Hotholly56- Bridgwater

[Sexyscotsman]

Avoid avoid avoid!!!  I booked her for an hour and it was horrible from.start to finish,  She opened the door to me her face looking angry and like she didn't want to work,  she took me upstairs and left me to undress,she was gone a good 20 minutes when I asked if it is in with the time she lAughed and told me it was.  So I paid for 1 hour but really it was now 40 mins. She grabbed my cock and put it straight in her mouth without asking me what I would like, then she put a condom on me and jumped on my cock, I didn't come within 5 minutes so she took condom off and gave me a hand job so I came over her blobs I would say this all lasted 20 minutes in the room if that, totAl waste of money.

[houseboot]

Registered @ 11:36

Review posted @ 11:56


   All a bit slapdash & questionable.

It would make sense to be more thoughtful and less hasty in posting. It would then be more believable.

[ian cognito]

Having seen her and posted a "Neutral", I can believe the OP's account if he met her on a bad day. The level of control and rushed service is not wildly different from my experience  - just more extreme.

[Crackpot11]

A bit more detail is needed for a review. This sounds just like a rant. Paragraphs would help.

[Hot holly 56]

In my defence. If I paid for the hour and someone left me upstairs for 20 minutes, I would of got my clothes back on, demanded my money back and left. None of that happened at all. I never comment in here. But this time felt I needed to.

[381stBG]

External Link/Members Only

Big Guy

[Crackpot11]

In my defence. If I paid for the hour and someone left me upstairs for 20 minutes, I would of got my clothes back on, demanded my money back and left. None of that happened at all. I never comment in here. But this time felt I needed to.

So are you saying the review is wrong?

[Hot holly 56]

Very much so. That's really all I want to say. I enjoy my job very much, and have very many regs. So this was a shock to me. Please see my feedback on aw. All I'm saying on the matter..

[Crackpot11]

Fair enough - I think people will take a review as first post with a pinch of salt, especially as it sounds like a rant.

[nurfe7]

She grabbed my cock and put it straight in her mouth without asking me what I would like

Oh my god, that is terrible. Poor sod!

[Fuzzyduck]

Registered @ 11:36

Review posted @ 11:56


   All a bit slapdash & questionable.

It would make sense to be more thoughtful and less hasty in posting. It would then be more believable.

Perhaps just a coincidence that Holly registers only 15 minutes before OP.
Everything just a bit fishy for this duck.

[Crackpot11]

So she colluded with him to write her a negative review? That would make sense 

[Fuzzyduck]

So she colluded with him to write her a negative review? That would make sense 

Or... [sharp intake in breath] ...is the same person.

[Fuzzyduck]

Cheers, Head1

[Crackpot11]

Why?!? What purpose of posting a negative review? It’s a strange theory.

[Fuzzyduck]

Why?!? What purpose of posting a negative review? It’s a strange theory.

Yeah a bit odd but it gives her a legitimate reason to post (i.e. self promote) herself by destroying the credibility of the review. It's different I'll agree but a positive from a complete newbie would've attracted more suspicion. Both accounts were registered within 15 mins of each other and she was on the thread pretty quickly (less than a day) saying "I never post in here...". She's probably got another account on here somewhere.