Author Topic: giulya romanian tourer bradford  (Read 7614 times)


11 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5163484) (7 positive, 1 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by mrfishyfoo]
9 review(s) for Sexy giulya (6 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by mrfishyfoo]

Offline muffin

The op seems a credible chap with 32 reviews. He wasnt offered bb. I have seen vids of sps shagging boyfriends bare. It happens. Move on!

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,715
  • Likes: 749
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I'm sorry, but did IQ's suddenly drop while I been away?
Since when did asking a fucking question or querying an anomaly become white knighting?

There is no proof that this girl is offering Bareback other than a fucking tick on a fucking form.  What the fuck.....is this a cause for banning or threatening to ban a member of the forum?
Who knows who ticked the fucking box which also says unprotected sex unticked.  Which is it?  Is she saying "i'll do bareback but I won't do unprotected sex"?  Thank fuck none of you guys are lawyers...you'd fucking starve.

And aren't moderators supposed to be....well..moderate?  Am I gonna be banned now for asking questions?
If this girl came to my area I would go see her (fully bagged up of course, I'm not a BB'er)....AND I'd review her too... You will be hard pressed to find a SP that does not BB somebody..What is this credibilty/moral high ground crap ...WE ALL BUY PUSSY ON A FUCKING WEB SITE.
I was brought up...if the line is wrong......don't tow the fucking line....ask questions...It's free....don't fear no man...he has a heart that stops......just as we all..

We are not all sheep-like and follow blindly.....fucking Baaaaaaaa!

Hey Alli Katt I hope you are not seduced by the dark side...and stay fair  for fucks sake...
"Help us Obi Katt Kenobi.....you're our only hope"

Once again....ASKING A QUESTION IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING....QUERING SOMETHING IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING.
Please show me the rule and I will gladly shut the fuck up and apologise.

As for others...you know who you are.....I can't even be asked typing for you sheep....a black and white border Collie will be around shortly to herd you back into the pen...until you get a mind and a backbone of your own.

Once again...it's a tick in a box....from people who are still struggling with English.. is NOT proof either way that an SP is a BB'er, therefore questions can be asked..
Debate is always good....but it seems a lot of guys are treating a tick on a "likes list" as Gospel, Quranic or Torah worthy.  We all know about SPs and their "likes lists" don't we when you're in the room?  Scotch fucking mist..
I have no wish to get into a debate with you about something you know nothing about, the main issue with sall71 is he doesn't know when to stop and this is the second thread he has done it on.

The fact is he is making excuses for this escort, just as he did with her mate the last time. he is asking for'proof' and can't accept the fact that anyone seeking bareback services would be unlikely to post on here. She has bareback listed and even the OP won't go back now.

sall71 made his point very early in the thread instead of leaving it at that he has continued to defend this escort, even another mod, Ali Katt has come on to answer his "what rule have I broken" question, Ali Katt's reply. -
Rule 1. Favouritism, pandering to the escort in other words white knighting.

She advertises bareback, as we know any service can be denied for any reason. Sure maybe her pimp advertised it to get more "bums on seats", but likewise she could be a barebacking skank. Whether an error or not, she advertises it.

Head1 had to step in and tell him to stop on the last thread because he just goes on and on, this thread was heading the same way, so I told him to leave it at 11pm last night, did he? no, I told him again to stop at 11.54, again he took no notice. The reason he was threatened with a ban was because he was told, by a moderator, to stop arguing and to leave it, not because he had asked any questions or put his point of view over.

We are all entitled to ask questions and query anomalies, though we all know AW likes lists are full of them.  But when you are repeating the same thing over and over again do you not think it wise to stop when asked.

Offline sall71

I have no wish to get into a debate with you about something you know nothing about, the main issue with sall71 is he doesn't know when to stop and this is the second thread he has done it on.

The fact is he is making excuses for this escort, just as he did with her mate the last time. he is asking for'proof' and can't accept the fact that anyone seeking bareback services would be unlikely to post on here. She has bareback listed and even the OP won't go back now.

sall71 made his point very early in the thread instead of leaving it at that he has continued to defend this escort, even another mod, Ali Katt has come on to answer his "what rule have I broken" question, Ali Katt's reply. -
Head1 had to step in and tell him to stop on the last thread because he just goes on and on, this thread was heading the same way, so I told him to leave it at 11pm last night, did he? no, I told him again to stop at 11.54, again he took no notice. The reason he was threatened with a ban was because he was told, by a moderator, to stop arguing and to leave it, not because he had asked any questions or put his point of view over.

We are all entitled to ask questions and query anomalies, though we all know AW likes lists are full of them.  But when you are repeating the same thing over and over again do you not think it wise to stop when asked.
Headmaster does know what we are on about as he will have taken the time to actually read the points I have made.

‘’just as he did with her mate’’? who’s her mate then? In terms of proof, see comments about about box ticking

Yes I made my point, then as usual for this site the little gang tried the bully boy tactics, unfortunately they don’t work with me. Ali Katt’s response acknowledged the point I was making, it didn't threaten to ban me unless I agreed with him.

Head1 got involved on the last post as it was reported to him by another member who was concerned about the level of bullying that was going on.

Yes we are entitled to ask questions and query things, and we should be able to do it without threats of being banned! To be honest the only sensible comments I have read are those of Ali Katt and Head Master!

Draw a big line under this thread and move on!
« Last Edit: December 30, 2019, 10:02:48 pm by daviemac »
Banned reason: Just doesn't know when to stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,715
  • Likes: 749
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I've edited your post so people can understand, it's hard to make out who's saying what when you answer within a quote.

