Author Topic: Seeking.com (London)  (Read 1912925 times)

Offline gurds

A few of them have been raw off the bat for me mate

ok man, do you not check their recent results first though sexual health

Offline MLawro93

do you guys fuck these seeking girls raw straight away? Or start with condom first time.

The girls are who fine with BB are always screened out by me, however, since my use of seeking a while back compared to more recently, more girls have wised up and don't offer it. I imagine if you were exclusive with one, then that is open to debate, but personally I wouldn't risk it. The amount of times I've had the "BB is fine but don't finish inside because I'm not on contraception" line is insane.  :scare: Makes me runaway instantly.

You probably can't account for the girls who are fine with it, but just don't tell you. Some of these girls don't even get tested or vaccinated, and I'm not talking she only wants one sugardaddy, but they are sleeping with multiple men (so might as well be an escort).

Offline gurds

Yh you should never have unprotected sex with a girl without knowing whether they have clean results. Is too risky.

Online stampjones

Yh you should never have unprotected sex with a girl without knowing whether they have clean results. Is too risky.
Oh fuck off did you just bring up the subject so you could preach at people you troll.
Bottom line seeking is different from escorts and you need to take responsibility for protection as the girl probably wont. That includes taking your own condoms and making sure you use them (if thats your thing). Its quite easy when first seeing a seeking girl to expect the same as an escort but they are different in this area so come prepared.

Offline sapunter

Yh you should never have unprotected sex with a girl without knowing whether they have clean results. Is too risky.

I know I am going to create a shit storm now - Went raw so many times and never got a STD. A lot of those girls on SA are total slags. They tell you they see only you and reality is they see 3-4 new guys every week. They make a multiple of their money doing this. They are escorts, nothing else. Straight up prostitutes. You are totally naive if you believe you are exclusive with them or romanticising anything. You talk to women who are willing to fuck for money, it’s totally transactional. On top of it most of them want to bang you raw contrary to an escort. My advice, hence the quote, is that you should get PReP if you engage in their preferences. You can BAN me and I won't tell you where to get it prescribed if helpful.

Alright, I am ready for your abrasive feedback now :-) Have a good weekend lads?
« Last Edit: November 01, 2025, 01:18:08 pm by daviemac »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,545
  • Likes: 729
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Alright, I am ready for your abrasive feedback now
I would recommend you read the rules if you want to remain a member, there's a link at the bottom of every page.

Offline bigden40

I know I am going to create a shit storm now - Went raw so many times and never got a STD. A lot of those girls on SA are total slags. They tell you they see only you and reality is they see 3-4 new guys every week. They make a multiple of their money doing this. They are escorts, nothing else. Straight up prostitutes. You are totally naive if you believe you are exclusive with them or romanticising anything. You talk to women who are willing to fuck for money, it’s totally transactional. On top of it most of them want to bang you raw contrary to an escort. My advice, hence the quote, is that you should get PReP if you engage in their preferences. You can BAN me and I won't tell you where to get it prescribed if helpful.

Alright, I am ready for your abrasive feedback now :-) Have a good weekend lads?

Massively ignorant post. I wonder if it’s rage bait?

Seeking is not a homogeneous population of women, there are pros, sluts, ordinary women, girls next door, unicorns, etc. what you end up dating depends on how YOU approach it. There’s plenty other posts on this forum with great advice on sexual health, so it’s not like you’ve been particularly useful either.

Interesting that you choose to post advice here given that most of your posts on this forum are about fucking men. No judgement but it’s an interesting juxtaposition.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2025, 02:48:40 pm by bigden40 »

Online finn5555

I know I am going to create a shit storm now


You want to create a shit storm more to the point  :crazy: although you’re deluded  :rolleyes:

Offline sapunter

Ok fair - I rephrase it a bit to get the points across correctly:

- I agree with previous posts on here which say that many on there are not very concerned about it. There are additional ways to make sure to stay healthy in case you engage with it (which you shouldn’t).
- It is transactional on there. Although they change their approach to a dating website. Most are having the same expectation on there. And if you charge for sex than that’s escort, there is no difference apart from that you also pay there truffle pasta and martinis and have a conversation. It’s a great concept and it can work well but you need to be realistic that it is what it is.

