Previous punter and BB

[JRWK]

Something I've learned from comments on this forum is to look at who has previously seen a new WG. 

I was on the verge of booking a new to Southport WG, till looking back at who had seen her previously, found after a short search, someone who'd seen a WG only a few months previous who once had (and after checking still has) BB on her likes list. 

This girl might well have been ok, I may have missed the time of my life, but is it worth it?

[Al R]

I’ve seen plenty of feedback on wg’s profiles who have feedback off punters who have seen wg’s who offer BB.

It’s a minefield...if it’s a one-off (ie if the punter only has feedback from one wg that advertises BB) I’ll likely let it slide. If the punter has seen a lot of different wg’s who offer BB I’ll give her a miss. I’ll also give her a miss if several different punters who have seen wg’s who offer BB have left her feedback as it’d make me wonder if BB was being offered on the sly.

[chrishornx]

Something I've learned from comments on this forum is to look at who has previously seen a new WG. 

I was on the verge of booking a new to Southport WG, till looking back at who had seen her previously, found after a short search, someone who'd seen a WG only a few months previous who once had (and after checking still has) BB on her likes list. 

This girl might well have been ok, I may have missed the time of my life, but is it worth it?

is the 'new Southport WG' and the 'WG only a few months ago' the same person

if so would help the thread if you provided a link

[JRWK]

is the 'new Southport WG' and the 'WG only a few months ago' the same person

if so would help the thread if you provided a link

No, this is different girl.. as implied in reply above, it just might be the one off, if so I don't want to name and shame what could be an innocent WG. 

I was just pointing out the choices we need to make - should we be ultra careful, and miss out on what could be one of the the highlights of the year, or do we trust our instinct?

[katmandu]

should we be ultra careful, and miss out on what could be one of the the highlights of the year, or do we trust our instinct?

I think you trust your instinct.
She probably has no idea about one of her previous punters seeing a BBer and if she practices safe only the risks are minimal.

[Doc Holliday]

Something I've learned from comments on this forum is to look at who has previously seen a new WG. 

I was on the verge of booking a new to Southport WG, till looking back at who had seen her previously, found after a short search, someone who'd seen a WG only a few months previous who once had (and after checking still has) BB on her likes list. 

This girl might well have been ok, I may have missed the time of my life, but is it worth it?

If some people want to avoid a wg who advertises BB then that is their prerogative and whilst I would question the scientific rationale for the perceived risk involved (and assuming you practice safe sex yourself) I accept what people feel comfortable with.

However when you start searching for evidence that a wg has seen a punter who has also seen a girl who offers BB, then you not only entering a world of extreme paranoia but one which has no practical bearing on risk assessment.

Let's assume every wg we see practices safe sex at all times in both her working and private life (and that is a big assumption) However she will not be able to avoid seeing punters who have unprotected sex either with other wgs or more commonly their private lives.

If you fancy seeing this girl just do it.

[JRWK]

and assuming you practice safe sex yourself

If you fancy seeing this girl just do it.

Trouble is, there is no way to practice safe sex with oral in either direction..

[katmandu]

Trouble is, there is no way to practice safe sex with oral in either direction..

There's always an element of risk, especially with oral. That's why some wg's won't do owo.

[Doc Holliday]

Trouble is, there is no way to practice safe sex with oral in either direction..

But its the same principle. if you chose to stick your unprotected penis or tongue somewhere where many others have done the same thing, then you have decided to take a risk, albeit a small one. Once again  some of those penises and tongues will belong to people who practice unprotected penetrative sex. Discovering evidence that one such punter definitely does so is irrelevant in terms of affecting that risk.

[tr!gger]

But its the same principle. if you chose to stick your unprotected penis or tongue somewhere where many others have done the same thing, then you have decided to take a risk, albeit a small one. Once again  some of those penises and tongues will belong to people who practice unprotected penetrative sex. Discovering evidence that one such punter definitely does so is irrelevant in terms of affecting that risk.

I couldn't agree more with what you have said.

It's a risky game we all play and if you get wrapped up worrying about the statistics for STD's then you should find another hobby.

I've been doing this for 25 years and I have never contracted anything, I always practice protected penetration but OWO and reverse oral are unprotected and both favourites of mine. I credit myself as a good judge of character & situations and I have walked away from numerous situations or changed my modus operandi once i've met a provider as a result of making a judgement about the service provider.

