Author Topic: Seeking.com (London)  (Read 1929908 times)

Offline paceywitter


Offline MichaelDBW

Thanks! I remember meeting her once a fair few years ago. It doesn't surprise me that she's gone on to be very successful on there .. Smart, good chat and skilled in the bedroom. 300 is good, I can't remember for sure but think I paid more than that ..

External Link/Members Only

"charlotte", 30 - outcall, lunchtime fun - £300

This one is a pro, been on the game since uni (early 20s) and knows the drill. Been living in Dubai for last many years. Open and genuine from the start. Easy to start with and has high expectations. Once we got past all the formalities over WA we was able to date. First thing that strikes me is how smart she is - she's very intelligent and via SA and the sugaring world shes built a very good network of professionals who support her financially and in her business goals.

This was an afternoon appointment so got a good DayUse deal. She's very firm and light! Picking her up was a joy! Kissing was nice and she was very happy for me to control her but she did talk about switching which we will do at a future date. No ass for those who are booty lovers but very responsive to oral. Was able to get a couple of pops during our time and she was happy for us to shower together.

She's defo a keeper so will be returning. She's looking for a LTR but I was clear with her that I'm only seeing her for short term flings and she's fine with that but if she meets someone she would close the door to me but that's fine.

Enjoy!

Offline Punting2022

Liya - External Link/Members Only
This one talks the talk, but rubbish in the room.
Flirty over Telegram. Attractive enough. Bengali girl.
From the West Midlands.
Insist on Lunch first somewhere fancy. When it comes to bedroom time not as good. Takes time in shower to waste time. Put lingerie on etc.

Will make excuses for no kisses or lack of it. Says ticklish so light pecs and couldn't kiss her neck etc. Does BJ and also let me lick her.

When it comes to penetration, she insist on riding. Will say why soon. First round i wanted to go on top. She agrees but limits penetration, Positions body in a way that its impossible to get in.
So switched to her riding, Get in and do it. But as soon as i cum, She jumps straight off. Didn't let me throb. Whilst doing this the Condom ovs came off. Then cum went over my body and stomach as it was throbbing.

This is why she insist to Ride. so she can pull off straight away .
agreed 400 per meet. Wont see again.

Offline TheOracle

In case it might be helpful to anybody I'll write a quick review of secretbenefits and whatsyourprice that I tried over the past couple of months. I know this is the "Seeking" thread so in case this is off-topic I ask a moderator to move this to its own thread.

Secretbenefits:

I bought 1000 credits for about 289$ (217 GBP) and they lasted me for about three months. It costs 10 credits to unlock a conversation (or to try to open one writing to someone new) so I had about 90 conversations (because I used 100 credits in other ways, see later). Out of those 90, I would say probably 70 were initiated by the girl, and in probably 50 cases the same girl didn't respond after my first message back (that I try to write as nice, non generic, relatively informative about me and what I look for, etc.). From those 20 conversations that lasted a bit longer I ended up meeting (if I remember correctly) 5 people, sleeping with 4 (the fifth one was too different from her pictures and I didn't find her attractive). With respect to Seeking, where alongside a lot of money-based arrangements I also met a bunch of women that were not specifically interested in money, people on SB seem to be 1) all specifically interested in money-based arrangements, 2) not particularly chatty or interested in establishing a connection before meeting, quite matter-of-factly interested in talking about money and then setting up a meeting, 3) very flaky in conversation, disappearing randomly after previously engaging relatively seriously, 4) generally of lower intellectual level than what I was used to on Seeking.

The profiles on the site seem mostly real, and when I reported a clearly AI-generated one it disappeared quickly. That doesn't mean that the site is not scammy, as it clearly is: I know for a fact that they revive old accounts and they make them look as online when they are not. I know because I spotted someone I know on the site, she admitted that she had made an account but denied vigorously that she was still using it, and was quite distressed when I told her that she had been appearing online for most of the previous two weeks. She ended up removing all her pictures and closing the account. Other signs of fake activity are from the fact that writing certain accounts of particularly hot women that look online in that moment (i.e. they appear on top of the list of accounts with a vivid green dot) results in absolutely nothing (meaning in particular that those accounts didn't even bother opening my profile, which seems absurd and didn't happen on Seeking).
Not sure if the tons of conversations that didn't continue after the first message are also scammy, it might as well be. I just ended up accepting that no conversation was really happening until it moved to whatsapp or Telegram. The number of people on the site is WILDLY lower than on Seeking. Judging from the number of people who look at my profile (5-6 per day) even when I'm logged in constantly, from new accounts that pass my filter (3-4 per day) and the number of messages I get (1-2 per day) I would estimate SB to be at least 10 times if not 20 smaller than Seeking. Women possibly on the younger side, but not necessarily more attractive, and the youth is also not necessarily a plus.

