Sugarbabies / Seeking Regional Thread (SE)

[finn5555]

They've all seem to have gone, mate

Both there when i view them.

[paul_tall_]

External Link/Members Only Frankie
Notice she has been mentioned previously as asking for deposit, she messaged me and said similar when i replied £300 meeting £150 deposit in advance to guarantee a booking at a later date to meet for a drink and if a vibe back to hers. Blocked on telegram when i said i dont do deposits

[seed_sprayer]

anyone met, chatted to or have info on the following two please:

Jasmine, 19, New Milton
External Link/Members Only

Princess 25 Southampton
External Link/Members Only

I’ve spoke to princess
Pics are accurate
Actually seems like would be good fun
But then flaky - couldn’t be bothered pushing for date

[sugardaddy0511]

External Link/Members Only Frankie
Notice she has been mentioned previously as asking for deposit, she messaged me and said similar when i replied £300 meeting £150 deposit in advance to guarantee a booking at a later date to meet for a drink and if a vibe back to hers. Blocked on telegram when i said i dont do deposits

yes she is a scammer

[paul_tall_]

yes she is a scammer

Thanks for the warning
Have you spoken to Diana External Link/Members Only
Very flirty and keen to meet but has given no indication on allowance ?

[Cunning Punt]

anyone met, chatted to or have info on the following two please:

Jasmine, 19, New Milton
External Link/Members Only

Princess 25 Southampton
External Link/Members Only

I’ve spoke to princess
Pics are accurate
Actually seems like would be good fun
But then flaky - couldn’t be bothered pushing for date

Not spoken to her but her profile, as it is, is in instant red flag. Just one line in each box, repeating that she is looking for "the finer things in life" then adding she is after "fine dining, hotels, spas, shopping" so she won't come cheap. Mention of the word 'shopping' is an instant pass from me.

[sugardaddy0511]

External Link/Members Only Abigail 22 straight with bank account on WhatsApp asking for money ! Anyone spoken to her too ?

[Danj89]

External Link/Members Only

Chelsea -reading -27
Requests a 150ppm for platonic first meet. Comes across very businesslike in comms and very articulate, my guess is beneath the surface she is trying to hoover up as many platonic ppms as possible. Highly doubt intimacy is on the cards but happy to be proven wrong.

[paul_tall_]

External Link/Members Only Natalie
is
External Link/Members Only

[paul_tall_]

External Link/Members Only Rebecca - Dorking
Anyone recall this profile ? Looks to have been a member since 2016
Messaging very covid-esq message vibes, has partner, debts, child care needed

[sugardaddy0511]

External Link/Members Only  Em 24 portsmouth . Scammer and time waster alert .

[paul_tall_]

External Link/Members Only  Em 24 portsmouth . Scammer and time waster alert .

Sorry to hear .
Scam / time waster profiles can probably never be fully eradicated no matter what the platform even profiles  where they have verified themselves which for new profiles is required on seeking now. The issue remains that to report the profiles to seeking risks having yourself banned with no guarantee seeking will act on the girls profile

[sugardaddy0511]

Sorry to hear .
Scam / time waster profiles can probably never be fully eradicated no matter what the platform even profiles  where they have verified themselves which for new profiles is required on seeking now. The issue remains that to report the profiles to seeking risks having yourself banned with no guarantee seeking will act on the girls profile

I know and what’s why sharing the intel here is collectively helpful.

[sugardaddy0511]

Amirah 23 Southampton . Sorry can not share link as blocked her . Expects paid platonic meets and financial support and trips . Delusional

[paul_tall_]

Amirah 23 Southampton . Sorry can not share link as blocked her . Expects paid platonic meets and financial support and trips . Delusional

External Link/Members Only

[Cunning Punt]

Sorry can not share link as blocked her

You can as long as you still have the message thread with a girl. Click on her photo/the icon where it was the message thread (rather than opening up the thread itself) and then copy and paste the url.

