'I will not see guys under 35 or over 60'

[themaserman]

 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She's a bit up herself isn't she, she's no spring chicken herself!

[mace-window]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She's a bit up herself isn't she, she's no spring chicken herself!

This bitch is 51 demanding what guy she wants to see. She should be lucky some guy with some value is going to date her let alone pay her to fuck her. Delusional and spoiled is word to describe her she is way past her prime.

[peter purves]

To be fair it could go something like this 

Under 35 - too irresponsible

Over 60s - Too much hardwork

However, there are two  other categories

Overweight guys - Too heavy on top of her

Misogynists - The least said the better 

Seems fair enough to me  

[Herts_Outcaller]

*Wants guys around the same age as her
*Doesn't charge extra for a dinner date
*No fatties

Seems like she's treating Adultwork like an extension of her Tinder profile, and she's looking for a friend with benefits (with extra benefits)

i.e she wants a fuck buddy she kinda fancies (or can at least tolerate) who also pays her

[mace-window]

*Wants guys around the same age as her
*Doesn't charge extra for a dinner date
*No fatties

Seems like she's treating Adultwork like an extension of her Tinder profile, and she's looking for a friend with benefits (with extra benefits)

i.e she wants a fuck buddy she kinda fancies (or can at least tolerate) who also pays her

I really doubt it. She is just being very picky. They are WG's more than half her age here who will deal with anyone regardless of age, weight or race and make no a big deal out of it. And she is here thinking she can pick best guy to pay her to fuck when she is past her prime is delusional. Funny thing she is quite an attractive Milf, but again is any guy her age going to pay to fuck her? Most of the time no. They will likely pay someone half her and his age to book. And funny part she would get customers from guys in their 20's but hi she does not want to guys under 35. Shooting herself on the foot if you ask me.

[delete]

Statements like that just turn me off even though I pass her checklist.

When I read profiles like that I just think what else are they going to add in when I meet them.

[webpunter]

You've hit the nail on the head
Given that she only does outcalls can see the reasoning
Doesn't wanna waste her time for starters, as in having to 'walk'
If you tick the various requirements then its focused marketing
If you don't it can be viewed as discrimination
The same happens in 99% of businesses so don't see why hookering should be any different
Businesses that advertise 'all cummers welcome' rarely if ever mean it
With this milf deffo a case of 'YM may will Vary'
Not in my area but the kinda milfy burd if i wanted an outcall when staying somewhere nice i'd give some thought to her
Great rack & tanned
Only just started on Awank so best perhaps to get in early if she floats your boat

*Wants guys around the same age as her
*Doesn't charge extra for a dinner date
*No fatties

Seems like she's treating Adultwork like an extension of her Tinder profile, and she's looking for a friend with benefits (with extra benefits)

i.e she wants a fuck buddy she kinda fancies (or can at least tolerate) who also pays her

[WARSZAWA16]

She seems quite raunchy if a bit pretentious and up herself. Academic though as I don't met her imposed age criteria. However. there are plenty more fish in the sea.....

[mr.bluesky]

Thats ok by me because I won't see women who have false tits and charge £150 an hour   

[Doc Holliday]

Thats ok by me because I won't see women who have false tits and charge £150 an hour   

 

Not seeing under 35s removes a huge section of a potential market for MILFS/GILFS

[WelshClipper]

I know the list of reasons for not seeing a particular type or age is as long as my arm. Some of the reasons are trivial. Some make more sense if you know the circumstances. One 50 year old said she won't see older guys because she was abused as a child by an older guy. Who knows 

My gut feeling is this one prefers guys around her own age. If she gets a dusty phone she could quickly expand her age range with the flick of a keyboard though. 

[HarryZZ]

Fair play to her, people soon complain about robotic sex, this one wants to be into it. I've felt uncomfortable fucking SPs who are way too young for me and ones who were a few years older and not wearing so well, the profile kind of suggests you're going to get a bit better involvement from her, although as said above, what about the fat sweaty bloke or the timid 40 something virgin if she's fussy?

[Sedition]

No idea about the woman, well off my manor. However, I do remember her pics, which I’m pretty sure I first saw about 10 years ago.
Make of it what you will

[willie loman]

Personally I fully support her right to be choosy, the majority of wgs would impose restrictions if they could . She is missing a huge market , but lots of girls cant be bothered with young guys who want to pound them non stop for a full session, and with the older guys, again its hard work.

[winkywanky]

To be fair it could go something like this 

Under 35 - too irresponsible

Over 60s - Too much hardwork

However, there are two  other categories

Overweight guys - Too heavy on top of her

Misogynists - The least said the better 

Seems fair enough to me  

Totally agree with all of that*

It's up to a WG to set her stall out as to who she sees. So long as she provides the expected service to those that she does see, she's OK in my book.


