Mia_Baby - Monument

[Animalbeast]

Visited Mia after seeing a review on here for her a few weeks ago and finding her extremely beautiful. She’s actually my ideal girl looks and body wise so after my first choice was unavailable I  decided to give her a go.

Booking communication is a bit crap to be honest. She takes a while to confirm. Had to change my initial time, the second time I asked was not available so booked 3 hours later then I planned.

Location. Quick walk from Monument Station, on very narrow cobblestone type road. I think during normal times some punters might feel
self conscious when they see how it’s accessed. Room was good and decent size. .

Mia is beautiful in a very natural way, exactly like her pics but more tanned and slimmer. Only disappointment were that her tits are not as pert as I imagined they’d be. But still very nice small breasts.

Her service is great full on dfk, owo, cim, sex in multiple positions. Only issues occasionally she tries to make porn type noises and it doesn’t suit her, much better when her natural self comes out and she just goes with the flow.

booking was 1 hour @ £170

[tantric talents]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Was £150 ph now showing 180.
Obviously not heard of covid19 yet 

[Animalbeast]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Was £150 ph now showing 180.
Obviously not heard of covid19 yet 

That’s why I think people are still punting. Definitely not as much as before, but enough to ensure girls are not reducing their prices. Don’t forget if some girls stopped working, then everything balances out. When I was with her I heard another customer go in for her flatmate , I don’t know who her flatmate is thou.

[LLPunting]

The people still punting and paying over the odds for the girls are those who can afford private health provisions.  (Granted some might be fatalists of no particular means who are playing Russian Roulette to go out with a bang.)

If the Government formally co-opts all private health care into the national response then we might see a difference in rich people's behaviour.

[sparkus]

The people still punting and paying over the odds for the girls are those who can afford private health provisions.  (Granted some might be fatalists of no particular means who are playing Russian Roulette to go out with a bang.)

If the Government formally co-opts all private health care into the national response then we might see a difference in rich people's behaviour.

But a lot of these reviews may be of the "didn't get round to before" variety?

Anyhow, was her arse as spectacular as in the pics? I had her on radar but also thought it'd probably just be the angle.

[Animalbeast]

But a lot of these reviews may be of the "didn't get round to before" variety?

Anyhow, was her arse as spectacular as in the pics? I had her on radar but also thought it'd probably just be the angle.

Her ass is very nice, tout and firm. Comparing to her pics. I’d say lost a bit of size on the ass. She was skinnier all round.

[PLeisure]

Her ass is very nice, tout and firm.

Did you mean, ‘taut’?

What was it about her boobs that disappointed you.

[Animalbeast]

Did you mean, ‘taut’?

What was it about her boobs that disappointed you.

Yes.

Her boobs weren’t as firm as I expected, not a plastic bag. But compared to the rest of her body  not as pert

[PLeisure]

Yes.

Her boobs weren’t as firm as I expected, not a plastic bag. But compared to the rest of her body  not as pert

Thanks for the intel 

[LLPunting]

But a lot of these reviews may be of the "didn't get round to before" variety?

Anyhow, was her arse as spectacular as in the pics? I had her on radar but also thought it'd probably just be the angle.

I was replying to #2 as he implied current activity.

[LLPunting]

Her ass is very nice, tout and firm. Comparing to her pics. I’d say lost a bit of size on the ass. She was skinnier all round.

This is a re-profile, she's been around for a while.

The pics, particularly the naked back shot, show a soft body with no particular tone of someone who would soon have slacker skin and tone if she didn't exercise more/eat less.  Texture of skin in the very few pics where it's not been filtered is dimpled in a pre-visible-cellulite way.

Boobs look like Bs which have lost their plumpness and probably were never proud and pert.

[Animalbeast]

This is a re-profile, she's been around for a while.

The pics, particularly the naked back shot, show a soft body with no particular tone of someone who would soon have slacker skin and tone if she didn't exercise more/eat less.  Texture of skin in the very few pics where it's not been filtered is dimpled in a pre-visible-cellulite way.

Boobs look like Bs which have lost their plumpness and probably were never proud and pert.

