Author Topic: Big Juicy Tits - Holborn  (Read 2671 times)


2 review(s) for Big Juicy Tits (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Waterhouse]

Offline neverberoyal

External Link/Members Only - was on +447535486580

This is just a short one, since I wasn't in there that long at all - mostly just to give others a heads up that this is actually not one of those dreaded ones where it all goes south quickly.

Comms/Logistics

Rang her on the day, agreed to meet 30 minutes later. Text me the street/block number in advance, rang her when I was outside and she gave me the flat number. OWO was agreed in advance, as well as the price, which was as stated on her profile (£80 for 30 mins - OWO in the price).

Location

It was a weekend, so unsure if the street is busy during the week, but outside of work hours it was pretty quiet. Hung out in a park nearby until got the details of her flat number, was no drama.

The girl

She's fit. Facially attractive, great tits. The photos on her profile are pretty accurate, although I'd say the angle of the photos of her ass are probably taken at an angle that makes it look bigger than it is. She's definitely got marginal bitchy resting face, but once she was talking and answering questions, the smile came out a few times and she looks really quite attractive.

She's probably on the smaller side - 5'3/5'4 maybe?

The service
Decent blowjob. I was pretty much there just to lie back and enjoy and she was pretty great for that. Good, deep, felt like she really worked it well with her tongue. Lots of eye contact, and she seemed to react well with a few sly smiles when she could tell I was enjoying it.

Near the end I really felt the need for sex as I found her quite attractive. Missionary, didn't last long so cant really comment on that.

Post-service
She didn't seem that in a rush to get me out the door (probably only had about 20 mins of service). Took a shower, which she provided a fresh towel for (always a good sign). The shower room is pretty weird as its a wet room and its pretty small - basically the toilet/sink get absolutely soaked as well when you have a shower, bit of a strange set up, but it was a nice flat with quality fixtures and fittings - think it was a serviced apartment most likely. We chatted and then I left, thought she was pretty nice on the whole.

Conclusion
 - £80 for 30 mins including OWO.
 - good BJ, lots of tongue, deep and eye contact.
 - she's fit, more attractive if you can get her chatting and joking.
 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 9
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Cheers for the review!

Perennial Question [variant]: Is she a worthy Bubble Butt thread entrant??
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline last_days_of_logan

External Link/Members Only - was on +447535486580

This is just a short one, since I wasn't in there that long at all - mostly just to give others a heads up that this is actually not one of those dreaded ones where it all goes south quickly.

Comms/Logistics

Rang her on the day, agreed to meet 30 minutes later. Text me the street/block number in advance, rang her when I was outside and she gave me the flat number. OWO was agreed in advance, as well as the price, which was as stated on her profile (£80 for 30 mins - OWO in the price).

Location

It was a weekend, so unsure if the street is busy during the week, but outside of work hours it was pretty quiet. Hung out in a park nearby until got the details of her flat number, was no drama.

The girl

She's fit. Facially attractive, great tits. The photos on her profile are pretty accurate, although I'd say the angle of the photos of her ass are probably taken at an angle that makes it look bigger than it is. She's definitely got marginal bitchy resting face, but once she was talking and answering questions, the smile came out a few times and she looks really quite attractive.

She's probably on the smaller side - 5'3/5'4 maybe?

The service
Decent blowjob. I was pretty much there just to lie back and enjoy and she was pretty great for that. Good, deep, felt like she really worked it well with her tongue. Lots of eye contact, and she seemed to react well with a few sly smiles when she could tell I was enjoying it.

Near the end I really felt the need for sex as I found her quite attractive. Missionary, didn't last long so cant really comment on that.

Post-service
She didn't seem that in a rush to get me out the door (probably only had about 20 mins of service). Took a shower, which she provided a fresh towel for (always a good sign). The shower room is pretty weird as its a wet room and its pretty small - basically the toilet/sink get absolutely soaked as well when you have a shower, bit of a strange set up, but it was a nice flat with quality fixtures and fittings - think it was a serviced apartment most likely. We chatted and then I left, thought she was pretty nice on the whole.

Conclusion
 - £80 for 30 mins including OWO.
 - good BJ, lots of tongue, deep and eye contact.
 - she's fit, more attractive if you can get her chatting and joking.
 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Thanks for reviewing
I dont get how the photos of her are accurate... a few members have been there and confirmed it as a Bait and switch operation.  Are you 100% sure you saw the woman in the pictures mate?

Offline grandaddybadman

her old profile pics (they are now in her private gallery) show that she has big tits but her tits look tiny in these new pictures

i've uploaded those pics i saw where her tits were big.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline grandaddybadman

Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline neverberoyal

All good questions above.

Peter Purves, is she a worth entrant to the bubble butt thread? No.

