Author Topic: Seeking.com (London)  (Read 1888919 times)

Offline massagepuntingfan

She looks a bit TS for my tastes... caked in make-up makes it difficult to consider her age as 19.

Yes I thought similarly. Strangest looking 19 year old I’ve seen on SA.

Offline Rock4ages

Got talking to a SB 2 years ago she gave me her socials saw she had a BF who seems like a 'nice" guy. She just recently reactivated and sent me a message , I could find her socials and see nice guy is still there. She's hot  :wacko: usually i would pass but the question is has anyone had a long term arrangement with someone in a relationship. To me it seems messy, Don't want a BF showing up to my Business or starting an online campaign.  :hi:

Offline Markus

Got talking to a SB 2 years ago she gave me her socials saw she had a BF who seems like a 'nice" guy. She just recently reactivated and sent me a message , I could find her socials and see nice guy is still there. She's hot  :wacko: usually i would pass but the question is has anyone had a long term arrangement with someone in a relationship. To me it seems messy, Don't want a BF showing up to my Business or starting an online campaign.  :hi:

Just don’t provide any personal information and don’t invite her back to your place.  She doesn’t seem to be too taken aback by her BF otherwise she wouldn’t be doing shit behind his back. 

Offline fudi_maar

Lots of girls who are on Seeking/Adultwork are in a relationship or even married. Just like many of us punters.

I've met at least one woman at a well-known party place who was married and her husband didn't know what she did for work.



Offline Joran

Thought to add my experience on this one. Pictures are like 5+ years old as she is way overweight. I didn’t want a commotion so I knocked back a few drinks and got my cock in and said she can leave. Didn’t even bother to finish as she had a funny smell emanating. Definitely very pro and I would avoid. Her lifestyle seems to demand money (party and pills by the sounds of it IIRC) and she will not be ashamed to message you whenever she is short on business.

She is definitely ok with less than 500, 300 or less depending on how dusty her phone is and how low her balance is too.
I did agree last year for 150ppm, but I did not manage to find a hotel. She was very pushy and did not want to share many pictures. We did video call but I could not see her body. So I was a bit reluctant to meet her and happy that I dodged a bullet

Offline Froomey

There are thousands of scammers, catfishes and other types of deceptive profiles (even those with no intention of meeting) on the site. Empirical evidence (not only my experience). Why does your evidential standard work one way btw? This is a forum, so it's for people to express opinions. You'll need to get used to hearing those different to your own.

I relish hearing opinions that differ from my own - it's one of the main benefits of a forum like this as it enables one to question one's assumptions. But the exercise is fruitless when when reference is made to 'empirical evidence' but that evidence is not presented to back up the argument. Thus discussion becomes pointless and as newspaper editors say when letters page debate hits this kind of brick wall: "this correspondence is now closed."

Offline pa5151

Girl wants to meet up with me at a hotel room. Says she's not looking for a gift or anything and just wants to break the ice with some fun. Shouldn't I be expecting a pack of men to turn up and beat the shit out of me instead?  :crazy:

Offline Trenlover

Girl wants to meet up with me at a hotel room. Says she's not looking for a gift or anything and just wants to break the ice with some fun. Shouldn't I be expecting a pack of men to turn up and beat the shit out of me instead?  :crazy:

I had that once with an 18yr old black girl, my only "free fuck" from SA, turned out to be a great meet although found out after she wanted money for future meets as she was trying to break into prostitution, never saw her again

was great for a free shag, but I wouldnt pay her 150+ for it.

Offline pa5151

I had that once with an 18yr old black girl, my only "free fuck" from SA, turned out to be a great meet although found out after she wanted money for future meets as she was trying to break into prostitution, never saw her again

was great for a free shag, but I wouldnt pay her 150+ for it.

After the first shag the next one should be discounted since you banged her already. So it's free the first time wouldn't make sense to pay.

