Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: AdultWork Movie Pictures Now Hidden  (Read 2327 times)

Offline vorian

Not sure if this is just me but I have noticed that an AW profile which has  movies for sale the pictures for the movies are now hidden so you can't see them. Anyone know why and of course before it is said I know a lot of punters do not and will not pay AW on principle which I fully respect.

Just wondered what's going on.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline SteveNova

 Yes, I had noticed that.  I've just tried looking while logged in and the picture previews are there - but they are hidden when logged off.

Offline vorian

Yes, I had noticed that.  I've just tried looking while logged in and the picture previews are there - but they are hidden when logged off.

Oh I see I'm so rarely logged on I didn't notice.  Still does seem odd as the gallery pictures are visible if you are logged on or not. :unknown:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline redhat

Just had a look, got to log in to see the private galleries as well. Thought it would all be free like the main gallery.

Offline cunnyhunt

Just had a look, got to log in to see the private galleries as well. Thought it would all be free like the main gallery.

You have to sign up and pay for the private galleries and movies.

Offline Taggart

I suspect they realised that you could get a big image on the screen, free of charge, and also do a screen grab. I often used it when the girl's gallery was indistinct, but the movie images were more graphic and detailed. Cant believe AW were so stupid for so long. Ah, well, another loophole closed.

Offline vorian

I suspect they realised that you could get a big image on the screen, free of charge, and also do a screen grab. I often used it when the girl's gallery was indistinct, but the movie images were more graphic and detailed. Cant believe AW were so stupid for so long. Ah, well, another loophole closed.

That's my thoughts,  occasionally a wg might not have a face pic in galleries but was shown on the movie screen shot. I wonder if people will make more effort with movie descriptions now.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jimmyredcab

I know a lot of punters do not and will not pay AW on principle which I fully respect.


That is of course their choice but false economy in my opinion, I once paid £2 for a private gallery and it saved me a 2 hour round journey.   :hi:

Offline vorian

That is of course their choice but false economy in my opinion, I once paid £2 for a private gallery and it saved me a 2 hour round journey.   :hi:

Thats my personal view as well Jimmy, but some punters do not wish to hand over details to AW or will give any money to AW on principle. I can respect those with the principle.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jimmyredcab

Thats my personal view as well Jimmy, but some punters do not wish to hand over details to AW or will give any money to AW on principle. I can respect those with the principle.

I also have principles, on things that matter to me, I spend roughly £60 a year on adultwork credits, the price of a 30 minute punt.    :hi:

Offline vorian

I also have principles, on things that matter to me, I spend roughly £60 a year on adultwork credits, the price of a 30 minute punt.    :hi:

A good investment imho. :hi:
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Jimmyredcab

A good investment imho. :hi:

Some people want everything for nothing, I remember when NIK suggested a 10 pence a week donation from members to pay for the site expenses, all hell broke loose.    :thumbsdown:

Offline webpunter

Some people want everything for nothing, I remember when NIK suggested a 10 pence a week donation from members to pay for the site expenses, all hell broke loose.    :thumbsdown:

As with most things in life - you get what you pay for - generally anyways
AW girlies deffo included !
10p a week would hardly be a killer in terms of the usefulness of the info available & general all round fun being a member
Lets assume say a punt a month @ £100 quid for an hour as an average
That's £1,200 for a year.  So what's an extra fiver on top for a UKP subscription
I'm sure that judging by the number of posts / reviews by certain UKP lotharios, then it is clear that spending is considerably above £1,200 p.a.
More like £1,200 mth - in some cases maybe £1,200 week [i'm just envious & am happy to admit this]
I've already dramatically changed my punting plans on several occasions thanks to UKP
Even if i wouldn't have probably got to meet several AW girlies in reality [general concerns & other better ones come into focus etc] - then UKP has enabled me to knock these straight off my HL
And i haven't wasted loads of time pondering etc
My HL has had a thorough overhaul thanks to UKP - lots of deletions & an equal number added
If there were a charge it would help eliminate time-wasters & general terry-fuckwits
The only problem i can see happening is how would members pay discreetly
For those with OH's then keeping the nokia punting mobile hidden is enough of an issue, without pondering credit card payments & the like