Last Days of Logan and Granddaddybadman - there is some definite photoshop in those photos. The base photo for the ones you've uploaded are definitely her - remember being struck by how large (but also smooth) her nipples were, so that's definitely a photo of her. However, there is some serious photoshop on those photos. For example, first glance at the photo of her full length body, those hips definitely don't look right - she doesn't have that shape at all. If anything I found her bottom half reasonably slim. If you look closely at her left hip in that photo, you can see where she's photoshopped it. See where around her hip on the left the line isn't smooth, it gets a bit wavy and then a bit further down a bit blurry? That's because she or someone else has used the "smudge" tool or something similar on photoshop to try and push her hips outwards. The reason for the wavy-ness is because to get it to work, you have to use a small brush size and do the line in parts - where you move the line slightly different amounts at different bits, you end up with a line that's not straight (or smooth). Where the line goes blurry is obviously where they've rushed the movement, and instead of moving the entire line in one piece, they've only picked up part of the line, hence the blurring. You've never see anything like that on a legit photo. As for the photos of her tits, could be good angles or photoshop on those as well. Since she's obviously photoshopped the bottom part of that photo I wouldn't like to trust any of them tbh.

As I said, I think the profile photos are accurate - the red one, to me, is accurate. Recognise the bottom half of her face (nice smile) and also her hips and tits look correct (you'll see that ass isn't anything like it is in the photos you've posted, and she's bending her front leg to make her behind look more curved).

With regard to bait and switch, I definitely saw the girl in the photo, and she was pretty hot, once you got her talking/smiling. (she didn't have a bad attitude at all, quite the reverse in fact, she just had a little bit of bitchy resting face going on). As for other members experience with getting other girls, just based on the adultwork profiles in that area/region, there are a few similar looking profiles, so its entirely possible this happens sometimes, but I can't comment on that. I rang her number and got her, as far as I'm concerned.


As a further point, I quite like variety when I do this kind of thing, so for that reason I wouldn't go back. For me to repeat, I would have to think someone is exceptional. There is only one escort I've seen 3 times over the last 7 years or so, and the others have all been only once. However I enjoyed my visit to ISA, and just wanted to let people know that in my case, I got what was advertised, what was agreed and what was in the photo (i didn't see her private gallery photos beforehand - probably would have put me off tbh, that photoshop is a terrible job). Others may have a different experience.

Cheers fellas.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2019, 11:19:02 pm by neverberoyal »

Offline grandaddybadman

All good questions above.

Peter Purves, is she a worth entrant to the bubble butt thread? No.

Last Days of Logan and Granddaddybadman - there is some definite photoshop in those photos. The base photo for the ones you've uploaded are definitely her - remember being struck by how large (but also smooth) her nipples were, so that's definitely a photo of her. However, there is some serious photoshop on those photos. For example, first glance at the photo of her full length body, those hips definitely don't look right - she doesn't have that shape at all. If anything I found her bottom half reasonably slim. If you look closely at her left hip in that photo, you can see where she's photoshopped it. See where around her hip on the left the line isn't smooth, it gets a bit wavy and then a bit further down a bit blurry? That's because she or someone else has used the "smudge" tool or something similar on photoshop to try and push her hips outwards. The reason for the wavy-ness is because to get it to work, you have to use a small brush size and do the line in parts - where you move the line slightly different amounts at different bits, you end up with a line that's not straight (or smooth). Where the line goes blurry is obviously where they've rushed the movement, and instead of moving the entire line in one piece, they've only picked up part of the line, hence the blurring. You've never see anything like that on a legit photo. As for the photos of her tits, could be good angles or photoshop on those as well. Since she's obviously photoshopped the bottom part of that photo I wouldn't like to trust any of them tbh.

As I said, I think the profile photos are accurate - the red one, to me, is accurate. Recognise the bottom half of her face (nice smile) and also her hips and tits look correct (you'll see that ass isn't anything like it is in the photos you've posted, and she's bending her front leg to make her behind look more curved).

With regard to bait and switch, I definitely saw the girl in the photo, and she was pretty hot, once you got her talking/smiling. (she didn't have a bad attitude at all, quite the reverse in fact, she just had a little bit of bitchy resting face going on). As for other members experience with getting other girls, just based on the adultwork profiles in that area/region, there are a few similar looking profiles, so its entirely possible this happens sometimes, but I can't comment on that. I rang her number and got her, as far as I'm concerned.


As a further point, I quite like variety when I do this kind of thing, so for that reason I wouldn't go back. For me to repeat, I would have to think someone is exceptional. There is only one escort I've seen 3 times over the last 7 years or so, and the others have all been only once. However I enjoyed my visit to ISA, and just wanted to let people know that in my case, I got what was advertised, what was agreed and what was in the photo (i didn't see her private gallery photos beforehand - probably would have put me off tbh, that photoshop is a terrible job). Others may have a different experience.

Cheers fellas.

i am really tempted mainly because of the tits, thanks for the detailed response
Banned reason: Troll, "inshallah" WTF.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline neverberoyal

Definitely was loving her tits, but also remember she's pretty tiny (5'2/5'3). They'll still be a solid handful but just look at those photos in the context of her overall size.

Offline bediscrete


Offline neverberoyal

DFK: Didn't go in for it (was in there for the OWO really) and it wasn't at any point offered or ventured. My gut would say no.

Offline bediscrete

DFK: Didn't go in for it (was in there for the OWO really) and it wasn't at any point offered or ventured. My gut would say no.
Dammit - DFK is a must-have

Thanks OP