Offline Trenlover

got a few girls who are like 4/10 or 5/10 at best thinking im going to pay 200/250 to shag them. 

sorry no  :dash:


Offline stampjones

Girl wants to meet up with me at a hotel room. Says she's not looking for a gift or anything and just wants to break the ice with some fun. Shouldn't I be expecting a pack of men to turn up and beat the shit out of me instead?  :crazy:
It does happen but not often. Go for it but take precautions. Eg get a hotel where they have card access to the rooms and meet her downstairs without telling her the room number. Trust your instinct.

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
got a few girls who are like 4/10 or 5/10 at best thinking im going to pay 200/250 to shag them. 

sorry no  :dash:

I'm assuming these are girls who've sneakily hidden their photos or have contacted you first? I rarely contact girls who haven't got a reasonably clear face photo visible and if they have and I don't find her attractive, then I tend not to contact her in the first place. I may if I were desperate but then only if she made clear on her profile that she isn't looking for an allowance, which rarely happens.

What amuses me most are the deluded fat, pig ugly girls who expect to be paid allowances while stressing there will be no sex.  :unknown:

I feel like telling them: there will be no sex, no allowance and no meets, love. But if in a weak moment, I decide to meet you, there would be sex which you never get in real life and there will be no allowance - and, what's more, you'll be fucking grateful for it.  :sarcastic:

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

I’ve been “dating”  :D SB’s for about 5 years and have seen a few SB/SD arm in arm.  In fact as I was walking back to mum hotel with my Asian beau on my arm a guy walked out the door with an exact doppelgänger of her on his arm … in fact he looked like me too. It wasn’t a reflection… he gave me a knowing wink which I reciprocated  ;)

BUT in my 5 years I’ve never seen a SD with a fat, dumpy lass on his arm.
I just block all fatties instantly … it’s less cruel that way.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2021, 08:25:10 pm by Prifessionallondinguy »

Offline HomerC

She looks a bit TS for my tastes... caked in make-up makes it difficult to consider her age as 19.

This is a horrifying prospect.
I'm straight, I never ever want a male

Do you think a lass would be offended if I straight up asked, "Are you a transgender?"
I don't want to offend.
I can see her private pics, and they are mannish.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2021, 10:08:29 pm by HomerC »

Offline HomerC

This is a weird profile:
Quote
Little
20 • Female • Canterbury Manchester London
External Link/Members Only

Why are her pics straight up cheetahs or birds (the flappy animal)?
WTF is d d l g?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline stampjones

Do you think a lass would be offended if I straight up asked, "Are you a transgender?"
I don't want to offend.
Mate  :lol: :dash: :dash: :dash:
Have a guess!

Offline KorbenDallas

This is a weird profile:
Why are her pics straight up cheetahs or birds (the flappy animal)?
WTF is d d l g?

Hidden Image/Members Only

The bird is a common starling External Link/Members Only

I'd be keen to get in touch with her to ask her for her ginger mate's number.

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 19, 2021, 10:38:09 pm by KorbenDallas »

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,055
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
This is a horrifying prospect.
I'm straight, I never ever want a male

Do you think a lass would be offended if I straight up asked, "Are you a transgender?"
I don't want to offend.
I can see her private pics, and they are mannish.

Really  :unknown: :unknown:
If your concerned, why bother just move on? Why make a drama out of it??

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,055
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
The bird is a common starling External Link/Members Only

I'd be keen to get in touch with her to ask her for her ginger mate's number.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Waste of time not looking to meet.. using this as a dating app rather than looking for an arrangement

Offline jackthelad

This is a weird profile:
Why are her pics straight up cheetahs or birds (the flappy animal)?
WTF is d d l g?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Ddlg is daddy dom/little girl

Offline HomerC

Really  :unknown: :unknown:
If your concerned, why bother just move on? Why make a drama out of it??

nah i'm not genuinely concerned - i was being a bit silly

Offline rskane

Did you get anything from her yet? Nothing back after the first few messages. No clue wtf she’s looking for from that profile

Waste of time not looking to meet.. using this as a dating app rather than looking for an arrangement

Offline Link7

I relish hearing opinions that differ from my own - it's one of the main benefits of a forum like this as it enables one to question one's assumptions. But the exercise is fruitless when when reference is made to 'empirical evidence' but that evidence is not presented to back up the argument. Thus discussion becomes pointless and as newspaper editors say when letters page debate hits this kind of brick wall: "this correspondence is now closed."

