Any lady members?

[dieseldriver]

Looking through all the names that now appear on whatever board your viewing, wonder how many are ladies? So are there any lady members here? Be it WG's or perhaps ladies that just like reading the reviews of other ladies?

[Midori]

I am a member and I am a WG.

[darkknightrises]

There’s more than you can shake a stick at. A lot look but don’t post that often they usually post more frequently on the other site as that’s more Lady friendly.

[Strawberry]

I'm here I enjoy reading the forum find it very informative, and when appropriate make contributions.

[EastCoast Rambler]

There's probably a lot, that either post their own positive reviews, or if they are bit quiet work-wise get the reviews they have received back to the top, so they get more viewings on their AW profiles. 

[daviemac]

Very few by comparison, any service providers have to declare themselves as such and even then not many of those survive. A few try to pose as punters but get found out.
Can't see the point of non WGs being members.

[Mohican]

Wonder how many Ladies use female SP's.they could be members.

[daviemac]

Wonder how many Ladies use female SP's.they could be members.

What could they gain? there aren't any solely female on female reviews.   

[mike63]

Wonder how many Ladies use female SP's.they could be members.

There was a SAAFE thread on this. The replies suggested that there are very few female clients, if any.

[Strawberry]

There was a SAAFE thread on this. The replies suggested that there are very few female clients, if any.

I would say numbers of sole female punters are incredibly low, a few more with their partners, but low. However I am bit back of beyond, so that may mean I'm not as exposed. There used to be a national female TW who rang around chatting away about how she wanted to book and take you shopping.

[darkknightrises]

I would say numbers of sole female punters are incredibly low, a few more with their partners, but low. However I am bit back of beyond, so that may mean I'm not as exposed. There used to be a national female TW who rang around chatting away about how she wanted to book and take you shopping.

Didn’t she use to be on here as well or was the female SS here legit ( name escapes me )

[OakTree]

There used to be a couple of female punters on the NW forum.

[Doc Holliday]

There used to be a couple of female punters on the NW forum.

Indeed there was ... but they are rare.

[Midori]

I would say numbers of sole female punters are incredibly low, a few more with their partners, but low. However I am bit back of beyond, so that may mean I'm not as exposed. There used to be a national female TW who rang around chatting away about how she wanted to book and take you shopping.

The only females I have had book me have been other SP's and for obvious reasons we are not allowed to review.

[Mohican]

I thought there would be one or two but like the man said 'there aren't any review's ' they must know something we don't about getting your itch scratched?

[Strawberry]

I thought there would be one or two but like the man said 'there aren't any review's ' they must know something we don't about getting your itch scratched?

I would guess far easier, and less drive.

[datwabbit]

I love the way we can see who's on the board. I hope that stays. It's made me realize how many sp's read the posts, including the ones who don't want to see ukp members.

[Fuzzyduck]

And there was me thinking the thread was about pre-op TS.

Can't see the point of non WGs being members.

Journalists, suspicious wives/partners, mumsnet warriors...

[Colston36]

There's probably a lot, that either post their own positive reviews, or if they are bit quiet work-wise get the reviews they have received back to the top, so they get more viewings on their AW profiles. 

Why assume they are devious and calculating?

[daviemac]

And there was me thinking the thread was about pre-op TS.

Journalists, suspicious wives/partners, mumsnet warriors...

How many of those do you suppose there are among 90000 members.     Even 900 is only 1%

[Fuzzyduck]

How many of those do you suppose there are among 90000 members.     Even 900 is only 1%

Oh sure. I wasn't suggesting there were many of them, just thinking of why a non-SP would be on here. <1% feels reasonable. Not really sure what OP was looking to gain by asking the question TBH.

[daviemac]

Oh sure. I wasn't suggesting there were many of them, just thinking of why a non-SP would be on here. <1% feels reasonable. Not really sure what OP was looking to gain by asking the question TBH.

It was meant as a general comment as I think people overestimate how many there are. There's been far more SPs banned than there are members. How many fall into the categories you mentioned but view as guests is anyone's guess.

[Strawberry]

And there was me thinking the thread was about pre-op TS.

Journalists, suspicious wives/partners, mumsnet warriors...

The wording does remind me of a League of Gentlemen sketch.

[Lady Victoria]

Hello. I am a WG. Long term lurker on here. First time poster. I understand and respect that this is a forum for punters but I find this site very useful and informative. It helps me improve my service when needed. 

[PRIYA-X]

WG, occasional poster and avid reader here.  interestingly enough, I’ve been on the “punter” end of services before too.
Some of the threads prove a damn fascinating read.

[GingerNuts]

Hello. I am a WG. Long term lurker on here. First time poster. I understand and respect that this is a forum for punters but I find this site very useful and informative. It helps me improve my service when needed. 

Hi and welcome.

You need to make sure you're registered as a service provider.

[Lady Victoria]

Hi and welcome.

You need to make sure you're registered as a service provider.

Cheers 

When I registered there was no option to choose which one you are, which I thought was a bit odd. Tried to edit it on my profile settings but no luck. Any advice on this would be appreciated please.

