Looking good for her age

[IrishAndy]

External Link/Members Only

This one seems to have a review from 1970!

[nephilim]

Haha nice!

Looks like default Unix time to me - 01/01/1970

[Home Alone]

Doesn't that usually simply mean the reviewer forgot/chose not to put the date in?

[Moby Dick]

Doesn't that usually simply mean the reviewer forgot/chose not to put the date in?

Yeah that sounds about right
No mention of a hairy bush, but then that would have been the norm back then so wouldn’t be mentioned anyway.
Topping up the tan (spray or otherwise) kinda gives it away. More likely to get sun burnt, wind burnt or go rusty back in the 70s.
Getting nostalgic now: Tan lines, natural boobs and a hairy minge still prevailed into the 80s all for half a lager and lime and a bag o chips = happy days.

[IrishAndy]

Yeah that sounds about right
No mention of a hairy bush, but then that would have been the norm back then so wouldn’t be mentioned anyway.
Topping up the tan (spray or otherwise) kinda gives it away. More likely to get sun burnt, wind burnt or go rusty back in the 70s.
Getting nostalgic now: Tan lines, natural boobs and a hairy minge still prevailed into the 80s all for half a lager and lime and a bag o chips = happy days.

Just to say: I had realised that it was probably a typo / lazy website admin issue (Captain Obvs). But thanks to this poster for picking up on the humour.

Do you imagine that if a forum like this had existed in the 1970’s punters would be raving about which SP had the hairiest Bush? Me, I’m very happy in the current environment of enhanced boobs and pube free pussy!