Chloe baby 22- Palmers Green

[Gambitman92]

£60/30mins

She only does the things under "includ", ignore the enjoys list

Comms 10/10: all done by text, I was near morrisons that day and she was happy to see me right away.

Girl 6.5/10: decent face, not as cute as the pics but had a slutty look, she made an effort with her make up, slim body almost skinny but looked good, had some lower stomach fat and marks due to child birth but not a problem to me.

Service 8/10: she's passive, she waited for me to make all the moves but she had a good attitude, owo was ok, told me she would take it deeper for extra........no thanks. Condom on, doggy, cg, mish, then rg, finish in the bag. Don't know if can take a pounding, she was very tight and I didn't want to go too fast. Quick chat in the end, she's pretty smart, told me she does not work often but profile is handled by others sometimes.

External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only

[smiths]

I was bait and switched by this low life, my negative review is linked in. I also met this WG on another try; External Link/Members Only who didn't look like her pics to me but was the same WG as in the pics just less attractive, I would of given her a go but I walked as kissing had been agreed on the phone but she said she didn't offer it and I did a neg on here, and a recent review was done on this WG; External Link/Members Only These 3 are or were in the same brothel of Hedge Lane, I think this one External Link/Members Only is also working out of it but an not 100% certain. This brothel is on my blacklist, full of total scumbags in my view. And this review is I think the first positive on any of these WGs so far on here, on these A/W numbered links.

It may well be the case a maid/pimp does the comms for these WGs but to ME that doesn't excuse the lying I experienced, I punt in good faith, I expect WGs to do the same, 2 from this brothel fucked me about.

[Gambitman92]

I was bait and switched by this low life, my negative review is linked in. I also met this WG on another try; External Link/Members Only who didn't look like her pics to me but was the same WG as in the pics just less attractive, I would of given her a go but I walked as kissing had been agreed on the phone but she said she didn't offer it and I did a neg on here, and a recent review was done on this WG; External Link/Members Only These 3 are or were in the same brothel of Hedge Lane, I think this one External Link/Members Only is also working out of it but an not 100% certain. This brothel is on my blacklist, full of total scumbags in my view. And this review is I think the first positive on any of these WGs so far on here, on these A/W numbered links.

It may well be the case a maid/pimp does the comms for these WGs but to ME that doesn't excuse the lying I experienced, I punt in good faith, I expect WGs to do the same, 2 from this brothel fucked me about.

I saw your reviews of both the girls, I'm sure I posted in one of them. I think this is the first review of Chloe, she hardly works and doesn't handle her profile.

I did say that Jessica doesn't kiss at all, it's never been on her likes list ever but both negatives deserved since whoever was handling comms lied to you, it isn't fair to the clients.

[smiths]

I saw your reviews of both the girls, I'm sure I posted in one of them. I think this is the first review of Chloe, she hardly works and doesn't handle her profile.

I did say that Jessica doesn't kiss at all, it's never been on her likes list ever but both negatives deserved since whoever was handling comms lied to you, it isn't fair to the clients.

Yes the first review under her A/W numbered link where the punter saw and punted with her. I blame both the person who does the comms AND the WG if I get fucked over, I punt in good faith and expect the same courtesy back. I did not get it from this brothel.