Hannah PornStar - Lancaster Gate

[hermanmunster]

External Link/Members Only

Hannah lives in a beautiful basement apartment 2 mins from Lancaster Gate tube and 5 mins from Paddington.

I paid £350 for 2 hours – effectively £200 for the first hour and £150 thereafter, as DFK is £50 extra and for me a visit without this is pointless.

The door opened as I approached and a beaming smile greeted me on this pocket size, stunningly gorgeous bundle of fun. Hannah facially is truly beautiful – I have looked at every one of her profile pictures since and not one of them reflects (or even shows) her true beauty.   With her hair tied back you see how classically beautiful she is.  I say pocket size, I guess 5’ 3”ish - she was very easy for me to pick up and carry.  She has toned, tanned firm legs and a beautiful rear, it’s difficult to keep your hands off her body. 

Hannah was wearing a red lace, revealing bodysuit, but the first thing that strikes you is her happy personality, she genuinely seemed so happy and excited to see me.  She continued like this throughout the meeting.  Hannah is tactile from the word go, DFK is something that she knew I wanted and she admitted that she loves kissing – that became clearer and clearer.  I handed over the money, it was nice to see that she accepted it wearing a latex glove (for hygiene purposes in the current climate).  Obviously we’re all vulnerable to the virus but knowing that she was being as careful as possible offered a little reassurance.

I requested a shower and was given a fresh towel. The en-suite bathroom is very modern and immaculately clean.  Returning to the bedroom Hannah was all over me.  I struggle to imagine that she is not enjoying herself as she constantly moves from one position to another suggesting different options asking what I want whilst kissing for the remainder of the time. You are not allowed to escape from sex in one position or another for more than a few minutes.  We went seamlessly through many positions CG, RCG, miss, her feet on my shoulders, spoons, etc.  In doggy she turns round making eye contact with a mischievous look in her eye.  She really seems to enjoy OWO and her tongue ventures everywhere.  She was always very turned on when having her nipples kissed and sucked. The question of CIM has been asked – I don’t know the answer for sure but she had her tongue out waiting for it (although the timing wasn’t right and it didn’t happen).  Towards the end she took me by my hand and led me to the bathroom and bent over the bath – she looked at me in the mirror in front of her and squealed with excitement as we went at it for several minutes..  Such a beautiful sight – me behind her and me looking at her face in the mirror with her mischievous eyes looking up at me.

Hannah loves passionate hugging, kissing and is relentless in her pursuit of enjoyable sex.  She let my fingers do whatever I wanted and seemed greatly turned on with them inside her.

She is unfailingly happy and full of smiles with a genuine, natural sense of humour. Every so often we stopped for a chat (I accept not everyone cares about chatting to a lady, but I do). She is very interested and very open about her life, she seems focussed on what she wants in life and she will definitely enjoy life to the full and achieve her ambitions.  Consequently it was very interesting for me to get to know her a little bit and was all I could ask for in such a meeting.  After a less than satisfactory experience with an expensive Russian this was a perfect return.

In short Hannah was a wonderful hostess, refreshingly open, open minded, desperate to please and desperate for some enjoyable sex and is as fit as anyone.  After our meeting she sent a couple of flattering texts – she ought to work in sales!

I believe she is in London for another 6 months - obviously could easily change.  Would I recommend - DEFINITELY.


She has just changed her profile picture on adultwork - the selfie with the red phone is exactly as she is (but with a smile).

[Bornslippy]

Yes she looks attractive but seriously, extra £50 each for cim and dfk??

[hermanmunster]

Yes she looks attractive but seriously, extra £50 each for cim and dfk??

Exactly my thought.  But I then considered it as £200 per hour for first hour (rather than £150 + £50) and in comparison with some of the agencies girls I have seen who are £350 or £400 she is in a different league (above).

[Devil4thrill]

Thanks for the review. She Seems pretty but £50 for DFK is a big no.
CIM, maybe but charging for DFK is just too much. But hey it’s each ones preference.

[hermanmunster]

Thanks for the review. She Seems pretty but £50 for DFK is a big no.
CIM, maybe but charging for DFK is just too much. But hey it’s each ones preference.

