Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: An infographic on the year of a life of a $1000 an hour whore  (Read 7663 times)

Hellraiser

  • Guest
Normally I wouldn't wipe my arse with the Daily Mail, much less read it, so I got this link from another website. It's an infographic on the year of a life of a $1000 an hour whore. Some American prossie called Avery Moore. Some interesting tidbits are that she claims she has gotten 177 free meals, 60 flights and 9 pairs of shoes, all for free, as well as travelling to 19 different cities.

This will make some useful reading to some of you dumb fuck fluffy punter twats who believe whore lies when she says 'Oh boo hoo, I am skint, please can I borrow a grand!'. I'm looking at you GrumpyOldGit and bilbobaggins, you pair of gullible stupid fuckbag cunts  :sarcastic:

Never forget, especially you folks who lurk this board and never post: There is no such thing as a whore with no money. If a whore ever asks if she can borrow money from you... tell her to FUCK OFF.

Link to the Daily Mail article: External Link/Members Only

Link to the whores blog: External Link/Members Only

The full version of the infographic: External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only


GrumpyoldGit

  • Guest
Normally I wouldn't wipe my arse with the Daily Mail, much less read it, so I got this link from another website. It's an infographic on the year of a life of a $1000 an hour whore. Some American prossie called Avery Moore. Some interesting tidbits are that she claims she has gotten 177 free meals, 60 flights and 9 pairs of shoes, all for free, as well as travelling to 19 different cities.

This will make some useful reading to some of you dumb fuck fluffy punter twats who believe whore lies when she says 'Oh boo hoo, I am skint, please can I borrow a grand!'. I'm looking at you GrumpyOldGit and bilbobaggins, you pair of gullible stupid fuckbag cunts  :sarcastic:

Never forget, especially you folks who lurk this board and never post: There is no such thing as a whore with no money. If a whore ever asks if she can borrow money from you... tell her to FUCK OFF.

Link to the Daily Mail article: External Link/Members Only

Link to the whores blog: External Link/Members Only

The full version of the infographic: External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Hellraiser.
Yes I fucked up and became fluffy.
DO NOT call me a fuckbag cunt. That is the lowest of low.

Hellraiser

  • Guest
Hellraiser.
Yes I fucked up and became fluffy.
DO NOT call me a fuckbag cunt. That is the lowest of low.

Alright.

You're a fluffy fuckbag vagina  :kiss:

GrumpyoldGit

  • Guest

Hellraiser

  • Guest
And you're just a twat

I'm not the old man whose fallen in love with a 20 year old barebacking prossie, lending her money and then asking for advice on how to destroy her life in a final act of dramatic revenge  :wacko:

The purpose of this thread is to act as a Public Service Announcement to future fluffy punters, who no doubt lurk this forum, that there is more chance of the Pope being a virgin than a whore being broke  :hi:

lordship

  • Guest
Jeez man you cant stop swearing can you ....

we all make mistakes the guys not harming you


calm down and have a cuppa or something

Jvosta

  • Guest
Jeez man you cant stop swearing can you ....

we all make mistakes the guys not harming you


calm down and have a cuppa or something

+1

Tone it down hell raiser, your posts are good at knocking sense into some fluffys, but your approach gets a bit tedious..."fuck this fuck that"

PompeyChap

  • Guest
I'm not the old man whose fallen in love with a 20 year old barebacking prossie, lending her money and then asking for advice on how to destroy her life in a final act of dramatic revenge  :wacko:

The purpose of this thread is to act as a Public Service Announcement to future fluffy punters, who no doubt lurk this forum, that there is more chance of the Pope being a virgin than a whore being broke  :hi:

No, you're just the guy who has to pay for sex; like the rest of us. Going back through your posts it seems that you've got a massive hatred for WGs and love to take it out on anyone who shows the faintest bit of fluffiness. Calm down a tad and realise that all your swearing and attacks on other posts only makes you look as pathetic as the people you're harassing.

Hellraiser

  • Guest
No, you're just the guy who has to pay for sex; like the rest of us. Going back through your posts it seems that you've got a massive hatred for WGs and love to take it out on anyone who shows the faintest bit of fluffiness. Calm down a tad and realise that all your swearing and attacks on other posts only makes you look as pathetic as the people you're harassing.

Que? Why are you derailing my thread with this off-topic talk? I thought we had moved on from this?

