Author Topic: SEXY EWA69 - Southgate - B&S but positive  (Read 1167 times)


1 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5070637) (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by lewishamguy]

Offline bedhedred

External Link/Members Only

I was intrigued by the pictures, so I headed to the location not far from McDonald's and down a lane. Once I got in the room, it was clearly not the girl in the profile. I'd say she was mid 30s. Long Mousy/blonde dyed hair. Short and quite chubby verging on bbw, but all well in proportion. Her boobs were not huge so maybe c-cups. Face was acceptable, but less so than the profile pictures - who are someone else entirely.

I asked her about dfk - she said yes. And in response to DT, she said she'd try her best. So I handed over £60 for 30 minutes and we got stripped down. I'd showered pre arrival. She seemed down to earth and ready for action giving enthusiastic DFK and also giving a good impression of a girl who likes sex. I fingered her and felt her go from dry to wet.

Onto the bj and she would have done owo, but I opted for covered. She got down pretty deep and I felt her gag a little. As we went on the saliva dribbled down. After a spell in 69, I did her in doggy. No lube needed. There was a nice large mirror for added visuals. Finally, I turned her over and we did a noisy rough session in mish. This came to a sweaty finish, and all in all it was good fun.

About 20 mins of action time was had. If I'd known it was going to be a success, I'd have upgraded to an hour.

After showering and getting dressed, I asked her why the B&S photos. She mentioned something about needing to keep her identity secret which didn't quite convince me. Then she said noone so far has walked so she can't be that ugly.

Anyway. It was fun, and I may return.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2019, 01:03:41 am by bedhedred »

Offline Donkeykong69

Purely for being a blatant B&S this should be a Neutral at best.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,547
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Purely for being a blatant B&S this should be a Neutral at best.

This has been bashed about so many times.  Just because you don't get to see photos prior and she's not the one shown IF YOU STAY because she's tasty enough then she deserves all the credit for the performance.  Very few SPs publish totally representative, current pics so most are B&Sing you to some degree, don't get me started on claimed size of boobs, promised service and performance levels.  These are what really matter.  A superhoney starfish with awesome promises and pics is as much of a B&S.
If OP had turned on his heels at first sight or because negotiation of fees and services didn't convince him to chance it then the B&S has full weight.
Once you stay this is no different to rating a parlour girl or almost any Oriental escort, including the Thai agency ones.

Offline winkywanky

Difficult, isn't it?

She was B&S but gave a good service worthy of a Positive.

I guess the best compromise is exactly what the OP has done, to put 'B&S' clearly in the review heading.

Otherwise, a cursory look at the indexed ratings suggests that all is well, when infact subsequent punters have a high likelihood of not seeing the girl(s) that got reviewed previously. That fact needs to be very clearly displayed.

Offline bedhedred

If it helps to explain my thinking, this punt happened less than an hour after the one linked:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=264766.0

Which I rated a neutral. By comparison, the b&s was more fun, albeit with a less impressive girl. Once in the room, I had the choice to leave.

Offline bestbefore

If it helps to explain my thinking, this punt happened less than an hour after the one linked:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=264766.0

Which I rated a neutral. By comparison, the b&s was more fun, albeit with a less impressive girl. Once in the room, I had the choice to leave.

EWA has now changed her photos. Was this the girl you saw or has the profile been switched?

Offline JamesRockford

Purely for being a blatant B&S this should be a Neutral at best.

I would agree.

Even though we're glad that this experience turned out positively, a B+S is totally risky for the punter because today it could be this lady, and tomorrow it could be a slob with a bad attitude. Yes, the punter could walk away when he sees who is actually working that day, but who likes to waste their time and money traveling to and from an abortive meet?

The only thing that one can really review reliably and usefully for other punters in these cases  is the location.