Khloe Sexy Girl in Colindale

[pepsicolaboy]

A simple answer to my very complex question. Thanks. Mystery solved.

If aw are doing that to appear to discourage clients and SP meeting during the lockdown, theres a bit of a hole there as they are still allowing SP to pay to display there number daily (for escort bookings)

[g284]

One thing that has come to light out of Khloe’s stupidity in trying to defend a neutral review is that she admitted to working during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Taking Khloe’s example and whilst leaving aside those girls who have their AW green light on, I bet there must be many others like Khloe who are still working despite the present health risks.

You can't judge to be honest. I mean, if it means either not putting food on the table, spending nights outside I'd know which I'd pick.

What I also find very strange and highly suspicious is the fact that for the many ladies who have had their AW green lights on over the past month have had no increases in their AW feedback scores. I have been following several popular girls on AW that have constantly had their daily AW green light on, yet their AW feedback score has not changed.

Maybe these girls are not getting any business at all; but I doubt if that is the case with each and every girl whose AW score hasn’t changed despite the AW green light.

In my view, these AW ladies (who have their AW green light on) are asking punters not to leave any AW feedback for them, and they are not leaving any for the punter too, for the same reason, i.e. not to be seen as presently working. Yet, they have their AW green light on which defies this logic. I am confused.

Read the AW box on each profile page:

This profile remains visible as offering Escort Services to give you the insight that under normal conditions this member engages in physical meetings.  At this time you may use this insight to discuss any mutual interests via DirectCam, Phone Chat or the Site's built-in email system.  The member's Available Today status can be used to ascertain their current ability to communicate with you.

By Act of Parliament, in the UK, it is illegal to meet anyone with whom you do not share a household, so we have removed the facility to arrange a meeting with any advertiser and would strongly encourage you to stay at home, where possible.

[iseekcougar1]

There's no right or wrong answer, if for example you live alone and don't go out much then I don't see the problem, the only person at risk is yourself. I have seen a few posts criticising girls working, despite the fact that many don't have savings & and lots of EE girls can not go back home so they need to work to survive (and you think the girls under a pimp have a choice?), some of these posts are made by the same punters who were cheating on their wives pre lockdown without a second thought.

I haven't punted since the lockdown but I might book someone this week, the only one at risk is myself.

+1

spot on... things are not black and white in real life... everyone is in a different situation

[daviemac]

I haven't punted since the lockdown but I might book someone this week, the only one at risk is myself.

If only that were true, but it isn't. If you become infected and it affects you badly you put the lives of all the health workers who treat you at risk, all because of your selfish attitude.

[Al R]

If aw are doing that to appear to discourage clients and SP meeting during the lockdown, theres a bit of a hole there as they are still allowing SP to pay to display there number daily (for escort bookings)

AW get paid for that - and ‘available today’. They don’t get paid for the booking facility..

[winkywanky]

If only that were true, but it isn't. If you become infected and it affects you badly you put the lives of all the health workers who treat you at risk, all because of your selfish attitude.

It's OK, he promises not to get really ill and be a burden or anything  .

[Beamer]

It's OK, he promises not to get really ill and be a burden or anything  .

Yes, of course it's ok. He will I am sure be careful

What a selfish idiot.

[Al R]

If only that were true, but it isn't. If you become infected and it affects you badly you put the lives of all the health workers who treat you at risk, all because of your selfish attitude.

It’s not even limited to health workers, it’s potentially anyone he comes into contact with after he becomes infected - then anyone they come into contact with after that.

He could even be asymptomatic, but still spread the virus.

There’s a reason for there being a lockdown

[pepsicolaboy]

AW get paid for that - and ‘available today’. They don’t get paid for the booking facility..

Excatly, some might call that a double standard 

[Xtro]

I haven't punted since the lockdown but I might book someone this week, the only one at risk is myself.

As long as you Stay Alert, that's fine.

After all, that appears to be the take away message from the government at the moment!   

[winkywanky]

As long as you Stay Alert, that's fine.

After all, that appears to be the takeaway message from the government at the moment!    

I'm always alert, the last takeaway I got home there was a cat collar floating in my vindaloo.

[g284]

I'm always alert, the last takeaway I got home there was a cat collar floating in my vindaloo.

Did it taste good mate?

External Link/Members Only

[winkywanky]

Thankfully I live a very long way from Swindon  .

[The Film Director]

Thankfully I live a very long way from Swindon  .

Racist 

[winkywanky]

Wouldn't consider myself racist, but very happy to be disgusted at old-skool Islamic toilet habits 

[Xtro]

I'm always alert, the last takeaway I got home there was a cat collar floating in my vindaloo.