2 escorts you have seen have had references to bareback, you have resolutely defended them both, several other members, including Ali Katt have told you it's white knighting.

You have no idea what posts get reported or for what, so you don't know the reason for Head1's intervention. I have told you to stop the arguing on this thread so you don't drag it on for page after page. You have made your point, you thing it's an error stop trying to convince everyone else of the same.

I am not asking you to agree with me, I telling you this has gone on long enough, you are just repeating yourself. Do not post further on this thread unless you have something new to convey.

You are not being threatened with a ban for asking questions or posting an opinion you are being threatened with a ban because you will not stop arguing and repeating the same point. now for the very last time leave it, take you own advice and move on.

Offline sall71

Dropped you a PM. As we've said, thread closed!  :hi:
Banned reason: Just doesn't know when to stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline mrfishyfoo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,834
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 203
I'm sorry, but did IQ's suddenly drop while I been away?
Since when did asking a fucking question or querying an anomaly become white knighting?

There is no proof that this girl is offering Bareback other than a fucking tick on a fucking form.  What the fuck.....is this a cause for banning or threatening to ban a member of the forum?
Who knows who ticked the fucking box which also says unprotected sex unticked.  Which is it?  Is she saying "i'll do bareback but I won't do unprotected sex"?  Thank fuck none of you guys are lawyers...you'd fucking starve.

And aren't moderators supposed to be....well..moderate?  Am I gonna be banned now for asking questions?
If this girl came to my area I would go see her (fully bagged up of course, I'm not a BB'er)....AND I'd review her too... You will be hard pressed to find a SP that does not BB somebody..What is this credibilty/moral high ground crap ...WE ALL BUY PUSSY ON A FUCKING WEB SITE.
I was brought up...if the line is wrong......don't tow the fucking line....ask questions...It's free....don't fear no man...he has a heart that stops......just as we all..

We are not all sheep-like and follow blindly.....fucking Baaaaaaaa!

Hey Alli Katt I hope you are not seduced by the dark side...and stay fair  for fucks sake...
"Help us Obi Katt Kenobi.....you're our only hope"

Once again....ASKING A QUESTION IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING....QUERING SOMETHING IS NOT WHITE KNIGHTING.
Please show me the rule and I will gladly shut the fuck up and apologise.

As for others...you know who you are.....I can't even be asked typing for you sheep....a black and white border Collie will be around shortly to herd you back into the pen...until you get a mind and a backbone of your own.

Once again...it's a tick in a box....from people who are still struggling with English.. is NOT proof either way that an SP is a BB'er, therefore questions can be asked..
Debate is always good....but it seems a lot of guys are treating a tick on a "likes list" as Gospel, Quranic or Torah worthy.  We all know about SPs and their "likes lists" don't we when you're in the room?  Scotch fucking mist..

That tick box, if a punter has the balls to accept AWank feedback off the lass, is enough for him to get blacklisted by the majority of lasses that don't offer it.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

Regardless of whether it's genuine, a typo or whatever it is do you have the balls to have a lass that blatantly offers BB in your feedback as I certainly don't.  :hi: :hi:


« Last Edit: December 31, 2019, 11:19:04 am by mrfishyfoo »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,715
  • Likes: 749
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Dropped you a PM. As we've said, thread closed!  :hi:
You've been told time and again to leave it and move on, fair enough you've stopped posting on this thread but have continued by PM, that's 3 now all repeating the same thing. You just can't leave it can you.

I've pointed out where you have gone wrong and how this all started from mrfishyfoo posting that she offered bareback, without any further comment.

Edit

Make that 4 PMs.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2019, 12:17:23 pm by daviemac »

Offline mrfishyfoo

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,834
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 203
You've been told time and again to leave it and move on, fair enough you've stopped posting on this thread but have continued by PM, that's 3 now all repeating the same thing. You just can't leave it can you.

I've pointed out where you have gone wrong and how this all started from mrfishyfoo posting that she offered bareback, without any further comment.

Edit

Make that 4 PMs.

It was another punter that spotted it not me.  :hi: :hi:

Offline camshaft72uk

It's a shame,  as always very intrigued by her "look",  but there has always been the question and debate about her bb'ing.
Not just from the videos,  but I am sure I remember someone somewhere mentioning it about her.

Having said that the above is more hear say,  but for how long she has been around,  having BB on her profile doesn't strike me as a mistake.

All a shame.


Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,715
  • Likes: 749
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
It was another punter that spotted it not me.  :hi: :hi:
Doesn't really matter, sall71 was adamant that it shouldn't have been posted without proof she actually did bareback as it would "destroy her reputation".  :unknown:

 

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,717
  • Likes: 542
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
To put an end to the debate I just asked her.
BB is £20 extra on an hour booking

Offline agentsmith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 283
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
To put an end to the debate I just asked her.
BB is £20 extra on an hour booking
You couldn't have done this before Sall got himself banned!?  :lol:

Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,717
  • Likes: 542
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
You couldn't have done this before Sall got himself banned!?  :lol:

Only just spotted the thread otherwise I would have done. But he was a fucking idiot anyway - there was one thread where his only intention was to wind up fishy, and to a lesser extent me. Good riddance to a fool

Offline agentsmith

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 283
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
Only just spotted the thread otherwise I would have done. But he was a fucking idiot anyway - there was one thread where his only intention was to wind up fishy, and to a lesser extent me. Good riddance to a fool
It must be killing him not to be able to get in the last word. :lol:

Offline viper13

To put an end to the debate I just asked her.
BB is £20 extra on an hour booking

Well done Mr SC was going to do that myself but was enjoying the thread too much   :D   :hi:

Offline viper13