MARIE ANN BABY DOLL - Harrow HA3

[Steve2]

External Link/Members Only

I got a call from Nikki who was upset about the negative reviews. She asked me to visit Marie and give her honest feedback, and if I wasn't happy, she would refund the £50 for 1/2 hr

I found her to be a good provider. Good kissing, not DFK, very good OWO, happy with RO and some good sex in a couple of positions

She does have some acne on her back but nothing to put me off

Happy and smiley with no hint of not enjoying herself

I was happy not to ask for a refund. As always YMMV 

[smiths]

External Link/Members Only

I got a call from Nikki who was upset about the negative reviews. She asked me to visit Marie and give her honest feedback, and if I wasn't happy, she would refund the £50 for 1/2 hr

I found her to be a good provider. Good kissing, not DFK, very good OWO, happy with RO and some good sex in a couple of positions

She does have some acne on her back but nothing to put me off

Happy and smiley with no hint of not enjoying herself

I was happy not to ask for a refund. As always YMMV 

Thanks Steve. So now its all about how good a service this WG now offers ALL her punters moving forward as I see it.

[Steve2]

I think you are right mate. Only time will tell 

[RAJEC]

Interested to see what the next review now comes in as... 

[Ron89]

Interested to see what the next review now comes in as... 

+1
My neck of the woods so might go again sometime and walk if she gives me the 'is life worth living?' demeanor like before.

[Diggler fights back!]

+1
My neck of the woods so might go again sometime and walk if she gives me the 'is life worth living?' demeanor like before.

Once bitten twice shy for me so I won’t even attempt.

[HERTSBLUE]

Good review  got half day Friday looks pretty cute and 50 for 30 minutes is a bargain what's the nearest station .

[Ron89]

Good review  got half day Friday looks pretty cute and 50 for 30 minutes is a bargain what's the nearest station .

Middle of nowhere if you're relying on public transport. Probably go to Stanmore and get a bus.

[smiths]

Good review  got half day Friday looks pretty cute and 50 for 30 minutes is a bargain what's the nearest station .

As said its in the middle of nowhere station wise, not sure what station is nearest as I drive and its great for free parking on the roads around the place.

[Lovewomen]

New profile. External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Nikki certainly has a good business head on her shoulders to push for better service from her stable of ladies. Close to me and perhaps I may have to visit soon. 

[LLPunting]

On the one hand it's great that a Madam wants her girls to deliver a good service BUT the fact she called up a "friendly" customer to come review a poor performer who would no doubt be told in no uncertain terms to treat him well is troubling, in that her management is coercing her...  It's not the same as an indie choosing to make things right by her own reputation.

I much prefer an agency/management that offers disappointed customers some consideration on their next punt with a different girl and let the poor performer go if she's not cut out for the work.

[Kool Keef]

On the one hand it's great that a Madam wants her girls to deliver a good service BUT the fact she called up a "friendly" customer to come review a poor performer who would no doubt be told in no uncertain terms to treat him well is troubling, in that her management is coercing her...  It's not the same as an indie choosing to make things right by her own reputation.

I much prefer an agency/management that offers disappointed customers some consideration on their next punt with a different girl and let the poor performer go if she's not cut out for the work.

100% agree.

[Muff licker]

+1

[bestbefore]

We all know WGs’ service can deteriorate sharply after time, and, conversely, it can improve. If the WG was just starting out, then you can expect service to possibly be awkward. They are going to get situations they are not expecting and may never have experienced. They might then make the decision to give up, or improve, as if they don’t improve, their phone won’t ring. So if this girl has decided to carry on, we should see some better reviews from now on. Let’s hope so as the standards set at that place have been high.

[whoya.kiddin]

On the one hand it's great that a Madam wants her girls to deliver a good service BUT the fact she called up a "friendly" customer to come review a poor performer who would no doubt be told in no uncertain terms to treat him well is troubling, in that her management is coercing her...  It's not the same as an indie choosing to make things right by her own reputation.

I much prefer an agency/management that offers disappointed customers some consideration on their next punt with a different girl and let the poor performer go if she's not cut out for the work.

+3  Credit to you Steve for reporting this straight forwardly but it makes me wonder if your relationship with this place has become a bit too close for you to be able to review them impartially? 

Last year I had a regular reviewed on here who started offering me services that were extras on her price list without charging me for them.  This worked for both of us but I took it as precluding a review under Rule 1 - I was sure this was because I was reliable and regular and would not be representative of her typical service. 