I don’t think those points are unreasonable.

Offline Hobbit

I know I am going to create a shit storm now - Went raw so many times and never got a STD. A lot of those girls on SA are total slags. They tell you they see only you and reality is they see 3-4 new guys every week. They make a multiple of their money doing this. They are escorts, nothing else. Straight up prostitutes. You are totally naive if you believe you are exclusive with them or romanticising anything. You talk to women who are willing to fuck for money, it’s totally transactional. On top of it most of them want to bang you raw contrary to an escort. My advice, hence the quote, is that you should get PReP if you engage in their preferences. You can BAN me and I won't tell you where to get it prescribed if helpful.

Alright, I am ready for your abrasive feedback now :-) Have a good weekend lads?

You could have worded it much better without offending others. The one point that I would agree with you on is that most of the girls on Seeking are seeing multiple guys. The only ones that aren't are the ones that are being paid around 2K per month by one sugar daddy. Many of us cannot afford to do that, but there are some.

Personally, I tend to get bored with people in general, especially modern women, so I rather play the field. :hi:

Offline Consafo


Online Mr Garmin

Back on seeking and getting a few bites… any info on the following would be appreciated:)

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only


Thanks, lots of options …

It makes the lives of others on here much simpler if you put their name as well.  It also sometimes saves us from clicking on her profile resulting in an 'all right babe?' message

Offline Consafo


Offline PLeisure

Sorry dude my mistake.
Great, so please provide their username and, ideally, some additional information such as age/ ethnicity/ any information in their bio that can help us remember if we've engaged with them without having to open the profile.
You'll appreciate that we may not want to view their profile -thereby drawing attention - if the negotiations went south.
Providing intel may jog a memory and you may receive collective intel from those who have previously contacted any of these SBs
thanks  :hi:

Offline Consafo

1. Danielle 34
2. Enigma 31
3.heidi 26
4.Bella 21
5.Anastastia 31

These are the names and usernames Amos I presume.

Offline seed_sprayer

1. Danielle 34
2. Enigma 31
3.heidi 26
4.Bella 21
5.Anastastia 31

These are the names and usernames Amos I presume.

Yeah I can help with these..

Danielle - pretty sure I met some time ago, looks older than pics, wouldn't recommend. 

Enigma is on there constantly, messages lots, but time waster - couldn't be bothered.

Heidi - wanted short notice meets (same day), a bit pushy, wanted 500 but negotiated down a bit.  In the end pro vibes put me off.  But she looks fit.

Bella looks hot but wants to receive gifts for platonic meets upfront to begin with (?250 lol) - up to you whether you want to entertain that (I don’t generally).

Depends what you're looking for but not sure I'd rush for any of those tbh

Offline PLeisure

Thank you for providing names and ages, Consafo  :hi:

The last one, Anastasia was discussed earlier this week:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=259378.msg4359602#msg4359602
« Last Edit: November 02, 2025, 03:58:34 pm by PLeisure »

Offline Consafo

Yeah I can help with these..

Danielle - pretty sure I met some time ago, looks older than pics, wouldn't recommend. 

Enigma is on there constantly, messages lots, but time waster - couldn't be bothered.

Heidi - wanted short notice meets (same day), a bit pushy, wanted 500 but negotiated down a bit.  In the end pro vibes put me off.  But she looks fit.

Bella looks hot but wants to receive gifts for platonic meets upfront to begin with (?250 lol) - up to you whether you want to entertain that (I don’t generally).

Depends what you're looking for but not sure I'd rush for any of those tbh


Thanks dude,

I’m struggling then to find the “good” ones, do you have anyone you would recommend?