Why don't you tell everyone what you're expecting by way of evidence, then? I think that would be much more efficient than simply saying you cannot accept empirical observations (except when those observations are your own of course). This is a sex buyers' forum, not an academic research institution, so I think you need to be realistic about the basis of this entire thread (what is it if not empirical!). If you were really interested in other views your response to hearing them would not be so pompous and, frankly, daft.

Offline maakriman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 264
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: No response to question about no reviews.
Banned by: 90125

Offline maakriman

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 264
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: No response to question about no reviews.
Banned by: 90125

Offline Froomey

Why don't you tell everyone what you're expecting by way of evidence, then? I think that would be much more efficient than simply saying you cannot accept empirical observations (except when those observations are your own of course). This is a sex buyers' forum, not an academic research institution, so I think you need to be realistic about the basis of this entire thread (what is it if not empirical!). If you were really interested in other views your response to hearing them would not be so pompous and, frankly, daft.

OK; one last time since you are struggling with this. You have provided no evidence. You have done no more than assert a position which you say is supported by 'empirical evidence' without presenting anything to back it up. As I suggested previously, I think this exchange is has become both circular and pointless. Move on.

Offline Froomey

This is a weird profile:
Why are her pics straight up cheetahs or birds (the flappy animal)?
WTF is d d l g?

Hidden Image/Members Only

It could be that as she's photography student she is showing off a little of her work. It's one way of differentiating her profile from the pretty repetitive content that serves for most of them. It'd be a point of engagement and she maybe sees it as a filter. If I was interested in pursuing a meet with her (which I'm not because other aspects of the profile ring some alarm bells) that's be me starting point.

My view could well be different if - as KD alludes to later in the thread - she'd be a route to her redhead friend!

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

SA subscription expiring today…. I’m receiving lots of messages … am I right to be cynical?  :sarcastic:

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

It could be that as she's photography student she is showing off a little of her work. It's one way of differentiating her profile from the pretty repetitive content that serves for most of them. It'd be a point of engagement and she maybe sees it as a filter. If I was interested in pursuing a meet with her (which I'm not because other aspects of the profile ring some alarm bells) that's be me starting point.

My view could well be different if - as KD alludes to later in the thread - she'd be a route to her redhead friend!
Wrong type of pussy 🐱 shots. But I do this too to catch the eye.

Offline stampjones

SA subscription expiring today…. I’m receiving lots of messages … am I right to be cynical?  :sarcastic:
They boost your profile so more see it hence more messages. Treat them as any other cold call is how I do it

Offline Link7

OK; one last time since you are struggling with this. You have provided no evidence. You have done no more than assert a position which you say is supported by 'empirical evidence' without presenting anything to back it up. As I suggested previously, I think this exchange is has become both circular and pointless. Move on.

I can only assume that reply is a wind up. So ok, I'll ignore you as requested.

Offline Mr_Juest


Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
I can only assume that reply is a wind up. So ok, I'll ignore you as requested.

No, what Froomey wrote was very clear and absolutely correct - you made a wild suggestion that most girls on SA are scammers and he asked you for evidence which you can't provide because it is obviously rubbish. Coming up with fancy phrases like 'empirical evidence' doesn't mask that.
And on that, if one could be so inclined to go through every page on here and count up all reports of scams via SA, it would be double figures, when there have been several tens of thousands of female profiles over the past few years.

