Author Topic: Gail - Diva Escort - Gloucester Road - TOFTT  (Read 2219 times)

Offline Jason1212

External Link/Members Only

Saw Gail yesterday but initially wanted to see Tavolga but she was booked up to very late  :cry:

Comms - Diva good yet bad because they gave me wrong flat number  :dash:

Price - 250 hour  :dash:

Location - Gloucester station couple mins walk

The meet - Got to the location (funnily enough it's exactly same place where I once saw the amazing Guila) try to buzz in multiple times but no answer so ended up calling diva who said they'll check. Shortly after Gail came down in a robe to let me in stating the wrong flat number was given  :angry:. She looks amazing, as per pic without the filter solid 7/10 russian with smooth skin but slight scar to her enhanced breast. Profile states non smoker but I caught a whif of it once I entered. Shower offered and accepted after exchanging the funds. Gail is very talkative btw, round one, she kissed my body all over some OWO which was decent but nothing to shout about. RO, she tasted nice and was dripping wet, on with the dom, CG ( she does has an amazing toned slim body which was a sight to behold), some lip kissing but defo no FK, doggy and then shot my load over her chest with some onto her mat and hair  :D

Cleaned up and we talked which was getting awkward for me since I wanted round 2 for that price. Eventually managed to get her to kiss my body again whilst pop number 2 happened via handjob.

Left 5mins over the hour but also considered I was got in 5-8mins late due to the misinformation provided..

Conclusion - She is a nice girl, nice body but service wasn't up to par considering she's a Russian so maybe had high expectation plus the price charged...Wished I'd hold on for Talvolga or tried Freya...but you live and you learn...basically go with the positive reviews before testing the water...

Offline Dashing

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,613
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
« Last Edit: January 30, 2020, 07:53:49 pm by Dashing »

Offline James

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,862
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
russian hunnies getting a bit lazy.
no eye of the tiger
Banned reason: Unhealthy obsession with SP malicious posts out of spite
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Dashing

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,613
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Cross-references for Gail @ Diva

= Gala @ Admiral (External Link/Members Only)
= Geil petite @ Hot Collection (External Link/Members Only)
= Gayle @ Angels of London (External Link/Members Only)
= Gail @ Barracuda (External Link/Members Only)
= Gail @ Babylon (External Link/Members Only)

To help key-word searches find relevant reviews/intel.

Offline Jason1212


Offline The Film Director

Oh look, price has dropped  :dash:

Wonders never cease.  :lol:  Maybe some more negatives required.  ;)

Offline James

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,862
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Wonders never cease.  :lol:  Maybe some more negatives required.  ;)

do negatives on the hunnies and you never know. 250ph girls will be 200 or 150
Banned reason: Unhealthy obsession with SP malicious posts out of spite
Banned by: daviemac

Offline golden bull

Despite this review I’m actually considering her as her price has dropped. :scare: :scare: :scare:

Only because she looks like a girl at work who everyone wants to bang 😆😆🥵

Will sleep on this one 🤞🏻

Offline Jason1212

I mean she is hot   :rolleyes:  She's got good attitude but maybe newish to the scene? just lacking something for the price I paid  :unknown:

Offline Jason1212

Wonders never cease.  :lol:  Maybe some more negatives required.  ;)
Right! more Neg for Tavolga pls  :lol:

Offline cotton

Hidden Image/Members Only
She looks stunning in the natural pic , like 9/10 but the rest with the horrible dyed hair and moronic poses she looks crap 4/10.

Offline golden bull

She looks stunning in the natural pic , like 9/10 but the rest with the horrible dyed hair and moronic poses she looks crap 4/10.

You really do have beef with diva don’t you?🤔

Offline kasamaa

No FK but says DFK on her profile  :dash:

Offline cotton

You really do have beef with diva don’t you?🤔
It does piss me off they have a harem of hot chiks but then they use such terrible unflattering pics and also consistently mislead about the services the girls offer , why cant they just be honest.
Plus you should also bare in mind that Diva are notorious for fake reviews so its not surprising they get a little more scrutiny and eyes are out for the next Diva spokesperson.