[Cunning Punt]

It's been a blast (mostly) but, after being on Seeking for almost 8 years on and off, meeting 50 women (38 for intimate meets lasting from 1 meet to 18 months, others just M&Gs), I think I've reached the end of the road with the site.

It was fantastic when I first joined in 2018 but it's gradually gone downhill since Covid and Brandon's misguided changes to Seeking (stricter rules and bannings plus sub hikes) plus apathy/laziness/entitlement of Gen Z have greatly accentuated the decline. There are now fewer women overall (certainly outside London), and proportionately fewer of them are up for sex and those that are are looking for a lot of money now. The fees have gone up considerably too.

To finish off, here is some feedback from some girls I've recently engaged with on the site.

External Link/Members Only
Luna, 23, Oxford.
Nice girl, if a bit quiet and reasonable in bed if disengaged but she was on her period without warning me in advance. She had quoted me a per hour rate initially but agreed a reasonable ppm for meets of around 3hrs if we met regularly. But come the meet, she said she had to go and early, so same difference.
Admits to being a former escort but she really still is - entirely focused on money and not bothered about any connection/engagement.

Olivia, early 30s, Winchester but actually Andover.
No link as she blocked me.
I meet her a few times a couple of years ago before she entered a serious relationship and, it seems, had a kid. She's a nice girl, reasonable shag, can host and reasonable ppm but wants fairly short meets. 

External Link/Members Only
Aimee, 32, Basingstoke.
She's essentially an escort - quick to the point and businesses-like, quoting "£350ppm for intimacy".

External Link/Members Only
Jade 24, High Wycombe.
Needless to say her facial features are digitally altered in the profile photos, though she is attractive. But she was monosyllabic on text and video call, and she didn't seem that bothered, so I didn't think it would be a good experience. And she was asking more than I usually provide when I'm getting a hotel. Therefore, I didn't go through with a meet.

External Link/Members Only
Chantel, 26, Southampton
Online content, too shy to meet.

External Link/Members Only
Chelsea, 26, Aylesbury
Insisted on chatting on Telegram not WhatsApp which is always a warning sign. Then asked for very high ppm - £500 if I recall.

External Link/Members Only
Layal, 26, says Southampton but actually Fareham
Fairly monosyllabic and wanted £300 plus travel to go to Southampton, though she does drive which I thought was a pisstake given the fairly high fee and short distance. I didn't even bother to ask her how much petrol money she wanted.

External Link/Members Only
Rhi, 27, Southampton
Timewaster. Got onto WhatsApp, suggested a video call then and then blocked me - single tick and no profile photo. When I messaged her on SA she tried to deny it but a check on my primary number's WA clearly showed her photo by her number.

External Link/Members Only
Alexandra, 25, Oxford
I've already shared her details on this thread but as I'm doing a list, worth repeating: she's a timewaster - didn't show up for a M&G despite it apparently being near very where she lived.

I will share details of a couple of others on the SW Seeking thread.

 

[paul_tall_]

External Link/Members Only
Layal, 26, says Southampton but actually Fareham
Fairly monosyllabic and wanted £300 plus travel to go to Southampton, though she does drive which I thought was a pisstake given the fairly high fee and short distance. I didn't even bother to ask her how much petrol money she wanted.

From your list this is the only one i have been in contact with, must be 3 years ago now under a different profile. Iirc she was overly keen to meet and messaged me a number of times  even though i pointed out Southampton was too far and im sure she had Basingstoke on her profile  , cant recall the allowance but do recall money for a child sitter

[sugardaddy0511]

It's been a blast (mostly) but, after being on Seeking for almost 8 years on and off, meeting 50 women (38 for intimate meets lasting from 1 meet to 18 months, others just M&Gs), I think I've reached the end of the road with the site.

It was fantastic when I first joined in 2018 but it's gradually gone downhill since Covid and Brandon's misguided changes to Seeking (stricter rules and bannings plus sub hikes) plus apathy/laziness/entitlement of Gen Z have greatly accentuated the decline. There are now fewer women overall (certainly outside London), and proportionately fewer of them are up for sex and those that are are looking for a lot of money now. The fees have gone up considerably too.