[Steve2]

+3  Credit to you Steve for reporting this straight forwardly but it makes me wonder if your relationship with this place has become a bit too close for you to be able to review them impartially? 

I have known Nikki for a long time and reviewed her and Xena a long time ago. I would hate to think that I am not impartial. I reviewed as I found 

P.S. I saw Marie Ann again today and still good 

[mrx007]

I have known Nikki for a long time and reviewed her and Xena a long time ago.

If only Xena would ever come back.....

[Yesyes]

Ahh Xena! It would be great if she made a come back

[smiths]

I have known Nikki for a long time and reviewed her and Xena a long time ago. I would hate to think that I am not impartial. I reviewed as I found 

P.S. I saw Marie Ann again today and still good 

I know from my experiences of dealing with you for many years going back to UKPs early days that you are trustworthy, personally I ignore the shite some on here post. We have ALL got a right to post our own punting experiences as we see them as long as true. Those that did negative reviews on this WG got fucked over in my book, and Niki or whoever had words with her to shape up, or presumably ship out. That doesn't help those punters sadly though.

Time will tell if she does shape up all the time and keep it up if remaining at the Fun House. A WG should offer ALL her punters a good service.

Makes me laugh, if it wasn't for punters like you UKP would of gone down the shitter years ago due to tumbleweed, there were a mere handful of decent London/Herts reviewers in those early days. You were one of the main ones including doing TOFTT punts and reviewing them. It seems perfectly acceptable to me that Niki was in touch with you about this WG as long as your feedback on here was an honest account of what occurred, I don't doubt it, what others think is of course a matter for them. IMO punters with many years membership on here AND actually still punting are worth their weight in gold if I find them credible. I know as fact you are credible to me and that's all I need to know.

[dubhcarr]

I have known Nikki for a long time and reviewed her and Xena a long time ago. I would hate to think that I am not impartial. I reviewed as I found 

P.S. I saw Marie Ann again today and still good 

snap and she was a delight.......

[Bornslippy]

So after all this....she's now worth a punt?

[dubhcarr]

So after all this....she's now worth a punt?

Your money your choice
There are some reviews now to inform you. 

[latrell]

So after all this....she's now worth a punt?

Its a wait and see if you ask me

[Diggler fights back!]

So what’s with the new profile???? Trying to shake off the negative reviews?

[LLPunting]

No one has seen any evidence that questions the honesty of any of the reviews for this SP.

My "concerns" are that after this post on DFBs negative https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=274619.msg2810163#msg2810163 the following happens:

1) Someone, perhaps the poster, contacts Nikki and tells her about the Negatives on UKP

2) Nikki shows up on a misclassified profile to complain that she's not been told how bad the punts were and that refunds aren't an issue if you can prove the negative.  She said/He said...  I'm not depressed... He too rough... She was reluctant... She was not happy or enthusiastic... He too big...

3) After several days of controversy the profile disappears and a new one appears  completely clean of the negs for both SPs that used it (and disappointed).

This indicates that there is at least one UKPer who tells Nikki about UKP reviews, but doesn't tell her the substance, so he's currying favour not addressing the concern for an SP's wellbeing.  The number of regulars who are unnecessarily defending the Funhouse is a disappointment as is the "gushiness" of some of the rebuttal positives and comments.   There is nothing wrong with a Negative being posted or an SP occasionally warranting one. 

UKPers known to any management for posting reviews should openly declare this relationship, as Steve2 did, in their reviews.

Nikki is vested in the busyness of the brothel, any disruption to how many punts run though each room is a cut in her cut of the proceeds, and she is inclined to tell the girls, regardless if they're possibly troubled, to perform better rather than ship out.

Whilst it's great that the Funhouse tries to offer a good service, the manner in which that comes about is now less than a "house of happy hookers" working as a collective.

[dubhcarr]

No one has seen any evidence that questions the honesty of any of the reviews for this SP.

My "concerns" are that after this post on DFBs negative https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=274619.msg2810163#msg2810163 the following happens:

1) Someone, perhaps the poster, contacts Nikki and tells her about the Negatives on UKP

2) Nikki shows up on a misclassified profile to complain that she's not been told how bad the punts were and that refunds aren't an issue if you can prove the negative.  She said/He said...  I'm not depressed... He too rough... She was reluctant... She was not happy or enthusiastic... He too big...

3) After several days of controversy the profile disappears and a new one appears  completely clean of the negs for both SPs that used it (and disappointed).

