Cumforcarly, Gateshead

[roboeggman]

This punt was a little while ago, and if I'd reviewed straight away I probably would have given a neutral. The way it is I've thought about it alongside punts I've had before and since and feel a negative is justified.

External Link/Members Only

Half hour incall at £60.

Comms-
Can't fault comms at all. From what I remember it was mostly handled through UKE and later texts. She had mentioned during the arrangements that she didn't think she'd be what I was looking for as she provided GFE and thought I was looking for something much more rough. This wasn't necessarily the case, as I do usually prefer that type of booking but on this occasion I was looking for a very relaxed GFE.

Location-
Easy to find, and the instructions given were spot on. As usual I parked a few minutes walk away. I was very pleased with the location as the cleanliness and tidiness were faultless. I especially enjoyed the 'wet room' which Carly later told me was an assisted living bathroom from the previous owner .

Girl-
I don't find Carly very attractive. She does have a somewhat shapely bum and quite nice boobs; but for me facially she isn't the type of girl I'd go for at all. I would say the pictures on adultwork at the time were generous, but I don't think edited by any means.

Booking-
On arrival I used the shower as I think it was a fairly warm day and I had been driving all morning. Carly was wearing some lingerie and a see-through lingerie nightie thing I don't know the name of, looked good. The booking was supposed to be oral-only, and this was the case but I found her technique very poor. I can't quite put my finger on what was wrong but I remember not really enjoying any of it. There was a sort of overhanging apprehension from Carly the entire booking and I don't know why. I hardly think I'm a scary man but it may have been due to the comms earlier where she thought I was going to attempt some sort of rough sex; though I thought since she'd accepted the booking she was comfortable that wasn't going to happen.

I was just thinking about how I wanted to leave after a while and Carly mentioned that we were already over time by quite a bit. Although I wasn't enjoying it I felt very bad for overstaying and offered to leave straight away, but to her credit she said it was all right and that she could tell I wasn't taking the piss. Went on for another five minutes or so but I had to call it as it just wasn't happening. It was a mostly forgettable punt honestly; enough so that I really can't remember whether we had sex or not. Either way I didn't finish and I don't think I'll be returning for round two.

I said at the beginning that if I'd reviewed earlier I would have given a neutral. This is because it felt like an off day, both for me and possibly for Carly, and I felt like if I returned it would potentially be a much better booking. I've gone for a negative now since I've not had any inclination since that I would want to return, nice a lass as she is.

I am still very grateful for the advice given by a member to go and see her, but what's working for them obviously isn't working for me.

[The Outsider]

There was a sort of overhanging apprehension from Carly the entire booking and I don't know why.

I'm just speculating here, but maybe because you booked on UKE she was expecting a review and that put her on edge?  That's one reason I prefer anonymity where possible. 

Shame it didn't work out for you, and thanks for the info.   

[Kev3773]

Cheers for the review, her first negative, others possibly wouldn't have been brave enough to post it for fear of being attacked for going against the grain with a 'darling' of the north east. Good on you 

[Shutty238]

Cheers for the review, do you need to check the price though?

All this red is infectious, even caught by the top performers now it seems.

[roboeggman]

I'm just speculating here, but maybe because you booked on UKE she was expecting a review and that put her on edge?  That's one reason I prefer anonymity where possible. 

Shame it didn't work out for you, and thanks for the info.   

Quite possible, though with her track record I don't know why she'd be nervous about that.

I'm due a new punting phone soon so hopefully that will 'reset' my anonymity. I do think I need to be a bit more discreet in that department.

Cheers for the review, her first negative, others possibly wouldn't have been brave enough to post it for fear of being attacked for going against the grain with a 'darling' of the north east. Good on you 

I had thought about not reviewing because of just that. Would it be worth the trouble to get it in the neck over a bad punt? Yes it would, might make someone think twice and save there cash if there was a chance they think the same as me.

Cheers for the review, do you need to check the price though?

All this red is infectious, even caught by the top performers now it seems.

Yeah absolutely, don't know why I put £30 when it was £60. Cheers.

