Author Topic: Eleanor.Rose - Manchester  (Read 2458 times)


15 review(s) for Eleanor.Rose (14 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Bedasha

External Link/Members Only

30 mins £100

This is one of those where I'm umming and arring about a positive or neutral, but there's more than one factor swaying it so neutral it is.

Great comms, nice appartment (about 10 mins walk from Victoria station), good hygiene, all services delivered satisfactorily.

She could be the girl in the pics, but body is more weighty (won't say she's chubby or fat but big in a good way). Very arousing sight just not what I expected from her skinnier profile pics.
She's well spoken and very friendly.
Amazing big womanly arse, bigger boobs than expected too. Really soft skin.

The services are top notch. Passionate and she's into it but.....
She's a bit of a faker in that everything you do she loves. Any suggestion you make is her favourite thing, and when she's 'cumming' every 30 secs from oral it made me stop before I wanted to.

Not considering negative as there's nothing inherently bad about her and I didn't feel any regret afterwards.
I won't be back soon, however her womanly figure is quite rare so maybe in 6 months or so...

Offline stanr

At £100 for 30 mins i would expect a positive review! Top prices should equate to top service but rarely do....Sorry it didnt do it for you!

Offline freeze44

Interesting review and her first neutral. Get what you saying if body is bigger than expected and ott service and cumming all the time!

Offline antsz

Can you park close by ? What us the nearest land mark to her apartment, just trying to see if this is my next punt, she looks stunning

Offline samneil15

Fuck me no WG is worth £100 for 30 mins with such a limited list of likes - I'll not be going near this one. No wonder she's in a "luxury apartment" if people keep paying her rates.

Offline OakTree

Can you park close by ? What us the nearest land mark to her apartment, just trying to see if this is my next punt, she looks stunning

When I saw her (assuming she's in the same place) there was car parks very near.

Offline stanr

Fuck me no WG is worth £100 for 30 mins with such a limited list of likes - I'll not be going near this one. No wonder she's in a "luxury apartment" if people keep paying her rates.

Agree totally... but has over 200 verifications..so do that many punters have more money than sense?
« Last Edit: February 04, 2020, 05:51:58 pm by stanr »

Offline Bedasha

When I saw her (assuming she's in the same place) there was car parks very near.

Did she look like the pics to you? If I had to guess I'd say it's not her, but no one else has ever said that before.
Even if they are her, she's a lot different now.

Nearest car park is red bank which is just north east of victoria station and very close to her place.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2020, 06:21:54 pm by Bedasha »

Offline OakTree

Did she look like the pics to you? If I had to guess I'd say it's not her, but no one else has ever said that before.
Even if they are her, she's a lot different now.

Nearest car park is red bank which is just north east of victoria station and very close to her place.

Yeah she looked just as her pics from what I remember. I don’t like chunky girls and she certainly wasn’t that back then but that was over fifteen months ago. It would seem going by your experience she’s put some timber on.

Offline mace-window

External Link/Members Only

30 mins £100

This is one of those where I'm umming and arring about a positive or neutral, but there's more than one factor swaying it so neutral it is.

Great comms, nice appartment (about 10 mins walk from Victoria station), good hygiene, all services delivered satisfactorily.

She could be the girl in the pics, but body is more weighty (won't say she's chubby or fat but big in a good way). Very arousing sight just not what I expected from her skinnier profile pics.
She's well spoken and very friendly.
Amazing big womanly arse, bigger boobs than expected too. Really soft skin.

The services are top notch. Passionate and she's into it but.....
She's a bit of a faker in that everything you do she loves. Any suggestion you make is her favourite thing, and when she's 'cumming' every 30 secs from oral it made me stop before I wanted to.

Not considering negative as there's nothing inherently bad about her and I didn't feel any regret afterwards.
I won't be back soon, however her womanly figure is quite rare so maybe in 6 months or so...

Don't know man. Sounds like a positive to me. But thanks for the review. Looks like she gotten a lot sexier from the looks of it. If I was you, if she was actually faking it, I would continued eating her pussy till I hit the right spot. That would shut her up - I know as I have done this to many ladies before  :D :D :D.

Offline Titi

Quote
She could be the girl in the pics, but body is more weighty (won't say she's chubby or fat but big in a good way). Very arousing sight just not what I expected from her skinnier profile pics.
She's well spoken and very friendly.
Amazing big womanly arse, bigger boobs than expected too. Really soft skin.

Spot on description OP. Her stable mate Diana is of similar build, a bit like Christina Hendricks (pic below) in her Mad Men days. Very fuckable looks IMO and I agree with you, she’s bigger than her AW pics and it’s only fair both her and Diana put up recent pics.

A neutral review is justified.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 06, 2020, 11:41:18 pm by Titi »

Offline mace-window

Spot on description OP. Her stable mate Diana is of similar build, a bit like Christina Hendricks (pic below) in her Mad Men days. Very fuckable looks IMO and I agree with you, she’s bigger than her AW pics and it’s only fair both her and Diana put up recent pics.

A neutral review is justified.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Now I need to check that Diana girl out :diablo:.

Offline Titi

Now I need to check that Diana girl out :diablo:.

Yea both girls are decent fucks and FAF IMO. However their AW pics are misleading/old, as both have very womanly figures. The thighs alone  :wacko:.

Offline RocknRollStar


Offline mace-window

Yea both girls are decent fucks and FAF IMO. However their AW pics are misleading/old, as both have very womanly figures. The thighs alone  :wacko:.

Well I will keep my eye on them for 2020.