After being questioned, you then lumped catfishes in with scammers, which while annoying is not in the same league as scamming. Just use due diligence. (I'm also sure lots of guys catfish well.) Again, I can't be bothered to count but after scanning many many thousands of profiles over the past 3 years and being fairly astute, I would say the percentage of profiles with inaccurate photos is fairly small. What's 'deceptive' is subjective - some could take a look at every profile, boy or girl, and say it is deceptive in some way.

Froomey was polite. Not for the first time, you've come across as a bit of a dick who acts like he knows it all after a very short time on SA but actually doesn't.  :rolleyes:

« Last Edit: July 21, 2021, 12:40:57 am by Cunning Punt »

Offline Froomey

Wrong type of pussy 🐱 shots. But I do this too to catch the eye.

Haha...the 'right' kind of pussy would be very eye catching on a profile but most likely wouldn't get past Brandon's minions.....I've had another look and she is quite cute.....

Offline Froomey

No, what Froomey wrote was very clear and absolutely correct - you made a wild suggestion that most girls on SA are scammers and he asked you for evidence which you can't provide because it is obviously rubbish.

Froomey was polite. Not for the first time, you've come across as a bit of a dick who acts like he knows it all after a very short time on SA but actually doesn't.  :rolleyes:

Thanks CP. And your wider points are spot on. I do think a lot of people don't fully grasp the subtleties of the SA game compared with something like AW - it's like playing chess when you are used to draughts.....

Offline supastarjay

External Link/Members Only

Anyone come across her? Seems like a pro

Yes, first time I tried to meet her but was unable to because of lockdown. Second time more recently, she went quiet on the day. She doesn't really talk much which I find off putting, I like to get an idea of the girls personality beforehand. I do believe she is a real person, you may well get to meet her if you are willing to chase her up. No idea what she'd be like in bed as she doesn't really give much away, her ass does look phenomenal though.

Offline HomerC

GoodGirl_Xx
External Link/Members Only

This is a profile that gets you on WhatsApp, but is unable to verify she is the person in the pics that she sends.
"She" is clearly not.

"I am 19 I need to see a pic of u lol"

Offline Link7

Thanks CP. And your wider points are spot on. I do think a lot of people don't fully grasp the subtleties of the SA game compared with something like AW - it's like playing chess when you are used to draughts.....

Just to let you know - if you had read/understood anything I said, your last response truly did not make sense. So I was not being facetious when I said I thought you were winding me up.

Just wanted to add that in case the other guy's diatribe convinced you any different (he has a personal problem fyi - can't argue with himself though. But fun (for me) to watch him get worked up trying).

PS: I don't think SA is much like chess at all; you do these girls a compliment. I don't see any parallel in terms of tactical sophistication, anyway. Empirical view btw - I know you will ask for evidence that it's not like chess, and experience is only valid when it's the basis for your views. So you can disregard this post (as I assume you have the whole thread) :hi:

Offline Mr_Juest

Yes, first time I tried to meet her but was unable to because of lockdown. Second time more recently, she went quiet on the day. She doesn't really talk much which I find off putting, I like to get an idea of the girls personality beforehand. I do believe she is a real person, you may well get to meet her if you are willing to chase her up. No idea what she'd be like in bed as she doesn't really give much away, her ass does look phenomenal though.

What were the prices quoted for you?

Offline Froomey

Just to let you know - if you had read/understood anything I said, your last response truly did not make sense. So I was not being facetious when I said I thought you were winding me up.

Just wanted to add that in case the other guy's diatribe convinced you any different (he has a personal problem fyi - can't argue with himself though. But fun (for me) to watch him get worked up trying).

PS: I don't think SA is much like chess at all; you do these girls a compliment. I don't see any parallel in terms of tactical sophistication, anyway. Empirical view btw - I know you will ask for evidence that it's not like chess, and experience is only valid when it's the basis for your views. So you can disregard this post (as I assume you have the whole thread) :hi:

I take it you've been at the sherry.........

