Sue Lee - South Croydon

[ericthered2015]

External Link/Members Only

£100/hour

Punt sorted out within about 30 minutes of initial contact.  Comms quick and easy, speaks fluent English but you have to talk to her, she doesn't reply to texts.  SL's place is about half a mile west of South Croydon station.  It was bloody hot outside but the flat was fairly cool and the bits I saw were clean and tidy.

Ignore the picture on the ad, it's not her.  I would say that she is around 5'2", late 40's/early 50's, nice figure  (IMHO) straight shoulder length hair, B/C tits with nice suckable nipples, shaved below, no stubble.

Cheery and smiley greeting on arrival, straight into the bedroom, lots of DFK and mutual undressing.  Once we were both naked, SL sat me down on the end of the bed, knelt between my legs and started OWO - which was very nice, wet and deep with lots of attention to the tip as well.  I shuffled up the bed and we moved into 69 for a while, fresh and clean down below.  She made some wiggles after a while and got very wet but dunno if she had come or just pretending - either way the attention to my dick was minimal while she was wriggling, her mind seemed to be on other things  .  Anyway, SL moved back between my legs and continued her efforts until I managed a very enjoyable CIM.

After round 1 SL gave me a massage which was more rubbing her fingertips along my back as opposed to a proper massage as such before we moved onto round 2 which SL initiated with more OWO.  This carried on for a while until we flipped over, I put on the mac and pounded away in missionary. 

After I had popped, SL cleaned my up and then gave me a foot massage for the last 10 minutes or so which was so good I nearly fell asleep.  After that got dressed and carried on my way.

In short, a great punt with a cheerful and attractive MILF.  Whilst she was smiley and chatty on arrival, she doesn't prattle away during the massages which I liked.  The only negative is that I wasn't offered a shower either before or after the punt so one may not be available.  Doesn't bother me and, to be fair, didn't ask, but may be a concern to others. 
 

[LLPunting]

Thanks for this 

So as it's not her pics, how pretty was her face?  Any likeness to women we might recognise?
How toned or chubby is her figure?
Any scars, tattoos or piercings?
Boobs pert and full or somewhat saggy?
Good oral hygiene (assuming yes, but just in case)? 

[Cityman]

I'm astonished by the OP's statement that the pictures aren't of Sue Lee. I've only seen her once and that was at least two years ago, but I would have sworn that the pictures are genuine. But in any case, I would say that they accurately reflect the sort of overall appearance a client can expect, i.e., perfectly acceptable. The OP's description of this lady as "cheery and smiley" is also exactly how I remember the person I saw. The OP got more than a straightforward massage, and on my visit I was bewildered to be offered FS (and got the impression that a refusal would have offended!). I think I may have to see her again.

[Jerk Chicken]

Why don't you do your own review instead of spurting out nonsense or challenging OP's review that the pics are not genuine.

Then, perhaps, we will take your comments seriously.

[thetinman007]

I'm astonished by the OP's statement that the pictures aren't of Sue Lee. I've only seen her once and that was at least two years ago, but I would have sworn that the pictures are genuine. But in any case, I would say that they accurately reflect the sort of overall appearance a client can expect, i.e., perfectly acceptable. The OP's description of this lady as "cheery and smiley" is also exactly how I remember the person I saw. The OP got more than a straightforward massage, and on my visit I was bewildered to be offered FS (and got the impression that a refusal would have offended!). I think I may have to see her again.

All right mate, calm down !

[winkywanky]

I'm astonished by the OP's statement that the pictures aren't of Sue Lee. I've only seen her once and that was at least two years ago, but I would have sworn that the pictures are genuine. But in any case, I would say that they accurately reflect the sort of overall appearance a client can expect, i.e., perfectly acceptable. The OP's description of this lady as "cheery and smiley" is also exactly how I remember the person I saw.

If you saw her at least 2yrs ago, how do you know she hasn't changed in all that time? And more to the point, you saw her once at least 2yrs ago and you reckon you remember her that well?

[Fuzzyduck]

Why don't you do your own review instead of spurting out nonsense or challenging OP's review that the pics are not genuine.

Then, perhaps, we will take your comments seriously.

A little harsh perhaps. I didn't think it was nonsense and, acknowledging that he's not yet contributed any reviews (yet), the new rule prohibits reviews of any punt older than 6 months. I was only surprised at the use of the "astonished" considering how pictures on acemassage are often years out of date (as may well be in this case) or simply another girl. It's naive to believe that the pictures will be representative.

Furthermore he's added a little value confirming much of OP's experience. That said, your point around credibility was spot on and I'm sure he's taken on board your feedback to do a review when he goes back to see her.