The 4 people I ended up sleeping with were:
- attractive (7), intelligent, alternative greek girl with whom I had fun for a couple of meetings but wasn't motivated to move forward. She asked for 400, seemed a good deal to me, remained overnight on the second meeting which was at my place.
- disappointing (in terms of attractiveness, 5/6) turkish girl with whom I had a fun enough dinner that I accepted to go through with an arrangement, before realising too late that I really didn't find her attractive. Ended up not being able to get hard, and wasting the 400 quid I had promised her. Still had a nice conversation, though.
- hot petite latina (8) who asked for 500 and seemed worth it. Good conversation, great fuck. I might see her again.
- hot petite indian (8.5), again happy with 500, smart and interesting, very passionate in bed. Will see her again.

I had a couple ones who asked for 800 and didn't budge. I'm in talk with a couple more for 500 who seem pretty hot. The hottest woman I tried to score there asked for 1000, I told her I would absolutely not go above 600, she accepted but then she flaked and I didn't chase further.

The most annoying aspect of the site is related to all the thousand ways they try to extort you money other than with unlocking conversations: 10 credits to watch the private pictures of someone, 10 credits per video, 10 credits to "boost" a message making it pop up on someone's list, 10 credits to get read receipts... I avoided most of these, except that sometimes one clicks by mistake on something and ends up wasting 2 quid: when that happens it's absolutely infuriating, and I must have wasted about 20 pounds with this shit. Another infuriating thing is that the messages disappear after about a month, so you lose any conversation that hasn't moved to WA or Telegram (although you can still message that person).

The most disconcerting experience on SB (one that still worries me if I think about that) was when I met the first girl who seemed a good prospect: she arrived to dinner with me quite tipsy after an afternoon out with a girlfriend, we bonded pretty well over dinner while she drank three more cocktails that led her to a state of heavy drunkenness, while in the meantime she told me of her previous arrangement with a guy that gave her 6000 quid a month for years but ended up in jail for some kind of financial scam (and kept giving her money from jail for a while!). She was just too drunk to go through with it for the evening so I accompanied her to the tube: I wanted to take her to the train station and put her on her train home (she was from some village north of London) but she asked me not to go on the tube with her because she thought she would throw up while in it. Ended up kissing me promising we would have a wild night the next time we would meet... and then her phone went silent, she didn't block me or anything. She simply never logged on SB any more, never reappeared on WhatsApp (that still reports her last login on that night). I wonder what happened to her.

Whatsyourprice:
Really not worth it for a few reasons: 1) the most attractive women on it use it to find arrangements, so it's basically mostly a way to arrange meet and greets for money, which is not the right thing to do, 2) the number of users is ridiculously low (probably 1/10 of secretbenefits), and one always sees the same accounts popping up, 3) the number of credits needed to unlock a conversation depends on how much money is on offer. I think the minimum is 15 credits and I don't remember what the maximum I paid (for a 500 quid offer) was, but it must have been around 10 quid overall and I thought "never again" 4) it's unclear what one gets for a high offer: I tried offering 500 for the hottest woman on the site, she matched (which ended up costing me said 10 quid), only to tell me that for 500 she was OK for dinner and for an actual arrangement she wanted a thousand, 5) the site on mobile is unacceptably slow.

Still, if what you want is to find people to go out for dinner with, I ended up offering 50/80 to a few people who ended up accepting, and came to dinner with me. In a couple of cases there was no chemistry, in one the lady clearly wanted to bed me at the next opportunity (but I ended up closing contacts because I set up a relationship that sadly didn't last), and in another case I am now dating a lady who seem keen to continue seeing me. So... YMMV, but I ended up thinking that maybe as a way to find dates where I end up offering basically taxi money or taxi + nails it's possibly not too bad.