[daviemac]

Yeah absolutely, don't know why I put £30 when it was £60. Cheers.

Corrected.   

[Tiger63]

TBH if a SP told me she didnt think she was what I was looking for then I would have thanked her and moved on

[Kev3773]

TBH if a SP told me she didnt think she was what I was looking for then I would have thanked her and moved on

Me too, but that doesn't distract from the fact that she accepted his booking and his money then gave a poor BJ in his opinion. 

[waynekerr600]

Thanks for the review Robo. I feel bad as I think it was my recommendation.

I guess we are all different.

[Ahmedhutan]

Such a shame you had a bad time. Have been thinking about seeing her for a long time but this is making me reconsider. I guess we all get on differently with different SPs.

[Mansell]

Thanks Robo for a good and honest review. It's quite a few years ago now but I saw one of the UKE well reviewed girls and had a similar experience but decided not to review as I did have a good laugh and a lot of fun and it was ok. I think booking through UKE possibly didn't help. However I then booked a UKE girl who was touring and it was great a definite positive. So an odd one. My recommendation now would always be to book incognito.

[billabong]

No doubt it's a negative.....however it does still read as a potential off day and given her previous reviews I can see this being a lonely red for Carly.... i hope, but we shall wait and see if this opens the flood gates.

[Sar-Major]

I'm just speculating here, but maybe because you booked on UKE she was expecting a review and that put her on edge?  That's one reason I prefer anonymity where possible. 

Shame it didn't work out for you, and thanks for the info.   

Well you could well be right about her being on edge OS, as the first time i met her she was a tad "Nervous" about me. She actually said she was "Apprehensive" about meeting the "Snake" I reassured her, by telling Carly that if girls can push babies out they can take a slightly oversized dick. She laughed and said I was right, and we had a good time.

Cheers for the review R.       Sorry things didn't pan out the way you hoped for matey.   

At the end of the day you rated your review as you thought it should be. 

 

[MME]

....they can take a slightly oversized dick.....

Are we talking about you or the snake here? 

[Sar-Major]

Are we talking about you or the snake here? 

Possibly "Both" as I've had a couple of "Peroxide Moments" of late................        

 

[Kev3773]

She's just put a Summer deal on 
Good timing

[Cumforcarly]

Thank you for the review, I apologise if I haven't been up to your standard or delivered services how you would of liked.
I did have to look back and realised the booking was from March, if I had of known you weren't enjoying the services I could of tried to change this to how you like to recieve it.
As said above I did mention to you I probably wasn't the girl for you, as I am relaxed gfe sp.
I put 100% into every appointment, and apologise if you felt this wasn't the case with your appointment.
I would also like to clarify as Alfie mentioned above about my summer deal, this is not in connection with this review. I do this every year and it can be seen from last year June 30th 2018 when I published it on uke.

[Kev3773]

Thank you for the review, I apologise if I haven't been up to your standard or delivered services how you would of liked.
I did have to look back and realised the booking was from March, if I had of known you weren't enjoying the services I could of tried to change this to how you like to recieve it.
As said above I did mention to you I probably wasn't the girl for you, as I am relaxed gfe sp.
I put 100% into every appointment, and apologise if you felt this wasn't the case with your appointment.
I would also like to clarify as Alfie mentioned above about my summer deal, this is not in connection with this review. I do this every year and it can be seen from last year June 30th 2018 when I published it on uke.

Personally I think you should have declined the booking, you said yourself you didn't think you were right for him  again this is just my opinion, then this negative wouldn't have happened 

[billabong]

$$$ and more $$$... probably why booking went ahead

[Woodcutter]

To be fair the OP did say in his review that the WG stated she wasn't sure that she was what he was looking for & he decided to proceed nonetheless, Sorry it didn't work out for him.

[roboeggman]

I should say in case it wasn't entirely clear in the review.

Yes, Carly said she thought that she wasn't the kind of escort I was looking for based on the type of booking she thought I wanted. This wasn't the case, I have had relaxed GFE punts before and that is exactly what I was looking for this time.

I knew what I was after and those were the services provided, but I just don't think they were provided very well.