Offline Jack_w71


Online paul_tall_

The one point that I would agree with you on is that most of the girls on Seeking are seeing multiple guys.
The only ones that aren't are the ones that are being paid around 2K per month by one sugar daddy.
What are you basing this on ? That certainly not my experience that the majority are seeing multiple guys , for a start a fair number dont even meet , in most areas most of the profiles are inactive and havent logged on in weeks/months and disappear when a year of inactivity happens

Offline Mstar86

What are you basing this on ? That certainly not my experience that the majority are seeing multiple guys , for a start a fair number dont even meet , in most areas most of the profiles are inactive and havent logged on in weeks/months and disappear when a year of inactivity happens

Kind of obvious that this is talking about girls who are having sex on seeking as he’s replying to the comments about BB. He’s not talking about inactive accounts or girls that don’t meet or girls that just plutonic meet.

Yes it’s a blanket statement, yes there are always going to be exceptions but surely “in your experience” you have no idea what these girls are up to outside of what they tell you. They want you to think you’re the only one.


Online paul_tall_

Kind of obvious that this is talking about girls who are having sex on seeking as he’s replying to the comments about BB. He’s not talking about inactive accounts or girls that don’t meet or girls that just plutonic meet.

Yes it’s a blanket statement, yes there are always going to be exceptions but surely “in your experience” you have no idea what these girls are up to outside of what they tell you. They want you to think you’re the only one.
I’m not naive that they some will be seeing other guys , but it’s not the majority based on my experience . It’s quite easy to talk and get to know what someone is about . It was the sweeping statement of the majority .

Online southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,060
  • Likes: 160
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
I too hate “generalised sweeping statements “ that some guys seem to do and especially when it is about Seeking girls! But I have to agree with Hobbit ( and that doesn’t happen too often) that if they are PPMing you then there is a fair chance that they are also PPMing other guys!
But not all girls that meet will do PPM and some are in fact only seeking one regular!
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 10:55:04 am by southcoastpunter »

Online paul_tall_

It’s the sweeping statement .
I know full well that some girls I have seen in the past have seen other guys and I trust they are honest about it and I know that some have continued on dating sites . My meetings are no more than helping a girl out , experiencing something they might not generally do .It’s none of my business really and I trust they are safety conscious. I’m always upfront and explain what an arrangement would be like , how often , what we can do and can’t , ie I have no desire to holiday with a girl on that basis . In the past this worked for me as there was more getting to know someone than a aw meeting and there was no danger of them
Expecting to move in etc or pressure of the mistress type relationship . The site has completely changed from when I first joined and I recognise that .

Offline bigden40

As I said earlier, it’s a mistake to assume the girls on seeking to be a homogeneous population. Some are very pro but many are not. If you treat women like escorts then the only ones you’ll meet will be the pros and that will be your experience.  But there are many girls on there that are just looking for one partner at a time, and enjoy the benefits of dating an older man.  I’ve experienced both ends of the spectrum and a few variations in between.





Offline sapunter

As I said earlier, it’s a mistake to assume the girls on seeking to be a homogeneous population. Some are very pro but many are not. If you treat women like escorts then the only ones you’ll meet will be the pros and that will be your experience.  But there are many girls on there that are just looking for one partner at a time, and enjoy the benefits of dating an older man.  I’ve experienced both ends of the spectrum and a few variations in between.

Where I see it differently is that they will obviously tell you they only see you. I think SA is genius, you meet amazing girls and can have a lot of fun. For very little money. Honestly it’s a lot more expensive to be in a relationship. However one needs to be realistic about it, almost all of them do this in a leveraged way and they get better at it the longer they do it. I don’t know who you meet exactly and you seem to be very protective of your own experience but it’s in their interest to mislead you who they see as that’s part of their business. Always remind yourself that they sell themselves and preagree terms. There is no need to romanticise who they are. And that is fine. I use SA a lot, imo a much more satisfying experience than aw. And repeating my point: I agree with the comments of most in here that protection doesn’t seem important to most of them and I would be a bit careful with that as they are not trustworthy just by the concept of how they do this and then don’t even care about protection. I dont think my points are unreasonable. NB: Defo love the conversations on here and the different view points. Saw a fellow punter last weekend for a few drinks and I think we agreed this thread is only missing more input of the good finds. I saw a few recently and will share. My only problem is that I usually block them once I start seeing them (so basically doing the reverse of what they do haha 😜)….so now I don’t know how to post their link to the experience.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 02:24:05 pm by sapunter »

