SILKSTOCKINGS69 - Eltham

[385North]

SILKSTOCKINGS69: External Link/Members Only

SERVICES: 1 hour in-call (£110)

PHYSICAL: Petite 50-something, around 5'3". Slim but not especially toned. Physically fit and energetic. Tattoos here and there. Shoulder-length hair. Boobs are a handful; slight sagging. Fanny trimmed up top and shaved down below. Facially, OK - neither stunning or otherwise. Looks her age.

VENUE: Approx 10 minutes walk from Eltham train station. Shabby-looking road that's lined with grey, pebble-dashed, semi-detached council houses. Parked the car a few doors away (permit holders only between 10:30 - 12:30pm). Property was clean inside. Bedroom small, but adequate (with radio playing). Bathroom fitted for disabled access.

ABOUT: Arrived early, texted SilkStockings to confirm and was inside and upstairs by 1pm as arranged. Payment made. Having showered before I left home SilkStockings was happy to get straight down to it. Round 1: DFK, nipple-biting (me receiving), fingering, RO, OWO, 69, cowgirl (facing, reverse, sitting/squatting). Round 2: DKF, missionary, doggy. Chatted for a bit. Dressed. Bit more DFK behind the front door. Left.

POSITIVES:
- Great attitude and level of service
- Very, very, enthusiastic kisser - full on DFK throughout (although probably at WGs discretion)
- Nice lettuce leaves, if you like fanny au naturel
- Proactive: I almost called it a day after R1 but SilkStockings kept going at it.

NEUTRALS:
- Dowdy looks wont suite everyone.
- Services fairly vanilla.

NEGATIVES:
- Outfit requested with booking, but not accommodated. Not a deal breaker for me.
- Area a bit sub-prime. Probably wouldn't leave car parked there after dark.

OTHER: Got the impression other entities were present in the house.

OVERALL:
Happy. £110 well spent. Would visit again.

[ampithestud1]

Offered me BB for £30 right before the action was about to start 

Needless to say I walked

[385North]

Offered me BB for £30 right before the action was about to start 

Needless to say I walked

And yet, no review to warn other punters. When was this?

[hornypnter]

I have been exchanging messages on AW and was planning on seeing her.
Although like your review - now I am not sure 

[LLPunting]

And yet, no review to warn other punters. When was this?

You'd know if you just searched her AW ID.

[385North]

You'd know if you just searched her AW ID.

Still should have posted a separate review though so that's it's indexed with the others. Wouldn't you if you had made a booking, turned and and was offered BB? I know I would. As a result I searched reviews only, after ampithestud1 added his comments to the BB thread and missed it entirely.

[Xtro]

Still should have posted a separate review though so that's it's indexed with the others. Wouldn't you if you had made a booking, turned and and was offered BB? I know I would. As a result I searched reviews only, after ampithestud1 added his comments to the BB thread and missed it entirely.

Cheers for the review.   

Sorry to hear about this mate. Get yourself checked anyway.

UKP is a great resource and to be fair, ampithestud1 did post it in the relevant thread -
London / Re: Bareback Avoidance Thread - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=128980.msg2908000#msg2908000
Hence, it is important to search the complete site and not just "reviews only".

Incidentally, what prompted to to want to see her after reading her Negative review and what looks like "pimp" comments on that thread trying to defend her?   

[385North]

Cheers for the review.   

Sorry to hear about this mate. Get yourself checked anyway.

UKP is a great resource and to be fair, ampithestud1 did post it in the relevant thread -
London / Re: Bareback Avoidance Thread - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=128980.msg2908000#msg2908000
Hence, it is important to search the complete site and not just "reviews only".

Incidentally, what prompted to to want to see her after reading her Negative review and what looks like "pimp" comments on that thread trying to defend her?   

Indeed it is.

What prompted me to see her? Liked the look of her, spoke to her in person on the phone beforehand, discussed services in advance, she didn't sound like a time waster, although based on Shagbambi's previous review from in 2017 I was prepared for a no show upon arrival, but as it happens I had a great time. I was also planning on a return visit next week. I always discuss services beforehand, including sex: protected, rather than asking a WG what she offers when we meet for the first time, so maybe that's why I never received the same offer as ampithestud1.

[ampithestud1]

Still should have posted a separate review though so that's it's indexed with the others. Wouldn't you if you had made a booking, turned and and was offered BB? I know I would. As a result I searched reviews only, after ampithestud1 added his comments to the BB thread and missed it entirely.

Our meeting never went ahead due to her offer of BB so IMO it didn't warrant a review, just a mention of the most important bit and a warning to fellow punters. I always look up WGs on UKP using their IDs to ensure I get all possible intel on them, e.g. profile verification pics, that may be missing on review threads. I can only suggest you do the same.

[ampithestud1]

Indeed it is.

What prompted me to see her? Liked the look of her, spoke to her in person on the phone beforehand, discussed services in advance, she didn't sound like a time waster, although based on Shagbambi's previous review from in 2017 I was prepared for a no show upon arrival, but as it happens I had a great time. I was also planning on a return visit next week. I always discuss services beforehand, including sex: protected, rather than asking a WG what she offers when we meet for the first time, so maybe that's why I never received the same offer as ampithestud1.

Just to respond to your last statement there, I did agree all services with her beforehand. She happened to mention the BB price (unsolicited) when I queried the price of a rimjob on the day / in person.