Offline vorian

Some people want everything for nothing, I remember when NIK suggested a 10 pence a week donation from members to pay for the site expenses, all hell broke loose.    :thumbsdown:

I would be prepared to pay a lot more than that, perhaps voluntary contributions should be considered any amount, of course anonymously so that no one can affect the independence of the site.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

The only problem i can see happening is how would members pay discreetly
For those with OH's then keeping the nokia punting mobile hidden is enough of an issue, without pondering credit card payments & the like

I've seen some websites accepting payment via Bitcoin, seemingly because it's anonymous.  I don't know if it actually is, though.

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
Adultwork have today instructed all SPs to move any photos considered pornographic, depicting genitalia, intercourse or other services in their free public gallery, into their private gallery. AW say that in the meantime free content will not display for non-age verified members, and if you do not carry this request out that you run the risk of losing your profile.

So guys if you notice less photos in the public galleries, and less showing in them this is because SPs have been instructed to move them.

AW say it's in line with controlling access to pornography.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 09:35:44 PM by Strawberry »

Offline vorian

Adultwork have today instructed all SPs to move any photos considered pornographic, depicting genitalia, intercourse or other services in their free public gallery, into their private gallery. AW say that in the meantime free content will not display for non-age verified members, and if you do not carry this request out that you run the risk of losing your profile.

So guys if you notice less photos in the public galleries, and less showing in them this is because SPs have been instructed to move them.

AW say it's in line with controlling access to pornography.

Very interesting indeed, is any nudity now banned or just the more close up type shot, for example would you know if a topless picture would be accepted.

This could change how many WG's present themselves in public galleries. No face picture but close up legs open shots, if that is now banned what could they show instead.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 09:39:27 PM by vorian »
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
Very interesting indeed, is any nudity now banned or just the more close up type shot, for example would you know if a topless picture would be accepted.

Not a clue Vorian.

The new rule says something like 'anything considered pornographic including genitalia, penetration, watersports(urine).

Wikipedia doesn't list breasts as genitalia but the description given by AW is fairly short, and could be interpreted in a variety of ways. Basically says 'don't have anything in public you'd not show to a minor'

What you guys need to know is that you may have less revealing photos in the free areas and have to pay to see anything more. It's up to SPs to worry about what they are and are not allowed.

Offline sixtyten

I suspect they realised that you could get a big image on the screen, free of charge, and also do a screen grab. I often used it when the girl's gallery was indistinct, but the movie images were more graphic and detailed. Cant believe AW were so stupid for so long. Ah, well, another loophole closed.

Once you are logged in:

Using chrome browser add the 'Allow Right Click' Extenssion
Right click image - AW will still give you the right click isn't allowed message
Click OK and up pops the context menu
Select open image in a new tab
Go to the tab and you should now see a thumbnail image
In the address bar delete the word 'thumbnail' and a back slash (though I don't believe this is necessary)
Press enter
Voila! Full size image
Right click to save image to hdd

They are using javascript with a div class=pixel.Mask so in theory you could just stop the script from running and therefore masking the pics and of course you could then still do the above without logging in. And it just so happens that you can block this with Adblock  :dance:

Offline broksonic

So will this also be the same for the video thumbnail pics,  I doubt any one would risk paying for a video clip if the can't at least see what the video is going to be , if that's the case
Banning reason: White-knight leaver

Offline vorian

So will this also be the same for the video thumbnail pics,  I doubt any one would risk paying for a video clip if the can't at least see what the video is going to be , if that's the case

That is my thoughts, this could change how revenue streams work on AW to a degree, although my understanding is once you log on to AW you can see the pictures.
Banning reason: Two faced - Slagging off UKP and it's membership using fake account

Offline SteveNova

So far movie clips are still visible when logged in to AW.  For those who want to view a PG before booking, use UKASH vouchers and then no credit card details have to be supplied.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)