I hope this helps!
« Last Edit: April 02, 2026, 12:56:21 am by TheOracle »

Online paul_tall_



Secretbenefits:

I bought 1000 credits for about 289$ (217 GBP) and they lasted me for about three months. It costs 10 credits to unlock a conversation (or to try to open one writing to someone new) so I had about 90 conversations (because I used 100 credits in other ways, see later). Out of those 90, I would say probably 70 were initiated by the girl, and in probably 50 cases the same girl didn't respond after my first message back (that I try to write as nice, non generic, relatively informative about me and what I look for, etc.). From those 20 conversations that lasted a bit longer I ended up meeting (if I remember correctly) 5 people, sleeping with 4 (the fifth one was too different from her pictures and I didn't find her attractive). With respect to Seeking, where alongside a lot of money-based arrangements I also met a bunch of women that were not specifically interested in money, people on SB seem to be 1) all specifically interested in money-based arrangements, 2) not particularly chatty or interested in establishing a connection before meeting, quite matter-of-factly interested in talking about money and then setting up a meeting, 3) very flaky in conversation, disappearing randomly after previously engaging relatively seriously, 4) generally of lower intellectual level than what I was used to on Seeking.

The profiles on the site seem mostly real, and when I reported a clearly AI-generated one it disappeared quickly. That doesn't mean that the site is not scammy, as it clearly is: I know for a fact that they revive old accounts and they make them look as online when they are not. I know because I spotted someone I know on the site, she admitted that she had made an account but denied vigorously that she was still using it, and was quite distressed when I told her that she had been appearing online for most of the previous two weeks. She ended up removing all her pictures and closing the account. Other signs of fake activity are from the fact that writing certain accounts of particularly hot women that look online in that moment (i.e. they appear on top of the list of accounts with a vivid green dot) results in absolutely nothing (meaning in particular that those accounts didn't even bother opening my profile, which seems absurd and didn't happen on Seeking).
Not sure if the tons of conversations that didn't continue after the first message are also scammy, it might as well be. I just ended up accepting that no conversation was really happening until it moved to whatsapp or Telegram. The number of people on the site is WILDLY lower than on Seeking. Judging from the number of people who look at my profile (5-6 per day) even when I'm logged in constantly, from new accounts that pass my filter (3-4 per day) and the number of messages I get (1-2 per day) I would estimate SB to be at least 10 times if not 20 smaller than Seeking. Women possibly on the younger side, but not necessarily more attractive, and the youth is also not necessarily a plus.

There was discussion on Secret Benefits a couple of years back, your thoughts mirror some of that discussion.
I do look occasionally at the state of profiles as still receive market emails re new profiles. There used to be quite an overlap of profiles on there and seeking but that doesnt appear to be as obvious now, obviously there are a few. The rates you quoted re your meets seem very high from what I recall and from spending a few remaining credits i have left though could be area based and type of girl. I found there were/are a few more down to earth , non sb types compared to seeking.
Not just opening every message you receive would be good advice as that's where it does feel like the site is scammy as you run though credits quickly. Ive noticed messages appear quickly when you view the site and often they are not local and i call London not local for me. Like seeking the same profiles seem to be recently logged on though the last online status is less green indicator that is was and more grey "last online"

Offline Punter910

Is it me only noticing that even mediocre girls on site are asking for at least 500 and not negotiating now ?

Offline Zanderpanda

I was kicked of SB. dont know what i did wrong but it was a pain but they did refund me. it was obvously a scam and so many of the profiles are made up / fake / run by SB. i had soemting like 20 messages from women on there and I responded to most and not one of them responded back.

Offline Reallytired86

Liya - External Link/Members Only
This one talks the talk, but rubbish in the room.
Flirty over Telegram. Attractive enough. Bengali girl.
From the West Midlands.
Insist on Lunch first somewhere fancy. When it comes to bedroom time not as good. Takes time in shower to waste time. Put lingerie on etc.