Offline HomerC

ChloeH
27 • Female • London, England, United Kingdom
sassy, classy and bad-assy 💁🏼‍♀️
Member Since   Nov 24, 2019
External Link/Members Only



Has anyone made any progress with her?


Offline HomerC

applepie091
29 • Female • London, England, United Kingdom
Student seeking sugar daddy :)
External Link/Members Only


Member Since   Feb 29, 2016


Has anyone approached her? She seems like a veteran (profile since 2016!)

Offline bigden40

No, what Froomey wrote was very clear and absolutely correct - you made a wild suggestion that most girls on SA are scammers and he asked you for evidence which you can't provide because it is obviously rubbish. Coming up with fancy phrases like 'empirical evidence' doesn't mask that.
And on that, if one could be so inclined to go through every page on here and count up all reports of scams via SA, it would be double figures, when there have been several tens of thousands of female profiles over the past few years.

After being questioned, you then lumped catfishes in with scammers, which while annoying is not in the same league as scamming. Just use due diligence. (I'm also sure lots of guys catfish well.) Again, I can't be bothered to count but after scanning many many thousands of profiles over the past 3 years and being fairly astute, I would say the percentage of profiles with inaccurate photos is fairly small. What's 'deceptive' is subjective - some could take a look at every profile, boy or girl, and say it is deceptive in some way.

Froomey was polite. Not for the first time, you've come across as a bit of a dick who acts like he knows it all after a very short time on SA but actually doesn't.  :rolleyes:

+1

I find it interesting how certain posters seem to think that they conclusively know “the answer” to what SA is.

I have an MO that works perfectly well for me.  I have not been subbed for nearly 2 years, do not have a profile pic, but probably still get 20 numbers per month.  I have a well crafted profile that I put a lot of effort into and I’m reasonably aware of obvious scammers/pros [too professional pics, profile inconsistencies, language, stolen pics, repeat profiles, etc, etc] when I go through the process of searching and favouriting. 

After making contact I follow a fairly well rehearsed script, that I have tested and works for me, that treats them more as potential dates rather than whores.  As a result I have more girls willing to meet than I have time to meet and am therefore able to be more dispassionate when it comes to agreeing allowances, meet and greets, etc.  I’m not worried about walking away and moving onto the next one. 

Getting there has involved a lot of trial and error and mistakes have been made along the way, but now I would say I have about half the girls I see without paying them a bean (but giving them a good night out) and the other half I’ve paid PPMs in the £150-250 range.  I haven’t paid a PPM over £250 since 2018.

Edit:  I tell a lie, I paid £300 once just before Covid because I REALLY fancied her.  It was decent but not worth the extra £100 and I never repeated.

I'm London based btw.
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 12:16:34 pm by bigden40 »

Offline stampjones

+1

I find it interesting how certain posters seem to think that they conclusively know “the answer” to what SA is.

Yeah that interests me too. I have my way which works really well for me but I’d never suggest it was the only way like some do

Offline Bikerboy

+1

I find it interesting how certain posters seem to think that they conclusively know “the answer” to what SA is.

I have an MO that works perfectly well for me.  I have not been subbed for nearly 2 years, do not have a profile pic, but probably still get 20 numbers per month.  I have a well crafted profile that I put a lot of effort into and I’m reasonably aware of obvious scammers/pros [too professional pics, profile inconsistencies, language, stolen pics, repeat profiles, etc, etc] when I go through the process of searching and favouriting. 

After making contact I follow a fairly well rehearsed script, that I have tested and works for me, that treats them more as potential dates rather than whores.  As a result I have more girls willing to meet than I have time to meet and am therefore able to be more dispassionate when it comes to agreeing allowances, meet and greets, etc.  I’m not worried about walking away and moving onto the next one. 

Getting there has involved a lot of trial and error and mistakes have been made along the way, but now I would say I have about half the girls I see without paying them a bean (but giving them a good night out) and the other half I’ve paid PPMs in the £150-250 range.  I haven’t paid a PPM over £250 since 2018.

