Christina Glasgow any info?

[Vanhobonk]

Profile has been around for years but strangely not alot of info on her ,has anyone seen her recently as pics are about 10 years old ?
Link to this Profile Page using External Link/Members Only or https://www.adultwork.com/christina%5Fglasgow

[shyjock]

I had a wee shot of Christina, but it must have been at least 5 years ago, maybe longer.
She was in a cottage flat at the back of Hampden, quite a busy residential area and would be very surprised if the neighbours haven’t caught on to what is happening.
Christina advertised both as a single and as part of a couple at the time, although I saw her on a 121 basis. She was a nice enough girl, a little chavy if I was being hypercritical. Around a size 8 - 10 at that time had a tidy body and small, slightly saggy tits, not an issue for me as I like that. She had a few tattoos and had actually a new one at that time, she asked me to be careful with in terms of grabbing etc during the action. I got the impression that she intended too get more tats and she might have more by now.
I had a good time with her and was not aware of any restrictions on her part, although I was quite vanilla. She was a good ride and made my time with her enjoyable. I seem to remember that she was relatively expensive at the time and she stated over the phone at booking time that the price was set to ensure a certain level of client and discourage riff raff!!
Overall it was an OK punt.

[bigmike32]

She looks older than 29.

[Clattypats]

She looks older than 29.

Thought of maybe booking her previously, about 4 year ago... Had a feeling she would be a good bit older than stated age though... 

[bigmike32]

That doesnt bother me she looks mid thirties to me and i like older women aswell. I find her attractive and if i punted in glasgow i would see her.

[Clattypats]

That doesnt bother me she looks mid thirties to me and i like older women aswell. I find her attractive and if i punted in glasgow i would see her.

Fair play, though my "uneducated" guess is, she's probably in her forties... 

[shyjock]

When I saw her, I would have said early thirties, so would guess at middle to late thirties.

[Clattypats]

When I saw her, I would have said early thirties, so would guess at middle to late thirties.

That's fine, maybe go see her again, and do this thing thats called a review... Then people can maybe guesstimate... 

[Lesdoit]

Fair play, though my "uneducated" guess is, she's probably in her forties... 

Definitely 40's. Seen her at a supermarket probably ten years ago and she looked 30's then.

[dougal]

Done a review on her a few years ago. Was a good experience. Only thing putting me off was the location/ been out the game a while

[mrwhite]

Last saw her in 2010.  The one thing I remember from both the meets was the fact that there was a hole in the stairs which had been carpeted over and I nearly tripped on it.   (It was the flat near Hampden)

[Uncle Buck]

Done a review on her a few years ago. Was a good experience. Only thing putting me off was the location/ been out the game a while

I’ve been tempted. What wrong with the location?

[the fitter]

The location is ok, when you get the address, drive by, check it out, park up, and walk back and straight in the gate. The door is open to view from the street, but you are only exposed in the time it takes her to open the door, and that is quick, because she is also aware of it.

[pilgrim]

Ive seen her years ago, possibly 10+ I thought Id done a review but I can see it showing in the 4 reviews?

She has had a rough life and was not the best at hygiene, was shocked when I asked for a shower, bin overflowing with tissues beside the bed, think it was actually a large roll of electrical cable and she was using the hole in the middle.  Blokes tool kit, weights and covies lying in the livingroom.  Someone must have been in the kitchen as she opened it a fraction and squeezed in.

Had profiles up everywhere, I think I saw her from the NothernAngels site.  I would say avoid.

[dougal]

I’ve been tempted. What wrong with the location?

To residential for my liking. To many curtain twitchers. Cracking service though

[valdishere]

Yes similar to Pilgrim I met her about 10 years ago in the rather as described untidy Hampden cottage flat. After my 1st visit only went at night under cover of darkness as her place/front door was on a wide open road stretch with plenty of nosy neighbours, 1st time neighbour stood out from next front door as I approached her doorway. Did go back as she was a  really good dirty talk ride and could suck like a dyson also seemed to enjoy playing 2 cocks at same time when I saw them both. I do think then she was mid to late 20's poss early 30 so currently stating 29 is definately in "prossie years". I see somone has done a recent review on AW where she did the appointment from a hotel with her 'Driver' so OP should be able to meet her easily. Although still high prices. ‎

[The Man With No Name]

Profile's been kicking about for years.

I'm sure she's a lovely girl, but it always bewildered me how, what always just looked like another wee Glasgow schemie (even in her 5 year-old minimum pictures) did any business from a wee flat in Hampden, by charging the rates of premium glamour girls working from high-end city-centre apartments.

What always bewildered me even further, is how she got any decent reviews by doing so.

[dougal]

Profile's been kicking about for years.

I'm sure she's a lovely girl, but it always bewildered me how, what always just looked like another wee Glasgow schemie (even in her 5 year-old minimum pictures) did any business from a wee flat in Hampden, by charging the rates of premium glamour girls working from high-end city-centre apartments.