All I know is that she was slimmer and more tanned in person. Not really one for hypothesising about why a WG lost weight.

[Mr_Shins]

Right near where I work then - or did work before they closed the office and made us all work from home.

But it isn't the "Mia Baby" I was expecting anyway.

[PointGuard]

Usually these girls work in 5/6 in the same flat probably illegally soo obviously don’t care about clientes privacy services... because don’t care about regulars

[Animalbeast]

Right near where I work then - or did work before they closed the office and made us all work from home.

But it isn't the "Mia Baby" I was expecting anyway.

Hahaha, literally right on top of an office, and opposite one. When things are normal could be quite awkward.

The Mia you are thinking of is the one in Shoreditch?

[Animalbeast]

Usually these girls work in 5/6 in the same flat probably illegally soo obviously don’t care about clientes privacy services... because don’t care about regulars

I don’t know. I only heard door open, followed by male and female voice for a few second and then I’m guessing they went to another room.

While she didn’t offer me business card or invite me for a client retention drink afterwards, her service seemed to be about encouraging a return.

[PointGuard]

Visited Mia after seeing a review on here for her a few weeks ago and finding her extremely beautiful. She’s actually my ideal girl looks and body wise so after my first choice was unavailable I  decided to give her a go.

Booking communication is a bit crap to be honest. She takes a while to confirm. Had to change my initial time, the second time I asked was not available so booked 3 hours later then I planned.

Location. Quick walk from Monument Station, on very narrow cobblestone type road. I think during normal times some punters might feel
self conscious when they see how it’s accessed. Room was good and decent size. .

Mia is beautiful in a very natural way, exactly like her pics but more tanned and slimmer. Only disappointment were that her tits are not as pert as I imagined they’d be. But still very nice small breasts.

Her service is great full on dfk, owo, cim, sex in multiple positions. Only issues occasionally she tries to make porn type noises and it doesn’t suit her, much better when her natural self comes out and she just goes with the flow.

booking was 1 hour @ £170

Honestly I can’t see any beautiful features in her face for she charge £170

[Animalbeast]

Honestly I can’t see any beautiful features in her face for she charge £170

“My ideal girl in terms of looks and body” note the emphasis on “my”

[PointGuard]

“My ideal girl in terms of looks and body” note the emphasis on “my”

Well,  you have only 3 reviews here maybe that’s why

[sparkus]

Her ass is very nice, tout and firm. Comparing to her pics. I’d say lost a bit of size on the ass. She was skinnier all round.

And for that reason, I'm out.

[Animalbeast]

Well,  you have only 3 reviews here maybe that’s why

I said she was “my ideal type”... some people actually meet civi women and base preferences on that. So yeah your preferences are different and not for me to judge.

[PLeisure]

Her profile has now been updated to say she's no longer working due to the virus

[Parking]

Right near where I work then - or did work before they closed the office and made us all work from home.

But it isn't the "Mia Baby" I was expecting anyway.

There's only one Mia Baby we know

[Animalbeast]

There's only one Mia Baby we know

Yep. She’s a stunner.  Think she’s working again this week.

[PointGuard]

There's only one Mia Baby we know

She have amazing body

[Animalbeast]

She have amazing body

Assuming mia_. (Hoxton/Shoreditch) she is very beautiful. Face reminds me of a really sexy air hostess or cosmetic sales rep at Selfridges

[Meursault]

The people still punting and paying over the odds for the girls are those who can afford private health provisions.  (Granted some might be fatalists of no particular means who are playing Russian Roulette to go out with a bang.)

If the Government formally co-opts all private health care into the national response then we might see a difference in rich people's behaviour.

Private health care isn't going to help you much as ICUs and ventilators are all in NHS hospitals. Obviously some beds will be freed up for less chronic conditions I guess.
It's clear that some girls are taking the view that they are young and it won't affect them too badly. As will some punters.
It could be argued that is selfish. That partly depends on who else both parties are mixing with.
I won't be punting until it either disappears, testing is common place or a vaccine is in place.
Others won't see it that way.