Yes couldn't agree more, just consider it as a base price of £200,

[JackSaint]

Yes couldn't agree more, just consider it as a base price of £200,

Got to say, Hannah certainly delivers at £200/hour, it's expensive but the new flat is very nice and she's a special talent.

[king tarzan]

super great you had a brilliant time

[Bartolomeo]

wow she looks gorgeous in her selfie. She should just put those normal pics up not the photoshoot ones.

[Superjames0824]

Also, as she is Brazilian, I will be very worried that she will be a trans

[Oscpat]

Great review OP saw her and Nanda for duo few days ago, Hannah is dynamite and dare I say vfm at her rate! Review to follow shortly.

[hermanmunster]

Also, as she is Brazilian, I will be very worried that she will be a trans

She is 1000%  a gorgeous sexy lady.  As someone else said, she is similar to J Lo.

[0mard3000]

Sounds good but I'm so surprised dudes are still out there right now 

[hermanmunster]

Sounds good but I'm so surprised dudes are still out there right now 

Not for much longer.  The whole industry may be changed with prices/availability etc. And ladies going home to Eastern Europe may find it more difficult to return and stay around?

[Bornslippy]

well I for one will stop this lark if prices rise.

[kasamaa]

J.Lo?!

Oh well, Off the hotlist she goes 

[hermanmunster]

J.Lo?!

Oh well, Off the hotlist she goes 

I wasn't the one who made the comparison - but yes there is a definite facial similarity.  I guess JLo would win (only just), because she is a bigger feather in the cap!  Believe me this lady is an all round gorgeous package.  I will revisit at some point.

[hermanmunster]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Now this was my second visit to Hannah in a short period of time.  The reason : she is a breath of fresh air, energetic, enthusiastic, genuinely friendly and last but not least, stunningly beautiful.  Coupled with the fact that I will now work outside London for the foreseeable future and she may sadly be gone by the time it is “safe” again.  I hope not, because anybody else would be 2nd best.

She is located approx. 4 minutes walk from Paddington Station in a very luxurious basement apartment.  She is slightly closer to Lancaster Gate but this is closed presently.

The meeting was again very easy to arrange, she replied very quickly to my messages in a very friendly personable way. 

I paid £350 for 2 hours in the company of this drop dead gorgeous lady.  2x £150 plus £50 for what equated to a package of extras to make the whole experience unforgettable ………. and it was.

Hannah has already been described many times.  For those looking at her AW page, the first picture (her taking a selfie with a red phone) is exactly as you find her.  She is approx. 5’3” and is a perfectly proportioned package for some intimate fun. Her body is petite, tanned and firm, she has been a model back in Brazil – she showed me some amazing photos.  She speaks excellent English and is intelligent and interesting to talk to - if you have time!  A very driven, focussed young lady.

I don’t think I have ever been kissed so much in a “date” and it was fantastic – so important to me.

The more intimate parts became a bit of a blur as one position of fun slipped into another position and so on.  We went through me on top, me behind, CG, RCG, at the side of the bed with Hannah face down and on her back, in the bathroom, in the bath.  Hannah seems to have an insatiable appetite for sex and relentlessly aims to satisfy.

At the beginning of the meeting (and the end) there was plenty of OWO and Hannah uses her tongue all over your body in such a teasing way.  I have a vivid memory of Hannah kneeling in front of me waiting expectantly.  But my clearest memory of the time I spent with Hannah is that in whichever single position and entanglement into which we found ourselves she always had a smile on her face and appeared to be enjoying herself.  She makes eye contact throughout and has mesmerising eyes.

Why would guys contemplate paying £300-£600 per hour for the risk that a “high class” Russian will give them an enjoyable time when such a gorgeous delightful friendly young lady like Hannah is in London.

Would I recommend?  Of course!  My only disappointment is that I may not have the pleasure of seeing her soon, possibly ever again.   I wouldn’t advise if you have a weak heart though, she is a sex bomb!
Very best of luck to her.

[LLPunting]

This reads like a fluffy puff piece.
Fake tits, short hefty legs and a makeover, nothing exceptional in the looks department.
Kindly provide some relevant, objective details like what skills she demonstrated, how she demonstrated them and what extras you paid for, amongst other things.

