To be fair, she has always been very good and professional towards me.... when something goes wrong in my opinion she instantly gets demonised, which is unfair.. there are two sides to a coin, as there are two sides to paper...
If she is in the wrong then fairy play criticism is applicable.. if she is in the right then good for her to stand her ground..
As i have stated very professional hottie and for radio silence there must of been a good reason.
Beyond that who knows..
Example Katalina gave me horrendous experience.. yet there are punters who will say she is a great service provider..
Mr Smith for example i find is always very open minded and gives a fair point of view, without being a shield for her..
This is the problem here where you say; for radio silence there must of been a good reason, you cant know that that is true or not, yes you can give your opinion of the WG which is up to you but who knows the real reason for radio silence except the WG herself.
You mention Katalina the difference is I wouldn't post because her comms were always great with me that there must be a reason her comms were radio silence for another punter. I wouldn't have a clue why they were radio silent for another punter so wouldn't post that. And an example of this with Kat was you kept saying she was off her head on drugs when you had dealings with her, well I didn't say she wasn't as I wasn't their. I did say I had not experienced her off her head on drugs myself. I stick to what I know not what I cant know.
The fact is all a reviewer can do is go on his OWN experience with a WG, another or others defending her when it was HIM that experienced her is no help on UKP in my view. Even good WGs can turn bad, I had it recently with Amy Amazon, great for many punts then a complete cunt with a bad attitude out of the blue, neg review done.
Topic: English Anabella (Read 5297 times)