Not saying it's right, but if the OP had posted a review as his own, who would have known otherwise?
Too true JBJ, nobody would have known the difference, but i Prefer the honesty myself, Im sure over the years many people have read reviews which could be deemed as unbelievable but if our reviews
are our reviews then the most someone can be accused of is of being creative with their writing rather than plagiarism in one form or another
I don't have an issue with posting a link which as been suggested and i don't have an issue with admin allowing/approving third party reviews as long as we know that it is a third party review, but rules are rules and
the OP should be commended for asking the question