[Kev3773]

To be fair the OP did say in his review that the WG stated she wasn't sure that she was what he was looking for & he decided to proceed nonetheless, Sorry it didn't work out for him.

To be fair SHE also decided to let the booking go ahead 

[oldrockingchair]

Sorry this wasn’t a good punt for you, speaking from experience I have never had any issues with Carly in the past and hope to still be able to continue with hassle free, easy and no fuss bookings in the future, I do realise not one size fits all so maybe a level of incompatibility was between you,  non the less thanks for the review but Carly does tick the boxes for me.

[datwabbit]

Sorry this wasn’t a good punt for you, speaking from experience I have never had any issues with Carly in the past and hope to still be able to continue with hassle free, easy and no fuss bookings in the future, I do realise not one size fits all so maybe a level of incompatibility was between you,  non the less thanks for the review but Carly does tick the boxes for me.

Don't suppose you could do a review where she ticks your boxes?

I never understand why people comment on a negative by saying "she was ok for me". Put that into your review and let this one stand on its own merits.

[daviemac]

Don't suppose you could do a review where she ticks your boxes?

I never understand why people comment on a negative by saying "she was ok for me". Put that into your review and let this one stand on its own merits.

I can't understand it either, to me it comes across as trying to put the onus on the punter for the poor punt. It makes no difference what has gone on with other bookings or other punters, this review is of the OP's experience during his booking.

[Kev3773]

Sorry this wasn’t a good punt for you, speaking from experience I have never had any issues with Carly in the past and hope to still be able to continue with hassle free, easy and no fuss bookings in the future, I do realise not one size fits all so maybe a level of incompatibility was between you,  non the less thanks for the review but Carly does tick the boxes for me.

This could easily construed as promoting Carly as well as defending her for her poor performance (according to the Op) 

[FLYING BLUE]

Are we talking about you or the snake here? 

Hahahaha - Bloody hell SM - you're getting all your cum-uppances at once here!!!

[FLYING BLUE]

Sorry this wasn’t a good punt for you, speaking from experience I have never had any issues with Carly in the past and hope to still be able to continue with hassle free, easy and no fuss bookings in the future, I do realise not one size fits all so maybe a level of incompatibility was between you,  non the less thanks for the review but Carly does tick the boxes for me.

Yet you didn't review her (for whatever reason)

[oldrockingchair]

Yet you didn't review her (for whatever reason)

Carly is well reviewed and the last time I reviewed a punt with a well reviewed SP it wasn’t received with much grace, so I have decided not to review a punt with a well reviewed SP unless for whatever reason it’s a Negative.

I’ve decided it’s pointless trying to appease the critics, as I only punt a couple of times a year I wouldn’t do many reviews anyway but if I feel the urge to TOFTT I will do a review..

[waynekerr600]

Carly is well reviewed and the last time I reviewed a punt with a well reviewed SP it wasn’t received with much grace, so I have decided not to review a punt with a well reviewed SP unless for whatever reason it’s a Negative.

I’ve decided it’s pointless trying to appease the critics, as I only punt a couple of times a year I wouldn’t do many reviews anyway but if I feel the urge to TOFTT I will do a review..

I think it was the 'treat her well' that caused the grief. Otherwise I think you're positive review  (I guess of VK) adds to the bigger picture and is useful.

[winkywanky]

Carly is well reviewed and the last time I reviewed a punt with a well reviewed SP it wasn’t received with much grace, so I have decided not to review a punt with a well reviewed SP unless for whatever reason it’s a Negative.

I’ve decided it’s pointless trying to appease the critics, as I only punt a couple of times a year I wouldn’t do many reviews anyway but if I feel the urge to TOFTT I will do a review..

Blimey, you let a tiny little bit of gentle ribbing in just ONE of your reviews put you off? (You suggested 'treat her well' to get the best out of her in your last of seven reviews, this is a well known 'target' on here).

Push back a little bit 

[winkywanky]

I think it was the 'treat her well' that caused the grief. Otherwise I think you're positive review  (I guess of VK) adds to the bigger picture and is useful.

Yes, infact all his reviews have received a positive response from others on here.