I exercise more caution when I'm abroad especially in Africa and Far East.

[JRWK]

I couldn't agree more with what you have said.

It's a risky game we all play and if you get wrapped up worrying about the statistics for STD's then you should find another hobby.

I've been doing this for 25 years and I have never contracted anything, I always practice protected penetration but OWO and reverse oral are unprotected and both favourites of mine. I credit myself as a good judge of character & situations and I have walked away from numerous situations or changed my modus operandi once i've met a provider as a result of making a judgement about the service provider.

I exercise more caution when I'm abroad especially in Africa and Far East.

My point exactly.  Tho I've only been doing this for only a few years. 
I prefer just seeing 2-3 regulars, but with one retiring from this game, I was looking for a 'replacement' when with only a little digging found she'd recently seen a well known BB'er - so decided against her.

[tr!gger]

My point exactly.  Tho I've only been doing this for only a few years. 
I prefer just seeing 2-3 regulars, but with one retiring from this game, I was looking for a 'replacement' when with only a little digging found she'd recently seen a well known BB'er - so decided against her.

Go with your gut feel, it sounds like you have done ok up till now.
I know what you are saying about having regulars but I find I'll see someone 3 or 4 times and then the 'getting to know one another' excitement wears off.

[Doc Holliday]

Looking through this again maybe I've read it wrong? Are you implying that the girl you hoped to see may have had unprotected sex with the punter in question and that is what is worrying you?

[JRWK]

Looking through this again maybe I've read it wrong? Are you implying that the girl you hoped to see may have had unprotected sex with the punter in question and that is what is worrying you?

No, you read it right first time ..

looking through the ratings on her profile - briefly, not a determined search - one of her last 3 bookings had been with a BB'er.  Maybe it means nothing in the cold light of day, and the chances are I have missed out on a good WG. 

Oh for the 1970's when the worst you could catch would be sorted with antibiotics for a week!!

[Doc Holliday]

Thanks for clarifying in which case I stick by my view that you are potentially missing out by not seeing her 

Oh for the 1970's when the worst you could catch would be sorted with antibiotics for a week!!

Actually on the basis you are having protected heterosexual penetrative sex and unprotected oral (giving and receiving) the risks are very similar now and then ..... possibly slightly less? ... with maybe the exception  of antibiotic resistant gonorrhoea.

[JRWK]

Thanks for clarifying in which case I stick by my view that you are potentially missing out by not seeing her 

Actually on the basis you are having protected heterosexual penetrative sex and unprotected oral (giving and receiving) the risks are very similar now and then ..... possibly slightly less? ... with maybe the exception  of antibiotic resistant gonorrhoea.

Cheers Doc.   

[Twotall]

I think it’s a risk that you have to be aware of but I wouldn’t worry too much about previous clients as most girls get screened regularly.  Although, I’m not so sure about the massage scene.

[softlad25]

I think it’s a risk that you have to be aware of but I wouldn’t worry too much about previous clients as most girls get screened regularly.  Although, I’m not so sure about the massage scene.

you really think that girls who have been screened and show positive would stop working 

[Twotall]

you really think that girls who have been screened and show positive would stop working 

I was trying to put the OPs mind at ease.

The truth is that it’s always a gamble when you stick your unprotected dick in any hole. Most of us enjoy OWO and ask for CIM. You can never know if someone had been there half an hour before and who they’ve been shagging and how careful they’ve been.

You can worry about it and risk performance issues or accept that although the risk is small it’s always a risk.

[Doc Holliday]

.. as most girls get screened regularly. 

Now there's a question. 

Getting accurate data on this is not easy, but when I have investigated this in the past what data is available suggests the majority do not? This is also supported anecdotally in my experience.

It tends to be an all or nothing. The minority that do get tested seem to be very conscientious and follow a strict and regular regime. However most are at best sporadically tested or only respond to symptoms.

Throughout my lifetime my unprotected dick has been in many hundreds of different mouths and the same with my naked tongue around 'lady bits'. I have got away with it. This is a combination of low risk and good fortune. However I am under no illusion that could change tomorrow.

[Bigdave2000]

Throughout my lifetime my unprotected dick has been in many hundreds of different mouths and the same with my naked tongue around 'lady bits'. I have got away with it. This is a combination of low risk and good fortune. However I am under no illusion that could change tomorrow.