Will make excuses for no kisses or lack of it. Says ticklish so light pecs and couldn't kiss her neck etc. Does BJ and also let me lick her.

When it comes to penetration, she insist on riding. Will say why soon. First round i wanted to go on top. She agrees but limits penetration, Positions body in a way that its impossible to get in.
So switched to her riding, Get in and do it. But as soon as i cum, She jumps straight off. Didn't let me throb. Whilst doing this the Condom ovs came off. Then cum went over my body and stomach as it was throbbing.

This is why she insist to Ride. so she can pull off straight away .
agreed 400 per meet. Wont see again.

I had a slightly different experience in that it was less restrictive and actually wanted me to fill her up raw multiple times - tbh I think she really liked me but who knows.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2026, 01:31:37 am by Reallytired86 »

Online finn5555

I had a slightly different experience in that it was less restrictive and actually wanted me to fill her up raw multiple times - tbh I think she really liked me but who knows.

You’re clearly irresistible  :D

Love hearing how studs like you convert all these shy women  :hi:
« Last Edit: April 03, 2026, 01:48:52 am by finn5555 »

Online jamiekinkxxx

You’re clearly irresistible  :D

Love hearing how studs like you convert all these shy women  :hi:

 :D

Offline Punting2022

You’re clearly irresistible  :D

Love hearing how studs like you convert all these shy women  :hi:

International pornstar
Ive had more luck in europe this time. Lots of cobtacts in spain. 500 euro overnights.
Girls look better too. Book in advanced, flights are same as a train in uk.

Uk is finished in terms of seeking, general living standards, prostitutes

Online jamiekinkxxx

International pornstar
Ive had more luck in europe this time. Lots of cobtacts in spain. 500 euro overnights.
Girls look better too. Book in advanced, flights are same as a train in uk.

Uk is finished in terms of seeking, general living standards, prostitutes

 :lol:

Offline highlander7777

hello

I just got quoted £1500 from a lady on seeking. can share link now , blocked. Seriously , you have to earn £3k to afford £1.5k. So half to the lady and the other half to the tax man!!

Offline Mr Garmin

hello

I just got quoted £1500 from a lady on seeking. can share link now , blocked. Seriously , you have to earn £3k to afford £1.5k. So half to the lady and the other half to the tax man!!

I bet that there's more than a few guys out their with their own company who have their SB on the payroll as a 'cleaner' or similar.  Yes, have to pay NI for them but still cheaper than renumerating them out of tax-paid income.

Offline highlander7777

I bet that there's more than a few guys out their with their own company who have their SB on the payroll as a 'cleaner' or similar.  Yes, have to pay NI for them but still cheaper than renumerating them out of tax-paid income.
Oh , I like that ...


Offline Punting2022

Lads suscription to site ends in 4 days. Really want some1 in london. People either not replying or not online as much.

Please help. Any1 will do. Blonde ideally. Need a really passionate shag.


Offline Punting2022

Her face is hidden, profile not verified, looking for princess treatment, age 33 but student,...Too many red flags...I dont know why you will even consider her after your last debacle. Best is to completely avoid non-verified profiles.

Had her on tg. Is indian.
Attractive. Doesnt do per meet. Wants allowance straight away.

Online bigden40

Had her on tg. Is indian.
Attractive. Doesnt do per meet. Wants allowance straight away.

I have come across this type of request before.  In some cases - where I like the girl and I think it might have a chance to be a regular thing - I have agreed to an allowance, but to be paid weekly until we develop mutual trust and connection. Which gives you a de facto PPM until you decide if you want to go down a regular/long term route or not.

Otherwise I would just say that I can’t commit to a monthly allowance until we’ve developed that connection and it would have to be PPM for the first month or so. Some understand that and agree. 

Offline Punting2022

I have come across this type of request before.  In some cases - where I like the girl and I think it might have a chance to be a regular thing - I have agreed to an allowance, but to be paid weekly until we develop mutual trust and connection. Which gives you a de facto PPM until you decide if you want to go down a regular/long term route or not.

Otherwise I would just say that I can’t commit to a monthly allowance until we’ve developed that connection and it would have to be PPM for the first month or so. Some understand that and agree.