To finish off, here is some feedback from some girls I've recently engaged with on the site.

External Link/Members Only
Luna, 23, Oxford.
Nice girl, if a bit quiet and reasonable in bed if disengaged but she was on her period without warning me in advance. She had quoted me a per hour rate initially but agreed a reasonable ppm for meets of around 3hrs if we met regularly. But come the meet, she said she had to go and early, so same difference.
Admits to being a former escort but she really still is - entirely focused on money and not bothered about any connection/engagement.

Olivia, early 30s, Winchester but actually Andover.
No link as she blocked me.
I meet her a few times a couple of years ago before she entered a serious relationship and, it seems, had a kid. She's a nice girl, reasonable shag, can host and reasonable ppm but wants fairly short meets. 

External Link/Members Only
Aimee, 32, Basingstoke.
She's essentially an escort - quick to the point and businesses-like, quoting "£350ppm for intimacy".

External Link/Members Only
Jade 24, High Wycombe.
Needless to say her facial features are digitally altered in the profile photos, though she is attractive. But she was monosyllabic on text and video call, and she didn't seem that bothered, so I didn't think it would be a good experience. And she was asking more than I usually provide when I'm getting a hotel. Therefore, I didn't go through with a meet.

External Link/Members Only
Chantel, 26, Southampton
Online content, too shy to meet.

External Link/Members Only
Chelsea, 26, Aylesbury
Insisted on chatting on Telegram not WhatsApp which is always a warning sign. Then asked for very high ppm - £500 if I recall.

External Link/Members Only
Layal, 26, says Southampton but actually Fareham
Fairly monosyllabic and wanted £300 plus travel to go to Southampton, though she does drive which I thought was a pisstake given the fairly high fee and short distance. I didn't even bother to ask her how much petrol money she wanted.

External Link/Members Only
Rhi, 27, Southampton
Timewaster. Got onto WhatsApp, suggested a video call then and then blocked me - single tick and no profile photo. When I messaged her on SA she tried to deny it but a check on my primary number's WA clearly showed her photo by her number.

External Link/Members Only
Alexandra, 25, Oxford
I've already shared her details on this thread but as I'm doing a list, worth repeating: she's a timewaster - didn't show up for a M&G despite it apparently being near very where she lived.

I will share details of a couple of others on the SW Seeking thread.

 Similar experience here ! I have an arrangement going on for the last 4 years , but unsuccessful to add or alter my portfolio . Girls are rude and abnoxious too some demanding money for platonic meets and suggesting that seeking is not for intimate meets . God knows why they think they are so entitled ?

[paul_tall_]

Similar experience here ! I have an arrangement going on for the last 4 years , but unsuccessful to add or alter my portfolio . Girls are rude and abnoxious too some demanding money for platonic meets and suggesting that seeking is not for intimate meets . God knows why they think they are so entitled ?

Unfortunately the site is now marketed more that way , if they are new say last 12 months they may well have been picked up under that marketing .
There have also been media articles from women claiming guys are just gifting them from afar and social posts as to how to get money out of guys

[bigden40]

Unfortunately the site is now marketed more that way , if they are new say last 12 months they may well have been picked up under that marketing .
There have also been media articles from women claiming guys are just gifting them from afar and social posts as to how to get money out of guys

I’ve not seen any real difference in my interactions on the site.

There was always girls trying to get paid for platonic and there have always been girls trying to squeeze as much as possible from guys.

[sugardaddy0511]

I’ve not seen any real difference in my interactions on the site.

There was always girls trying to get paid for platonic and there have always been girls trying to squeeze as much as possible from guys.

Yes that’s true ! However there were also some girls who were happy to have intimate fun meets for sensible ppm / allowance from some normal non - working girls e.  That last category seem to be so hard to find now and in the last couple of times I have had them the sex was meh and they were not interested in a long term arrangement !

