Author Topic: What do I get out of this?  (Read 5728 times)

Offline 90125

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,095
  • Likes: 67
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
If anyone is running 2 Profiles they are at risk of a ban even if permission was given as we have no records of such decisions made in the past. Be careful  :bomb:

Offline bearcat69

Ah, the classic "I contributed and was insulted so what do I get from this forum" combined with the "I'm a super elite punter who has punted for 10 bazillion years" line. :rolleyes: It's simple really, you get nothing with that attitude. :lol:

Offline freeze44

Ah, the classic "I contributed and was insulted so what do I get from this forum" combined with the "I'm a super elite punter who has punted for 10 bazillion years" line. :rolleyes: It's simple really, you get nothing with that attitude. :lol:

+1 that winger came on with some love story punt...even though the wg wouldn't see him again!  :lol:  :wacko:

Place be better without the dick tbh!  :thumbsup:

Offline workinallweek

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,560
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 33

This is a classic case of a descriptive and factual Negative or Neutral review by one punter, indicating to another punter that infact this WG might be for him.


er again but slower ive had a drink or two  :lol:
Banned reason: Offering glowing positive reviews for free bookings.
Banned by: daviemac

Online Moby Dick

I certainly did  :lol: that’s one nice camel toe  :thumbsup:
Yeah, the rest of the thread is a load of bollox.
Give me camel toe any day of the week

Offline Bogof60

What do I get out of this.

A ban if your attitude does not improve I am willing to bet   :bomb:
Banned reason: Abuse of a mod.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Drayki

Yeah, the rest of the thread is a load of bollox.
Give me camel toe any day of the week
:thumbsup:   :lol:

Offline shagbambi

Jamie, you need to be patient.  Rumour has it you will be on the next honours list for services to punting  :thumbsup:

Offline Plan R

+1 that winger came on with some love story punt...even though the wg wouldn't see him again!  :lol:  :wacko:
:lol: :lol:

Offline nightbot

Well that's a question you have to ask yourself. I've reviewed girls that no one has seen as well, and I kind of got a bit of comments about being a bit flowery for one of them elsewhere but I didn't get called out for being fluffy. I've also been called out for "wasting my money" on long bookings and chatting. But that's just the way I like it and I don't really have to adhere to their standard for my personal enjoyment. 50% of the people responding to your posts on this site will probably go against you and the rest 50% with you, that won't change ever and you just have to get used to it....unless you are someone like NigelF.

With that said, you only got shit for one review (i.e. the latest one) and that is very tame in all honesty. But I'll explain what the issue with that particular review was as best as possible. It was the overt fluffiness with cliche use of words (I'll explain why this is exactly an issue in a bit), now bear in mind that is all fine if you felt that way and she blew your socks off. Many of us probably do feel that way from time to time with someone and anyone who says otherwise is a straight up liar. However, those details are not actually important to a review and it just causes the reader to cringe because there have been reviews where the reviewer would use those same exact cliche phrases and then someone else would go see the girl and find out that she's a shit provider and the reviewer was just so enamoured by her that he didn't see it. That is the reason why that kind of stuff is frowned upon, even if she genuinely is that good. It's because it becomes difficult to tell if you are being objective about the important things.

It was also on the long end, but they convey less information than a lot of other shorter reviews. It's not really important to talk about how many fingers you put inside her vagina, or minute by minute description of the meeting. That only leads to people skimming on your reviews and focusing on the cliche lines like "Treat her well".

You are bound to get a few shit here and there every time you review someone or even post, there are just so many people here from varying age group, demographic, preference that it's just impossible to have something that pleases everyone and you just kind of have to get used to that fact. There is no need to respond to everyone who speaks out against you and defend yourself, because if you do you'll be here all day long wasting your time.
« Last Edit: October 23, 2019, 09:23:14 pm by nightbot »

Offline Bonker


Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
But I'll explain what the issue with that particular review was as best as possible.
Wow, and I thought the OP was a walloper, then you posted :wacko:... What a condescending twat... I suppose you're such an authority, what with the big two reviews you've done in three years...  :rolleyes:

Offline nightbot

Wow, and I thought the OP was a walloper, then you posted :wacko:... What a condescending twat... I suppose you're such an authority, what with the big two reviews you've done in three years...  :rolleyes:
I only started punting this year, and if you looked at my profile to check when I joined you'd have also seen I've done more than 2 reviews.
Anyways I am talking to the OP and no one else, because I used to feel the same way due to posters such as yourself...and I couldn't really give two shits about what they think.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2019, 11:54:38 am by nightbot »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,301
  • Likes: 803
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I only started punting this year, and if you looked at my profile to check when I joined you'd have also seen I've done more than 2 reviews.
Anyways I am talking to the OP and no one else, because I used to feel the same way due to posters such as yourself...and I couldn't really give two shits about what they think.

You are talking to everyone here when you post, even if you had quoted the OP (which you didn't) to direct your reply to him others are entitled to voice their opinions on what you post.

Before you appoint yourself chief review adviser, I would suggest you look to your own reviews. They are not only long but full of totally irrelevant information, including how big you cock is and, apparently, you get the best out of one escort if the weather's nice and you can view the sunset. Quite how things of this nature are meant to help punters is beyond me.