She wanted up front. Im open to making a reg thing. Make what she wanted in allowance but per meet to that amount a month.
Girls abuse the monthly allowance. I gave twice to my old arrangement who was long term. One time we only met for a platonic in that month i gave. 2nd time just once for sex. So for me its ppm. Plus if i have a cost i need to focus on one month. Ppm works as such. U dont meet the girl.

Offline Punting2022

External Link/Members Only

Adeline
Thank me later lol

Last sign in 2 weeks. Thats issue i have atm. Girls just not online. Will shag a prosse tbh and retry in june.

Online bigden40

She wanted up front. Im open to making a reg thing. Make what she wanted in allowance but per meet to that amount a month.
Girls abuse the monthly allowance. I gave twice to my old arrangement who was long term. One time we only met for a platonic in that month i gave. 2nd time just once for sex. So for me its ppm. Plus if i have a cost i need to focus on one month. Ppm works as such. U dont meet the girl.

I’ve never done an upfront monthly allowance.  I’ve always wanted at least a month of regular meets to determine if I want to proceed on that basis is or not.  If girls get too pushy I walk away.

Even when I’ve had monthly’s I’ve usually split the allowance in two, one at beginning of month and one mid-month. Limits your exposure to things changing or her getting lazy.

Offline metalqaz

External Link/Members Only

Adeline
Thank me later lol

I remember chatting to her when she went by Stella but never ended up meeting, what’s your experience been like with her?

Offline seed_sprayer

I remember chatting to her when she went by Stella but never ended up meeting, what’s your experience been like with her?

Very good - pics are accurate - and she's a lot of fun
She's happy to start PPM, 350 I think - I've seen her a few times
Too much choice to settle but some of best fun I've had on that site

Offline BeingSilent

Had her on tg. Is indian.
Attractive. Doesnt do per meet. Wants allowance straight away.

Yeah, I did end up messaging her on WA (if I remember correctly).  Nice enough girl but like you said, wanted an allowance which I wasn't keen on immediately.  Left it as I didn't want the back/forth that was happening to just get something setup.

Offline Punting2022

External Link/Members Only

Adeline
Thank me later lol

You got a contact number. My Sub will expire before she logs on

Offline Punting2022


Offline highlander7777

i was emailing a lady then this message below popped up with the no entry !!. This member is unavailable to message until they complete further verification.

not seen this message before. seeking seems to throwing out random messages!

Offline Punting2022

i was emailing a lady then this message below popped up with the no entry !!. This member is unavailable to message until they complete further verification.

not seen this message before. seeking seems to throwing out random messages!

Seen that few times. I believe its when they have not selfie verified or Seeking wants them to upload a ID to verfify.
I had to Upload my Driving License this time when registering a new account.

Offline highlander7777

Seen that few times. I believe its when they have not selfie verified or Seeking wants them to upload a ID to verfify.
I had to Upload my Driving License this time when registering a new account.
  - Oh thanks. also , I work the number 3 in a sentence and seeking flag that !. when i changed to 3pm it was fine

Offline styussr

External Link/Members Only Imi

Seen her a few times over the years, most recently last week. She lives in Kent so booked a spot in Canary Wharf.

She’s tall and all natural, good body. Filthy mind, properly kinky and sub, loves dirty talking and mercifully not into the powder. Loves a drink though.

500 for the night, went through 3 bottles of champagne and dealt with an uber both ways. Didn’t sleep much so great value for all you by the hour calculators out there.

Fill your boots gents.

Offline highlander7777

External Link/Members Only Imi

Seen her a few times over the years, most recently last week. She lives in Kent so booked a spot in Canary Wharf.

She’s tall and all natural, good body. Filthy mind, properly kinky and sub, loves dirty talking and mercifully not into the powder. Loves a drink though.

500 for the night, went through 3 bottles of champagne and dealt with an uber both ways. Didn’t sleep much so great value for all you by the hour calculators out there.

Fill your boots gents.
how kinky ? what sort of kinks

Offline styussr

how kinky ? what sort of kinks

Message her and find out, so few people put their good experiences on here and obviously what a person does with one isn't necessarily what they'll do with another so IMO it's pointless doing a blow by blow accounts with civvies, AI is better for erotica anyway.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2026, 09:42:45 pm by styussr »

Offline Punting2022

A rare post these days of some positive past experiences, and that I've seen online recently:

Ayla, 25, External Link/Members Only, very petite and eager to please, £500.