[worldpunter]

A blast from the past . She has been working Croydon for over ten years , before had 2 thai working for her while she was the madame . Times must be harder now and she has to do the work herself . Ten years ago i was paying £80 for 45 mins punt with her girls  , mostly the well known Dee Dee 

[Jonestown]

A blast from the past . She has been working Croydon for over ten years , before had 2 thai working for her while she was the madame . Times must be harder now and she has to do the work herself . Ten years ago i was paying £80 for 45 mins punt with her girls  , mostly the well known Dee Dee

Yes, as you say Sue Lee is well known and has a good reputation, has been back on the tools herself now for a good few years, which I think coincided with the departure of her star girls, Dee Dee and Ya Ya. She had some connection with the walk up in Romilly Street that got closed down during the Great Raids a few years back, a lot of Thai girls worked both places.

[peter jb]

A blast from the past . She has been working Croydon for over ten years , before had 2 thai working for her while she was the madame . Times must be harder now and she has to do the work herself . Ten years ago i was paying £80 for 45 mins punt with her girls  , mostly the well known Dee Dee

Then I hope you visited Stephanie, as well at around same time- long straight hair Thai girl with huge tits 😋 - god she was good !

[last_days_of_logan]

I'm astonished by the OP's statement that the pictures aren't of Sue Lee. I've only seen her once and that was at least two years ago, but I would have sworn that the pictures are genuine. But in any case, I would say that they accurately reflect the sort of overall appearance a client can expect, i.e., perfectly acceptable. The OP's description of this lady as "cheery and smiley" is also exactly how I remember the person I saw. The OP got more than a straightforward massage, and on my visit I was bewildered to be offered FS (and got the impression that a refusal would have offended!). I think I may have to see her again.

claws out with no review?

[ericthered2015]

So as it's not her pics, how pretty was her face?  Any likeness to women we might recognise?
How toned or chubby is her figure?
Any scars, tattoos or piercings?
Boobs pert and full or somewhat saggy?
Good oral hygiene (assuming yes, but just in case)? 

To take your questions in order;

I thought she was very pretty but that's subjective, can't think of any lookalikes
The pictures are not of SL but the body is not a million miles away, slight middle aged spread and tits about the same as the picture, legs a bit thinner, hair similar so I'd agree Cityman's comment about the overall appearance
None that I remember
Tits a bit saggy but I enjoyed playing and sucking on them
Good oral hygiene

Sweet 

[LLPunting]

To take your questions in order;

I thought she was very pretty but that's subjective, can't think of any lookalikes
The pictures are not of SL but the body is not a million miles away, slight middle aged spread and tits about the same as the picture, legs a bit thinner, hair similar so I'd agree Cityman's comment about the overall appearance
None that I remember
Tits a bit saggy but I enjoyed playing and sucking on them
Good oral hygiene

Sweet 

Many thanks   

Thanks to the others for pointing out her history.  A topic for conversation if I do pop in.

[bluelad]

Saw Sue nearly two years ago, see review then: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=168548.msg1799865#msg1799865

It's not her in the photos on here: External Link/Members Only

The lady in the photos in an Asian porn actress called Lucky Starr: External Link/Members Only

Probably worth another visit judging by recent report.

[Jerk Chicken]

Saw Sue nearly two years ago, see review then: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=168548.msg1799865#msg1799865

It's not her in the photos on here: External Link/Members Only

The lady in the photos in an Asian porn actress called Lucky Starr: External Link/Members Only

Probably worth another visit judging by recent report.

Thanks for clearing that up. How close a look is she to the porn actress?

[Fuzzyduck]

Saw Sue nearly two years ago, see review then: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=168548.msg1799865#msg1799865

It's not her in the photos on here: External Link/Members Only

The lady in the photos in an Asian porn actress called Lucky Starr: External Link/Members Only

Probably worth another visit judging by recent report.

Great post.

[xabojuro]

a shower is available and it is very nice with plenty of clean towels but you have to ask

[xabojuro]

Saw Sue nearly two years ago, see review then: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=168548.msg1799865#msg1799865

It's not her in the photos on here: External Link/Members Only

The lady in the photos in an Asian porn actress called Lucky Starr: External Link/Members Only

Probably worth another visit judging by recent report.

wow. you know too much man. how did you come to know that she is using the pics of an asian porn star. 

[xabojuro]

.  The only negative is that I wasn't offered a shower either before or after the punt so one may not be available.  Doesn't bother me and, to be fair, didn't ask, but may be a concern to others.

.

i think you have to ask but i know for a fact she has a nice shower facility with plenty of fresh towels.

[bluelad]

Thanks for clearing that up. How close a look is she to the porn actress?

