Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Lexi – Type A agency girl (Peachy, Admiral, Diva, etc) – Excellent in every way  (Read 10009 times)

Jason

  • Guest
MEETING DETAILS:
Escort name: Lexi
Website: External Link/Members Only
Agency phone number: 07531989898
Date of Visit: 10/04/2014, Time of Visit: 14:30, Type of Visit: Incall 
Time Spent: 1 hours, Fee Paid: £150

PREAMBLE:
I decided to write this review due to my one-year anniversary of membership in this forum. The review is about Lexi (also listed as Lexy and other different names elsewhere) who is a “type A” agency girl as that is defined here. I booked her through Peachy escorts agency. Overall the punt was excellent and Lexi is magnificent. 

ABOUT THE VENUE: (mostly positive)
Lexi’s place is located close to Earls Court tube station (10 mins walk) and Kensington High Street station (14mins walk). The postcode is W14  on the borders with SW5 and W8. The location is safe and discreet and the property is a shared (with 2 other girls) ground floor apartment comprising of 2 smallish bedrooms and a nice clean bathroom. Overall a very nice place.  As an aside I will say that the flat also has a (non-accessible to clients) large reception room and a fitted kitchen which leads to a private garden. As its monthly rent rate is around £2500 I guess that Lexi and her friend Electra might also be using the property as a residence.

ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PHYSICAL APPEARANCE: (positive)
Lexi is a very beautiful, young, Eastern European (Romanian) girl in her early twenties (she says she is 21 y.o. and she doesn’t look older than this). The gallery pictures of Lexi in her several agency profiles are genuine and the body measurements stated in her profile are correct. To summarise: beautiful face, brown curly hair, slim body, height 1.72m/5ft 8in (barefeet), natural 34C tits, nice ass, silky smooth skin. According to my picture-calibrated female beauty scale (which you may read in this thread), her overall attractiveness is 9.4/10 (face score: 8.8/10 & body score: 9.8/10).  From her gallery the most representative pictures about her face are the four shown below which albeit photoshopped match the reality remarkably accurately (90-95%).

Hidden Image/Members Only

ABOUT THE ESCORT’S PERSONALITY AND OTHER FACTS: (positive)
Lexi is warm, welcoming, friendly, smiling, easy to talk to, outgoing, extrovert, naughty, kinky, passionate and a lot of fun to be with. She has been in UK since 2012 and she speaks fluent English. I would say that her English level is currently B2/C1 (Vantage or upper intermediate/Advanced) as that is defined by External Link/Members Only.

ABOUT THE MEETING:
(A) Meeting arrangement: (positive)
I phoned “Peachy escorts” agency the day before the meeting to enquire about 3 girls (External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only) as they all work in the same flat with my first choice being Lexi. The (female) receptionist had a very good attitude, was very assisting and polite and confirmed that all three girls are available and provide proper FK and DFK. I asked to book a meeting at around 2pm but that I will confirm on the day. I phoned the agency again at 13:00 on 10/04 (male receptionist now) and made a confirmed booking for 2.30pm. They texted me back immediately the full address and told me once I get there to ring the bell of the ground floor and the girl should be waiting for me.

(B) During the meeting: (positive)
The door was opened by a different girl (good looking) and she told me that Lexi is going to come in a moment. Indeed half a minute later Lexi appeared wearing a white version of the same lingerie she is wearing in the pictures shown above (i.e. the two pictures on the left). Once we went to the bedroom formalities swiftly disposed of and I went to the bathroom to have a quick shower.

On my return she had already put some music on her iphone and the fun time began. We started with passionate French kissing (with tongue) with both lying on the bed and slowly undressing each other (nb I didn't go to the bathroom naked so I was wearing my pants and inner T-shirt when I returned from it). We were both soon fully naked and we went down to each other in turn before going to 69. We then started having protected vaginal penetration sex starting with missionary with body to body contact with DFK, then other missionary variations, then her riding me cowgirl, then went doggy, going hot at the standing doggy position (aka External Link/Members Only), then again further missionary, a brief break for a blowjob, then a spoon position. For the final part I requested her to put back her clothes and do some striptease while she was giving me a handjob. Finally I came on her body. By the way before cumming I questioned about CIF/CIM just to see whether they are provided but she said “no” (no problem from me though as I wasn’t intending to do CIF or CIM anyway). During the 40 minute relentless penetration pounding she was quite energetic and enthusiastic, she seemed to enjoy herself and she never rushed me to cum. At the end of the meeting we had a shower together and had some fun with the suds.