What's your problem??   As long as it wasn't a bat collar!!      COVInDaLOO         

[LLPunting]

There's no right or wrong answer, if for example you live alone and don't go out much then I don't see the problem, the only person at risk is yourself. I have seen a few posts criticising girls working, despite the fact that many don't have savings & and lots of EE girls can not go back home so they need to work to survive (and you think the girls under a pimp have a choice?), some of these posts are made by the same punters who were cheating on their wives pre lockdown without a second thought.

I haven't punted since the lockdown but I might book someone this week, the only one at risk is myself.

Infection risk doesn't end because you're alone!   Are you really suggesting that you don't care about being infected if you don't think you can pass it on because of your solitude?
If you pick it up from an SP but are apparently asymptomatic you can still be infectious so any inadvertent sneeze (oh, hayfever!) or runny nose that you stem with your hand or sleeve and subsequently touch something with whilst out in public is precisely the transmission risk we have all been trying to avoid through observing lockdown.

Just because you, like us, might believe that sex work is an acceptable means of income it doesn't make it an inalienable right to exert despite a health crisis lockdown.  Millions of "regular" peeps who have been left in financial peril or difficulty because of the measures yet were labouring in less risky jobs that have been suspended, are you saying that the whole economy should have been just left to tick on?

Kindly explain why you think that because one is at risk of being impoverished it is ok to engage in the most risky physical contact with multiple strangers during an epidemic of a highly infectious virus that presents a lethal hazard to a greater proportion of the populace than anything we currently tolerate?
Do you also support the open carriage of firearms or other lethal weapons?  How about the banning of all barrier-type contraception?  The non-isolation of Ebola sufferers?  The solving of the PPE shortage by banning it's use?

[LLPunting]

+1

spot on... things are not black and white in real life... everyone is in a different situation

So why isolate (or cure) anyone with any infectious affliction, they need to earn a living too?
Why have healthworkers risk their safety by treating any infectious patient?
Why stop anyone with a symptom that could prevent them from operating dangerous equipment safely or compromise their responsibility for others safety e.g. bus driver?

So no one should lose their job for incompetence?  What's the harm?

[Geko12]

This was funny to read, good riddance Khloe!

im surprised a certain punter that goes by the name of a southeast location on here isn't here to defend/white knight her as he normally is


could not agree more LLPunting, im so shock punters are still risking their lives as well as others by satisfying their balls. Have a wank at home punters, honestly its not worth it, you can have endless punting when all of this is over. Gods Sake.

[winkywanky]

What's your problem??  As long as it wasn't a bat collar!!     COVInDaLOO      

That's just silly, whoever heard of a pet bat? 

(...awaits amusing riposte  )

[Xtro]

@ LLPunting

You do say some of the most sensible (and concise) stuff on here.   

That's just silly, whoever heard of a pet bat? 

(...awaits amusing riposte  )

I wouldn't mind unleashing something for her in her Bat Collar Dress!!

External Link/Members Only

Sorry, that's about as amusing as it gets.

[winkywanky]

2/10   

[Londonpunter30]

There's no right or wrong answer, if for example you live alone and don't go out much then I don't see the problem, the only person at risk is yourself. I have seen a few posts criticising girls working, despite the fact that many don't have savings & and lots of EE girls can not go back home so they need to work to survive (and you think the girls under a pimp have a choice?), some of these posts are made by the same punters who were cheating on their wives pre lockdown without a second thought.

I haven't punted since the lockdown but I might book someone this week, the only one at risk is myself.

No it’s not just you at risk.  It’s every person you contact on the way , plus however many punters the girl has seen, plus however many people they have come in contact with.

It’s attitudes like yours that will continue the spread of this

[king tarzan]

punters who were cheating on their wives pre lockdown without a second thought.

A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do.. you can't eat the same fish and chips every day three times a day for the rest of you life..
eye of the 🐅👊👊👊

[cotton]

No it’s not just you at risk.  It’s every person you contact on the way , plus however many punters the girl has seen, plus however many people they have come in contact with.

It’s attitudes like yours that will continue the spread of this

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

[king tarzan]

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

sounds utter bollox advice....

[Londonpunter30]

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

Yes and I’m sure the SP won’t see anyone else either.

What is the SP works with another girl, that multiplies the risk even more

[karimbenzima1991]

Stay home, stay safe, stay alert!!!

[Wozel]

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

Just have a wank ffs

[Xtro]

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

You will be going against government guidelines, (The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020)

You are confusing the point of self isolation; This is for those that have shown symptoms.