Online bonapati

It does piss me off they have a harem of hot chiks but then they use such terrible unflattering pics and also consistently mislead about the services the girls offer , why cant they just be honest.
Plus you should also bare in mind that Diva are notorious for fake reviews so its not surprising they get a little more scrutiny and eyes are out for the next Diva spokesperson.
I’m not sure what your point is. I’ve stated here before “Diva” use the same pictures as other agencies that these SPs advertise. In some cases the can differ but I suppose that to the advantage of the punter.
If Burger King actually advertised (photographed) their burgers they way they are served nobody will be buying them (I’m not way saying these hotties are a piece of meat). It’s called advertising. Diva reviews on here are (I think) as honest as you can get. As for what’s published on their website I’d use my imagination if I were you. The same goes for pictures. I have to say photos or Freya, Mikel, Alissia, Alina, annisia, Narcissa, Hope, Natalie, dorote.. to name a few were quite close even with the photoshopping.




Offline hermanmunster

It does piss me off they have a harem of hot chiks but then they use such terrible unflattering pics and also consistently mislead about the services the girls offer , why cant they just be honest.
Plus you should also bare in mind that Diva are notorious for fake reviews so its not surprising they get a little more scrutiny and eyes are out for the next Diva spokesperson.

Not an advert for Diva - but they always seem to reply promptly and politely even when I cancel, so I have stayed using them.  Wouldn't it be the girls who provide the photoshopped pictures or would they provide originals and leave agency to photoshop?  Must be the girls photoshopping as all agencies use similar pictures?  Not sure who should take responsibility for the girls not providing advertised services - I guess the "at discretion" phrase can always be the reason/excuse.

Offline hermanmunster

I’m not sure what your point is. I’ve stated here before “Diva” use the same pictures as other agencies that these SPs advertise. In some cases the can differ but I suppose that to the advantage of the punter.
If Burger King actually advertised (photographed) their burgers they way they are served nobody will be buying them (I’m not way saying these hotties are a piece of meat). It’s called advertising. Diva reviews on here are (I think) as honest as you can get. As for what’s published on their website I’d use my imagination if I were you. The same goes for pictures. I have to say photos or Freya, Mikel, Alissia, Alina, annisia, Narcissa, Hope, Natalie, dorote.. to name a few were quite close even with the photoshopping.

I agree with bonapati here.  Also they have always published my reviews good or bad.  Obviously can't speak for others, but feel if they are "fair comment"  they will be published.  It can only help them if people can consider them credible/"honest".
« Last Edit: February 04, 2020, 03:24:19 pm by hermanmunster »

Offline cotton

I’m not sure what your point is. I’ve stated here before “Diva” use the same pictures as other agencies that these SPs advertise. In some cases the can differ but I suppose that to the advantage of the punter.
If Burger King actually advertised (photographed) their burgers they way they are served nobody will be buying them (I’m not way saying these hotties are a piece of meat). It’s called advertising. Diva reviews on here are (I think) as honest as you can get. As for what’s published on their website I’d use my imagination if I were you. The same goes for pictures. I have to say photos or Freya, Mikel, Alissia, Alina, annisia, Narcissa, Hope, Natalie, dorote.. to name a few were quite close even with the photoshopping.
So dont you think its wrong to state DFK on the profile and then theres no DFK or even FK  :unknown:

Online bonapati

So dont you think its wrong to state DFK on the profile and then theres no DFK or even FK  :unknown:

Never said agreed to any site published incorrect services. Your comment was about photoshopped photos. Stay focus stop moving about. Stay on point or move on if you don’t have value to add.

Besides, not sure what you are getting out of this tirade. 3 reviews in 3 years and none are of Diva or any  other london agency. Is it half term and I just don’t know it?
« Last Edit: February 04, 2020, 03:59:31 pm by bonapati »

Offline cotton

Never said agreed to any site published incorrect services. Your comment was about photoshopped photos. Stay focus stop moving about. Stay on point or move on if you don’t have value to add.

Besides, not sure what you are getting out of this tirade. 3 reviews in 3 years and none are of Diva or any  other london agency. Is it half term and I just don’t know it?
Im not moving focus . I said Diva "consistently mislead about the services the girls offer"
Diva are wrong to state DFK on the profile and then theres no DFK or even FK , if you dont like it being pointed out and objected to then tough , report it.