What always bewildered me even further, is how she got any decent reviews by doing so.

She nearly always seems to have her "special" rate of £120

Didn't notice any hygiene issues like a few other reviews

[Uncle Buck]

Profile's been kicking about for years.

I'm sure she's a lovely girl, but it always bewildered me how, what always just looked like another wee Glasgow schemie (even in her 5 year-old minimum pictures) did any business from a wee flat in Hampden, by charging the rates of premium glamour girls working from high-end city-centre apartments.

What always bewildered me even further, is how she got any decent reviews by doing so.

You’re absolutely right. As tempted as I am/was, there is o way I’m paying those prices for a bang average punt.

[2 pair]

If you read all of her profile, it states due to new rules all naked and erotic pictures have been removed from my free gallery and moved to my private gallery.
Seen plenty of naked photos, on other profiles free gallery.

[HazelValentine]

No she is correct....

Whilst you don't HAVE to, and you will see some profiles with nude photos in their free galleries, AW highly encourage you to put them in your private gallery - and if you tick this box you're basically promising to not have any NSFW stuff viewable for free.


As for why? Well I don't know for sure exactly : one reason will be Adultwork would be trying to make profiles "compliant with the laws in your country" as they put it (ie. to view the NSFW stuff you would have proved your age by making an account?) ...kinda jokes on a website that goes into explicit detail about escorting services and that already has a pop up asking if you're 18+ every time you open it

Also its important to realise they have a massive interest in encouraging you to purchase Private Galleries, as they take a cut from us twice - roughly 20% on the amount you see as the "price" of the PG, which goes to credits in our account, and then on top of that a 30% admin fee if you want to redeem the credits as to your bank account or cash. So they're taking quite a considerable cut of whatever punters spend buying private galleries/movies.... It's beneficial for them to encourage nude photos to only be in paid for areas


Just wanted to chip in as lots of clients may not realise this is why

Hidden Image/Members Only

[2 pair]

No she is correct....

Whilst you don't HAVE to, and you will see some profiles with nude photos in their free galleries, AW highly encourage you to put them in your private gallery - and if you tick this box you're basically promising to not have any NSFW stuff viewable for free.


As for why? Well I don't know for sure exactly : one reason will be Adultwork would be trying to make profiles "compliant with the laws in your country" as they put it (ie. to view the NSFW stuff you would have proved your age by making an account?) ...kinda jokes on a website that goes into explicit detail about escorting services and that already has a pop up asking if you're 18+ every time you open it

Also its important to realise they have a massive interest in encouraging you to purchase Private Galleries, as they take a cut from us twice - roughly 20% on the amount you see as the "price" of the PG, which goes to credits in our account, and then on top of that a 30% admin fee if you want to redeem the credits as to your bank account or cash. So they're taking quite a considerable cut of whatever punters spend buying private galleries/movies.... It's beneficial for them to encourage nude photos to only be in paid for areas


Just wanted to chip in as lots of clients may not realise this is why

Hidden Image/Members Only

Thanks for your input.
I hadn't seen that before.

There are still photos, of women naked in their free galleries though.
I very much doubt, that it is law, or regulations.
Just adult work, finding a way to cash in, on service providers.
I do believe, that they take a cut, out of what you earn, for each purchase.

[The Man With No Name]

No she is correct....

Whilst you don't HAVE to, and you will see some profiles with nude photos in their free galleries, AW highly encourage you to put them in your private gallery - and if you tick this box you're basically promising to not have any NSFW stuff viewable for free.


As for why? Well I don't know for sure exactly : one reason will be Adultwork would be trying to make profiles "compliant with the laws in your country" as they put it (ie. to view the NSFW stuff you would have proved your age by making an account?) ...kinda jokes on a website that goes into explicit detail about escorting services and that already has a pop up asking if you're 18+ every time you open it

Also its important to realise they have a massive interest in encouraging you to purchase Private Galleries, as they take a cut from us twice - roughly 20% on the amount you see as the "price" of the PG, which goes to credits in our account, and then on top of that a 30% admin fee if you want to redeem the credits as to your bank account or cash. So they're taking quite a considerable cut of whatever punters spend buying private galleries/movies.... It's beneficial for them to encourage nude photos to only be in paid for areas


Just wanted to chip in as lots of clients may not realise this is why

Hidden Image/Members Only

A hooking site, trying to ban naked pictures from their free pages? That's even more comical than AW's latest attempt to get all PC with its gender categorisation.

Or are they actually shamefully worried about the Tories' threat to make all access to porn on UK servers officially age-verified, in another shameful attempt to consolidate their backward, church-going, Brexit-shire vote even further?

Christ if that shite does actually go through, I'd like to see a mass public orgy in protest - hookers, punters, civies and whoever else wants to get involved - the full-length of the distance from Downing Street, to Parliament to Buckingham Palace. Or you'll at least find me having a wank at the gates in front of a big screen of the most sordid shit imaginable. Draconian cunts.