French kissing was the true highlight of the entire encounter. It was very passionate, deep and continuous. Our FK styles were very compatible a fact that played some role. We also spiced things up with some naughty tongue sucking, lip sucking /(slight biting) and changing positions (e.g. from cowgirl to mish) by rolling on the bed while French kissing and dirty talking.

There was no time-wasting, no clockwatching and no rushing at all from Lexi and we actually slightly overrun (by 2-3 minutes). I left her flat with a big smile on my face thinking that this was £150 worth spent (every single penny of them).

CONCLUSIONS & FINAL VERDICT:
Overall a genuinely fun, passionate and unrushed punt with a beautiful, friendly and skilful girl. I will definitely meet her again (and for many times if she maintains the same high standard) and I can highly recommend her to everyone without hesitation. Put it that way: If you are in the area of Earl’s Court/Kensington Olympia and you have £150 to spend on an escort don't think twice: Book Lexi for 1hr during early afternoon.

DETAILED SCORES ABOUT THE ESCORT:
Attractiveness/Beauty: 9.4/10 (face score: 8.8/10; body score: 9.8/10)
Patience & Politeness/Friendliness: 10/10
Willingness to please: 9.8/10
Participation, enthusiasm & expression of enjoy: 9.8/10
Available services: 9.6/10
Quality of available services: 9.9/10
Hygiene Standard: 10/10
Sex Protection Standard: 10/10
Health level & Energy: 10/10 
English level: 9.2/10
Smoker status: Smoker
Tattoos: None
Piercings: None
Quality/price ratio: Fair

Profiles of Lexi in several type A agencies:
1. Lexi, Peachy escorts:  External Link/Members Only
2. Lexy, Admiral escorts: External Link/Members Only
3. Lexy, Loyalty escorts: External Link/Members Only
4. Lexy, London001Escorts: External Link/Members Only
5. Angel, Diva escorts: External Link/Members Only
6. Imogen, Angels of London: External Link/Members Only

Previous feedback about Lexi in her agency profiles: External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only

password02

  • Guest
Nice well written review Jason - Quick Q? would she be better off with working as a indi? and maybe do a price at £130 ph instead of the agency taking a 25-30% cut of the £150 ph.


Offline Johny Stone


Stealthshagger

  • Guest
Very organised and useful review. Thanks. Might be worth sending the aw details to her, so she could earn more and punters pay less, by bypassing the agency pimp fee.


mrhappypants

  • Guest
Hmm not sure if she has picked up on stealthshagger's suggestion but it looks like she is no longer listed on the peachy website...

Jason

  • Guest
Lexi is currently on holidays and Peachy does not list the girls that are on holidays. Same applies for her flatmate Electra. Once they return they will be listed in Peachy escorts again. The other agencies have them listed clearly as "on holidays".

As I explained in this thread the vast majority of these “Type A” agency girls PREFER working for agencies for various reasons despite the cut that the agencies get. The irony is that some of you wrongly believe that all girls advertising on AW (that are not distinctly listed as belonging to a group/agency) are necessarily independent because they display an individual phone number where you can call “them” “directly” on, or that you can “confirm” services with “them” or that you are bypassing a pimping fee. Nothing could be further from the truth… And if anything these Type A agency girls do not belong exclusively to a certain agency and as they are effectively really independent - there is always a chance that once you meet them through an agency - provided you are a good and respectful - to be able to arrange meetings with them directly. That doesn't mean though that you will necessarily have any reduction in the fee – just the girl will get 1/3 more for the first hour in her pocket (but even so better that way than this money to go to an agent/pimp).

Stealthshagger

  • Guest
Lexi is currently on holidays and Peachy does not list the girls that are on holidays. Same applies for her flatmate Electra. Once they return they will be listed in Peachy escorts again. The other agencies have them listed clearly as "on holidays".

As I explained in this thread the vast majority of these “Type A” agency girls PREFER working for agencies for various reasons despite the cut that the agencies get. The irony is that some of you wrongly believe that all girls advertising on AW (that are not distinctly listed as belonging to a group/agency) are necessarily independent because they display an individual phone number where you can call “them” “directly” on, or that you can “confirm” services with “them” or that you are bypassing a pimping fee. Nothing could be further from the truth… And if anything these Type A agency girls do not belong exclusively to a certain agency and as they are effectively really independent - there is always a chance that once you meet them through an agency - provided you are a good and respectful - to be able to arrange meetings with them directly. That doesn't mean though that you will necessarily have any reduction in the fee – just the girl will get 1/3 more for the first hour in her pocket (but even so better that way than this money to go to an agent/pimp).