Offline bigden40

Where I see it differently is that they will obviously tell you they only see you. I think SA is genius, you meet amazing girls and can have a lot of fun. For very little money. Honestly it’s a lot more expensive to be in a relationship. However one needs to be realistic about it, almost all of them do this in a leveraged way and they get better at it the longer they do it. I don’t know who you meet exactly and you seem to be very protective of your own experience but it’s in their interest to mislead you who they see as that’s part of their business. Always remind yourself that they sell themselves and preagree terms. There is no need to romanticise who they are. And that is fine. I use SA a lot, imo a much more satisfying experience than aw. And repeating my point: I agree with the comments of most in here that protection doesn’t seem important to most of them and I would be a bit careful with that as they are not trustworthy just by the concept of how they do this and then don’t even care about protection. I dont think my points are unreasonable. NB: Defo love the conversations on here and the different view points. Saw a fellow punter last weekend for a few drinks and I think we agreed this thread is only missing more input of the good finds. I saw a few recently and will share. My only problem is that I usually block them once I start seeing them (so basically doing the reverse of what they do haha 😜)….so now I don’t know how to post their link to the experience.

I’m not protective of my own experience, I’m very happy with it.  For the majority of my time on the site I’ve been seeing 3 or 4 girls at a time and was under no illusion that I was not their only one either.

My point is that there is not a uniformity of expectations and experience and your outcome will absolutely reflect how you treat them.

There are obvious escorts and pro-SBs on the site and they’re using it to make a living and support a lifestyle.  There are also women who have day jobs and other commitments that just want to be treated nice and get some extra money on the side. The latter would often prefer to see one man regularly than see multiple SDs infrequently.  Which one you find depends on you.





Offline Spermdispenser

My experience is that I think most real girls on there, apart from possibly the very new/naive ones see multiple men. I think even the ones with full time jobs, who just do it to make extra money and have fun, end up seeing multiple men, almost by accident, as most blokes on there actually don’t want to, or in a lot cases can’t afford to keep seeing the same girl once per week at £500 per pop. I think there’s a lot men on there, who hope for the unicorn situation where the girl doesn’t ask for or chase for the allowance, but when they do have to pay £500, they then have to wait another pay cheque to go again with someone new.

I’ve not enjoyed this weird protection conversation, but one thing I’d say is you can often spot a pro if they mention using condoms on WhatsApp without being prompted. I think it’s likely the newer/less experienced ones who don’t want to lose the money, once they’ve got as far as the bedroom, so don’t speak up to enforce it. However, seeing comments from punters who see trans girls and bareback escorts, as well as seeing seeking girls should make everyone think twice about wrapping up.

« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 05:32:23 pm by Spermdispenser »

Online Garyhart

My experience is that I think most real girls on there, apart from possibly the very new/naive ones see multiple men. I think even the ones with full time jobs, who just do it to make extra money and have fun, end up seeing multiple men, almost by accident, as most blokes on there actually don’t want to, or in a lot cases can’t afford to keep seeing the same girl once per week at £500 per pop. I think there’s a lot men on there, who hope for the unicorn situation where the girl doesn’t ask for or chase for the allowance, but when they do have to pay £500, they then have to wait another pay cheque to go again with someone new.

I’ve not enjoyed this weird protection conversation, but one thing I’d say is you can often spot a pro if they mention using condoms on WhatsApp without being prompted. I think it’s likely the newer/less experienced ones who don’t want to lose the money, once they’ve got as far as the bedroom, so don’t speak up to enforce it. However, seeing comments from punters who see trans girls and bareback escorts, as well as seeing seeking girls should make everyone think twice about wrapping up.