External Link/Members Only

I know what you're saying sounds logical and while you may actually live alone, and genuinely self isolate for 2 weeks before and after meeting the SP, you may indeed catch it from her. Here's where the problem lies.....
You may need medical attention, thus exposing frontline NHS workers to the virus and adding to any existing strain on NHS facilities. That's assuming you go to hospital in the first instance because you MIGHT be showing the typical signs of dry cough, breathlessness, fever, etc. However, you may actually be asymptomatic, yet suffering from Silent Hypoxia, a condition that basically goes unnoticed but slowly starves your body, organs and brain of oxygen which can lead to multiple organ failure, permanent damage or death!

External Link/Members Only

This is a clip from a fantastic Japanese documentary called "COVID-19: Battle on the Cruise Ship"
External Link/Members Only
Please watch the full documetary here -
External Link/Members Only

[iq129]

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

Is that how desperate you are for a punt?

[cotton]

You will be going against government guidelines, (The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020)

You are confusing the point of self isolation; This is for those that have shown symptoms.

External Link/Members Only

I know what you're saying sounds logical and while you may actually live alone, and genuinely self isolate for 2 weeks before and after meeting the SP, you may indeed catch it from her. Here's where the problem lies.....
You may need medical attention, thus exposing frontline NHS workers to the virus and adding to any existing strain on NHS facilities. That's assuming you go to hospital in the first instance because you MIGHT be showing the typical signs of dry cough, breathlessness, fever, etc. However, you may actually be asymptomatic, yet suffering from Silent Hypoxia, a condition that basically goes unnoticed but slowly starves your body, organs and brain of oxygen which can lead to multiple organ failure, permanent damage or death!

External Link/Members Only

This is a clip from a fantastic Japanese documentary called "COVID-19: Battle on the Cruise Ship"
External Link/Members Only
Please watch the full documetary here -
External Link/Members Only

Yeh i will watch the documentary and thanks everyone for their comments. I was just wondering thats all , especially if this 2 meter rule is going to last a long time, no harm in asking , im not that desparate   

[g284]

What about if you self isolate for 2 weeks prior , then presuming you exibit no symptoms so you dont risk having or spreading the virus , visit and only interact with your chosen SP and then go home and self isolate again for 2 weeks as a precaution incase youve caught the virus from the SP , is that OK 

It's an epidemic but just remember the vast majority of people, 80%, will have mild to moderate symptoms and even if you're in the high risk group the majority of people will survive.

[Gambitman92]

The reason why I said I was the only one at risk is because I live alone and have not left my house since March 13th, last punt was March 2nd with Soniasweet19, today is May 20th and I am still at home. I do all my shopping online, I am not a risk to the public since I havent been out and if I were to punt then I would drive and then stay at home.

As for my attitude, if everyone stayed at home like me for 2+ months then this country would have less deaths.

I don't believe I will be a risk to any health worker because I know I wouldnt need to visit a hospital, why? Because I believe I already had the virus, there is apparently "good evidence" that you may become immune to the virus once you recover. Either way, I had mild symptoms on March 13th, didnt want to risk anyone so stayed home longer than the government advises just to be safe.

I am not judging these girls because some cant go home, some live under a pimp and are forced to work, and some cant apply for any benefits so they need to work to survive.

We all have our own personal circumstances if life, I am young, single, healthy and recovered from the virus months ago. If I am going to punt again then thats my choice.

[unus669]

The reason why I said I was the only one at risk is because I live alone and have not left my house since March 13th, last punt was March 2nd with Soniasweet19, today is May 20th and I am still at home. I do all my shopping online, I am not a risk to the public since I havent been out and if I were to punt then I would drive and then stay at home.

As for my attitude, if everyone stayed at home like me for 2+ months then this country would have less deaths.

I don't believe I will be a risk to any health worker because I know I wouldnt need to visit a hospital, why? Because I believe I already had the virus, there is apparently "good evidence" that you may become immune to the virus once you recover. Either way, I had mild symptoms on March 13th, didnt want to risk anyone so stayed home longer than the government advises just to be safe.

I am not judging these girls because some cant go home, some live under a pimp and are forced to work, and some cant apply for any benefits so they need to work to survive.

We all have our own personal circumstances if life, I am young, single, healthy and recovered from the virus months ago. If I am going to punt again then thats my choice.

You make a lot of assumptions, that you couldn’t possibly determine. You also cannot determine what the SPs protocol has been, or if you’ll catch the virus on the way to your punt . All these hypotheticals doesn’t justify punting in this environment.