I did not mean to imply that all a.w. WGs are independent, but in this case I simply meant that if she is good at her job, upfront etc, then it might benefit her as well as punters if the agency were cut out. In hypothetical numbers, if a WG charged £150 an hour through an agency, and the agency took £50 of it, then the punter and the WG would do well if she were on AW and did £120 an hour, for example.  If she is indie but with an agency, she could be on aw too, I assume?

My objection is not knowing who is behind the agencies, or which are bad. I also dont like someone else profiting off the services...that could be the case for someone I met on AW, but I wouldnt know it. With agencies I do.

Jason

  • Guest
I did not mean to imply that all a.w. WGs are independent, but in this case I simply meant that if she is good at her job, upfront etc, then it might benefit her as well as punters if the agency were cut out. In hypothetical numbers, if a WG charged £150 an hour through an agency, and the agency took £50 of it, then the punter and the WG would do well if she were on AW and did £120 an hour, for example.  If she is indie but with an agency, she could be on aw too, I assume?

My objection is not knowing who is behind the agencies, or which are bad. I also dont like someone else profiting off the services...that could be the case for someone I met on AW, but I wouldnt know it. With agencies I do.
As I said I don't think that if these Type A agency girls also had an AW profile they would necessarily charge less for the first hour (despite the fact that now the agency takes a fee equal to 1/3 of the first hour here £50 for £150). "Semi-independent" type A agency girls (semi-independent meaning they are advertise both in agencies and on AW) do exist but are very few anyway as all of these girls prefer to get work from agencies. Yes, some girls, as indies, may charge £50 less for the first hour (like for example Alice Tulip: External Link/Members Only Vs External Link/Members Only) but Jordan, for example, who is also a semi-independent escort, charges the same (£200ph) both as independent in her (now not very active) External Link/Members Only (previously known as Kelly Doll) and in External Link/Members Only. Also Kessy (another semi-indie) charges the same (£130/£125) as an indie and in Infinity escorts (External Link/Members Only Vs External Link/Members Only) though some agencies list her at 1h £150 (e.g. External Link/Members Only), so you may save £20.

The benefits of these girls working for agencies have almost not much to do with them being good in their work or not. These “type A” agency girls prefer to get work from agencies for one or more of the following reasons:
(i)they get richer clientele because of the higher price. You may say “silly girl just put a higher price on AW” and get all £200 yourself than giving £50 to the agency. Yet again I am not sure whether the AW audience wouldn’t overlook them as very expensive and/or as using professional pictures. You see that Alice and Kessy who are not expensive have zero feedback in AW.
(ii)They don't have to deal with the booking arrangement and timewasters. Also in a girl’s initial steps in AW she has to constantly confirm/reassure clients about her pictures authenticity, give her ID details to AW to get verified etc. In type A agencies clients know that the pictures are real (although you are concerned whether they are accurate and recent) plus the girl does not have to reply such confirmation questions herself.
(iii) Many of the agency clients are new punters and/or fluffies who are likely to be more easily satisfied, become regulars, etc.
(iv) Security and/or driver

Of course you may say that the “difficult part” as independents is just the beginning-if they are good then once they get good reputation they will see the real benefits of being indies in their pocket. But despite explaining this to them these Type A agency girls seem that they don't care about the little they lose as they already earn too much. After all if you are a good client YOU may be get to arrange meetings with them directly without an agency. Also I don't think it is a coincidence that some semi-independent girls like Raissa888 and latino_princess_x have deleted their AW profiles and now work only for agencies.

As for good and bad agencies. That is why I separated them into distinct groups - type A, B, C etc. as for arranging via a third party. You yourself mentioned that you visited the Marylebone brothel plenty of times. Well the only difference is the price. The girl in the Marylebone brothel who charges £100ph takes only £70-£80. But you don’t moan about the £20-£30 you effectively give to her pimp as the price is already low. You do deal with a female receptionist pretending to be the girl and you confirmed services with her. Or do you really think that the girls working in that brothel don't have a pimp? Of course they have.

