i did say UK employment law and i think Matt Gaetz might fall into the "senior" category and was not covered by UK employment law and as was pointed out, had other issues involved too.
This all started by the following comment:
no one in the UK is going to be fairly dismissed just because they are a member of seeking.com - of course they could be unfairly dismissed but that applies to anything to do with employment law. so any normal Seeking profile that mentions they work for the NHS is not at risk anymore than being on Tinder, Bumble etc and the risk (by itself) is almost zero.
You did, indeed, say UK employment law. My reference to Gaetz case was intended to be mildly humorous, though it is instructive.
The argument that 'no-one in the Uk is going to be fairly dismissed' because of Seeking membership, I think, is moot. I very much doubt that any instance of someone losing their job on this basis would ever get as far as testing the fairness of the dismissal, which would entail a vast to an employment tribunal. Having some experience of such cases, I can imagine the 'fun' a decent employment barrister would have: 'so, ms x, how many men did you meet through seeking for sex? how much did you charge them?' and on for hours potentially. So, in my view, anyone confronted with the facts would aim to leave quiet and certainly not face that kind of exposure.
I'm sure we'd al love to read the salacious details of any such case........