[datwabbit]

Blimey, you let a tiny little bit of gentle ribbing in just ONE of your reviews put you off? (You suggested 'treat her well' to get the best out of her in your last of seven reviews, this is a well known 'target' on here).

Push back a little bit 

If he's not going to review that's fine, but don't add onto someone's negative review that it won't put you off. Nobody cares if you see her! Just address any issues in the review.

[winkywanky]

Well ideally he would review, that is the point of the site (although granted, other input can be helpful), and it helps when others do searches and find all the WG's reviews listed one after the other, with either Positive, Neutral or Negative beside them.

[roboeggman]

Sorry this wasn’t a good punt for you, speaking from experience I have never had any issues with Carly in the past and hope to still be able to continue with hassle free, easy and no fuss bookings in the future, I do realise not one size fits all so maybe a level of incompatibility was between you,  non the less thanks for the review but Carly does tick the boxes for me.

It sounds like you're trying to invalidate my experience by saying this.

I find it strange that you don't want to review her because she's popular, but you'll defend her on a negative review.

[northface]

It sounds like you're trying to invalidate my experience by saying this.

I find it strange that you don't want to review her because she's popular, but you'll defend her on a negative review.

Is it really necessary to be so harsh on Old Rocker.
There are enough leeches on here with 0 reviews that don't get as much flak.
I don't think he meant it to be took the way it has been but that's just my opinion.

[roboeggman]

Is it really necessary to be so harsh on Old Rocker.
There are enough leeches on here with 0 reviews that don't get as much flak.
I don't think he meant it to be took the way it has been but that's just my opinion.

I don't see how it could be taken any other way honestly, but then again I do have trouble with that sometimes.

I don't think I'm being harsh either, and it wouldn't make a difference how long someone's been here or how many they've reviewed if they leave comments like this. I think I may have done it myself, and though I can't remember I'd hope I was told the same.

[northface]

I don't see how it could be taken any other way honestly, but then again I do have trouble with that sometimes.

I don't think I'm being harsh either, and it wouldn't make a difference how long someone's been here or how many they've reviewed if they leave comments like this. I think I may have done it myself, and though I can't remember I'd hope I was told the same.

Its the number of responses directed at him so I was certainly not just referring to you.
I thought Mansells ( reply 10 ) was more concerning that he admitted to not doing a negative review which seems to have passed by without any adverse comments.
We all see things differently and i did not see him trying to demean your review in any way but others obviously did.

[billabong]

Its the number of responses directed at him so I was certainly not just referring to you.
I thought Mansells ( reply 10 ) was more concerning that he admitted to not doing a negative review which seems to have passed by without any adverse comments.
We all see things differently and i did not see him trying to demean your review in any way but others obviously did.

Agreed he's averaging 3.5 reviews a year since he joined... people giving him stick averaging far less. And also other people admitting they don't do negative reviews "because they had a laugh" just goes over people's heads. Just shows how many blindly respond to back up a point without reading all comments.

[daviemac]

Its the number of responses directed at him so I was certainly not just referring to you.
I thought Mansells ( reply 10 ) was more concerning that he admitted to not doing a negative review which seems to have passed by without any adverse comments.
We all see things differently and i did not see him trying to demean your review in any way but others obviously did.

Agreed he's averaging 3.5 reviews a year since he joined... people giving him stick averaging far less. And also other people admitting they don't do negative reviews "because they had a laugh" just goes over people's heads. Just shows how many blindly respond to back up a point without reading all comments.

The way I look at it there are certain things that just don't need to be said on a negative review and "I've seen her and never had a problem" is one of them. I think is is demeaning.

Like I said previously what has gone on in past booking is irrelevant, though it is quite possible this booking should never have gone a head. For that I blame Carly, if she thought she couldn't provide the required service she should've declined the booking.

Note there has been no mention of reviews or the lack of by me, that isn't relevant either.   

[billabong]

The way I look at it there are certain things that just don't need to be said on a negative review and "I've seen her and never had a problem" is one of them. I think is is demeaning.

Like I said previously what has gone on in past booking is irrelevant, though it is quite possible this booking should never have gone a head. For that I blame Carly, if she thought she couldn't provide the required service she should've declined the booking.

Note there has been no mention of reviews or the lack of by me, that isn't relevant either.   

I get the impression the services the OP requested were well within Carlys comfort levels and expectations on both sides were matches. She just didn't deliver.

Anyone shoe horning in a positive experience on a negative review I agree should be called out. For the comment....not their contribution when it seems decent since joining.

[daviemac]

I get the impression the services the OP requested were well within Carlys comfort levels and expectations on both sides were matches. She just didn't deliver.

Anyone shoe horning in a positive experience on a negative review I agree should be called out. For the comment....not their contribution when it seems decent since joining.

I was going off what Carly herself said -

As said above I did mention to you I probably wasn't the girl for you, as I am relaxed gfe sp.

, if she felt like that she should've declined the booking instead of seeing ££ signs.

It's common practice in any business to refuse work that doesn't fit your remit, whether the customer thinks it would be OK or not.

[billabong]

I was going off what Carly herself said - , if she felt like that she should've declined the booking instead of seeing ££ signs.

It's common practice in any business to refuse work that doesn't fit your remit, whether the customer thinks it would be OK or not.

Agreed as per my post number 18.

[Mansell]

Its the number of responses directed at him so I was certainly not just referring to you.
I thought Mansells ( reply 10 ) was more concerning that he admitted to not doing a negative review which seems to have passed by without any adverse comments.
We all see things differently and i did not see him trying to demean your review in any way but others obviously did.

Have a re-read of what I wrote, it actually wouldn't have been a negative, you've picked me up wrongly. I certainly wasn't criticising the OP in any way, more agreeing with his dilemma. But as I said it was a long time ago, now I would definately review, it's called experience 
However the real point I was trying to make to the OP and everyone, is makes sure there is no link between your name on here and any punting you do. It's very easy to just book on UKE using your name over there, not the best plan.

[toon972]

I have noticed recently that on negative reviews punters have replied about incompatibility or she only likes certain guys. My view is replying like this is unnecessary, everyone pays the same and should expect the same level of performance. It just comes across as a little bit condescending although probably not meant that way.

[datwabbit]

My post was a reaction to his comment along the line of "you had a bad time. I didn't and your negative doesn't put me off". If his positive experience had been written up and he'd had a comment of "you had a good time. I didn't and won't be back" then he might not like that.

He does have a record of reviewing so it certainly wasn't a dig at that.

[The Outsider]

I get the impression the services the OP requested were well within Carlys comfort levels and expectations on both sides were matches. She just didn't deliver.

Anyone shoe horning in a positive experience on a negative review I agree should be called out. For the comment....not their contribution when it seems decent since joining.

Would you say the same for people making negative comments on a positive review?

[The Outsider]

I have noticed recently that on negative reviews punters have replied about incompatibility or she only likes certain guys. My view is replying like this is unnecessary, everyone pays the same and should expect the same level of performance. It just comes across as a little bit condescending although probably not meant that way.

For me the whole point of paying is to have sex with people who otherwise wouldn't look at me twice and may not even like me.  I expect the same level of pretence/performance as the next man. 

[billabong]

Would you say the same for people making negative comments on a positive review?

If you have first hand experience of the SP and then don't review, but decide instead, to disagree with someone who has took the time to review. Then yes they should be called out regardless of positive or negative opinion.

Both are equally frustrating as all reviews are helpful. Comments in a thread are generally unhelpful in the long run as time passes.

[The Outsider]

If you have first hand experience of the SP and then don't review, but decide instead, to disagree with someone who has took the time to review. Then yes they should be called out regardless of positive or negative opinion.

Both are equally frustrating as all reviews are helpful. Comments in a thread are generally unhelpful in the long run as time passes.

I think I have made counter comments on other people's reviews but only when I have reviewed her myself.  Usually to express surprise or interest in a very different experience from my own.  There was a phase where if I had a positive experience with a girl you could almost guarantee that Waynekerr would have a crap one and vice versa!

An additional review is way more useful than a comment on somebody else's thread though, I agree.