Author Topic: EmmaHallie - Good services but we didn't connect  (Read 2272 times)


32 review(s) for EmmaHallie (27 positive, 4 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by tomato sauce and waffles]

Offline massagepuntingfan

External Link/Members Only

Cost: £150
 
Location: Homely one bed studio flat in Bayswater with a large, smart walk in shower room.

Services: Limited FK, OWO, DT, Rimming, CG, Missionary, Doggy, CIM.

Appearance: Her non agency AW photos are accurate, she is about 5 foot tall, slim body, small boobs, boyish in appearance. If you like curves look elsewhere. Facial complexion spotty. She's attractive but not a knock out as some have described, she has a niche look. Age is probably about right, 20ish?

Could easily have given this SP a positive as she provided some services I didn't expect, but the overall experience lacked connection/passion and after reflecting on the hour long session I went away thinking ok, good at times but not great, hence the neutral.

Was expecting DFK, she has great lips and when kissing occurred it was soft and sensual but kind of stopped as the punt progressed. OWO was top notch, progressed into rimming which I didn't expect and was carried out well. BJ very sloppy and wet, covered balls in loads of spit.

Sex in cow girl was a highlight, I felt It was her preferred position, but after that the punt lost its spark for me. No blame to lay other than I probably fancy a curvier more passionate lady and this played out in the punt, plus she is relatively passive.

Was struggling to cum through sex so polished myself off and she assisted with her mouth.

So in summary she is a willing SP and provides good VFM - if you click I'm sure you'd enjoy yourself but for me we didn't so I have to give a neutral.




Online PLeisure

External Link/Members Only

Cost: £150
 
Location: Homely one bed studio flat in Bayswater with a large, smart walk in shower room.

Services: Limited FK, OWO, DT, Rimming, CG, Missionary, Doggy, CIM.

Appearance: Her non agency AW photos are accurate, she is about 5 foot tall, slim body, small boobs, boyish in appearance. If you like curves look elsewhere. Facial complexion spotty. She's attractive but not a knock out as some have described, she has a niche look. Age is probably about right, 20ish?

Could easily have given this SP a positive as she provided some services I didn't expect, but the overall experience lacked connection/passion and after reflecting on the hour long session I went away thinking ok, good at times but not great, hence the neutral.

Was expecting DFK, she has great lips and when kissing occurred it was soft and sensual but kind of stopped as the punt progressed. OWO was top notch, progressed into rimming which I didn't expect and was carried out well. BJ very sloppy and wet, covered balls in loads of spit.

Sex in cow girl was a highlight, I felt It was her preferred position, but after that the punt lost its spark for me. No blame to lay other than I probably fancy a curvier more passionate lady and this played out in the punt, plus she is relatively passive.

Was struggling to cum through sex so polished myself off and she assisted with her mouth.

So in summary she is a willing SP and provides good VFM - if you click I'm sure you'd enjoy yourself but for me we didn't so I have to give a neutral.
You have described the meet as "good VFM" - please clarify if you paid any of the extras currently displaying on her profile.
The review suggests that she threw in rimming, which is normally £50.
What about CiM - usually £30. Did you pay for that, or was that also complementary?

This helps us determine whether it was good VFM  :hi:

Offline massagepuntingfan

I can confirm that I paid £150 for the hour, I asked for neither rimming nor CIM and both were given in the standard price without my asking.

The light rimming moved from ball sucking to mainly licking tonguing of the perineum to occasional light tonguing/licking of the arsehole. Deep rimming is not my thing and not offered.

Again I think the CIM was given to help achieve orgasm. She might have been keen to get me out the door as our time was nearly up. Again I never asked for this service.

YMMV.



Online PLeisure

Excellent, mpf - VFM, indeed  :hi:


Online iq129

A very helpful review but very disappointing for me, as I was planning to see her very soon. She’s off my hot list now.

Online puntingking

External Link/Members Only

Cost: £150
 
Location: Homely one bed studio flat in Bayswater with a large, smart walk in shower room.

Services: Limited FK, OWO, DT, Rimming, CG, Missionary, Doggy, CIM.

Appearance: Her non agency AW photos are accurate, she is about 5 foot tall, slim body, small boobs, boyish in appearance. If you like curves look elsewhere. Facial complexion spotty. She's attractive but not a knock out as some have described, she has a niche look. Age is probably about right, 20ish?

Could easily have given this SP a positive as she provided some services I didn't expect, but the overall experience lacked connection/passion and after reflecting on the hour long session I went away thinking ok, good at times but not great, hence the neutral.

Was expecting DFK, she has great lips and when kissing occurred it was soft and sensual but kind of stopped as the punt progressed. OWO was top notch, progressed into rimming which I didn't expect and was carried out well. BJ very sloppy and wet, covered balls in loads of spit.

Sex in cow girl was a highlight, I felt It was her preferred position, but after that the punt lost its spark for me. No blame to lay other than I probably fancy a curvier more passionate lady and this played out in the punt, plus she is relatively passive.

Was struggling to cum through sex so polished myself off and she assisted with her mouth.

So in summary she is a willing SP and provides good VFM - if you click I'm sure you'd enjoy yourself but for me we didn't so I have to give a neutral.

i think people on here need to stop being too critical. As massagepuntingfan said that he could ask easily give her a positive. These reviews meant to be a guide for us. She has 100% positive reviews on her adultwork page and no negatives on ukpunting. ALL being positives except from this review. I would still recommend her. I am planning to see her for a third time on Friday. 

Online puntingking

A very helpful review but very disappointing for me, as I was planning to see her very soon. She’s off my hot list now.

again she has received no negatives reviews on here or adultwork. I am seeing her for a third time on Friday. Take all these reviews as a guide. I still think at this moment in time there is not a working girl better than she is.  ;) 

Offline massagepuntingfan

A very helpful review but very disappointing for me, as I was planning to see her very soon. She’s off my hot list now.

In response to this remark - the neutral was given due to the lack of connection, passivity and a lack of FK. Connection/passion is a big plus for me and is rarely found on a genuine level in this game. I was careful not to overly criticise this SP. You can't fake attraction both ways and that was a stumbling block in this punt hence the neutral.
« Last Edit: May 13, 2019, 07:46:34 am by massagepuntingfan »

Offline massagepuntingfan

i think people on here need to stop being too critical. As massagepuntingfan said that he could ask easily give her a positive. These reviews meant to be a guide for us. She has 100% positive reviews on her adultwork page and no negatives on ukpunting. ALL being positives except from this review. I would still recommend her. I am planning to see her for a third time on Friday.

I feel the neutral was justified due to her passivity, lack of FK and passion/connection. You obviously like her - be careful not to come across as her cheerleader though.

Online puntingking

I feel the neutral was justified due to her passivity, lack of FK and passion/connection. You obviously like her - be careful not to come across as her cheerleader though.

 ;)
 :thumbsup:

Online Jonestown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,760
  • Likes: 134
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
That’s an enormous fanny she she’s got her her, especially for a slightly built 19 year old.

Online puntingking

That’s an enormous fanny she she’s got her her, especially for a slightly built 19 year old.

 :D