Since when have I shown hatred for prossies?? Because I call them whores? Indeed, when did I ask for an amateur armchair psychological analysis of my posts?  :unknown:

On topic. This American hussy is very wasteful with her money. I am sure in 5 years time, she'll be skint and will only have her blog to show for her hard work  :sarcastic:

cjkany2015

  • Guest
Whilst I agree with the sentiment of the post, there aren't actually many hookers around earning a grand an hour!

The people paying this do need their head looking at though. Even if you have boat loads of cash, you are clearly paying it for more than sex and even good company. So fluffy it's ridiculous.

k

  • Guest
Que? Why are you derailing my thread with this off-topic talk? I thought we had moved on from this?

Since when have I shown hatred for prossies?? Because I call them whores? Indeed, when did I ask for an amateur armchair psychological analysis of my posts?  :unknown:

On topic. This American hussy is very wasteful with her money. I am sure in 5 years time, she'll be skint and will only have her blog to show for her hard work  :sarcastic:

Quote
Never forget, especially you folks who lurk this board and never post: There is no such thing as a whore with no money. If a whore ever asks if she can borrow money from you... tell her to FUCK OFF.

Make up your mind.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2014, 07:20:34 am by k »

Offline Convince Me

I think it's fantastic. It takes a lot of time & discipline to record ones life in this way. Yes there are those with too much money who have no connection with the real world & no understanding of the value of money so good luck to the girl. I also love the fact she recieved 44 books. Great looking bod on her as well. A Negative, she only drinks 3 times a year.

cjkany2015

  • Guest
I'm not sure it makes good business sense though as I bet every one of those customers thought they were special somehow and this surely shatters the illusion.

Tony Montana

  • Guest
All good information for the IRS - 1394 hours @ $1000 per hour.   $1.4 million turnover for a single girl is bullshit... errr sorry I mean quite impressive.

Hellraiser

  • Guest
Make up your mind.

When a whore is working she isn't broke.

When a whore has retired, she is still used to her high maintenance lifestyle and continues to blow throw whatever she earned ending up with nothing.  :hi:

Online wristjob

I think it's fantastic. It takes a lot of time & discipline to record ones life in this way.

Yeah. Course it takes a lot less effort to write it up from booking notes, memory and fill in the blanks

Offline tazz

What sort of prick pays $2000 an hour when you could fuck 2 prossies all day for that amount

Offline akauya

What sort of prick pays $2000 an hour when you could fuck 2 prossies all day for that amount

This is the kind of prossie that preys on morons who think that paying more gives you a better service/quality. I say those morons can have her.

 :cool:

jcdmj12

  • Guest
What sort of prick pays $2000 an hour when you could fuck 2 prossies all day for that amount

Someone to whom $2000 is an insignificant amount, I suspect. 

jcdmj12

  • Guest
From her blog, she's building up a career as writer for her time 'after this'. 

It's a smart piece of marketing imo.  She's neatly positioned herself as 'someone people pay $1000 an hour regularly for'. For all we know, that graphic could be complete fiction.  Very few people are going to question it, because it's not like you can ask for references.

Smart whore.   :hi:

k

  • Guest
Not smart if the total she declares to the taxman falls short of what she says she's earned.

jcdmj12

  • Guest
Not smart if the total she declares to the taxman falls short of what she says she's earned.

If she's earning 7 figures a year, she can probably afford a decent tax person to handle that.   There's a big difference between not declaring a few tens of thousands that you fritter away on shoes and handbags, and not declaring hundreds of k.  She'd be unbelievably stupid not to have someone handle it.

Offline NIK

+1

Tone it down hell raiser, your posts are good at knocking sense into some fluffys, but your approach gets a bit tedious..."fuck this fuck that"


Exactly what I have been thinking for some time. He is trying too hard and a number of members are starting to believe there is an agenda which isn't beneficial to UKP.

jcdmj12

  • Guest
Am I the only one here to appreciate HR's posts for what they are?  Obvious (and well-executed) trolling.   :thumbsup:

Normally, I'd suggest that the various respondents were just getting butthurt and should remove the sand from their respective vaginas, however NIK has a point. There are plenty out there who will do anything they can to try to get punting banned, and will use the likes of HR's posts out of context to further their aims.






Offline Daffodil


Exactly what I have been thinking for some time. He is trying too hard and a number of members are starting to believe there is an agenda which isn't beneficial to UKP.

If memory serves, I think we had somebody recently who appeared to be trying too hard, and was soon banned.

That said, I find quite a few of HR's posts amusing and am not particularly offended by the language. However, if you and Adam feel he is bringing the site into a bit of disrepute I hope he tones it down a little.

