Slight misunderstanding perhaps, the photo I posted was from a random google search of the girl who lives in Australia called Wettmelons. I posted it as I figured fellas can see it’s the same lass as the one on that vivastreet profile. As soon as I saw that vivastreet profile I instantly recognised who the model they were using as a bait and switch was. Trust me, I spent many hours enjoying that models content over the years to be sure of that! She’s very popular and has been raking in the money on OF so I was highly sceptical that she decided to go to all the way to Stratford from Australia and pretend to be a Polish lass escorting.
Just so you can be sure, below is a screenshot of a google image search of one of the pics used in the vivastreet profile which is a match of the model I’m talking about. The fact that the vivastreet profile says “IDverified” is making me question how stringent their checks are!
As for the impending ban, I’m not planning on making a new punt until a couple of months time so can you take that into consideration and that my post was answering a query and to enlighten fellow punters of a possible bait and switch. Also, I have posted reviews before and answered queries about other girls in the past which I hope is a sign of a net postive contribution.
Hidden Image/Members Only
As moderators we go by the site rules that the site owner sets matey unfortunately, so inline with rule 27, anyone seeming to be not contributing reviews (either noticed by us or reported by other members), we do a few check, basically we would look when the last review was, how often the member logs in and what questions they would ask, to work out if they aren’t contributing.
Would it be fair to say, please correct me if I’m wrong, your last review was in 2017 and you contributed a review in about 8 years.
You may have noticed as moderators, we no longer question members where previously we would ask a member to explain, the boss has updated rule 27, it’s very clear, it says if you don’t seem to be contributing a timer will be set, if you’d like to contribute a review it will be lifted, no pressure.
So I’m not questioning you about the next 2 months regarding will you review, I’ve set a timer because of you lack of contributing in the last 8 years.
As for the photo stuff, rule 22 explains in detail we only allow photos from current ads, no socials etc. As you can see the photo was removed “until source confirmed” because there’s no link to show its on a live advert, we obviously don’t have time to check every image a member uploads across google.
A link to VS would have helped, I’ve no way of knowing you’ve not used a photo from instagram as per your screen shot.
I hope that explains everything.