[* being 60 myself, I would argue strenuously that I am most definitely not hard work though    ]

[Taggart]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She's a bit up herself isn't she, she's no spring chicken herself!

Got it in one.

What’s amusing is she says no overweight ppl, fails to adequately define, yet is sucking off a guy who clearly has a gut! What an arse?

[winkywanky]

No, she says she won't see massively overweight guys.

The one she's sucking off in her gallery is moderately overweight.

[Payyourwaymate]

It seems she still thinks she is in her early 20s  . Best of luck to her.

[webpunter]

Can't count
Thirty [yes 30] credits for PG 1 day
4.80 for 3 days
 

[millbush]

Can't count
Thirty [yes 30] credits for PG 1 day
4.80 for 3 days
 

Won't be many takers for that you can get over 5k of pics off one WG for 1.19 credits,amazed how may girls price themselves out of PGs.

[fastnet]

Me thinks "dusty phone"

[Squire Haggard]

I would have to be paid to fuck her.  IMO she's a pig ugly blob that's got her head lost up her own enormous arse.

[GreyDave]

  perhaps should think about re-alinng her thinking and prices ....

Just like the surgeon re-alined and centered her nipples 

 

[themaserman]

Too much use of her hand in her BJ pics IMO

[Scarboroughdude]

if she states her age as 51 she's more likely knocking sixty herself, silly trollop lol

[Turtle1]

Ew, Shed have to pay me a lot of money just to consider. Bet she still gets tons of sad sad customers

[Gordon Bennett]

Describes herself as "laid-back" and then goes onto stipulate several uptight criteria that maybe precludes 30% of genuine/decent punters from seeing her????  Silly mare!

[Rochelle]

I don't get it. Why shouldn't she choose who she wants to see? So what if she cuts out a lot of potential clients?

[Nathxxx]

‘At the end of the day’ she can demand what she wants, she has that power.

When it comes to sex and sexual relationships, women control the market. The only thing that annoys me is this general attitude that men control everything and women are always the suppressed. Just think how much money we have spent to meet our sexual needs; women have us by the balls on that one (literally).

[mace-window]

‘At the end of the day’ she can demand what she wants, she has that power.

When it comes to sex and sexual relationships, women control the market. The only thing that annoys me is this general attitude that men control everything and women are always the suppressed. Just think how much money we have spent to meet our sexual needs; women have us by the balls on that one (literally).

This and rest of the comment I agree cold heartedly. It's 2020 and women (and men for that matter) are living in the best time in history. You can do whatever you want without anyone discriminating against you for your skin colour, sex, age and etc.... (well most of the time). 

But what annoys me with questions like the one from Rochelle "Why shouldn't she choose who she wants to see" is look, we are not forcing her to not see under 30's and over 50's (when she is 50 or 60 herself). Like I said before she can do what she want. But she will have to face the outcome of her stupid decision. That and we can comment on such actions and put our money to other WG's without such weird/bad criteria.

[Rochelle]

This and rest of the comment I agree cold heartedly. It's 2020 and women (and men for that matter) are living in the best time in history. You can do whatever you want without anyone discriminating against you for your skin colour, sex, age and etc.... (well most of the time). 

But what annoys me with questions like the one from Rochelle "Why shouldn't she choose who she wants to see" is look, we are not forcing her to not see under 30's and over 50's (when she is 50 or 60 herself). Like I said before she can do what she want. But she will have to face the outcome of her stupid decision. That and we can comment on such actions and put our money to other WG's without such weird/bad criteria.

It's weird or bad for you but it's what suits her. I didn't imply you shouldn't have your opinions.
Many women set criteria on who they want to see, I don't think it's stupid. It seems she wants to enjoy herself as much as possible and that the money is good but secondary.

[rathbone]

I agree it's an SP's prerogative to decide who she does or doesn't want to see.  Plus she's being honest on her profile about the reasons why.  Meantime if I was near the south coast I'd give her a shot. 

lots of girls cant be bothered with young guys who want to pound them non stop for a full session

+1.  A couple of girls have mentioned to me that they won't see anyone under 25 or 30 because young guys turn up and want to hammer away just like they've seen in porn videos.

[mace-window]

I agree it's an SP's prerogative to decide who she does or doesn't want to see.  Plus she's being honest on her profile about the reasons why.  Meantime if I was near the south coast I'd give her a shot. 
+1.  A couple of girls have mentioned to me that they won't see anyone under 25 or 30 because young guys turn up and want to hammer away just like they've seen in porn videos.