This indicates that there is at least one UKPer who tells Nikki about UKP reviews, but doesn't tell her the substance, so he's currying favour not addressing the concern for an SP's wellbeing.  The number of regulars who are unnecessarily defending the Funhouse is a disappointment as is the "gushiness" of some of the rebuttal positives and comments.   There is nothing wrong with a Negative being posted or an SP occasionally warranting one. 

UKPers known to any management for posting reviews should openly declare this relationship, as Steve2 did, in their reviews.

Nikki is vested in the busyness of the brothel, any disruption to how many punts run though each room is a cut in her cut of the proceeds, and she is inclined to tell the girls, regardless if they're possibly troubled, to perform better rather than ship out.

Whilst it's great that the Funhouse tries to offer a good service, the manner in which that comes about is now less than a "house of happy hookers" working as a collective.

Im sorry LL that you see it that way. I can only speak for myself and as stated in my review of Marie Ann I had noticed her profile and was looking to visit. When I read the neg I commented at the time that I was sorry for the punters experience and took note. His views are valid irrespective of what Nikki may write/say. However I have confidence in Steve 2 s judgement and fidelity and as it happens this was not a factor in my plans. I review always as I find and my session was good. As a disclaimer I never knowingly recommend an escort as experiences do vary. Its the punters call based on his gut feel and the information shared. The funhouse is not a perfect venue but has a winning average for me. But this is punting and as always punter beware. 

[Diggler fights back!]

No one has seen any evidence that questions the honesty of any of the reviews for this SP.

My "concerns" are that after this post on DFBs negative https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=274619.msg2810163#msg2810163 the following happens:

1) Someone, perhaps the poster, contacts Nikki and tells her about the Negatives on UKP

2) Nikki shows up on a misclassified profile to complain that she's not been told how bad the punts were and that refunds aren't an issue if you can prove the negative.  She said/He said...  I'm not depressed... He too rough... She was reluctant... She was not happy or enthusiastic... He too big...

3) After several days of controversy the profile disappears and a new one appears  completely clean of the negs for both SPs that used it (and disappointed).

This indicates that there is at least one UKPer who tells Nikki about UKP reviews, but doesn't tell her the substance, so he's currying favour not addressing the concern for an SP's wellbeing.  The number of regulars who are unnecessarily defending the Funhouse is a disappointment as is the "gushiness" of some of the rebuttal positives and comments.   There is nothing wrong with a Negative being posted or an SP occasionally warranting one. 

UKPers known to any management for posting reviews should openly declare this relationship, as Steve2 did, in their reviews.

Nikki is vested in the busyness of the brothel, any disruption to how many punts run though each room is a cut in her cut of the proceeds, and she is inclined to tell the girls, regardless if they're possibly troubled, to perform better rather than ship out.

Whilst it's great that the Funhouse tries to offer a good service, the manner in which that comes about is now less than a "house of happy hookers" working as a collective.

I found you made a lot of good reasonable points. I had that really disappointing punt but I moved on pretty soon after. What rattled my cage was the ‘rate punt’ and how it went down. I guess I judged what happened in the way I would handle it. For me it’s a foreign concept to be friendly enough with a knocking shop that they know me on UKP too so they can use me as a platform to be heard. Maybe Steve went with good intentions but it didn’t feel right that Nikki should reach out to him like that or vice versa.

[LLPunting]

Im sorry LL that you see it that way. I can only speak for myself and as stated in my review of Marie Ann I had noticed her profile and was looking to visit. When I read the neg I commented at the time that I was sorry for the punters experience and took note. His views are valid irrespective of what Nikki may write/say. However I have confidence in Steve 2 s judgement and fidelity and as it happens this was not a factor in my plans. I review always as I find and my session was good. As a disclaimer I never knowingly recommend an escort as experiences do vary. Its the punters call based on his gut feel and the information shared. The funhouse is not a perfect venue but has a winning average for me. But this is punting and as always punter beware. 

I understand it's a matter of interpretation of the "facts". 
To re-iterate I don't think any of you, vets or otherwise, are being accused of fabrication or complicity, however there is the question of being taken advantage of.  Steve2 did the solid (rigid?) thing to declare his association.  Things always read a little uncomfortably (as it should do to keep us all hopefully honest) when members in good standing appear to rally in support of an SP or establishment when there's no indication of malice.
Most of us, even P&Ders, will recognise an accommodating and engaged attitude as well as a reluctant or resentful one, whether it matters or not to busting a nut.

