Cassie is indeed Madison.
She's def not pre-op, but I have heard she is post-op.
She wasn't on my list to see but passed her in the street one day and she is now on my list!
I've seen her & something definitely wasn't quite right, was glad I was only there for a half hour. Started off ok with some kissing, got her stripped & then went to start playing with her using my fingers, she applied a fair bit of lube before I inserted a finger too. Didn't feel right, went for her g-spot, but it felt more like a smooth tube inside rather than what one would expect. I went down for a closer look with the intention of reverse oral, didn't happen. Couldn't find a clit & there was a fair bit of what looked like scar tissue down both sides of the opening, although this could have I suppose been stretch marks or badly applied fake tan (playing devils advocate). At that point I started looking for boob job scars, couldn't see any, then looked for masculine signs, again couldn't see any but her feet looked a decent size & she has quite a square jaw. I was out of there shortly after, with no sex, no cum, just happy to be out. Didn't think too much about it again after leaving.
Since then I have seen two escorts who have brought it up unprompted. One when I was joking about hoping she didn't have a cock, to which she replied "like Cassie used to". She told me that apparently Cassie worked as a pre op previously & that there were some images on another site with her with the meat & two veg on show. She apparently had a regular who also saw Cassie & had seen her both pre & post op, who raved about how Cassie was always so tight & never got looser. Could have just been a malicious prossie bad mouthing the competition, but that was two unrelated prossies saying it about the same girl. I tried to find the images, but had no luck.
I like her look with the tattoos & whatnot & to be fair to her she is rather hot with a cracking set of tits, that seem real. I could be totally wrong & she could just have a really small clit & feel different inside to what I'm used to. However if she is post op & advertising as female then that for me just isn't cricket & is misleading at best.
I was conscious about writing a negative, as it thought at the time I was over reacting & that she was probably perfectly normal. But with having it mentioned twice by escorts & now another punter on here, it's freshened the memory & got me thinking again.
Anyone else seen her with an opinion?
If she is post op then at least I can tick it off the sexual bucket list, even if it was an act I wasn't particularly aiming to participate in.