Many of us kissers have spent most of an hour (or more) snogging with a willing SP, your personal superlative isn't particularly absolute and may well be significantly individual from her given how much you dropped in her purse.

[Payyourwaymate]

Hmmm... abit too positive for me. I'm not sure if you are trying to get her business in these times with such a glowing review or if you are a fluffy type  .  I remember there was a positive review from another member for her as being part of a duo which seemed legit.  It was not like this advert of a review... might as well tell us she has the antibodies to fight COVID-19 and fucking her will give us immunity to boost her monies with our custom...my goodness  .

[PLeisure]

Two reviews of the same WG in four days is ridiculous, and not helpful to the ethos of this forum. You’ve been a member long enough to know the 6-month rule, surely 
Check your ego, please - it looks desperate 

[hermanmunster]

Two reviews of the same WG in four days is ridiculous, and not helpful to the ethos of this forum. You’ve been a member long enough to know the 6-month rule, surely 
Check your ego, please - it looks desperate 

Apologies, the two meetings were roughly a week apart and I commented on them.  I always believed the 6 month rule was that the meeting had to be in the last 6 months. Perhaps you have corrected me.  I will check.

[LLPunting]

Apologies, the two meetings were roughly a week apart and I commented on them.  I always believed the 6 month rule was that the meeting had to be in the last 6 months. Perhaps you have corrected me.  I will check.

2 positive reviews of the same SP within a few days of each other describing a similar experience is highly liable to be called touting which if suspected strongly enough will get you tossed out not off.

This should've been appended to your previous review.

A new review so close to a previous report is only warranted if a substantially different service was received and is described.

[daviemac]

Apologies, the two meetings were roughly a week apart and I commented on them.  I always believed the 6 month rule was that the meeting had to be in the last 6 months. Perhaps you have corrected me.  I will check.

That is correct, reviews can only be of meets within the last 6 months, though we expect members to use some common sense when posting repeat reviews. Two reviews within a week does not offer any new information. A note added to the previous review would be more suitable.

[hermanmunster]

That is correct, reviews can only be of meets within the last 6 months, though we expect members to use some common sense when posting repeat reviews. Two reviews within a week does not offer any new information. A note added to the previous review would be more suitable.

Point taken daviemac, thank you.

The meetings weren't 6 months and 4 days apart but they were more than 4 days. The first review was historical and the second on time. Maybe we should all be encouraged to state the exact date of the meeting.

Regards

[LLPunting]

Point taken daviemac, thank you.

The meetings weren't 6 months and 4 days apart but they were more than 4 days. The first review was historical and the second on time. Maybe we should all be encouraged to state the exact date of the meeting.

Regards

No the date is not required.  The advice that reviews should either describe substantially different experiences, whether services indulged or qualitative in how repeats were delivered, is sound.  If you're trying to evidence consistency then a new review would be best after an SP's return after a "lengthy" absence (>2 months say) or change of AW ID or departure from AW to another platform.  You could chance a review of an encounter you had after a reported Neg but then you know what you'll likely be charged of.  Otherwise just add an update to your existing review if you still rate her the same.
The nearer the time of review is to the time of the punt the more useful you are to this community.

[hermanmunster]

No the date is not required.  The advice that reviews should either describe substantially different experiences, whether services indulged or qualitative in how repeats were delivered, is sound.  If you're trying to evidence consistency then a new review would be best after an SP's return after a "lengthy" absence (>2 months say) or change of AW ID or departure from AW to another platform.  You could chance a review of an encounter you had after a reported Neg but then you know what you'll likely be charged of.  Otherwise just add an update to your existing review if you still rate her the same.
The nearer the time of review is to the time of the punt the more useful you are to this community.

Thank you LLP for your egotistical patronising on this and many other reviews. You seem desperate to portray yourself as an experienced punter and intelligent man - maybe you are experienced, intelligent you are not.  Why you are telling me when I have seen this lady is a mystery, but feel free.  I have better things to do with my time than try and pick holes in other people's opinions. I have better ways of occupying my time.  I wouldn't be surprised if I speak for other people but it is of no consequence.