This is the biggest reason to use a condom when seeing seeking girls that they’ve seen.

Online stampjones

Where I see it differently is that they will obviously tell you they only see you. I think SA is genius, you meet amazing girls and can have a lot of fun. For very little money. Honestly it’s a lot more expensive to be in a relationship. However one needs to be realistic about it, almost all of them do this in a leveraged way and they get better at it the longer they do it. I don’t know who you meet exactly and you seem to be very protective of your own experience but it’s in their interest to mislead you who they see as that’s part of their business. Always remind yourself that they sell themselves and preagree terms. There is no need to romanticise who they are. And that is fine. I use SA a lot, imo a much more satisfying experience than aw. And repeating my point: I agree with the comments of most in here that protection doesn’t seem important to most of them and I would be a bit careful with that as they are not trustworthy just by the concept of how they do this and then don’t even care about protection. I dont think my points are unreasonable. NB: Defo love the conversations on here and the different view points. Saw a fellow punter last weekend for a few drinks and I think we agreed this thread is only missing more input of the good finds. I saw a few recently and will share. My only problem is that I usually block them once I start seeing them (so basically doing the reverse of what they do haha 😜)….so now I don’t know how to post their link to the experience.
What a load of shite. You somehow just know that “almost all” SBs who agree to fuck someone have multiple other SDs. And anyone who has evidence to the contrary is just deluding themselves. That's just mysoginistic and disrespectful nonsense. As was said there are all sorts of girls on there and Ive met many who Im very sure werent seeing anyone else. Ive also seen others who it was blatantly obvious were. And a bunch inbetween. What is indisputably true, though, is that every single girl on there who agrees to fuck someone, it has been true at least once that she wasnt fucking any other SDs. That itself proves you are talking bollocks.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 07:23:52 pm by stampjones »

Offline sapunter

What a load of shite. You somehow just know that “almost all” SBs who agree to fuck someone have multiple other SDs. And anyone who has evidence to the contrary is just deluding themselves. That's just mysoginistic and disrespectful nonsense. As was said there are all sorts of girls on there and Ive met many who Im very sure werent seeing anyone else. Ive also seen others who it was blatantly obvious were. And a bunch inbetween. What is indisputably true, though, is that every single girl on there who agrees to fuck someone, it has been true at least once that she wasnt fucking any other SDs. That itself proves you are talking bollocks.

I think you need to stop falling in love with a sugarbaby who takes money to be entertained and then give you one pop. You seem very agitated that there is possibility that she is seeing more lads than you. Be realistic mate, it isn‘t the love of your life, it is a quick very fun fix which can be very, very satisfying. And if you think she sees only you and you love her, then my advice is that you should be careful as they are smart, possibly outsmarting you fella.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 08:53:03 pm by sapunter »

Offline sapunter

My experience is that I think most real girls on there, apart from possibly the very new/naive ones see multiple men. I think even the ones with full time jobs, who just do it to make extra money and have fun, end up seeing multiple men, almost by accident, as most blokes on there actually don’t want to, or in a lot cases can’t afford to keep seeing the same girl once per week at £500 per pop. I think there’s a lot men on there, who hope for the unicorn situation where the girl doesn’t ask for or chase for the allowance, but when they do have to pay £500, they then have to wait another pay cheque to go again with someone new.

I’ve not enjoyed this weird protection conversation, but one thing I’d say is you can often spot a pro if they mention using condoms on WhatsApp without being prompted. I think it’s likely the newer/less experienced ones who don’t want to lose the money, once they’ve got as far as the bedroom, so don’t speak up to enforce it. However, seeing comments from punters who see trans girls and bareback escorts, as well as seeing seeking girls should make everyone think twice about wrapping up.

Amen. Agree with all points. Although you seem beyond homophobic. There is a section on here as preferences might vary but you seem an angry little boy searching for love 😂 Differemce between us is very likely that others get laid all around and you are a little bitter there.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 08:56:29 pm by sapunter »

Offline sapunter

This is the biggest reason to use a condom when seeing seeking girls that they’ve seen.

