate from a plush apartment in Hammersmith. As far as I'm aware they've not operated outside of this area.

[TTGR]

So OP posts yesterday where it’s £80 huh
......Make that £130 for a half hour now.......!!

  

I can only imagine blokes are seeing ‘Asian Indian girl’, cock stiffening from the pics without understanding the content of the review properly and mad rushing to her Ilford door for action. 

Letting down the side guys. 

[v I r G I n]

British Indian Aisha
+447385592645
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Expensive
Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

This was late July, location was and still is the same, prices are exactly the same, they've not dropped since the start, deffo never £80 for 1/2 hr. Check the images.

IMO the OP has his facts wrong and has reviewed the wrong girl. Must have seen another profile with similar sounding name. This one does NOT add up.

[v I r G I n]

OP needs to state exact date of meeting and confirm if the photos match. But I am confident that this is the wrong girl he is reviewing.

[v I r G I n]

My money (and my house if I had one) is he has seen this SP, no way does the other one match up with regards to both location and price etc. External Link/Members Only

Also works from a hotel (other girl does not) and has had 3/3 previous negative reviews, all very similar to this one. Next time OP you need to make sure you have the correct girl in your review!

[sunnyj]

This was late July, location was and still is the same, prices are exactly the same, they've not dropped since the start, deffo never £80 for 1/2 hr. Check the images.

IMO the OP has his facts wrong and has reviewed the wrong girl. Must have seen another profile with similar sounding name. This one does NOT add up.

Good spot v I r G I n
I have her in my HL and didn't see her price dropping to £80/hh or change location but was not checking her profile every day. OP need to clarify it.

[daviemac]

OP needs to state exact date of meeting and confirm if the photos match. But I am confident that this is the wrong girl he is reviewing.

No he doesn't, he can confirm who he saw without giving any dates.

[v I r G I n]

No he doesn't, he can confirm who he saw without giving any dates.

I only asked because if the OP mentioned when the meeting actually took place then it would help collaborate as to which SP he saw. British Indian Aisha last logged in on the 13th Aug (at time of this post). That was nearly a week ago.

[sunnyj]

I only asked because if the OP mentioned when the meeting actually took place then it would help collaborate as to which SP he saw. British Indian Aisha last logged in on the 13th Aug (at time of this post). That was nearly a week ago.

It's not required for OP to mention the exact date of the meeting, as it can be used by the SPs/pimps to out the punters . He just need to reconfirm the price and the location.
Last logged is not an indication that she is working or not.

[v I r G I n]

It's not required for OP to mention the exact date of the meeting, as it can be used by the SPs/pimps to out the punters . He just need to reconfirm the price and the location.
Last logged is not an indication that she is working or not.

Well OP's been online since I posted but has not followed up. IMHO he's reviewed the wrong girl. And I know last login isn't representative of whether an SP is working or not but with this group, usually they only have their green light on and have logged in the same day to let know the fact they're currently available for bookings. Anyway perhaps the OP would care to shed some light on  the inconsistencies that are clearly apparent?

[Neil197]

That must be one of the worst reviews I’ve ever read.

Makes the terrible visit I made to Poppy in Mitcham last month seem amazing in comparison.

[v I r G I n]

This is clearly a false review or a review that's intended for a different WG.

OP has gone a bit quiet hasn't he? He's been online several times and still has not bothered to put the record straight.

[LLPunting]

This is clearly a false review or a review that's intended for a different WG.

OP has gone a bit quiet hasn't he? He's been online several times and still has not bothered to put the record straight.

Why are you white knighting the other girl you think is using this profile?

Why not show us who else was/is using it?  And tell us why you're convinced it's different or his comments aren't warranted.

Presume you won't go quiet all of a sudden.

[Gambitman92]

Why are you white knighting the other girl you think is using this profile?

Why not show us who else was/is using it?  And tell us why you're convinced it's different or his comments aren't warranted.

Presume you won't go quiet all of a sudden.

I don't see it as him white knighting, Virgin actually saw the Chinese girl that works with Aisha, this crew usually works in Hammersmith. I did see this Indian girls profile when she first made it and then again a few times last week, the price has stayed the same, never saw her location change or the price go down to £80/30mins.

The OP might have seen this girl but we need more information, a false or misleading review helps no one.