Offline Daffodil

I personally believe it possible, nay probable, that a prossie is working and is also broke. It's their mismanagement of cash that is the problem. They live for the now and when they realise they need to pay their landlord £800 they think 'fuck' and plead with some punter for a loan.

I would never loan a prossie some money, no way  :hi:

Offline jackdaw

What sort of prick pays $2000 an hour when you could fuck 2 prossies all day for that amount

A mix: rich stupid guys, and guys that are incredibly picky.

Legends aside, completely thick rich people are incredibly rare. And… of course… soon to be incredibly thick ex-rich. The incredibly picky guys will be looking for fantastic looks, good rep, etc…. to earn the big bucks the WG will need to tick all the boxes.

We always get a variant of this question when some cam or picture seller on adult work claims to be available as a WG for about 500 quid a hour. We nearly always tend to get some joker suggesting that there are plenty of bankers willing to pay that rate for an average WG.

No. Guys willing to pay those rates are as rare as rocking horse shit. And fish in waters other than the murky depths of adult work.

Offline titanph

Was there any need to be so rude to certain members? They made a mistake, last thing they need is someone being so arrogant and obnoxiously insufferable about them.

As for how much she charges, I can't believe people pay for that - maybe they have no idea about cheaper WG's and to them the cheapest WG is £1000. If I won 100 million, I would use it on £100-200 an hour WG's and I would get my money's worth.

Offline AnthG

The problem with this topic is this WG in question is based in the USA where its illegal to work as a prostitute and to book a prostitute.

This will mean prices will be totally different, i.e higher, to a country where its totally legal and thus competition can develop.

I don't know the prices but I can bet Cannabis is way cheaper in Holland than it is in the UK to buy. Same reasons.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Hellraiser

  • Guest
Was there any need to be so rude to certain members? They made a mistake, last thing they need is someone being so arrogant and obnoxiously insufferable about them.

We've moved on from that. Let's not derail the thread  :thumbsup:

Quote
As for how much she charges, I can't believe people pay for that - maybe they have no idea about cheaper WG's and to them the cheapest WG is £1000. If I won 100 million, I would use it on £100-200 an hour WG's and I would get my money's worth.

I did see she is American. Maybe some Americans are prepared to pay insane fees, especially if the girl looks good, has a great body and, more importantly, has a full set of teeth (something most British whores don't  :crazy:)

Offline AnthG


I did see she is American. Maybe some Americans are prepared to pay insane fees, especially if the girl looks good, has a great body and, more importantly, has a full set of teeth (something most British whores don't  :crazy:)
Thinking further what this topic may be good for is a horror story of what prices could go to if the MPs have their way.

As I can bet if the MPs get what they want, the prostitutes will all be gone leaving only the courtesans left.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Hellraiser

  • Guest
Thinking further what this topic may be good for is a horror story of what prices could go to if the MPs have their way.

As I can bet if the MPs get what they want, the prostitutes will all be gone leaving only the courtesans left.

I tend to think that MP's want to have prostitutes all to themselves, rather than share them with common riff-raff. Mayfair was notorious for it's brothels. They just want a return to the good ol' days  :hi:

Whoremonger

  • Guest
The problem with this topic is this WG in question is based in the USA where its illegal to work as a prostitute and to book a prostitute.

This will mean prices will be totally different, i.e higher, to a country where its totally legal and thus competition can develop.

I don't know the prices but I can bet Cannabis is way cheaper in Holland than it is in the UK to buy. Same reasons.

 You would of though so but its not the case, having been to Amsterdam many times In the past (before I discovered AW). I found that Cannabis was around the same price as here (maybe it was a little cheaper for the lower quality stuff) they just had a better selection.

As for the million dollar hoe, I bet yank land has I lot more millionaires per a person than we do. I myself think she's been watching to much Pretty Women  :wackogirl:

Offline NIK


Exactly what I have been thinking for some time. He is trying too hard and a number of members are starting to believe there is an agenda which isn't beneficial to UKP.

Seems Adam beat me to it!

whiterussian

  • Guest
am guessing it was the insults ?

Offline NIK

am guessing it was the insults ?

Quite a few members thought he/she was trying too hard. We've had ones like this before who are trying so hard to act Neanderthal that it makes us think they are actually just trying to discredit the site.
Whether that was the case here I don't know, but I think the majority of members will be glad to see the back of Hellraiser.
Personally I was sick of seeing the ott bollocks.

Offline Daffodil

Quite a few members thought he/she was trying too hard. We've had ones like this before who are trying so hard to act Neanderthal that it makes us think they are actually just trying to discredit the site.
Whether that was the case here I don't know, but I think the majority of members will be glad to see the back of Hellraiser.
Personally I was sick of seeing the ott bollocks.