[Wozel]

The reason why I said I was the only one at risk is because I live alone and have not left my house since March 13th, last punt was March 2nd with Soniasweet19, today is May 20th and I am still at home. I do all my shopping online, I am not a risk to the public since I havent been out and if I were to punt then I would drive and then stay at home.

As for my attitude, if everyone stayed at home like me for 2+ months then this country would have less deaths.

I don't believe I will be a risk to any health worker because I know I wouldnt need to visit a hospital, why? Because I believe I already had the virus, there is apparently "good evidence" that you may become immune to the virus once you recover. Either way, I had mild symptoms on March 13th, didnt want to risk anyone so stayed home longer than the government advises just to be safe.

I am not judging these girls because some cant go home, some live under a pimp and are forced to work, and some cant apply for any benefits so they need to work to survive.

We all have our own personal circumstances if life, I am young, single, healthy and recovered from the virus months ago. If I am going to punt again then thats my choice.

Unus669 makes some very solid points here plus the virus will be muted so what assurance do you have that you won’t can’t it and become ill or worse , spread it ?

[Xtro]

The reason why I said I was the only one at risk is because I live alone and have not left my house since March 13th, last punt was March 2nd with Soniasweet19, today is May 20th and I am still at home. I do all my shopping online, I am not a risk to the public since I havent been out and if I were to punt then I would drive and then stay at home.

As for my attitude, if everyone stayed at home like me for 2+ months then this country would have less deaths.

I don't believe I will be a risk to any health worker because I know I wouldnt need to visit a hospital, why? Because I believe I already had the virus, there is apparently "good evidence" that you may become immune to the virus once you recover. Either way, I had mild symptoms on March 13th, didnt want to risk anyone so stayed home longer than the government advises just to be safe.

I am not judging these girls because some cant go home, some live under a pimp and are forced to work, and some cant apply for any benefits so they need to work to survive.

We all have our own personal circumstances if life, I am young, single, healthy and recovered from the virus months ago. If I am going to punt again then thats my choice.

Any links to that evidence?

I'm aware of the test done with 4 rhesus monkey's, where 3 were re-infected 28 days after initial infection and subsequent recovery; they showed a slight increase in body temperature but no virus present when checked after 5 days. But what could happen between re-infection (of the same strain, or a different strain) and day 5?
Multiple bouts of reinfection, although rare, can happen with other viruses, (smallpox in Trinidad 1902-1904), even after vaccination. Incidentally, the 4th monkey was sacrificed for autopsy purposes.

There are incidences in South Korea and China I have heard about where people who had the virus, are admitted back to the hospital and tested positive again, after already testing negative and discharged previously. These are case studies and studies that are not peer reviewed. Obviously, it would be unethical to re-infect a human to trial a more worthy study. There is still a lot to learn about this virus.

The current WHO stance on re-infection states "There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection.", where they show concern regarding "Immunity passports" in the context of COVID-19 -
External Link/Members Only

[cunningman]

Because I believe I already had the virus, there is apparently "good evidence" that you may become immune to the virus once you recover. Either way, I had mild symptoms on March 13th, didnt want to risk anyone so stayed home longer than the government advises just to be safe.

You haven't been tested for antibodies.  Sounds like you didn't see a GP.  My father thinks he's had it because he had a sore throat and mild cough for 3 days in February, FFS, and he's in his 80s.  He's just clutching at any fantastical reason to believe the rules don't apply to him.

[king tarzan]

Any links to that evidence?

I'm aware of the test done with 4 rhesus monkey's, where 3 were re-infected 28 days after initial infection and subsequent recovery; they showed a slight increase in body temperature but no virus present when checked after 5 days. But what could happen between re-infection (of the same strain, or a different strain) and day 5?
Multiple bouts of reinfection, although rare, can happen with other viruses, (smallpox in Trinidad 1902-1904), even after vaccination. Incidentally, the 4th monkey was sacrificed for autopsy purposes.

There are incidences in South Korea and China I have heard about where people who had the virus, are admitted back to the hospital and tested positive again, after already testing negative and discharged previously. These are case studies and studies that are not peer reviewed. Obviously, it would be unethical to re-infect a human to trial a more worthy study. There is still a lot to learn about this virus.

The current WHO stance on re-infection states "There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from COVID-19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection.", where they show concern regarding "Immunity passports" in the context of COVID-19 -
External Link/Members Only

the main man in the USA is himself trying a drug....he is leading by example as he says..

[Wozel]

the main man in the USA is himself trying a drug....he is leading by example as he says..

 

[Avg_Joe]

the main man in the USA is himself trying a drug....he is leading by example as he says..

hahaha, and caused mass panic in many circles by all accounts.....

External Link/Members Only