Edit:  I tell a lie, I paid £300 once just before Covid because I REALLY fancied her.  It was decent but not worth the extra £100 and I never repeated.

I'm London based btw.

Agree no one size fits all for SA.
50% freebies - qudos to you that’s the highest % I’ve read about, you must have a great MO and probably a lot more patience than most.

Offline bigden40

There definitely are women out there who want what an older man can offer them, better conversation, nicer places for dates and a wiser head to give them advice on their goals.  I seem to have developed a knack of finding them.

Offline Link7

+1

I find it interesting how certain posters seem to think that they conclusively know “the answer” to what SA is.

I have an MO that works perfectly well for me.  I have not been subbed for nearly 2 years, do not have a profile pic, but probably still get 20 numbers per month.  I have a well crafted profile that I put a lot of effort into and I’m reasonably aware of obvious scammers/pros [too professional pics, profile inconsistencies, language, stolen pics, repeat profiles, etc, etc] when I go through the process of searching and favouriting. 

After making contact I follow a fairly well rehearsed script, that I have tested and works for me, that treats them more as potential dates rather than whores.  As a result I have more girls willing to meet than I have time to meet and am therefore able to be more dispassionate when it comes to agreeing allowances, meet and greets, etc.  I’m not worried about walking away and moving onto the next one. 

Getting there has involved a lot of trial and error and mistakes have been made along the way, but now I would say I have about half the girls I see without paying them a bean (but giving them a good night out) and the other half I’ve paid PPMs in the £150-250 range.  I haven’t paid a PPM over £250 since 2018.

Edit:  I tell a lie, I paid £300 once just before Covid because I REALLY fancied her.  It was decent but not worth the extra £100 and I never repeated.

I'm London based btw.

Btw - and this is not to say you don't deserve great praise and admiration - but just in case you were not aware, the above post comes across far more like you think you have "the answer" than anything I've seen posted on this thread to date.

Offline bigden40

Btw - and this is not to say you don't deserve great praise and admiration - but just in case you were not aware, the above post comes across far more like you think you have "the answer" than anything I've seen posted on this thread to date.

I don’t have THE answer, I have MY answer. 

You need to find what works for you. 

Too many posters seem to think there are magic solutions or a one size fits all approach, but the girls are not a homogenous group nor are we all looking for the same thing. We all have different personalities, different levels of game, some of us are connecting with the right girls for us whilst others are connecting with the wrong girls for us. The right girl for me might be the wrong girl for you. 

With all that in mind it would be incredible if what works for me worked for you.  That is my point.




Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
Just to let you know - if you had read/understood anything I said, your last response truly did not make sense. So I was not being facetious when I said I thought you were winding me up.

Just wanted to add that in case the other guy's diatribe convinced you any different (he has a personal problem fyi - can't argue with himself though. But fun (for me) to watch him get worked up trying).

PS: I don't think SA is much like chess at all; you do these girls a compliment. I don't see any parallel in terms of tactical sophistication, anyway. Empirical view btw - I know you will ask for evidence that it's not like chess, and experience is only valid when it's the basis for your views. So you can disregard this post (as I assume you have the whole thread) :hi:

No mate, other way round. Froomey and I both read your posts and said what they said. What we wrote made total sense but you clearly didn't read the posts properly, or did and don't understand basic English.  :unknown:

However, your own posts have gradually become more nonsensical, so no-one really understands them.  :rolleyes:  No number of readings will change that and, frankly, now we can't be bothered anyway.  :sarcastic:

I take it you've been at the sherry.........

 :D
« Last Edit: July 22, 2021, 04:12:15 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline Cunning Punt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,618
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 193
Agree no one size fits all for SA.
50% freebies - qudos to you that’s the highest % I’ve read about, you must have a great MO and probably a lot more patience than most.

That is clearly true, though maybe unlike us, he's a good looking bastard.  :lol:

I had a reasonable MO, a lot of patience and not particularly high aesthetic standards but struggled to get freebies.