Stealthshagger

  • Guest
in Marylebone, I assume you mean audrey, mya etc? I actually speak with them directly not a madam. I have the non aw email address for a couple and correspond, so they let me know when they come back etc. I did not think it was a brothel. If it is, I guess it highlights how hard it is to tell these things.

Offline adindas

Very organised and useful review. Thanks. Might be worth sending the aw details to her, so she could earn more and punters pay less, by bypassing the agency pimp fee.

Thank you for review Jason. Top notch
Regarding agency and AW,
TBH despite taking site to prossie which I hate, AW is also doing the punter a favour.

The same WG who charge ridiculous price in the agency,  we could find them in much cheaper rate in AW. Cutting all of the middleman will make the punting market in the UK become more competitive.

Without AW it is very difficult to find goodlooking vfm WG in London.

Also while some are heavily photoshoped majority are not. On the contrary to the agency website, when you meet the WG in flesh you start thinking whether it is the same WG in the agency website due to all have been heavily Photoshopped.



« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 07:58:09 pm by adindas »

Mindful

  • Guest
Whenever I want a laugh I come on to the London review forum to read the reviews. Jason’s review and reply’s come to about 2000 words for a 1 hour booking. That’s 33 words for every minute of his time with the girl.

Which do you enjoy more? The sex or do you enjoy writing about it?

This is how reviews are done in Scotland
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=25208.0


« Last Edit: May 05, 2014, 04:22:07 pm by Mindful »

Offline Bartolomeo

Do you have a problem with reading more than a 100 words? Or the fact that someone can put together a properly written review?


Stealthshagger

  • Guest
Whenever I want a laugh I come on to the London review forum to read the reviews. Jason’s review and reply’s come to about 2000 words for a 1 hour booking. That’s 33 words for every minute of his time with the girl.

Which do you enjoy more? The sex or do you enjoy writing about it?

This is how reviews are done in Scotland
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=25208.0
So good in fact, that you left there and came to the london section and started to count words. that musy have been taxing for a scot. and everybody knows scots dont like taxing. why not have another iron bru and a day in the dark, and stick to the scottish section?

vorian

  • Guest
Whenever I want a laugh I come on to the London review forum to read the reviews. Jason’s review and reply’s come to about 2000 words for a 1 hour booking. That’s 33 words for every minute of his time with the girl.

Which do you enjoy more? The sex or do you enjoy writing about it?

This is how reviews are done in Scotland
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=25208.0

Jason's review was well written and detailed,  when spending hard earned punting money, you can never have too much information.

Stealthshagger

  • Guest
and when I think england are atrocious at football, I watch scotland play. Or one of their one professional teams that would cut it in the championship.

vorian

  • Guest
and when I think england are atrocious at football, I watch scotland play. Or one of their one professional teams that would cut it in the championship.

Good at Curling though.

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Good at Curling though.

I was a big fan of this one during the last olympics Hidden Image/Members Only

Festisio

  • Guest
I was a big fan of this one during the last olympics

Me too, and in fact there is a prossie who resembles her, been tempted to have a go on her for a while.

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Splosh

  • Guest
Do your reviews the way you want Jason don't let the nasty Scotsman tell you different.

Stealthshagger

  • Guest
Good at Curling though.

curling one out on the sidewalk. I went to a comedy festival there years ago to see stand up comedy, as everyone banged on about it. First time I have seen human shit on a sidewalk. clearly human.   rest of the city was very nice, to be fair.

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Stealth

I might have to break the habit of life time and travel for a bit of that

With regards to the Scottish Reviews. Most them read like they have been written by a 'jakey' with a buckfast and perscription drug problem


whiterussian

  • Guest
Stealth

I might have to break the habit of life time and travel for a bit of that

With regards to the Scottish Reviews. Most them read like they have been written by a 'jakey' with a buckfast and perscription drug problem

Bit harsh that imo, reviews reflect the personality of the writer.

Without reviews this site would not exist, lets not piss on a healthy fire  :timeout

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Bit harsh that imo, reviews reflect the personality of the writer.

Without reviews this site would not exist, lets not piss on a healthy fire  :timeout

A fair point WR

I shall state that I prefer a review with a bit more detail than the ones from the Scottish Poster on this thread.

And WR I shall be adding a review shortly of the prossie who looked your previous profile pic. She was surprisingly very good

« Last Edit: May 05, 2014, 09:44:07 pm by cockneybstrd »