[LLPunting]

I don't see it as him white knighting, Virgin actually saw the Chinese girl that works with Aisha, this crew usually works in Hammersmith. I did see this Indian girls profile when she first made it and then again a few times last week, the price has stayed the same, never saw her location change or the price go down to £80/30mins.

The OP might have seen this girl but we need more information, a false or misleading review helps no one.

Apologies to Virgin.

Whilst girls can move from one location to another within a day let alone from one to the next it's unlikely they drop their half hour price by 50 momentarily without promotional fanfare.  So the price quoted may be wrong or the time bought just as much as this wasn't the profile of the girl he saw.  His past reporting would indicate her advertised price is in his range.

Awaiting Virgin's review of Jas. 

[Jerk Chicken]

OP I do think you need to clarify who you fucked. You can clearly see it it is being challenged, you log on but so far have gone missing.

Nothing wrong in holding your hands up and say sorry chaps I got the wrong girl. Punters have known to post fake reviews after being rejected by the SP for whatever reason. I would like to think you do not fall into this category.

We look forward to your clarification.

[v I r G I n]

There is no white knighting here. This review is incorrect because there are some fundamental key facts that I have raised (and that have been backed up by at least two members on here, thanks @Gambitman92 @sunnyj), which have yet to be addressed by the OP.

When I saw the Chinese bird I actually bumped into the Indian girl afterward and had a very brief chat with her. I asked Aisha why her rates were much higher than the other girls she worked with and she told me it was simply demand. She was able to charge higher. Thus she was never offering lower than the advertised rates of £130/ £160.

So OP sees a young British Indian WG for £80 half HR. Don't think so, how many of these do you see around at that price with a full service list like that?

[Jerk Chicken]

There is no white knighting here. This review is incorrect because there are some fundamental key facts that I have raised (and that have been backed up by at least two members on here, thanks @Gambitman92 @sunnyj), which have yet to be addressed by the OP.

When I saw the Chinese bird I actually bumped into the Indian girl afterward and had a very brief chat with her. I asked Aisha why her rates were much higher than the other girls she worked with and she told me it was simply demand. She was able to charge higher. Thus she was never offering lower than the advertised rates of £130/ £160.

So OP sees a young British Indian WG for £80 half HR. Don't think so, how many of these do you see around at that price with a full service list like that?

Sounds to me OP has simply got the wrong girl. As far as I am aware there is no Indian SP selling her pussy for 80 queensheads a pop/per half hour.

There was talk in another thread she might not be Indian. Did she look Indian to you?

[arrow0404]

Sounds to me OP has simply got the wrong girl. As far as I am aware there is no Indian SP selling her pussy for 80 queensheads a pop/per half hour.

There was talk in another thread she might not be Indian. Did she look Indian to you?

Don’t think she’s Roma/ gypsy as stupid as it may sound if you look at the verification photo the writing it’s not a typical EE style ( especially the number ‘1’ )

Maybe I’m looking to much into it      

[v I r G I n]

Sounds to me OP has simply got the wrong girl. As far as I am aware there is no Indian SP selling her pussy for 80 queensheads a pop/per half hour.

There was talk in another thread she might not be Indian. Did she look Indian to you?

Well I did post this link: External Link/Members Only

To be honest I highly believe this is the correct one who the OP saw who is charging £80hh. If you read this genius but now delisted review you'll see it's very, very similar.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=181795.msg1913458#msg1913458

With regards to Aisha, I can't say for sure that's she's 100% Indian, because I only saw her very briefly, but I can say she is British as she speaks with a London accent.

[sunnyj]

Don’t think she’s Roma/ gypsy as stupid as it may sound if you look at the verification photo the writing it’s not a typical EE style ( especially the number ‘1’ )

Maybe I’m looking to much into it    

Her heritage can be Arabic/Persian/Indian/Pakistani/Gypsy/Latin. 
Good attention to detail.  We need to see verification pics of other WGs from this group to check who wrote their verification paper. In this below case which I found in South East region, all are written by their pimp
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=105000.msg2881901#msg2881901

[leicesterstudent]

I've actually met British Indian Aisha on fabswingers before, she was on there with her boyfriend at the time. She is Bengali but born/raised in London.

