Ginger_Maggie - Barnet

[ipaybyvisa]

External Link/Members Only

This meeting took place a few months ago after a few failed attempts to meet up.

The meeting was a disappointment to me. That was not due to Maggie's performance. She's very up
for it and is probably getting as much out of these meets as her customers. For me the issue is
that her pics give a very different picture to the person that you meet. In her pics she appears toned and slim.
she's carrying a few extra pounds now and has that pear shaped middle age look. Facially
she also looks like she's mid to late 50s

Reasonable value though given her usp, ginger with unshaven fiery red pubes. Services delivered were
owo, rimming on me and sex in doggy whereupon she encouraged to 'fuck that ginger pussy' whilst i
pulled her back on me grabbing her by the hair, and yes i enjoyed that part.

Still a neutral though due to the misleading, oudated pics and because i did'nt actually fancy her.
 

[pepsicolaboy]

Another absolute disgrace, essentially B&S customers with outdated and misleading pics 

[Payyourwaymate]

Shame about the punt. I like your username  .

[Mr_Shins]

That may well be someone I sent a request message to a couple of years ago and ignored it. Probably just as well.

[Heph]

I find the pictures a pretty accurate portrayal of her IRL, but with this caveat: you actually have to *look* at them - take at least 30 seconds per picture, and also ask yourself why certain lighting, angles and drapes have been deployed as they have. Too often, I find myself just scanning the basics, thinking I have a good impression of body shape, and not thinking about the arts above.

From not-so distant memory, she's in pretty good shape for her age, and I'd guess that age is early to mid-fifties (though I think her profile says 40s). She works out in yoga, but its all soft, comfortable and with the occasional small wobble.

[ipaybyvisa]

Those pics are probably accurate for what she looked like in her mid to late 30s.
I dont want to have to look and try hard to re-imagine that body when the reality is
right there in front of me.

I think she gives a sound service. Just lower the expectations on the body front.

[Heph]

Those pics are probably accurate for what she looked like in her mid to late 30s.
I dont want to have to look and try hard to re-imagine that body when the reality is
right there in front of me.

I think she gives a sound service. Just lower the expectations on the body front.

I'm not repeating this for the sake of giving you a hard time, but I genuinely believe the pics are relatively recent, or around 3-5yrs old max. For your theory to hold true, they'd have to be 15-20 years old and I think we can all see that they're simply not.

The point of taking time to revisit and observe more carefully, isn't some implicit criticism of you- but rather will reveal what was actually hiding in plain sight all along, and will help you spot similar SP 'editorial decisions' in future.

If it's any consolation, I share a not dissimilar experience with you, but found her charming and erotic enough to venture again afterwards.

[unus669]

I'm not repeating this for the sake of giving you a hard time, but I genuinely believe the pics are relatively recent, or around 3-5yrs old max. For your theory to hold true, they'd have to be 15-20 years old and I think we can all see that they're simply not.

The point of taking time to revisit and observe more carefully, isn't some implicit criticism of you- but rather will reveal what was actually hiding in plain sight all along, and will help you spot similar SP 'editorial decisions' in future.

If it's any consolation, I share a not dissimilar experience with you, but found her charming and erotic enough to venture again afterwards.

I think her pics are probably nearer 5+ years old, body types can change significantly in less years. I wondered why she still uses those pics. However, what her body looked like when I saw her earlier this year, is pretty much similar to what those pictures represent. I think a reviewer did raise the issue of the pics with her and her response was she hadn’t updated them, because it attracts the clientele she is happy with or something along those lines

The OP states he thinks she is in her 50s, if he’s correct she ‘defo’ looks much better than I claimed . Which is I thought she is in her 40s and looks good for it.

[Heph]

However, what her body looked like when I saw her earlier this year, is pretty much similar to what those pictures represent.

Agree

From not-so distant memory, she's in pretty good shape for her age, and I'd guess that age is early to mid-fifties (though I think her profile says 40s). She works out in yoga, but its all soft, comfortable and with the occasional small wobble.

[Jack1957]

Just to try and put the question of her age to rest - she’s 48. I’ve mentioned this on here before, and I know that for a fact.

[bobby1973]

how do you know that ?
or are you maggie ?
as you haven't done any reviews in 4 years 

[Jack1957]

No I’m not Maggie mate - that made me giggle. I’ve seen her a few times now, and all this discussion about her age made me do a little investigation on the internet. I found out in about 15mins. It’s not that difficult once you know the address and that’s all I’m saying. Regarding not doing reviews, I’ve tried a few times but the system doesn’t let me for some reason, so I sort of gave up. I am genuine I can assure you.

[unus669]

No I’m not Maggie mate - that made me giggle. I’ve seen her a few times now, and all this discussion about her age made me do a little investigation on the internet. I found out in about 15mins. It’s not that difficult once you know the address and that’s all I’m saying. Regarding not doing reviews, I’ve tried a few times but the system doesn’t let me for some reason, so I sort of gave up. I am genuine I can assure you.

So I’m guessing you checked the electoral register for her address and probably got her full name? Why on earth would you go to such length to get details of a WG? Even if you didn’t do the above, why would you go searching for such information about a WG

[Jerk Chicken]

So I’m guessing you checked the electoral register for her address and probably got her full name? Why on earth would you go to such length to get details of a WG? Even if you didn’t do the above, why would you go searching for such information about a WG

+1 .... creepy