I quite liked him. Some of his posts were amusing. Perhaps he'd have toned down the swears with some guidance. Is this a case were a temporary ban could be useful?

vorian

  • Guest
I quite liked him. Some of his posts were amusing. Perhaps he'd have toned down the swears with some guidance. Is this a case were a temporary ban could be useful?

I agree in this case,  some of his posts were quite insightful if you got through the ott shouty/sweary stuff and on occasion he was very funny. If he toned it down a few notches could still contribute imho.

Persie

  • Guest
I thought he was quite amusing....very raw in his style of posts and tad bit of anger...perhaps he should have a temp ban and organise a few cuddles before returning  :timeout

Offline AnthG

I quite liked him. Some of his posts were amusing. Perhaps he'd have toned down the swears with some guidance. Is this a case were a temporary ban could be useful?
From his posts he seemed quite funny/humorous to be honest - simply as its refreshing to see people who are very blunt and direct which he definitely was.

The only thing that seemed a bit needing getting used to was his calling prostitutes whores all the time. Which is the only term I personally am not a fan of (don't ask me why I just am not a fan of this one sole term) But at the same time I remember when on %%% every prostitute seems to sit there saying call me a whore all the time 'as that is what I am'.

They seem to get offended at Escort, Prostitute, prossie and Pro$$ie but sit there saying I am a whore.

So by that above you could then argue he may have really been a she given this one choice of word as nobody else uses this word bar prostitutes themselves.

But like I say he seemed quite funny in his bluntness to be honest.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

GeeWiz

  • Guest
Kudos for shutting Hellraiser up.  Not down with PN's approach, but having to read pointlessly rude posts like that was taking this site too far the other way IMO.

Offline Daffodil

It's been awhile since I've seen a poster get so many positive comments after his posts, some of them were very funny even if i didn't always agree. Also there were several were he actually took the side of the 'whore'. Ok, if he was just trolling and trying to undermine the site then he had to go.

Jvosta

  • Guest
Anti fluffy is fine. To a certain extent he tells it like it is. However, attacking fellow punters like grumpyoldgit or others who may genuinely have gone through a hard time (this game can involve emotions) telling everyone to fuck off...was a bit much imo. I do think he realised this though.

Offline Daffodil

Anti fluffy is fine. To a certain extent he tells it like it is. However, attacking fellow punters like grumpyoldgit or others who may genuinely have gone through a hard time (this game can involve emotions) telling everyone to fuck off...was a bit much imo. I do think he realised this though.

In my opinion the fact that punters like grumpyoldgit are still here, after being so fucking stupid/fluffy, and punters like HellRaiser, if genuine, are gone is a bad thing.

Offline Daffodil

Anti fluffy is fine. To a certain extent he tells it like it is. However, attacking fellow punters like grumpyoldgit or others who may genuinely have gone through a hard time (this game can involve emotions) telling everyone to fuck off...was a bit much imo. I do think he realised this though.

If 'this game' involves emotions for you then you're better off out of it  :hi:

Offline NIK

In my opinion the fact that punters like grumpyoldgit are still here, after being so fucking stupid/fluffy, and punters like HellRaiser, if genuine, are gone is a bad thing.

That is the key to it and there is little evidence the member was genuine. Apart from anything else he repeatedly broke the rule about behaviour towards other members.

For the record I'm not keen on the word 'whore' myself - sooner have 'prossy'!   :D

Tony Montana

  • Guest
What happened to the site rules page that said "No excessive abuse of other members" ?


(I prefer to let prossies abuse my member ;) )

Online Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,789
  • Likes: 47
I'm quite aware many don't like prossie input on here, and I'm here as a 'guest' but I'd like to say that I had been finding the language on here recently very hard going.

vorian

  • Guest
What happened to the site rules page that said "No excessive abuse of other members" ?


(I prefer to let prossies abuse my member ;) )

I think and I may be wrong people were going to far the other way and kept saying the rules the rules every time a swear word was used in an argument.  Maybe Adam and Nike were inundated with mod reports. It's a balancing act but personally I would prefer UKP not to lose it's rough edges.

Tony Montana

  • Guest
When posters start throwing around that kind of language as malicious insults I just switch off and ignore whatever useful input they might have.  If someone cannot have a reasonable discussion without swearing and insulting the other members, just because they have a different experience or point of view, they simply have no credibility or value.

Same with this thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=24725.msg359489#msg359489