Paige 27, External Link/Members Only, very naughty, requires money up front, but real and not going to run away. £500

Lily, 22, External Link/Members Only, great body, very polite, lovely girl. £400

Elle, 32 External Link/Members Only, she is as per her photos, came over very pro, so we didn't do the deed, but if that's your thing, she's real.

Have you met this one, - External Link/Members Only when you see eager to please. In WHat way

Offline bistokid



Offline metalqaz

She 42 not 32

How was she in bed? She wanted money upfront when we meet at the hotel and I wasn't ok with that back in the day

Offline Punting2022

How was she in bed? She wanted money upfront when we meet at the hotel and I wasn't ok with that back in the day

Ive not seen her. I was meant to write no way she is 32. Looks more 40ish. Sorry

Offline Punting2022

Pri
any one seen her. She has replied to me. Got contact agreed 400
External Link/Members Only

Online 90125

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,969
  • Likes: 54
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
External Link/Members Only

Does anyone have any info about this member?

Rule 27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..

Online 90125

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,969
  • Likes: 54
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
How was she in bed? She wanted money upfront when we meet at the hotel and I wasn't ok with that back in the day

Rule 27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..

Offline 123124

In case it might be helpful to anybody I'll write a quick review of secretbenefits and whatsyourprice that I tried over the past couple of months. I know this is the "Seeking" thread so in case this is off-topic I ask a moderator to move this to its own thread.
Thanks for the decent review!

My experience with SecretBenefits has been very positive. I've been using it about a year and had around 15 successful meets, some one-offs and some repeats.

I am a younger gent myself and tend to go for younger ladies in the 18-24 age bracket. SB seems to be really popular with this age group. In this age bracket there are noticeably more profiles on SB than Seeking.

Yes you do need to send a lot of messages and wade through a lot of pointless conversations. Yes you get scammers, and yes you get flakes - Gen Z are a bit flaky. But overall the experience has been fine - definitely lots of legit profiles and I've had a lot of good conversations.

I've cancelled my Seeking account and just use SB now.

Offline Punting2022

Thanks for the decent review!

My experience with SecretBenefits has been very positive. I've been using it about a year and had around 15 successful meets, some one-offs and some repeats.

I am a younger gent myself and tend to go for younger ladies in the 18-24 age bracket. SB seems to be really popular with this age group. In this age bracket there are noticeably more profiles on SB than Seeking.

Yes you do need to send a lot of messages and wade through a lot of pointless conversations. Yes you get scammers, and yes you get flakes - Gen Z are a bit flaky. But overall the experience has been fine - definitely lots of legit profiles and I've had a lot of good conversations.

I've cancelled my Seeking account and just use SB now.

Might try it. I tried Sugardaddy meet in Feb.
Is cheaper subscription. Met one really horny girl there. But she was demanding. Wanted money for pics inbetween. Shopping and makeup etc.

Offline Hendrix-fan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
She's been in touch with me, very pro vibes. How much did she ask you?

Seemed to change by the day. Last time agreed to 350. As I said before, she’s a good shag (responded to a late message last time when I was horny) but seems a little nuts.

Suggest only for last min pump and dump…
Banned reason: Needs to review
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline seraph20

So I met this girl again, saw her a few times over the last few years as she's always been a good shag - External Link/Members Only.

Concerningly she suggested I message a friend of hers who turned out to be some guy she was trying to get back at or something. All very weird. Recommend avoid.

Hey. She looks good and has just messaged me out of the blue. What was her ppm when you saw her please?

Offline jakes

Here's one for those of you who enjoy women with teeth that glow in the dark

External Link/Members Only

Offline Equilibrium


Offline Hendrix-fan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Hey. She looks good and has just messaged me out of the blue. What was her ppm when you saw her please?

350 but as I said she seems to change what she requests - negotiates a bit hard
Banned reason: Needs to review
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,514
  • Likes: 553
  •  
  • Reviews: 505
350 but as I said she seems to change what she requests - negotiates a bit hard


27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone