xxxsophiexxxx - Gateshead quayside

[ukgent1]

External Link/Members Only

1/2 hour incall - £70

Venue - Jury's Inn. Free on-street parking nearby (sun) plus plenty of payable car parks. Nice clean room with fresh sheets etc. No issues walking past reception.

Comms - Pretty good. All through AW. Meet arranged on the morning for an afternoon apt after enquiring the night before. Given room number on arrival.

Sophie - I couldn't find any feedback on UKP but decided to take a chance after looking at her private gallery where she looked very fit. So glad I did as she's actually a beautiful girl with an amazing toned body. I'd guess size 6, quite petite, great arse and as described on her profile. Natural looking without too much make up Has a cute nose ring and no tattoos. I did try to extend the meet at this point but she couldn't accommodate unfortunately.

Services - GFE. RO (very enjoyable and responsive), fingering, OWO (very good but not DT), kissing (didn't try for fk but it's on her enjoys list) which was really nice, soft and open-mouthed. Sex in a number of positions (mish, doggy and very deep with her legs pinned back). Finished with CIM and she swallowed everything which was a massive turn on given it was nearly 2 week's worth!
All delivered with apparent mutual enjoyment and no complaints. Slight overacting (unless i'm down-playing my skills  ) initially but seemed to settle into it.
Only don'ts were anal I believe.

Summary - A really enjoyable 1/2 hour with a gorgeous, fit young woman. I'd definitely recommend and i'll be very happy to see again. At 21, she's maybe a bit young for me as we didn't click totally but hopefully this would get better with a follow up, longer meet.

Note: She was offering duo's with april doll from the same room. Briefly met april on my way out as I understand they take turns using the room unless as duo. Wasn't an issue for me but worth noting. Might fancy a duo meet at some point She also told me she's hoping to have an incall place in byker soon rather than the hotel.

[mcb]

You really paid 3.6 credits for 5 pictures…?

[daviemac]

You really paid 3.6 credits for 5 pictures…?

Can sometimes be a very wise investment.

[ukgent1]

Sure did MCB. I wasn't 100% convinced by the free profile pics so thought it was worth a few quid to convince me rather than a long drive and a potential nasty surprise. 

[toon972]

Thank you for review, she sounds good.

[MagpieJohn]

Thanks for the review. I'd noticed her before but had second thoughts due to lack of info on here and a little confusion on her likes list as she states swallow but not CIM which could have been an oversight either way. Glad you could clarify and had a good time.

[billabong]

Sounds like an excellent find mate thanks for TOFTT

[Mixedracegeordie]

Thanks for the review!

I reviewed april doll last year - neutral but bordering on negative. Hopefully if you do see her things will have improved! Sophie looks good but i've limited myself to £60/half hr nowadays - so many great girls out there that work for that rate plus via agency so normally have that comfort if things dont go as expected.

[canny lad 1960]

I would avoid April Doll...seen her before...puts little effort into meeting...but Sophie is excellent

[Sar-Major]

I would avoid April Doll...seen her before...puts little effort into meeting...but Sophie is excellent

Well a member for 3 years, so where's your reviews to back this comment up then. 

 

[waynekerr600]

Thanks for the review.

It's it worth removing the name of the hotel?

[Sar-Major]

Thanks for the review.

It's it worth removing the name of the hotel?

I think it'll have to be a Moderator to amend the review. 

 

[daviemac]

Thanks for the review.

It's it worth removing the name of the hotel?

Hotel names don't get removed now, even OldAdmin stopped doing it, if people are daft enough to post them well ...

[MME]

Thanks for the review. I'd noticed her before but had second thoughts due to lack of info on here and a little confusion on her likes list as she states swallow but not CIM which could have been an oversight either way. Glad you could clarify and had a good time.

She must have updated her description, she's now listing this:
CIM/Swallow extra £20

[Mansell]

Hotel names don't get removed now, even OldAdmin stopped doing it, if people are daft enough to post them well ...

Exactly, it's within the Rules. I did suggest as soon as this review went up. Personally I would never name a Hotel and remember having an argument on here with a banned member about it. Down in London I doubt it makes much difference but ours it really could.

[daviemac]

Exactly, it's within the Rules. I did suggest as soon as this review went up. Personally I would never name a Hotel and remember having an argument on here with a banned member about it. Down in London I doubt it makes much difference but ours it really could.

No doubt the ones who post hotel names would be the first to moan on here if they got pulled up by reception. It's common sense to be a bit discrete really.

[toon972]

Sent her an email a week ago, never been read yet.

[tynetunnel]

Sent her an email a week ago, never been read yet.

Same - I sent her a second and got a reply, she apologized and said she doesn’t have dates for next availability (probably needs to book hotel) and will be in touch when she does. Not gonna hold my breath on that!

[mackeson]

Sounds like an excellent find mate thanks for TOFTT

Looking at the AW pictures showing blonde hair, could this be the "Sophie of Newcastle" that had a place behind the Gateshead Hilton?

[Geordie kidda]

Ages states 21 so unlikely!

Wishful thinking Mackeson

[ukgent1]

Wasn't my finest hour including the hotel name @Daviemac - Please feel free to remove/edit. Discretion is important for me too as well as the SP's so apologies for that.

[daviemac]

Wasn't my finest hour including the hotel name @Daviemac - Please feel free to remove/edit. Discretion is important for me too as well as the SP's so apologies for that.

Sorry no need for it to be removed, it's allowed to be there.   

 22 Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles and photos from messenger providers like WhatsApp. Phone numbers may be posted in full(If the number is anywhere online on an advert, personal numbers not allowed) . Hotels may be named but not room numbers
 General description of in-call locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and/or street names. Modeling, porn, and media-related work are acceptable to be posted, even if it includes their real names as they actively sought publicity / higher-profile. Any news items may be posted. All aforementioned restrictions do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of reasons.