[Cunning Punt]

Girls are rude and abnoxious too some demanding money for platonic meets and suggesting that seeking is not for intimate meets. God knows why they think they are so entitled ?

Because of the marketing, as has been said, and also lots of young people nowadays are entitled, as I mentioned - they expect people (the state, employers and individuals) just to give them money and stuff just for existing without putting in any graft. It makes me sound old, yes, but it's still true.

I've had several new members in recent months telling me what the site is and isn't - and in a very arrogant way. My response is along the lines of "no, I've been on the site for several years, you've been on here 2 minutes so I know far better than you what the site is/isn't for" resisting the temptation to add "luv" at the end. Then block 'em.

As if we are going to pay to watch them eat and, what is almost certainly, their dull or even non conversation.

I’ve not seen any real difference in my interactions on the site.

Lucky you!

[paul_tall_]

I’ve not seen any real difference in my interactions on the site.

There was always girls trying to get paid for platonic and there have always been girls trying to squeeze as much as possible from guys.

What area of the south east have you looked recently and with regards to girls you have chatted to are they new or been on the site for a while ?

[bigden40]

What area of the south east have you looked recently and with regards to girls you have chatted to are they new or been on the site for a while ?

I’m London based but my search picks up girls across the Home Counties and have generally found most to be willing to come to London for a night out.

I tend to search by Newest by default so mostly talking to new girls. I do look at recently active from time to time and sometimes pick up from there. 

I believe my relative success comes from my approach to them. I am clear about what I’m looking for and what my parameters are, I have invested a lot of effort in a well crafted profile that will appeal to the type of woman I’m looking to date, I can back that up in subsequent chat and meetings because it doesn’t portray a false image of who I am or what I want.

[paul_tall_]

I’m London based but my search picks up girls across the Home Counties and have generally found most to be willing to come to London for a night out.

I tend to search by Newest by default so mostly talking to new girls. I do look at recently active from time to time and sometimes pick up from there. 

I believe my relative success comes from my approach to them. I am clear about what I’m looking for and what my parameters are, I have invested a lot of effort in a well crafted profile that will appeal to the type of woman I’m looking to date, I can back that up in subsequent chat and meetings because it doesn’t portray a false image of who I am or what I want.

That’s interesting and obviously working for you. Admittedly I haven’t had a paid subscription to message since early Feb , but that subscription was probably the least productive in terms of chatting to anyone . My search radius has expanded and covers Basingstoke, west to Reading , east to about Dorking and north to say Kingston/uxbridge based on profiles I see and the number of new profiles pretty much if I look today is pretty low esp once you disregard either ones that may have returned and you spoke to before or ones that just don’t fit my own likes. Recently active is just the same profiles mainly that have been around for a few years and are always logged on

[888]

Did anyone else have any dealings with this girl, messages or meets?
Think her profile is gone? but I’m still in a position to possibly meet up with her…

External Link/Members Only
Jade 24, High Wycombe.
Needless to say her facial features are digitally altered in the profile photos, though she is attractive. But she was monosyllabic on text and video call, and she didn't seem that bothered, so I didn't think it would be a good experience. And she was asking more than I usually provide when I'm getting a hotel. Therefore, I didn't go through with a meet.

[rk_1985]

Did anyone else have any dealings with this girl, messages or meets?
Think her profile is gone? but I’m still in a position to possibly meet up with her…

This post was in the London thread

External Link/Members Only

Jade , 23

AVOID at all costs. 250 for one pop then made an excuse to leave despite agreeing beforehand about multiple rounds and a ‘few hours’ . Pussy absolutely stinks . Smells like weed. Hygiene is absolutely terrible. Smokers teeth. Honestly don’t bother with this woman and another reminder don’t give the money beforehand as some of these women are scammers.

Those pics her face is digitally edited as she doesn’t look exactly like that

Number ends in 1321

[888]

Wowzers! Thank you mate - you just saved me from getting stung!