Not quite as attractive as Lucky Starr but she has a nice figure and is facially OK in my opinion.

[LLPunting]

wow. you know too much man. how did you come to know that she is using the pics of an asian porn star. 

Try searching "image search" and learn a useful thing or two

[Cityman]

I'll steer clear of using the word "astonished" again, but I am genuinely surprised by the reaction on here to what I intended should be a modest and harmless contribution - and even perhaps helpful and interesting in a small way (in fact, a very small way). I most certainly didn't mean to imply the slightest criticism of the OP. But in return I'm accused of "spurting out nonsense", "challenging" the OP, and of  having "claws out". And I'm advised to "calm down".   

I suppose it can't be the case that I'm right and everyone else is wrong, but I do feel that a number of people on here are excessively touchy and intolerant.

[joe diddley]

Then I hope you visited Stephanie, as well at around same time- long straight hair Thai girl with huge tits 😋 - god she was good !

Three of Sue Lee's Thai girls, when she mama-sanned at Croydon as well as 'working', including Stephanie, also worked in Soho at the 2 Greens Court upper flat walkup. Dee Dee was one. Stephanie was known in Soho as Lulu as I recall. There was another I think but I've forgotten her name. This is years ago, as I recall, before the existence of UKP. Punted Lulu (Stephanie) once in Soho and definitely enjoyed myself.

[last_days_of_logan]

I'll steer clear of using the word "astonished" again, but I am genuinely surprised by the reaction on here to what I intended should be a modest and harmless contribution - and even perhaps helpful and interesting in a small way (in fact, a very small way). I most certainly didn't mean to imply the slightest criticism of the OP. But in return I'm accused of "spurting out nonsense", "challenging" the OP, and of  having "claws out". And I'm advised to "calm down".   

I suppose it can't be the case that I'm right and everyone else is wrong, but I do feel that a number of people on here are excessively touchy and intolerant.

you can criticise actually. just it came across as a bit of white knighting and almost flat out "you are categorically wrong, no other possible explanation" type thing

the intolerant think might have a been a reaction to someone being here 4 years, not helping with much contribution and then calling out someone who is actually contributing with the review

didnt it end that you were wrong anyway? it was a picture of someone else?

[leatherlover]

She's not wrinkled, but you can tell from the face that she is late 40s. Her face is quite taut, as if she's had a facelift? However, I can confirm she gives a great service. With me, she always builds up the OWO quite slowly, instead of launching straight in like the others. Plus on the last two times, when I've misjudged the time and cum after 15 mins, and then proceeded to leave, she's given me a refund.

[Cityman]

you can criticise actually. just it came across as a bit of white knighting and almost flat out "you are categorically wrong, no other possible explanation" type thing

the intolerant think might have a been a reaction to someone being here 4 years, not helping with much contribution and then calling out someone who is actually contributing with the review

didnt it end that you were wrong anyway? it was a picture of someone else?

I wanted to contact you by PM, but the system apparently won't allow messages to be sent to members who haven't already contacted the would-be sender. So how anyone ever starts a PM dialogue I just don't know.

Anyway, I have just read your last post re Sue Lee, which clearly sounds a less abrasive note than your first one. But despite my unequivocal assurance that "I most certainly didn't mean to imply the slightest criticism of the OP", you accuse me of calling him out. If you don't want to believe what I say, then that's your prerogative, but it doesn't alter the facts. You may feel the need to respond to this, but I promise that these are my last words on the subject (unless I visit Sue Lee!).

[last_days_of_logan]

I wanted to contact you by PM, but the system apparently won't allow messages to be sent to members who haven't already contacted the would-be sender. So how anyone ever starts a PM dialogue I just don't know.

Anyway, I have just read your last post re Sue Lee, which clearly sounds a less abrasive note than your first one. But despite my unequivocal assurance that "I most certainly didn't mean to imply the slightest criticism of the OP", you accuse me of calling him out. If you don't want to believe what I say, then that's your prerogative, but it doesn't alter the facts. You may feel the need to respond to this, but I promise that these are my last words on the subject (unless I visit Sue Lee!).

i have been in your position before trust me, the heat of the moment painting my thoughts more harsh than i intended

[bluelad]

Visited Sue earlier this week and as always a real pleasure with a great CIM conculsion. For those interested to know what she looks like these days I would say, others may disagree, but her face is quite similar to porn actress Kitty Jung when she has dark hair- now aged 34 but used to specialise in teen porn because of her youthful looks. But Sue's definitely a lot more mature as she is in her 50s and her body is nowhere near as skinny as Kitty's and Sue has much bigger tits.

External Link/Members Only

Have already done a previous review of Sue so haven;t done another one now but can supply another if required but don't want to come across as a white knight.