Baan Chaba Denton

[Smithsonian]

I'd heard this place had changed hands again.
I was in the area so took a look and walked in.
Maglock and bolted door, God knows what trouble they've had or expecting.
The place was clean but a bit chilly.
Shown straight to a room by the lady who was dressed like a bag lady!
The room was toasty, with a big (as it turned out) brand new massage bed.
Paid £30 for an hour and got ready.
The lady came back, dressed more for massage.
The massage wasn't as firm as I prefer but was very pleasant.
The conversation odd. She spoke like she had good command of the English language but then struggled understanding what I consider basic vocabulary.
She did seem a bit crazy, more in a fun way rather than she'll murder you in your sleep kind of way!
I'll venture back when I'm next in the area and perhaps spend more money if the mood takes me.

[Goldfinch]

External Link/Members Only

[Philmeboots]

Talking of basic vocabulary:
Extras on offer
Her looks and age
Cost


More information needed to draw any conclusions from your first review

[Smithsonian]

It's the girl on the Gumtree ad. (I should have added that to my review initially.)
I stated £30.
I also stated I would return and maybe spend more money if the mood took me.

[Goldfinch]

GT ad expired,but still visible:

External Link/Members Only

[Smithsonian]

My apologies Goldfinch; I assumed if punters could find this site, they'd be capable of doing a search but it appears some are unable to comprehend more than a couple of lines of text.
I often wondered why you put links on everyone's posts!!

[Bustydusty]

My apologies Goldfinch; I assumed if punters could find this site, they'd be capable of doing a search but it appears some are unable to comprehend more than a couple of lines of text.
I often wondered why you put links on everyone's posts!!

That’s gonna do you a lot of good

[GingerNuts]

My apologies Goldfinch; I assumed if punters could find this site, they'd be capable of doing a search but it appears some are unable to comprehend more than a couple of lines of text.
I often wondered why you put links on everyone's posts!!

It seems you're unable to comprehend the forum rules.

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only criteria is that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is duos etc and massage establishments where providers do not have names
Reviews must contain either a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider).

[Smithsonian]

Yes.
But Gingernuts requested a review and I didn't have the energy to get into a non-event debating debacle.
Refreshed and bouyed with copious amounts of sparkling water, I once again feel able to walk amongst the mentally challenged.

[Bustydusty]

Yes.
But Gingernuts requested a review and I didn't have the energy to get into a non-event debating debacle.
Refreshed and bouyed with copious amounts of sparkling water, I once again feel able to walk amongst the mentally challenged.

Don’t worry prick you won’t be here long

[chrishornx]

Yes.
But Gingernuts requested a review and I didn't have the energy to get into a non-event debating debacle.
Refreshed and bouyed with copious amounts of sparkling water, I once again feel able to walk amongst the mentally challenged.

who the fuck do you think you are? You should't be allowed on here with your shitty attitude

[Smithsonian]

Shitty attitude? Provoked.
You should never poke a bear.

[Smithsonian]

And to believe I was only answering an original request as to the status of Baan Chaba and their unanswered phones.
I was just trying to be helpful.
Immediately, I was challenged. Perhaps, instead, once in a while, people could be just grateful?

[hockogrockle]

And to believe I was only answering an original request as to the status of Baan Chaba and their unanswered phones.
I was just trying to be helpful.
Immediately, I was challenged. Perhaps, instead, once in a while, people could be just grateful?

You may well have been responding to a query. But you've posted it under "reviews", not "regional discussion" where the original query was posted.Nobody would have objected if you had put it in the original thread. In fact I imagine you would have been thanked for your help. It's the fact it has been wrongly-posted as a completely independent thread unrelated to the query, and in the "review" part of the site, that's caused the irritation among other site users, I think. Better luck with your next post!

[chrishornx]

You may well have been responding to a query. But you've posted it under "reviews", not "regional discussion" where the original query was posted.Nobody would have objected if you had put it in the original thread. In fact I imagine you would have been thanked for your help. It's the fact it has been wrongly-posted as a completely independent thread unrelated to the query, and in the "review" part of the site, that's caused the irritation among other site users, I think. Better luck with your next post!

not so sure...he mentioned on the 'other thread' that he had seen someone that was 'barking' and Ginger then 'suggested' or 'asked' for a review (suggesting that this guy has lurked on here for 4 months without any contribution) and so he did one and as such I am not convinced his review was wrongly posted.

[GingerNuts]

And to believe I was only answering an original request as to the status of Baan Chaba and their unanswered phones.
I was just trying to be helpful.
Immediately, I was challenged. Perhaps, instead, once in a while, people could be just grateful?

I suggested you post a review, and you did, so thanks for that.

The issue is your attitude towards other members of the forum. That's what you've been challenged on.

My apologies Goldfinch; I assumed if punters could find this site, they'd be capable of doing a search but it appears some are unable to comprehend more than a couple of lines of text.
I often wondered why you put links on everyone's posts!!

Yes.
But Gingernuts requested a review and I didn't have the energy to get into a non-event debating debacle.
Refreshed and bouyed with copious amounts of sparkling water, I once again feel able to walk amongst the mentally challenged.

You need to wind your neck in.

[hockogrockle]

not so sure...he mentioned on the 'other thread' that he had seen someone that was 'barking' and Ginger then 'suggested' or 'asked' for a review (suggesting that this guy has lurked on here for 4 months without any contribution) and so he did one and as such I am not convinced his review was wrongly posted.

Fair comment on my post.

[chrishornx]

Fair comment on my post.

I saw what you were getting at just not sure what he was doing but he is certainly out of order as Nuts points out

[nanga247]

My apologies Goldfinch; I assumed if punters could find this site, they'd be capable of doing a search but it appears some are unable to comprehend more than a couple of lines of text.
I often wondered why you put links on everyone's posts!!

you often wondered why he puts links in, well if you wondered about that then your excused for your stupidity.  Something as simple as that confuses you.