If it weren't so freakin' far from my stomping grounds I'd wade in with a review but none of the girls have been so irresistible that I'd hump 2+ hrs across London for a cheap trick.

[dubhcarr]

I understand it's a matter of interpretation of the "facts". 
To re-iterate I don't think any of you, vets or otherwise, are being accused of fabrication or complicity, however there is the question of being taken advantage of.  Steve2 did the solid (rigid?) thing to declare his association.  Things always read a little uncomfortably (as it should do to keep us all hopefully honest) when members in good standing appear to rally in support of an SP or establishment when there's no indication of malice.
Most of us, even P&Ders, will recognise an accommodating and engaged attitude as well as a reluctant or resentful one, whether it matters or not to busting a nut.

If it weren't so freakin' far from my stomping grounds I'd wade in with a review but none of the girls have been so irresistible that I'd hump 2+ hrs across London for a cheap trick.

understand but just to clarify my discussion and txts (30 secs and three) were to book MA. I have an open mind re Nikkis actions because my dealings with her have always been straight forward and as a SP she was a good VFM and delivered good service to me. I know she is an astute business woman who knows the product has to be right. Again to state that a Punter has to call it and review as he finds the meet for him. That is all I do and am happy to stand by my words. Please note the section in the conclusion of my review of MA where my judgement is that she would not be suitable for sexual athletics not because of the neg review but because of my experience with her. Sometimes we need to inform about the character of the SP because they are not all the same and as punters we do not all have the same requirements or expectations.   

[Steve2]

1) Someone, perhaps the poster, contacts Nikki and tells her about the Negatives on UKP

Nikki reads UKP and has done for years LL 

[pepsicolaboy]

On the one hand it's great that a Madam wants her girls to deliver a good service BUT the fact she called up a "friendly" customer to come review a poor performer who would no doubt be told in no uncertain terms to treat him well is troubling, in that her management is coercing her...  It's not the same as an indie choosing to make things right by her own reputation.

I much prefer an agency/management that offers disappointed customers some consideration on their next punt with a different girl and let the poor performer go if she's not cut out for the work.

+1

[LLPunting]

understand but just to clarify my discussion and txts (30 secs and three) were to book MA. I have an open mind re Nikkis actions because my dealings with her have always been straight forward and as a SP she was a good VFM and delivered good service to me. I know she is an astute business woman who knows the product has to be right. Again to state that a Punter has to call it and review as he finds the meet for him. That is all I do and am happy to stand by my words. Please note the section in the conclusion of my review of MA where my judgement is that she would not be suitable for sexual athletics not because of the neg review but because of my experience with her. Sometimes we need to inform about the character of the SP because they are not all the same and as punters we do not all have the same requirements or expectations.   

Indeed, all reviews are subjective, glowing reviews from depraved or ultra vanilla punters usually describe different SPs and each other's fancy could well be a disaster for the other.  However when a review includes activities and the manner in which they were conducted then more uniformity of opinion may be possible and consistency of reputation follows.  The darlings of this community will almost all be enthusiastic, empathetic and welcoming regardless of breadth of services offered or the body they inhabit, we are simple to please in a simply complex pursuit and can be inclined to shag almost anyone with those 3 basics sorted.
But where a behaviour is unwelcoming or unenthusiastic then it is quite right for it to be described and concern to be raised, that said the speculation by others who haven't sampled her is just (reasoned) guessing.

[LLPunting]

Nikki reads UKP and has done for years LL 

So she's lying about not having the time to read the reviews?   
Shame she cares enough to be worried about the hit to business but not enough to read the complaint and contact the punter to discuss remediation?

As have many vets, I've known managements before who are more discrete.  If they value your custom, integrity and opinion e.g. Steve2 then they will call you or collar you as you leave to ask for feedback if it hasn't been offered and if needs be make an offer for the next encounter.  There is no asking/insisting on reviews to make up for others.
Sensible management manage client relations.  They leave honest client commentary and opinion to be what it will be.  UKP offers SPs (or did) the option to contest unfair reviews privately.

She may well still be learning her CSM but to be properly involved in it one must consider how one's actions might be interpreted by all manner of viewers.

[Diggler fights back!]

Offline bestia6969
Posts: 3
View Profile  Email  Personal Message (Offline)

« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2020, 08:29:38 pm »
Quote
Hi dear's Please let me know whats the problem with her.
Nobody call me Back to complain about.
Report to moderator 

« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2020, 10:45:27 pm »
Quote
Quote from: bestia6969 on February 25, 2020, 08:29:38 pm
Hi dear's Please let me know whats the problem with her.
Nobody call me Back to complain about.