The best advice for anyone regarding reviews is to point them in the direction of the 'Guide to Writing Reviews' in the Punting wiki.

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am talking to the OP and no one else,

Only if you PM him, more likely that your just saying that as you don't want others pointing out what a prick you clearly are  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: October 24, 2019, 12:22:34 pm by James999 »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
I only started punting this year, and if you looked at my profile to check when I joined you'd have also seen I've done more than 2 reviews.
Anyways I am talking to the OP and no one else, because I used to feel the same way due to posters such as yourself...and I couldn't really give two shits about what they think.
Well sorry, you've done four, whoop dee Fucking doo... That definitely makes you an authority on reviews, and the right to be so condescending :rolleyes:

Furthermore, I'll reply to anyone I wish on here and that includes you... If you don't like it, well I couldn't give two shits either... Last time I looked it was a forum, and not a platform for a wee private conversation between you and the OP... :wacko:

You could always PM him in that case, I'm sure he'll appreciate your words of wisdom...  :sarcastic:
« Last Edit: October 24, 2019, 12:31:22 pm by Clattypats »

Offline DouglasReynholm

"When I opened the door I saw a very brief look of disappointment cross her face. I don’t rate myself but the evidence suggests that I’m not as ugly as I think I am, but her look brought it home to me that I’m going downhill and the direction is only going to be one way from now on. I also realised that I’m going to need some “help” if I ever book a girl like her again- if I couldn’t get it up properly for her, then something’s definitely fucked. All this left me with a very low feeling post punt which has since deepened as I’ve tried to book her again and she made excuses that she couldn’t see me :("

Find yourself a nice lady on OKCupid.

"There’s also a KFC just as you get back on the A1 which was good for a post punting feast! Fill your boots boys!"

He's clearly pimping KFC. Ban him up, moderators. UKP is exclusively for the eaters of KFC, NOT the salesmen.  :angry:

Offline winkywanky

Colonel Sanders' cocksucker!  :D

Offline AnthG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 8,861
  • Likes: 9
  •  
  • Reviews: 40
The guy has not even been back since he started this topic on the 19th. It's annoying like hell when they do that.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline lewisjones23

The guy has not even been back since he started this topic on the 19th. It's annoying like hell when they do that.

in this case it is for the best that he fucks off IMO

Offline Doc Holliday

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,073
  • Likes: 327
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
The guy has not even been back since he started this topic on the 19th. It's annoying like hell when they do that.

Yes his last login time matches the time of the post. He either slit his wrists in the early hours of that morning or has another account to read the responses?

If I was a betting man  :D

Offline DouglasReynholm

Yes his last login time matches the time of the post. He either slit his wrists in the early hours of that morning or has another account to read the responses?

If I was a betting man  :D
Hmmm, I'm starting to get worried about him now.*  :(

One of the funniest things about UKP is the banning reasons. You see a post saying something apparently normal and underneath it says:
Banning Reason: cocky, off-the-wrist tosspot

It would be very funny if poor Jammy got banned and under all his posts it said:
Banning Reason: undercover fried chicken salesman

*Not really.

Offline 381stBG

Jammie, I've just nominated you for an MBE, for your great reviews.

External Link/Members Only

MBE = Massive Bell End


Big Guy

Offline County Militia

Well that's a question you have to ask yourself. I've reviewed girls that no one has seen as well, and I kind of got a bit of comments about being a bit flowery for one of them elsewhere but I didn't get called out for being fluffy. I've also been called out for "wasting my money" on long bookings and chatting. But that's just the way I like it and I don't really have to adhere to their standard for my personal enjoyment. 50% of the people responding to your posts on this site will probably go against you and the rest 50% with you, that won't change ever and you just have to get used to it....unless you are someone like NigelF.

With that said, you only got shit for one review (i.e. the latest one) and that is very tame in all honesty. But I'll explain what the issue with that particular review was as best as possible. It was the overt fluffiness with cliche use of words (I'll explain why this is exactly an issue in a bit), now bear in mind that is all fine if you felt that way and she blew your socks off. Many of us probably do feel that way from time to time with someone and anyone who says otherwise is a straight up liar. However, those details are not actually important to a review and it just causes the reader to cringe because there have been reviews where the reviewer would use those same exact cliche phrases and then someone else would go see the girl and find out that she's a shit provider and the reviewer was just so enamoured by her that he didn't see it. That is the reason why that kind of stuff is frowned upon, even if she genuinely is that good. It's because it becomes difficult to tell if you are being objective about the important things.

It was also on the long end, but they convey less information than a lot of other shorter reviews. It's not really important to talk about how many fingers you put inside her vagina, or minute by minute description of the meeting. That only leads to people skimming on your reviews and focusing on the cliche lines like "Treat her well".

You are bound to get a few shit here and there every time you review someone or even post, there are just so many people here from varying age group, demographic, preference that it's just impossible to have something that pleases everyone and you just kind of have to get used to that fact. There is no need to respond to everyone who speaks out against you and defend yourself, because if you do you'll be here all day long wasting your time.

Absolutely spot on post dude.  :thumbsup:

It's a shame more people don't get this.