Long story short...You are white knighting for these hoes. Disappointing. They would not do the same for you. I've never seen a WG defend punters the way some punters are willing to die by the sword for these hoes 
. Outstanding and astonishing 
.
Long story short: I am actually female and a WG who was able to successfully reconcile my job (and yes, it's just a job) with a long-term relationship. I have also defended punters numerous times against the radfem crazies and "normal people" who paint all of you as abusers and rapists. After reading this thread, I have decided to offer a WG perspective on this matter,
based on personal experience, and hopefully create some balance to the mostly damning views expressed on this thread.
So let's go...
Point 1. Oh really? Then how do you end up in a relationship with a WG in the first place? Normal guys with a backbone are not putting up with any of what you said.
Well, according to the rest of population outside of escorting and punting, "normal guys with a backbone" aren't even paying for pussy. Do you really wanna do down this route?
How do you end up in a relationship with a WG? Well, he either meets a girl on the job or meets her in the civvy setting. I met my partner in the "normal life" and he knew me first of all by the real name. He was told very early on and whilst he initially had similar reservations to many of you guys here, we did have very open and honest discussion about this and and he has accepted it over time once he recognised it for what it is - a job. He has not rejected me over it, never threw it in my face, never called me a name and was able to see me as a whole person. The escorting and civvy life is kept strictly separate as well, he doesn't want to hear about it nor I want to dwell on it. It's simply a sideline of mine that he knows exists, yet has zero effect on our relationship. If and when we decide to take it onto the next level, I am happy to quit when I am ready to do so.
Point 2. Yes, so if you met her as a punter and liked her you have no chance in hell because of point one of what you stated. So that is discredited, normal guys who are not punters are likely not going to put up with it again. So.....
I am not a punter. I am a living breathing example of a WG who was able to make it work.
Point 3. That is likely not true in the long term. If you look at it on a hourly basis and extrapolate it for amount of clients per day for a certain period of time it would look like that. This does not count void periods of no customers, sick days, expenses, burnout, terrible spending habits etc. When COVID hit who was one of the groups that got hit the worst? Sex workers. They ain't got money like that. Enough punters have been scammed by WGs but it's ok because these WGs earned more than them right?
Great to see you sweeping WGs as having "terrible spending habits". Add also that we don't pay any tax and cannot count to ten. Sorry, wrong. I and several friends of mine were able to save big sums of money, make investments with it and buy properties. At least three that I personally know are running their own small businesses or are now self-employed in fields different from escorting, the shift funded with their escorting money. This is honest money and nobody was robbed. Not sure what you mean by 'scamming', do you mean the high fees WGs charge? Surely punters know what the rates are and nobody forces them to pay those rates? Do you feel scammed when paying for sex in the first place?
Point 4. I agree to an extent but realistically the men that go along with it will likely try to save the woman in the end and it goes pear shaped.
Realistically, mine did not ever attempt to 'save' me from anything. He knows this is something I do for my own reasons and will quit it once certain goals are met. By that time I am hoping to make enough for long-term investments and start a different, non-SW career path that pays better than the existing one. I also held a 'normal job' for years before making the jump to full-time few years ago. I don't expect him to ever match those earnings or to be a walking wallet either.
Point 5. Not sure where that is coming from, who's going to feel special about "loyalty" by a WG? Most men don't want their woman fucking other men. What loyalty is there, the relationship is already open sexually as she is fucking other men, there is no exclusivity between the man and the WG. It's an open relationship physically. Mental loyalty? What worth does that have exactly when they could get the same from a woman that is not a WG? This is some fluffy white knight BS.
Of course, I mean who on Earth would feel happy to have a loyal partner in someone as inferior as a WG, right? They're lesser people, a far cry from those pristine sinless vanilla girls who may preach all day about "self-respect" whilst hooking up with some randoms off Tinder for absolutely nothing.
Loyalty means different things to different people. Of course we can disagree on the definition of it. For you it can mean she's locked in the house in a chastity belt and never even looks at another man. *
For me and my partner*, loyalty is far beyond sexual. It means that if a punter or any man wants to push his number to my hand behind my partner's back, he gets a kick in the bollocks. It also means that I am able to cancel a high earning punt if this means being "there" for my partner when needed. Loyalty is also when he knows that no amount of cash and decent dicking is able to sway me away from him. Equally, I know that if a hot naked woman dances in front of his face, there is nothing to worry about as he is mine. Think about it next time the Mrs gets batshit mad when she catches you checking someone else out.
Maybe it's just my view, but I'd rather be upfront and let him make an informed choice, rather than playing as some sort of Holy Virgin Mary to his face whilst going behind his back.
Sure, you can get the same from a non-WG woman. Go for it. But you cannot state unequivocally that a woman who is a sex worker couldn't possibly be capable of loyalty or be unworthy of a "normal" relationship. Because guess what, behind our sexy personas, quite a few of us are actually "normal". Chances are you already know "one of those" without even knowing it. I wonder if you'd say those things to her face if it turned out to be your daughter, your sister or a good female friend. Always interesting to see the change in tune when those worthless dirty hookers suddenly stop being just an abstract concept you can anonymously pick apart on the internet but materialise as someone you know.
Point 6. A chick getting fucked by punters on a day to day is not going to be tired enough to fuck her partner? So if she fucked 3-5 guys in one day and they were all 1 hour sessions with lots of physical activity all of a sudden you are going to come along with your hard on as the next guy to fuck and suck but because you are the boyfriend you'll get special sex? Huh???????? Is that really realistic?
Look, I understand that a lot of men are not able to see the WG as a person, stop defining her through the lenses of her job and just can't handle it. I understand that many men won't be able to look past all those cocks. That's perfectly fine.
How it works here? Well, I work a few days a month and don't see my guy every day. On days I do see him, there are no punts. I block time out for him. So if your imagination wandered to some dramatic image of me coming to him with smudgy makeup, torn stockings and getting kissy kissy whilst glazed over in spunk at the end of the day, like in some cuckold porn, sorry to disappoint
As to the quality of sex itself - of course it's better than paid sex. Why? Because there is mutual attraction, more time to explore preferences, it's natural, it's unconstricted, it's genuine and there is intimacy which won't be replicated by the best GFE for any amount of money. Again, apples and oranges.
Haha sorry but I can't think of an instance I was too tired to shag my guy. Why would I not want to put all the effort with someone I actually like? That'd be a sin
Point 7. That could be true for the women you know but alot of members on her have stated plenty of examples of WGs for people to in general be wary of dealing with WGs outside of punting meets.
Yes, fortunately myself, and many of the fellow WGs I have made friends with over the years, do not fit the damning stereotypes that are present on this thread and also in the wider society. This is exactly why I have made my comment here in the first place. I do appreciate that a lot of guys do have bad experiences with WGs, and indeed some WGs do have drug abuse problems/mental health issues/messy lives that lead them to take this up as a profession, some are indeed unfit to have a relationship with. My point is - it's perhaps more sensible to look at each WG on individual basis, as opposed to tarring them with the same broad brush. Don't you know how society sees punters? Well, "normal people" may say that all punters are some greasy ugly creepy losers who cannot pull women "the normal way" so they have to pay for it. The "normal people" claim that "real men don't pay". And my all-time favourite: "
good that hookers exist so the creeps and rapists can also have their release".
Not nice to hear that bullshit and get judged due to your hobby, is it? Then please do extend the same courtesy before defining women and judging their worth and capabilities as partners solely by their jobs. You don't know anything else about the woman selling sex apart from the fact she's selling sex. We, just like punters, come from all walks of life and backgrounds.
Peace