« Reply #10 on: February 26, 2020, 05:59:54 am »
Quote
Before when somebody have problem they wrote me now nobody Just in here.
Why not complain to money Back at this time?
If right not a problem the money Back but other things Many of REGULAR said she nice.
If some REGULAR have problem so feel free to call me if she bad.
And u know why ím not reading the reviews my friend i dont have time to all the time checking this site.
I have my own life with family.
Report to moderator 
 Offline bestia6969
Posts: 3
View Profile  Email  Personal Message (Offline)

« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2020, 06:04:58 am »
Quote
But now i think this is enough.
If Many people hate this place or this GIRL pls dont come here i think i try my best with EVERYBODY.
But ím tired of this.
I hope u r can find the nice place if this one is close

I believe this was Nikki who was having a rant. When I had a crappy service I just wrote it off and thought I’d post about it on UKP. I didn’t want to get involved in a shit slinging match at the funhouse straight after the punt. Also the girl like I said didn’t make my blood boil for me to do that. I have said plenty to others when I’ve been heated in years gone by when I feel as though I’ve been fucked about. So if I had gone to Nikki straight after this punt and she had gone against me I know my temper would have flared so I don’t really want to be put in that headspace. I wasn’t writing the place off and saying all girls who work there give the same sort of performance. I just thought what is done is done and I’d give others the heads up. If I had approached Nikki what would I have been expecting to gain? A punt with another girl? A refund?
I believe Nikki shouldn’t have rattled that off as at no point did I say to anyone else boycott the funhouse. I gave an honest account of what happened and my thoughts about it.

[dubhcarr]

and Mr DFB your review was appreciated as it caused me to think about my hard earned. I appreciate all the reviewers who go to print with their experience.   

[latrell]

Looks like something's not right at the funhouse. All the girls have had their phone numbers taken of from their respected profiles since at least 2 days.

[dubhcarr]

Looks like something's not right at the funhouse. All the girls have had their phone numbers taken of from their respected profiles since at least 2 days.

I think today is the changeover day marie ann said to me that she was off on weds (today)   

[LLPunting]

Looks like something's not right at the funhouse. All the girls have had their phone numbers taken of from their respected profiles since at least 2 days.

Perhaps Nikki's thrown a strop and is only taking regulars' business because we were so mean. 

[Steve2]

Perhaps Nikki's thrown a strop and is only taking regulars' business because we were so mean. 

I can tell you LL but please don't share this information as it is not for general distribution










They have gone back home for 2 weeks or so 

[Ron89]

Let them throw their toys out of the pram. The service there isn’t what it used to be

[latrell]

Yeah and how the neighbours haven't sussed out whats going on for at least 5years is mind boggling.

[latrell]

Marie Ann baby doll is no longer acitive on this site" ... hmmm

[dubhcarr]

Marie Ann baby doll is no longer acitive on this site" ... hmmm

Thats cos she went to her home. Back in 2weeks she told me.   

[LLPunting]

Thats cos she went to her home. Back in 2weeks she told me.   

Thanks for update 
Was this conversation face to face or via phone/DM? 
Does Marie take her own calls or is Nikki/someone else the call taker?

[dubhcarr]

Thanks for update 
Was this conversation face to face or via phone/DM? 
Does Marie take her own calls or is Nikki/someone else the call taker?

Read my review of her. Its stated there.   

[GreyDave]

Yeah and how the neighbours haven't sussed out whats going on for at least 5years is mind boggling.

They have and I ve been questioned  a couple of times by the old guy at the end of corridor in a nice way manily I felt as they are worried about intruders in flats.

Also got stopped by a middle aged woman as I walked across the grass "Please dont do that youchaps are making a muddy path" was all she said so as long as no nutters upset the apple cart the funhouse can go on but its under the eyes of the neighbours no question..

[Muff licker]

Well maybe as its closed for a few weeks the neighbours will be happy 

[dubhcarr]

Read my review of her. Its stated there.   

Actually you did read my review and replied.. sorry .. but I stated what she told me in that meet. 

[LLPunting]

Actually you did read my review and replied.. sorry .. but I stated what she told me in that meet. 

No worries, asked because you may have talked to Marie since for more details about closure and removal from site or you may've talked to Nikki.

[dubhcarr]

No worries, asked because you may have talked to Marie since for more details about closure and removal from site or you may've talked to Nikki.

no I only phone/txt to book that is all.