Geezer - Is that a homophonic smashing forum? Unacceptable. Guess your girlfriend wouldn’t appreciate that you see brass if you ever have one? When I hear those comments I can imagine what kind of „lad“ you are as that all comes out of insecurity and probably lack of luck in life.

Offline londonhunter008

anyone else facing issue with Seeking messages?  icant see any of my message in Seeking Inbox

Online stampjones

I think you need to stop falling in love with a sugarbaby who takes money to be entertained and then give you one pop. You seem very agitated that there is possibility that she is seeing more lads than you. Be realistic mate, it isn‘t the love of your life, it is a quick very fun fix which can be very, very satisfying. And if you think she sees only you and you love her, then my advice is that you should be careful as they are smart, possibly outsmarting you fella.
Are you 12? Do you ever go out in the world and realise that its made up of all sorts of different people. As I pointed out (although maybe it hasnt seeped through your thick skull yet) every single SB on there (who anyone has seen for a fuck) has been in the position at least once where she wasnt seeing anyone else on there. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

Offline JAM2121

anyone else facing issue with Seeking messages?  icant see any of my message in Seeking Inbox

Yes, I was too earlier this evening

Online paul_tall_

I think you need to stop falling in love with a sugarbaby who takes money to be entertained and then give you one pop.
where has the poster said this ? why are you twisting every conversation to fit your narrative?
has a sb stung you/passed you over and you are anti all of them ?

Online Garyhart

Geezer - Is that a homophonic smashing forum? Unacceptable. Guess your girlfriend wouldn’t appreciate that you see brass if you ever have one? When I hear those comments I can imagine what kind of „lad“ you are as that all comes out of insecurity and probably lack of luck in life.

Nothing homophobic / transphobic was intended, it’s simply a statistical fact that trans people usually have a higher risk of getting stis. Here’s a link  External Link/Members Only And I’m happy to send more.

I’ve got my own place and retired my parents all before the age of 30 so I wouldn’t say I’m in lack of luck in life, I thank God for what he’s done for me so far  :lol:

Online Garyhart

where has the poster said this ? why are you twisting every conversation to fit your narrative?
has a sb stung you/passed you over and you are anti all of them ?

Just saw your response to sapunter’s post, I’ve got a feeling he’s trolling. I shouldn’t have responded to him in hindsight

Offline sapunter

Nothing homophobic / transphobic was intended, it’s simply a statistical fact that trans people usually have a higher risk of getting stis. Here’s a link  External Link/Members Only And I’m happy to send more.

I’ve got my own place and retired my parents all before the age of 30 so I wouldn’t say I’m in lack of luck in life, I thank God for what he’s done for me so far  :lol:

Talking religiously, smashing trans people. But being active on a punter‘s forum. Mamma Mia haha you me laugh.

Offline sapunter

where has the poster said this ? why are you twisting every conversation to fit your narrative?
has a sb stung you/passed you over and you are anti all of them ?

I am for all of them. As I said seeking is genius. But I won’t talk this unnecessary smack talk of some entry level punters. Thanking god whilst they post brass reviews. There is some odd people in his world  🍆:sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

Offline sapunter



you and 2-3 of your mates on here who make semi-homophobic comments are little warriors behind your screens. I am sure there women who are full of love on seeking. And then there is the money which is where you come in. I repeat, Seeking is genius. But I won’t just accept your abuse because I destroy your dream that those girls love you and see only you. I see many of them, more often than not they want a real relationship. Buuuut pls tell me a reason why you would trust a woman who takes money to sell herself? You can equally date any aw girl because she said she loves you. And no need to be homophobic or anything, stop being so bitter and angry you 2-3 guys who keep on with this. I repeat to you, your sugarbaby is more likely than not seeing many other guys. A fact.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 10:40:03 pm by sapunter »

Online Garyhart

Talking religiously, smashing trans people. But being active on a punter‘s forum. Mamma Mia haha you me laugh.