[LLPunting]

Thank you LLP for your egotistical patronising on this and many other reviews. You seem desperate to portray yourself as an experienced punter and intelligent man - maybe you are experienced, intelligent you are not.  Why you are telling me when I have seen this lady is a mystery, but feel free.  I have better things to do with my time than try and pick holes in other people's opinions. I have better ways of occupying my time.  I wouldn't be surprised if I speak for other people but it is of no consequence.

Oh you're a sensitive snowflake with an ego bigger than mine.  I was replying to your post, my apologies for not using "one" instead of "you" but apparently you too are unable to read subtext.
Enjoy your corner of stupid club, mines the one with shit on the walls.

Reading other subtext, perhaps it's because you don't speak English as a first language that you're not understanding me...  Then again plenty of natives here don't either so fair point to you.

[pepsicolaboy]

This reads like a fluffy puff piece.
Fake tits, short hefty legs and a makeover, nothing exceptional in the looks department.
Kindly provide some relevant, objective details like what skills she demonstrated, how she demonstrated them and what extras you paid for, amongst other things.

Many of us kissers have spent most of an hour (or more) snogging with a willing SP, your personal superlative isn't particularly absolute and may well be significantly individual from her given how much you dropped in her purse.

[bonapati]

This reads like is a fluffy puff piece.
Fake tits, short hefty legs and a makeover, nothing exceptional in the looks department.
Kindly provide some relevant, objective details like what skills she demonstrated, how she demonstrated them and what extras you paid for, amongst other things.

Many of us kissers have spent most of an hour (or more) snogging with a willing SP, your personal superlative isn't particularly absolute and may well be significantly individual from her given how much you dropped in her purse.

You have been a member here long enughto know the rules, either that or you havwn't noticed that nobody leaves a review of the same SP in one week ( I guess you have seen her more than twice then.. and still yearning to go?)

[hermanmunster]

Yes, I have seen her more than once, just describing my experience.  For whoever it was who asked about the likeness to her photos, I found this online.  I don't know how recent the photo is, but it accurately represents her now.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Bornslippy]

very fitting. a bottle of Corona.....

[hermanmunster]

Well spotted, I hadn't noticed the Corona bottle - ironic!

I have just looked at her profile, she seems to have a new page with some new photos that I hadn't seen before

External Link/Members Only

[Bornslippy]

Well forget the punting. I've just brought 18 bottles of Corona for £14. Bargain. Looks like I'm self isolating this weekend

[winkywanky]

Sounds like you got a bad case of it, or indeed, a whole case 

[PLeisure]

I have just looked at her profile, she seems to have a new page with some new photos that I hadn't seen before

External Link/Members Only

Thanks for posting this other AW link, OP.
Hopefully this means that she's taken The Film Director's advice on board and actually simplified her rates/ service so that the £200 PSE option includes Anal and CiM; plus (from the GFE option), "Passionate kissing". Or is that wishful thinking?
Alternatively, is that the coronavirus rate to pull in irresponsible punters 
I guess we may not know until this lockdown is properly over.

[The Film Director]

The only change I can see on this latest profile is that CIM is now back in the £200 PSE rate (though not on the enjoys list) - so it looks as though someone is reading comments on here, 

However, I still suspect the inclusion of 'everything' is still

wishful thinking?

[karimbenzima1991]

2 pop limit in a hour, no unlimited rounds like her fellow countrywoman Tayla

[hermanmunster]

2 pop limit in a hour, no unlimited rounds like her fellow countrywoman Tayla

Not an issue for me - but I couldn't see where that's stated on the profile (probably me being unfamiliar with the terminology).

[hermanmunster]

It seems as though Hannah has now moved to South Kensington on her own.

[tobyk1]

Still says Knightsbridge when I click. £250 seems a lil steep too, or maybe I just don’t find her hot enough in the pics.

Wonder how many people she has given Covid to, just being an intermediary. Seeing as she’s been online since the day the Bat was eaten in Wuhan. 

[Tom.Punter]

Her boob job is awful.....

[hermanmunster]

Yes, fair enough she will never be posted on the "best tits on Adultwork" thread, but you do have to look past them and she has a beautiful face, lovely body and bubbly personality.