[Kev40ish]

Cheers 

When I registered there was no option to choose which one you are, which I thought was a bit odd. Tried to edit it on my profile settings but no luck. Any advice on this would be appreciated please.

Just report your post. I’m sure someone will help

[Derrick101]

Just report your post. I’m sure someone will help

I have. Mods should change it 

[CoolTiger]

I have. Mods should change it 

Only Admin can, and they have been alerted.

[Lady Victoria]

Only Admin can, and they have been alerted.

Great. Thanks for that 

[winkywanky]

There’s more than you can shake a stick at. A lot look but don’t post that often they usually post more frequently on the other site as that’s more Lady friendly.

I wouldn't mind betting some of them are SAAFE spies from the undercover sisterhood  .

I quite like that actually, in some of my postings I imagine pissing them off with what I'm writing, and it can spur me on  .

[winkywanky]

Hello. I am a WG. Long term lurker on here. First time poster. I understand and respect that this is a forum for punters but I find this site very useful and informative. It helps me improve my service when needed. 

What a refreshing post!

The polar opposite of WGs such as Ms. Persiana Botty.

Welcome Ms. V.

[Lady Victoria]

What a refreshing post!

The polar opposite of WGs such as Ms. Persiana Botty.

Welcome Ms. V.

Cheers for the welcome 

[JonasG]

LOADS look.

Quite a few have turned up after a bad review and try to defend themselves.

[Strawberry]

Cheers for the welcome 

Hi Lady V I see you've got your SP badge now, welcome I'd give you a hug if there was a hug icon.

[Lady Victoria]

Hi Lady V I see you've got your SP badge now, welcome I'd give you a hug if there was a hug icon.

haha thanks. 

[James999]

haha thanks. 

Cheers for the welcome

Great. Thanks for that 

Don't you have facebook / any friends for that stuff, this isn't a pro$titute chatroom 

[freeze44]

haha thanks. 

Lady V...well by the look of your avatar...reckon like to give you one! 

[Vic69]

I'm a SP, I lurk, occasionally post......it really interests me to see things from a clients perspective.  One recent thread about how ladies dress when answering the door to a client surprised me, i assumed most guys liked to be greeted in sexy lingerie.....apparently not.......majority like their lady dressed in a nice dress......so now I put a couple of nice dresses in my bag!

[threechilliman]

Don't you have facebook / any friends for that stuff, this isn't a pro$titute chatroom 

Thought I'd logged on to the other place for a moment.....

[winkywanky]

Hi Lady V I see you've got your SP badge now, welcome I'd give you a hug if there was a hug icon.

I would say why don't you two get a room, but I don't know whether Bisexual is on your profiles 

[winkywanky]

I'm a SP, I lurk, occasionally post......it really interests me to see things from a clients perspective.  One recent thread about how ladies dress when answering the door to a client surprised me, i assumed most guys liked to be greeted in sexy lingerie.....apparently not.......majority like their lady dressed in a nice dress......so now I put a couple of nice dresses in my bag!

Of course. A nice frock which the client can remove, thus revealing the nice lingerie underneath. (Subject of course to any specific requests when the booking is made...which, it has to be said, often go unheeded).

Men are simple souls, but those complicated women don't seem able to understand them somehow  .

[smiths]

Of course. A nice frock which the client can remove, thus revealing the nice lingerie underneath. (Subject of course to any specific requests when the booking is made...which, it has to be said, often go unheeded).

Men are simple souls, but those complicated women don't seem able to understand them somehow  .

No idea why you say of course, I don't want WGs wearing any clothes at a punt let alone a frock. I can see women wearing frocks all day long out in public, I ideally want a WG too be a slut wearing nothing from when she opens her door to me until she I leave.

[winkywanky]

You forgot to read the bit where I said subject to any specific requests.

[smiths]

I'm a SP, I lurk, occasionally post......it really interests me to see things from a clients perspective.  One recent thread about how ladies dress when answering the door to a client surprised me, i assumed most guys liked to be greeted in sexy lingerie.....apparently not.......majority like their lady dressed in a nice dress......so now I put a couple of nice dresses in my bag!

The majority on 1 thread doesn't make it what we all like of course, or indeed what the majority of punters like. I don't want to see WGs wearing nice dresses, I want naked flesh from the get go. Blatant in my face filth is what I like.

[smiths]

You forgot to read the bit where I said subject to any specific requests.

I read all your post.

[winkywanky]

Well in that case you chose to ignore it, which of course is your prerogative.

[Hobbit]

Very few by comparison, any service providers have to declare themselves as such and even then not many of those survive. A few try to pose as punters but get found out.
Can't see the point of non WGs being members.

 Very much agree. Also, the last thing this forum needs is to be overwhelmed by hookers.

[Kev40ish]

Very much agree. Also, the last thing this forum needs is to be overwhelmed by hookers.

I think it’s best they are on here in the open.
I am sure any touting will still be dealt with in the same way