I’ve never had sex with a trans….ive never reviewed one or made reference to me seeing a trans person. as others have said, you’re clearly here to troll so this will be my last response to you. It’s clear to see you don’t get much satisfaction from other areas of your life so you’re resorting to online trolling

Offline sapunter

Nothing homophobic / transphobic was intended, it’s simply a statistical fact that trans people usually have a higher risk of getting stis. Here’s a link  External Link/Members Only And I’m happy to send more.

I’ve got my own place and retired my parents all before the age of 30 so I wouldn’t say I’m in lack of luck in life, I thank God for what he’s done for me so far  :lol:

Also you are such a genius - Please tell your parents that you referenced them in a punting forum. After thanking god. You are really a special one  :D

Also you seem to be well educated on the topic - I guess we all know why, it seems to interest you.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2025, 10:48:09 pm by sapunter »

Online 90125

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,960
  • Likes: 54
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
This Topic would be a lot more informative if members just post info about SA SP's and not running the same old discussions which add nothing.

Online Garyhart

External Link/Members Only

Natalia

Any intel on this girl? Looks really fit

Anyone met her? Natalia, 26. Spoke on WhatsApp a few weeks ago and she was comfortable with £600 for a few hours but we didn’t actually meet as our availabilities didnt align. She hasn’t been on for a while so she’s probably found an SD but if anyones met her, that’d be great to know what she’s like

Offline Mstar86

What a load of shite. You somehow just know that “almost all” SBs who agree to fuck someone have multiple other SDs. And anyone who has evidence to the contrary is just deluding themselves. That's just mysoginistic and disrespectful nonsense. As was said there are all sorts of girls on there and Ive met many who Im very sure werent seeing anyone else. Ive also seen others who it was blatantly obvious were. And a bunch inbetween. What is indisputably true, though, is that every single girl on there who agrees to fuck someone, it has been true at least once that she wasnt fucking any other SDs. That itself proves you are talking bollocks.

Why do the other guys have to be paying for it?

She could be charging you whilst sleeping with others for free.

You somehow just know you’ve “met many who Im very sure werent seeing anyone else.” There is no way to ever prove that and you’re putting a lot of trust into girls who sell sex that you meet online.

I’m actually in agreement with you that statistically you’ve probably been a an SB’s only SD at a point and the only person she’s sleeping with but it could have been the one you least expected. The ones you think are not could have been barebacking guys the night before you were eating them out and you’d never know.

Online stampjones

Why do the other guys have to be paying for it?

She could be charging you whilst sleeping with others for free.

You somehow just know you’ve “met many who Im very sure werent seeing anyone else.” There is no way to ever prove that and you’re putting a lot of trust into girls who sell sex that you meet online.
.
Yes any particular SB could be sleeping with someone else in the way that your wife or partner could be sleeping with someone else. Thats why I used the term “very sure” rather than certain. But at that point who cares. If they are not doing paid sex with multiple guys I dont really mind as it brings the risks back down to normal civvy level. Your wife or the girl you pick up at the bar could be barebacking someone else but that doesnt stop you sleeping with her with reasonable confidence all will be well.

Offline Mstar86

Kaleah 19, London

External Link/Members Only

Having your (or someone’s) baby in the background of your profile picture is wild.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2025, 11:35:30 am by Mstar86 »

Offline Spermdispenser

A few that I'm in conversation with/would appreciate any feedback on:

External Link/Members Only - spoliedgoddess 30, seemingly always online and has been for a couple of years, £500 - has anyone met her?

External Link/Members Only - Tia 27, ehanced boobs, seems very pro, doesn't want to travel to my side of London, and has suggested central hotel etc.. £500, probably won't meet.

External Link/Members Only - Arabella 26 - seems real, boobs natural apparently, £500 - hoping to meet.

External Link/Members Only - classygirl, 29 - seems experienced, won't go below £500 - has anyone met her?

External Link/Members Only - Izzy 24, happy with £500, but will only use a hotel, has anyone met her?