Author Topic: Naughty Mella XXX-Whetstone-N20-Not The WG In The Free Pics That I Met.  (Read 1026 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5065088) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by smiths]

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
So this punt was me taking a total chance, she does have 1 review on here i think that i read but in a good area for me so i decided to book her and have a look. Kissing and OWO were confirmed as being on offer.

Well i got to her place after some directions from what may of been the maid, near Tesco Express in Oakleigh Road North, no parking problems but a long way from the nearest tube.

What i was faced with when the door opened was an ugly fat pig, nothing like the free A/W photos body wise which suggests a slim WG. I did hear another woman in the flat but maybe that was the maid. Anyway after seeing this WG i walked without paying. I assume this was a planned Bait And Switch but sometimes the actual WG booked is busy and they try to palm you off with another WG, so that could of been the case here, so the WG in the pics may exist for all i know. Didn't help me of course as my time was wasted, i was already in the area on some business but they didn't know that.

External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only

Offline HERTSBLUE

Well nearly made a very long journey  from moorgate yesterday  because  the original  Mella was hot veri pic is available  somewhere on here booked for 1630 but cancelled due the travel difficulties so went to a Chinese place at finchley rd were I had a good punt before had a poor punt with a 30 year old Chinese bird with dodgy teeth 70  quid down the drain.

Online grrrreatnice

That's shit that you were B&S. I definitely saw the girl in the pics at that location when she was using an older profile, but obviously a dodgy operation. My review was barely Neutral mostly based on getting the girl from the pics. Based on the other review of this profile, I'm not convinced that he met the girl in the pics either as she was definitely a slim size 6, a few inches over 5" and the same face as the verification pics posted.

Link to my review for reference - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=251367.0

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
That's shit that you were B&S. I definitely saw the girl in the pics at that location when she was using an older profile, but obviously a dodgy operation. My review was barely Neutral mostly based on getting the girl from the pics. Based on the other review of this profile, I'm not convinced that he met the girl in the pics either as she was definitely a slim size 6, a few inches over 5" and the same face as the verification pics posted.

Link to my review for reference - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=251367.0

I met an ugly fat pig so it wasn't the WG in the free pics as I said. So I was either the victim of a pre-planned bait and switch or the WG you saw was busy and they tried to palm me off with a mate of hers. Whatever it was didn't help me obviously. Punting is always about the day of the punt, you can only review going on your own experience on that day.

Offline Heph

That's shit that you were B&S.

For a newish member of <20 posts and 4 reviews to decide to engage a longstanding member of >15600 posts and 170+ reviews in such an aggressive and rude manner, seems a peculiar way to introduce oneself and make a good impression. Perhaps it's just me though.

« Last Edit: July 16, 2019, 03:09:06 am by Heph »

Offline HERTSBLUE

Rude you should read it again  not rude in anyway. That's shit mate you were bait and switched is the term used.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2019, 05:36:30 am by HERTSBLUE »

Offline Rowntree

Thanks Smiths - she was on my Hot List - now no longer.

Online grrrreatnice

I have no doubt that this was a b&s and wasn’t accusing smiths of lying. I even said that this was clearly a dodgy operation and that the other review on her might also have been a more convincing b&s, but I could be wrong as I wasn’t there

Offline SamLP

Sorry to hear smiths, and thanks for the warning.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I have no doubt that this was a b&s and wasn’t accusing smiths of lying. I even said that this was clearly a dodgy operation and that the other review on her might also have been a more convincing b&s, but I could be wrong as I wasn’t there

And I didn't think you were accusing me.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Sorry to hear smiths, and thanks for the warning.

Cheers Sam. :thumbsup:

Offline Heph

Rude you should read it again  not rude in anyway. That's shit mate you were bait and switched is the term used.

You're right: my misreading. So it was just me after all.  :blush:


"That's shit that you were B&S. I definitely saw the girl in the pictures..."  I read as if it were intended to convey...  "That's [horse]shit that you were B&S, I definitely saw the girl..."

« Last Edit: July 16, 2019, 12:24:26 pm by Heph »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
You're right: my misreading. So it was just me after all.  :blush:


"That's shit that you were B&S. I definitely saw the girl in the pictures..."  I read as if it were intended to convey...  "That's [horse]shit that you were B&S, I definitely saw the girl..."

I would of launched a full-scale attack on them if I had thought that Heph. :lol:

Offline Heph

I would've launched a full-scale attack on them if I had thought that Heph. :lol:

I know! I was a little surprised at your apparent restraint - but then I reasoned the hour was very late and you had other priorities. That's partly why I interjected as I did - politely and with a caveat, to offer the opportunity for clarification and to forestall the prospect of warfare at dawn. I'm pleased it appears to have been my honest mistake.

« Last Edit: July 16, 2019, 01:50:07 pm by Heph »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I know! I was a little surprised at your apparent restraint - but then I reasoned the hour was very late and you had other priorities. That's partly why I interjected as I did - politely and with a caveat, to offer the opportunity for clarification and to forestall the prospect of warfare at dawn. I'm pleased it appears to have been my honest mistake.

No problem. :thumbsup: