Author Topic: TS - LadyboyKate69 - Glasgow HH Incall £60  (Read 3223 times)


5 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5273805) (5 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline irishdick

External Link/Members Only

Comms
Good comms, quick phone call to ask about availability. Agreed a time later that day.
Pleasant to speak to very good English.
Follow up texts with hotel name and then room number once I arrived.

Location
City centre hotel, paid parking on street.

Physical
I was a bit disappointed with this, as I like my TS girls very feminine.
Kate does try on this front with good lingerie, long hair and soft voice, but I could see more manliness than I like.
I like a "chick with a dick" but Kate with her moobs was more like an effeminate guy in stockings.
Dick was about 6"

The meeting
Kate was friendly and relaxed, got money out of the way and started off with some nice DFK.
Then onto OWO both ways, her BJ style is OK, nothing special.
Then onto covered doggy on her, she can take a pounding.
I wanted her to come for me but although she was willing, she could not get there.
She did get very hard and seemed on the edge a couple of time.
This could have been the hormones she is on, or more likely my shit blowjob skills  :unknown:
There was no clock watching and she seems like genuine nice person, not a hard nosed WG

Summary
While £60 h/h is good, I'd put this down to the fact that Kate is not very femininely attractive and she knows it.
For this reason alone I would not go back.








Offline Lothian83

Shame, her pic suggests she's cute and very feminine

Offline Oscar13


Offline irishdick

Yes, I thought so to, only my opinion but I think its important people are warned.

Offline J_H

I reviewed her recently and wrote 'The girl looks like the first pic on the profile page, less like the front page one which is probably slightly photoshopped. Quite curvy for an oriental ladyboy'.

The front page pic is definitely photoshopped, but not the others from what I can see.

Offline irishdick

J_H, Thanks, yes I see what you mean on the pics.
Would you agree she has quite manly features, or am I too critical ?

Offline J_H

J_H, Thanks, yes I see what you mean on the pics.
Would you agree she has quite manly features, or am I too critical ?

If I was being absolutely honest, with no testosterone coursing through my system, I'd say more 'androgynous' than 'feminine'.

I think between us we've given a reasonable 'caveat emptor'!!