Based on my experience, she was really shy and submissive. Doubt she'd be as abrassive as OP is suggesting

We have each other on social media and from what she says it seems like OP has the wrong girl. She hasn't been in Ilford. Attached part of her insta photo as proof

Photo removed as per rule #22.

[daviemac]

I've actually met British Indian Aisha on fabswingers before, she was on there with her boyfriend at the time. She is Bengali but born/raised in London.

Based on my experience, she was really shy and submissive. Doubt she'd be as abrassive as OP is suggesting

We have each other on social media and from what she says it seems like OP has the wrong girl. She hasn't been in Ilford. Attached part of her insta photo as proof

Photo removed as per rule #22.

There's a link to the rules at the bottom of every page, it might pay you to read them. Only photos from bona fide service provider adverts are allowed.

You seem to have a habit of posting spurious photos, just so there is absolutely no misunderstanding the relevant rule is quoted below.

22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.To clarify this means no personal photos at all from anywhere. Phone numbers may be posted in full if the number is anywhere online on an advert, personal numbers not allowed. Hotels may be named but not room numbers
 General description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and/or street names. Modeling, porn, and media-related work are acceptable to be posted, even if it includes their real names as they actively sought publicity / higher-profile. Any news items may be posted. All aforementioned restrictions do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of reasons.

[v I r G I n]

Appears the OP doesn't have the balls to admit he's reviewed the wrong SP. This review should be rescinded.

I will say this again, this review is entirely false and misleading for the girl that was mentioned.

[daviemac]

Appears the OP doesn't have the balls to admit he's reviewed the wrong SP. This review should be rescinded.

I will say this again, this review is entirely false and misleading for the girl that was mentioned.

So you keep saying, until the OP confirms one way or another, members will form their own opinions on the validity of this review based on the information available within this thread.

[leicesterstudent]

There's a link to the rules at the bottom of every page, it might pay you to read them. Only photos from bona fide service provider adverts are allowed.

You seem to have a habit of posting spurious photos, just so there is absolutely no misunderstanding the relevant rule is quoted below.

22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp.To clarify this means no personal photos at all from anywhere. Phone numbers may be posted in full if the number is anywhere online on an advert, personal numbers not allowed. Hotels may be named but not room numbers
 General description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and/or street names. Modeling, porn, and media-related work are acceptable to be posted, even if it includes their real names as they actively sought publicity / higher-profile. Any news items may be posted. All aforementioned restrictions do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of reasons.

ah I didn't know, thanks for the info

[Animalbeast]

In two minds about this.
On the one hand. Whether or not the review linked correct escort:  It’s imperative he says he did or confirms that he didn’t. Because now we have people either avoiding a girl based on mistaken identity, or if he didn’t link the wrong profile some might assume he did and book a terrible escort.

On the other hand I’m suspicious of people who can vouch for certain of an escorts daily whereabouts and then also just happen to have bumped into her spoke to her about her price being higher etc all this after meeting her flatmate?  Seems too convenient.... perhaps people with more knowledge of the escort trying make up stories to explain their knowledge?

[pewpewpew]

Can we all just take a step back? OP is the only one to review this girl. If there are others who have had a good experience with this girl where are the reviews? If there is nothing other than someone once spoke to a cousin of a friend who went to school with an SP who shared a flat for a weekend with this girl or whatever the story is then let's leave it at that. If people want to take a chance and see her they can leave a review after and people can make up their own minds.

[James]

shes bloody ugly and does look rom. Id give her a negative just for this

[Jerk Chicken]

Sorry I think this review is a load of bull.

I am suspicious of posters who log in can clearly see their review is being challenged but instead hide behind their keyboard.

#justsaying

[daviemac]

Sorry I think this review is a load of bull.

I am suspicious of posters who log in can clearly see their review is being challenged but instead hide behind their keyboard.

#justsaying

Still waiting for the OP to log in again in order to reply to the questions asked.

[Jerk Chicken]

Still waiting for the OP to log in again in order to reply to the questions asked.

OP last logged in August 19, by then we were on post #25 with significant challenges from@vIrgIn and some others. His account on face value simply does not match the profile in terms of price and location.

Silence is golden as they say!

[daviemac]

OP last logged in August 19, by then we were on post #25 with significant challenges from@vIrgIn and some others. His account on face value simply does not match the profile in terms of price and location.

Silence is golden as they say!

I'm waiting for the OP to log in again to answer the questions I have asked.