If people still believe this myth, they can believe in anything. If it is guys under 23 fucking like rabbits, then yeah those  people do have a point those guys aren't that experience in the bedroom. But 25 - 30 turning up and hammering away? I smell bullshit. They are many guys like myself who at least know what to do in the bedroom, love RO and more likely to spend more time with the for play. If you ask me, WG's who don't want to see guys aged 25 - 30 are most likely not seeing those guys due to those guys not having much money and hence can't book for longer bookings or see the WG more regularly. AKA can't juiced the 25-30 guys money that much compared to the older guys.

With that in mind, these 18 year old these days love eating ass as one of my friends little bother told me. So I don't know were you getting your information about young guys turning up and hammering way as these 18 - 21 love to eat that butty. 

[themaserman]

I mailed her earlier on AW for possible (fake) meat just out of interest to see
if she replied and I got this..

   
Hiya,

had to put up this auto-reply as too many emails

Please read my profile, and stated when you'd like to meet, ideally leave a contact number

if I can meet I'll text / message / email you

If your a timewaster .. I can smell you out a mile away

[themaserman]

She hasn't logged in to AW for nearly a week so I think it's all bollocks anyway.

[mace-window]

She hasn't logged in to AW for nearly a week so I think it's all bollocks anyway.

Looks like she aren't taking this seriously or most likely she aren't getting the amount of customers she thought she would get thanks to the criteria she set. And yes it's stupid criteria regardless if she wants to enjoy herself as much as possible or not. Regardless if I find her criteria weird or bad, the outcome only matters and as I thought, she aren't getting much service. Maybe if she changed her criteria more she would have more customers to see or bothered to logged in her AW at best. Or she could just quit.

[themaserman]

Looks like she aren't taking this seriously or most likely she aren't getting the amount of customers she thought she would get thanks to the criteria she set. And yes it's stupid criteria regardless if she wants to enjoy herself as much as possible or not. Regardless if I find her criteria weird or bad, the outcome only matters and as I thought, she aren't getting much service. Maybe if she changed her criteria more she would have more customers to see or bothered to logged in her AW at best. Or she could just quit.

Agreed mace or maybe as some other op's will say 'she could just be on a weeks holiday you know' 

[Knucklehead]

This one looked right up my street, so I thought I’d check out her feedback, the “guy” is refered to as a curvy milf in his feedback, bollocks ! More made up feedback!

[recycler]

As I understand discrimination based on age is illegal. I wonder how the court case would go?

[daviemac]

As I understand discrimination based on age is illegal. I wonder how the court case would go?

it wouldn't, you can't force a girl to have sex
 

[winkywanky]

Indeed, and it's very much similar to a recent debate on these very boards about girls who choose not to see guys of certain races/colours/religions.

The Human Right that trumps all others is a woman's right to choose who she has between her legs.

[munterhunter]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

She's a bit up herself isn't she, she's no spring chicken herself!

She's been on AW for a while I recognise the photos.
At the end of the day she's simply outlining her punting preferences. If that causes her to lose bookings it's her choice her problem. I fall just outside her upper age limit. I wouldn't mind an hour or so with her but wouldn't bother trying to persuade her to make an exception for me I'd simply go elsewhere.

[winkywanky]

I doubt she'll be asking to see a passport to prove anyone's age.

It'll come down to more whether you look like you're in her stated age range preference.

You'll need to take a good, honest look at yourself in the mirror  .

[Rochelle]

I doubt she'll be asking to see a passport to prove anyone's age.

It'll come down to more whether you look like you're in her stated age range preference.

You'll need to take a good, honest look at yourself in the mirror  .

Agree, however he may think he looks 55, when in reality he looks 75.

[winkywanky]

Agree, however he may think he looks 55, when in reality he looks 75.

That's a bit rich coming from a WG    .

[Rochelle]

That's a bit rich coming from a WG    .

I thought so too.

[Happylad]

Wouldn`t touch her with a 40ft barge pole anyway, and I certainly wouldn`t have IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES when I was within the age limits she specifies.

[Rochelle]

Wouldn`t touch her with a 40ft barge pole anyway, and I certainly wouldn`t have IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES when I was within the age limits she specifies.

You probably would have, considering that would have been over 30 years ago.

[LLPunting]

Even if I were over 60 we'd never meet chap-eye to eye because I don't pay for Frankenstein creations.  Only reason she and I might end up copulating is if it were first and foremost free.

[Happylad]

You probably would have, considering that would have been over 30 years ago.

30 years ago I was very happily married and had neither the need nor the desire to punt.