Aye I always prefer OWO and like to lick the flaps when the opporchancity arrives......I've always been rubbered up for penetration, but I was, I have to admit, horrified to find out a few years ago that I'd caught a case of clap  Now this was down to my parlour naivity at the time, but can almost guarantee it came from Arabs in Bury, and had to have caught it orally. Antibiotics sorted it......but took some explaining at the time, especially since t'other half had to get hersel' checked out too

[Kenco657]

What about all the punters WGs see that don’t have AW profiles??
You are only skimming the surface by checking previous feedbacks.
Best to not think about it. As long as you bag up and take all the precautionary measures you can. Chances are that you will be fine.

[bigbilly22]

Your reading way to much into it. Just focus on your punt and only punt with WGs and do things that you’re happy with.

Shagging a WG is probably safer than shagging some tart you pick up on a Saturday night but you simply can’t be 100% sure on anyone’s sexual activity.

The safest WG in the world might just of had a split condom incident with a secret barebacker who BB’s street whores for the price of a heroin wrap.

Only safe way is abstain, stee we y gone and have a wank instead.

22

[cueball]

Billy makes some valid points above imo.

Whilst it is always a good idea to do as much due diligence as you can. Just looking at who podged who can only go so far and works only for prolific bb'ers rather than the occasional one that slips through the net.

I (like many others) will podge lasses that have phone number displayed and book over the phone via a call.

If a lass has a phone number up then we have no idea who came before us.

I've said this before, the condom is for MY protection from her not her protection from me.

If you trace and link punters and lasses eventually I guarantee you will have a link to bb 'er.

You can over think it though, and miss some good safe fun.... Just remember the condom is for your protection first and foremost!

[fallentrees1321]

In response to what has already been said in this thread if you did decide to vet AW feedback so stringently that you dont see any WG has FB from someone that also has FB from a BB'er you probably would not see any WG off Awork.

Ive just had a quick flick through feedback for someone I have seen a few times and who is well reviewed on here , it did not take long to find feedback from a client that also has feedback from a profile that advertises BB services  .

Would I not see said WG on that basis , of course not . She does not advertise BB services , always has ensured condoms are used when I have visited her and tbh I have seen her several times so if she was the sort to offer BB on the sly then I would have probably been offered it by now .

If it was a fairly new account with no reviews here  and all the feedback was from clients with lots of feedback to and from advertising BB'ers then by all means exercise caution .

But when all is said and done , Awork feedback is only part of the picture , the WG could have seen countless prolific bug hunters through phone or text bookings , might have a reg who has only left feedback once but seen her countless times who is also a prolific bug hunter , heck just because a client does not have fb from prossies offering BB does not mean that he does not engage in BB with random sloots he has met off tinder or on civvie street in clubs etc which is just as bad .

[JRWK]

In response to what has already been said in this thread if you did decide to vet AW feedback so stringently that you dont see any WG has FB from someone that also has FB from a BB'er you probably would not see any WG off Awork.

Ive just had a quick flick through feedback for someone I have seen a few times and who is well reviewed on here , it did not take long to find feedback from a client that also has feedback from a profile that advertises BB services  .

Would I not see said WG on that basis , of course not . She does not advertise BB services , always has ensured condoms are used when I have visited her and tbh I have seen her several times so if she was the sort to offer BB on the sly then I would have probably been offered it by now .

If it was a fairly new account with no reviews here  and all the feedback was from clients with lots of feedback to and from advertising BB'ers then by all means exercise caution .

But when all is said and done , Awork feedback is only part of the picture , the WG could have seen countless prolific bug hunters through phone or text bookings , might have a reg who has only left feedback once but seen her countless times who is also a prolific bug hunter , heck just because a client does not have fb from Sex Workers offering BB does not mean that he does not engage in BB with random sloots he has met off tinder or on civvie street in clubs etc which is just as bad .

You're right of course, as have many who have also given their opinion.

I was obviously being TOO careful, but having said that, on a second look I did find exactly what I was looking for, someone I'd have missed had I opted for the original WG who only offered most of what I was looking for, the one that I started this thread about.

I have learned not to be so picky - as well as finding a new gem.

So thanks for all your opinions.