The downside is the drug taking, although she has now sensibly removed the video clips of her smoking marijuana and close up photo of her having sex with a joint proudly tucked into her underwear.   She freely admits to hosting drug taking sessions - what is she thinking?

Personally even though I had a lovely time with her (albeit with a few issues), I won't visit again.

[James]

which is her correct profile, theres 2. she looks super hunnie, when i can go to london she may be on my list

[hermanmunster]

which is her correct profile, theres 2. she looks super hunnie, when i can go to london she may be on my list

External Link/Members Only

Hi James, you will undoubtedly have a fantastic time with her.  She is facially a very attractive lady and bubbly.  But there are 2 issues that for me, will prevent my return: one that was obvious to me at the time of my meetings (that I glossed over), and one that wasn't obvious but should have been.

For our first meeting she asked me to come an hour later than agreed, I accepted this and went for a coffee at Paddington Station.  After about 50 minutes I got a text to say she was ready, I said I would be 5-10 minutes.  What I didn't realise at the time was that she started her alarm for our 2 hour meeting from the point she said she was ready (whilst I was drinking my coffee at Paddington).  A proposed second visit was postponed minutes before the meeting when she tried to adjust the time by an hour and 10 minutes.  The next visit, I was due at 1.00pm, I got a text at 11.47 saying she was ready.  I said I would try and come earlier, possibly by 12.30 if I could manage it - I arrived by 12.40, but she had already set her alarm as if the meeting started at 12.30!  It wasn't until I received notification that my 2 hours parking had elapsed (whilst driving), that I realised I had been cut short.  She seems to take back to back meetings and has to keep making adjustments over timings.  I have read that another punter was delayed by an hour and another by 5 hours (before she went incommunicado).  Obviously you will need to consider the timing issue if you are travelling from outside London.

The second is blatant drug use, whilst this isn’t my cup of tea, it may be yours.  But on my first visit it could be smelt in her apartment.

Lastly, not a problem for me, but may be for others : CIM and anal are not available despite the profile, she is adamant about this. I didn't really push about anal, but CIM - she said under no circumstances would she ever do it.


I hope this helps you make an informed decision.  But as I said, during the meeting itself, you are sure to have a great time.

[Payyourwaymate]

Please, stop promoting this chick. Every 2-3 weeks you keep bumping this review. Please relax, we know she's great. Christ.

[hermanmunster]

Please, stop promoting this chick. Every 2-3 weeks you keep bumping this review. Please relax, we know she's great. Christ.

That's hardly a recommendation? I was replying to James' question.

I said that James could have a great time if he doesn't mind (a) being messed about, (b) being cheated of time, (c) her being a blatant drug user, (d) definitely no anal or CIM despite what the profile occasionally says. 

And I state that I wouldn't return.  A recommendation?  - NO.

[James]

That's hardly a recommendation? I was replying to James' question.

I said that James could have a great time if he doesn't mind (a) being messed about, (b) being cheated of time, (c) her being a blatant drug user, (d) definitely no anal or CIM despite what the profile occasionally says. 

And I state that I wouldn't return.  A recommendation?  - NO.

Thanks. Looks wise if i get a punt wow. Hot face body top.
Im looking for a july return to punting. B4 the moral police kickoff. People were punting in jan when this virus was about. Just not reported

[winkywanky]

Thanks. Looks wise if i get a punt wow. Hot face body top.
Im looking for a july return to punting. B4 the moral police kickoff. People were punting in jan when this virus was about. Just not reported

Not that I'm necessarily saying punting in mid-July won't break whatever restrictions are in place then, but you can hardly blame people for punting in January when there were no govt restrictions whatsoever at that point, so it's a completely spurious comparison

[JackSaint]

Having seen Hannah & Nanda together and Hannah solo, had a great time both times, got to say this thread has done her no favours, drug use, short timing, lack of services will put a good few off, being good looking doesn't give her any right to take the piss.

[king tarzan]

drug use, short timing, lack of services

100% totally unacceptable... eye of the 🐅👊👊👊👊👊

SHOULD BE BOYCOTTED FOR THAT SHIT!!!!!!